Superstraight Containment Station - No superphobes allowed!

German newspaper WELT (THE boomer outlet, "conservative") has picked up on SS. And there's like 400+ comments under the article.
Why the TikTok trend “superstraight” is super stupid and pure hate
How straight cis men gloss over their transphobia for themselves and others

:woo:

What kind of men are there who say they would never date a trans woman? They call themselves “superstraight”. Our author explains why this is transphobic in his Saturday comment *.​

Sometimes, when I'm super crazy, I imagine a world where most people are queer. A world in which it is quite normal to be queer in every schoolyard, in every subway, at every traffic light - if only because they (that is, because we) are in the majority. Of course, there would still be a few straight people in such a world. And because queers are usually no better than straight people in real life, these straight people would have a hard time in my mind game world. You would hear words like "Dreckshete" and "F **** f *** er".

Because I consider myself an empathic person who cares about justice, I imagine that in such a world I would have a few straight friends and go to Hetero Pride Day with them to vote for equal rights for heterosexuals to demonstrate. Yeah, pretty crazy, I know. In the last few days one could get dizzy outside my little head when asked who is the majority and who is the minority here; and who needs to be protected from whom.

A new term is making the rounds in commercial social media such as TikTok: superstraight, i.e. almost superhetero. I think I have roughly understood what is straight over the years. But superstraight, what's that supposed to be? Well, recently men who say that they like women, but not trans women, call themselves superstraight.

My first impulse was: yes, why not? Because, in a purely logical way, that would mean that the standard assumption is that straight men want women, including trans women. And only these rather special, so to speak, not entirely normal heteros, who are super-straight, they just lack something, because they do not desire trans women. That makes sense to a certain extent, at first glance.

But if you take a closer look at what the superstraight community wants, it can be adventurous or even breakneck. Even if you try to ignore the fact for a moment that superstraight logos have already appeared on forums like 4chan with a Nazi rune-stylized "SS" (traditional emblem of Hitler's Schutzstaffel), the question arises: What are they doing with this new term?

He claims to have been invented (as far as this can still be said watertight in the widely ramified network) a guy who calls himself Kyleroyce and who postulated in a viral TikTok video: “I invented a new sexuality. Straight men are called transphobic because… I wouldn't date a trans woman. So I'm super straight. I only date the opposite sex, women who were born women. So you can no longer say that I am transphobic - because that is just my sexuality. "

Huh, what do you think? I think that as a gay or lesbian person you will quickly have to go so far that desire can hardly be controlled. (Anything else would mean that we could be made “straight again”, as supporters of so-called “conversion therapies” claim and demand.) That actually meant that a few gay men now also call themselves supergay , in the sense of: Men who like men, but not trans men.

The perfidious thing about the process is the following: These people, regardless of whether they are super-straight or super-gay, claim a certain protection status from a minority for themselves on the one hand - in order to exclude trans people in the same breath - the minority who are still is under fire like no other. Of course, nobody can (and does not want to) force you to like people with blue eyes or blood group B or trans people - but why should this be so categorically and all-validly excluded? But okay, even if you categorically exclude it: Why is that something that you would have to carry outward in the sense of a politically organized community? That goes even further than people who write in their Grindr profile that certain skin colors are undesirable for them.And here, too, the question arises: Why is that the one sentence that you want the dating world to know about you?

Kyleroyce openly admits he invented the term "superstraight" to evade allegations that he was transphobic. What a maneuver! If you watch the video, you can feel the audacity with which he presents it. He pretends to be the victim. The term “Superstraight” suggests that this is a minority that needs special protection from trans people and their evil, politically correct allies. We Kyleroyce ignore the fact that they actually represent a widespread prevailing attitude towards their categorical exclusion of trans people.

Besides, what does super mean? Super suggests: best. Anyone who is superstraight is, in this dire logic, the perfection of heterosexual. Purebred straight. I (from my perspective as a cis man) believe that there can be people who do not want trans people - without being trans-hostile. I believe that can be. But I also believe that anyone who writes on their t-shirts “I don't want trans people” is definitely very trans-hostile. And what else is this offensively disguised as defensive "I'm superstraight" supposed to be - if not such a digital hate shirt?

* The opinion of the authors of columns, comments or guest articles does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial team. (so if a author is seething it doesn't mean the editorial team is mmkay?)


Google Translator said:
Stefan Hochgesand is fascinated by the political, especially queer dimensions in pop. After stints at ZDF, 3sat and Arte, he now works in Berlin for the culture department of the daily newspaper Taz and as chief music editor of Tip Berlin. He also writes for Musikexpress, for the non-heterosexual film magazine Sissy and for Kaput - magazine for insolvency and pop. Sometimes you can hear him on the Byte FM station. Stefan studied general and comparative literature, philosophy and journalism in Mainz and Lyon, supported by a scholarship from the German National Academic Foundation. He is also involved in the Queer Media Society for more media representation of queers.
:story::story::story::story::story::story::story::story::story::story:
 
Last edited:
You're gonna have to correct me if I'm wrong and I don't wanna invite too much conversation about this since it's offtopic, but I've also heard a massive part of the creation of early civilization was being able to tame workhorse animals, a privilege that whitey and the chink had in spades to springboard societies. While the mesoamericans, first nations, and Africans didn't have such opportunities because of the animals in their environments.

this theory was originally proposed by Jared Diamond in Guns, Germs, and Steel in 1997. he built on William McNeill's well-supported and well-argued theory, presented in Plagues and Peoples in 1976, that disease was a critical component of the European conquest of the New World. McNeill's brilliant (and now pretty much universally accepted) observation is that the mysterious ability of the Spanish to fuck up pretty advanced civilizations was not due to the Spanish being magic and awesome but was instead due to the fact that so many of the Aztecs Incas etc all died of new European germs.

Taylor, who is not a historian and not an epimediologist and not any kind of expert on animal domestication, expanded off of this into the reasons why, other than probably syphilis, there wasn't an exchange of deadly new germs. Why did the germiness only go one way? Well Taylor thinks it's because random chance put a bunch of easily domesticable animals where white people could domesticate them. Living closely with cows and pigs and sheep made white people immune to a whole bunch of diseases (if you're curious about how this process actually happened *don't* read GG&S, but *do* read Plagues and Peoples). According to him, that's why white people run everything now.

There are some holes in this theory. I will mention the two biggest and then I will stop being OT.

1) it completely fails to account for why the Ottomans or the Chinese didn't end up running everything. Taylor has some very very weak reasoning here about technological access but it's stupid.

2) it both ignores the extreme domesticability of a bunch of North and South American animals (you don't get much more docile than a capybara) and assumes knowledge of something that is inherently unknowable, the domesticability of animals in the past. Taylor just asserts that African animals are meaner than animals further north and that's it.
 
Whether it's transphobic or not isn't an argument worth getting into with anyone. They just change the definition of the word constantly and use it to make people seem bad. Frankly it's best to just say "Yes, if you define transphobia as not wanting to have sex with a trans person then I'm transphobic". I'd also then ask if it's homophobic to not want to sleep with a gay man.
 

Oh my god, those fucking comments. KassieFox, I salute you. You are the god of shame rape. Incels tried their best, but you shame raped them to oblivion. You are the patron saint of shame rape. The living embodiment of shame rape. You are the all time worldwide heavyweight champion of shame rape. When God was creating shame rape he retired after creating you because he knew he'd never reach such a high standard again. In the shame rape afterlife Elliot Rodger is looking on with proud, almost fatherly affection. The dictionary will stop listing the definition of shame rape and just print a picture of your face instead.
 
Oh my god, those fucking comments. KassieFox, I salute you. You are the god of shame rape. Incels tried their best, but you shame raped them to oblivion. You are the patron saint of shame rape. The living embodiment of shame rape. You are the all time worldwide heavyweight champion of shame rape. When God was creating shame rape he retired after creating you because he knew he'd never reach such a high standard again. In the shame rape afterlife Elliot Rodger is looking on with proud, almost fatherly affection. The dictionary will stop listing the definition of shame rape and just print a picture of your face instead.
did you understood it? can you like give a shorter version because everytime i've read the responses made me ask myself "what the fuck am i reading?", this is fucking lunacy, there is no other word for that retarded rationalizing, i can't bring myself to put me in their shoes in that specific case, that would be akin to me put myself on a pedo's shoes but much worse.
 
did you understood it? can you like give a shorter version because everytime i've read the responses made me ask myself "what the fuck am i reading?", this is fucking lunacy, there is no other word for that retarded rationalizing, i can't bring myself to put me in their shoes in that specific case, that would be akin to me put myself on a pedo's shoes but much worse.
On a quick skim, it's the same conversation reduced to trans-only. So, "Is it transphobic to for a trans person to say "no" to another trans person?"

Poe's law applies, so I can't decide if it's trolling or troons on the brink of achieving sentience (history suggests the former).
 
While I understand NOTHING of what KancerFox said, here's the archive
again, fucking LUNACY.
Imprisexual said:

History​

Imprisexual was coined by Transgender Cat on March 8, 2021 to combat super straight as a way to have a transgender friendly term for those who want a term to specify preference. The coiner would go on to state it as:

Why impri and not SS?
Problem with SS is that it implies its better if you aren't attracted to trans people, above that SS pluck out trans-people, and further cause a bigger divide in trans people and dating, it also specifies "natural born" which clearly is very dehumanizing to transgender people because it implies trans people aren't "natural." I have seen this thread from a support forum regarding SS and: https://forum.heartsupport.com/t/super-straight-scares-me/21001 it just shows the sheer harm it causes, many who are SS don't see the lives this is risking by continuing the mob and further damaging others. Its not showing respect, its just dehumanization disguised as a sexuality. If you guys want to show your preference, then do impri, its a flexible term to specify any preference and how it can affect overall the playing field in dating.

Flag​

The flag was coined by Transgender Cat on the day after the term was coined. The handprint was made to represent how much of an imprint ones preference can make on orientation. The brown shades represent preference and how it can range from affect and the yellow shades are for orientations that both meld together and affect how ones attraction can be for someone in the dating field. The otherkin and therian inclusive flags was coined by Transgender Cat on March 12, 2021 as otherkin and therian individuals may have a preference wanting to date other otherkin and therian individuals.

Etymology​

The word "impri" comes from the Latin word "imprimis" which is translated to English to mean: "particularly" to represent the specifics in preference one may have.

why did we get rid of the whippings? by allah this motherfucker deserves some.

it's still funny seeing the gaydom wiki seethe with supersraights:
REEEEE said:
Controversial:
This identity is not part of the LGBT+ community. This wiki in no way supports this identity and does not accept this identity into the community. This article is strictly educational. Education on these terms is important so people can stay safe online and know what to avoid.

Warning:
This article contains discussion of topics which may be upsetting to some readers. This article is intended to be education but reader discretion is advised.

excuse moi faggotry but i decided to check the superstraight edit's parts:
they rollbacked this:
https://lgbta.wikia.org/wiki/Super_Straight?diff=52902&oldid=52741 :story:

they also edited this:
https://lgbta.wikia.org/wiki/Super_Straight?diff=53385&oldid=53381 :story:
resource1.jpg

resource2.png

we got someone asposing themself? lol
to this: https://lgbta.wikia.org/wiki/Super_Straight?diff=53656&oldid=53385 :story:

Wiki said:
The origin of the term is unknown. The first known instance of the use of the term was by TikTok user Kyleroyce on Feburary 21, 2021, who claims to have created it. He has also claimed to have created the flag. However, the term may have been created on 4chan, or least was quickly adopted by 4chan to deliberately attempt to spread Nazi imagery (SS) as a way of alt-right recruitment as well as drive a wedge between trans people and the rest of the community.
goddamn these people are coping hard, the 4chan image literally says 03/05/2021 and kyleroyce posted his video on 21/02/2021, are they fucking insane? wait, scratch that, are they fucking kidding?
 
Last edited:
goddamn these people are coping hard, the 4chan image literally says 03/05/2021 and kyleroyce posted his video on 21/02/2021, are they fucking insane? wait, scratch that, are they fucking kidding?
It's not necessarily insanity, it's just bad faith. They don't want to share information with their wiki but spread political propaganda, so if the evidence clearly contradicts the retarded propaganda, too bad for the evidence.
 
This "superstraight" thing is fucking retarded.
If you sleep with someone from the opposite gender, you're straight. If you sleep with someone from the same gender, you just had gay sex, and it doesn't matter what is the gender that the person you slept with identifies as.

The "super straight" distinction only fuels the LGBT narrative.
 
This "superstraight" thing is fucking retarded.
If you sleep with someone from the opposite gender, you're straight. If you sleep with someone from the same gender, you just had gay sex, and it doesn't matter what is the gender that the person you slept with identifies as.

The "super straight" distinction only fuels the LGBT narrative
The idea that LGB march in lock-step with the T is why anti-troon causes keep failing- if you keep joining (reprehensible position) to (reasonable position that most people have already accepted as axiomatic), you will never get rid of the reprehensible position. The simple fact is that, even if you personally think every fag should be used as an Alabama windchime, that position isn't coming back into the popular consensus anytime soon.
The hardest lesson in politics is this- campaign for what you can actually accomplish, not what you want in a perfect world.
 
MV5BMTc5MTQxMzQwNV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNTg4NzU2MDI@._V1_.jpg


Look at this picture and tell me.
Do you feel unsettled?
Do thing suddenly stop to make sense?

It looks like a woman.
But is it?
The tits are an afterthought.
The shape is clearly that of an aging man.
The face is almost a drawing at this point.
This is what the peak of transexualism is.
A man who has to undergo massive amounts of surgical procedures and spend hours on photoshop and doing his make up to LARP as a woman.
Now I ask you.
Is this sane?
 
View attachment 1994834

Look at this picture and tell me.
Do you feel unsettled?
Do thing suddenly stop to make sense?

It looks like a woman.
But is it?
The tits are an afterthought.
The shape is clearly that of an aging man.
The face is almost a drawing at this point.
This is what the peak of transexualism is.
A man who has to undergo massive amounts of surgical procedures and spend hours on photoshop and doing his make up to LARP as a woman.
Now I ask you.
Is this sane?
Why should I care? I don't have to stick my cock in their stinkditch. People are out there fucking people with physical deformities that would make me sick if I saw them IRL, too. We've got cis people who turn themselves into human barbie dolls or give themselves watermelon tits or stick fake six-packs into their abdomens instead of exercising.
People are allowed to be very insane in America so long as their insanity isn't infringing on the freedom of someone else to be very insane in a completely different direction. If you think America was ever not a country of beautiful insanity, you need to look at a history book.
 
Why should I care? I don't have to stick my cock in their stinkditch. People are out there fucking people with physical deformities that would make me sick if I saw them IRL, too. We've got cis people who turn themselves into human barbie dolls or give themselves watermelon tits or stick fake six-packs into their abdomens instead of exercising.
People are allowed to be very insane in America so long as their insanity isn't infringing on the freedom of someone else to be very insane in a completely different direction. If you think America was ever not a country of beautiful insanity, you need to look at a history book.
I really don't care as I am not american.
But I see where you are coming from.
Point is this retard was being astroturfed on youtube as a role model for people.
And I am just saying to be wary of it.

Back to the S. S. Movement tho
We all agree that Dirlewanger should be our spiritual liege right?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Dick Justice
I really don't care as I am not american.
But I see where you are coming from.
Point is this retard was being astroturfed on youtube as a role model for people.
And I am just saying to be wary of it.

Back to the S. S. Movement tho
We all agree that Dirlewanger should be our spiritual liege right?
Never saw them in my entire life. Are they one of those beauty YouTubers?
Kids are retarded, and a kid who takes anyone on YouTube as a role model is a retard among retards.
And no, I don't think tying an anti-rape movement to a war criminal famed for carrying out village-wide murderrape sprees is anything short of shooting yourself in the foot for the epic memes.
"Back to S. S. movement"
This thread hasn't really even been about SS for a lot of pages. It's basically now just bash the troon
Pretty much. Every thread about anything related to trannies quickly turns into an a-logging session of people going "Tranny Bad" over and over instead of contributing anything substantial. Yes, rapists in dresses are bad. You are not saying anything that 99.99% of this site doesn't already know, and you aren't brave for saying it here.
 
Never saw them in my entire life. Are they one of those beauty YouTubers?
Kids are retarded, and a kid who takes anyone on YouTube as a role model is a retard among retards.
And no, I don't think tying an anti-rape movement to a war criminal famed for carrying out village-wide murderrape sprees is anything short of shooting yourself in the foot for the epic memes.

Pretty much. Every thread about anything related to trannies quickly turns into an a-logging session of people going "Tranny Bad" over and over instead of contributing anything substantial.
We are currently in a slow moment.
Kinda like the TNO thread I hope, when you have a couple of days or weeks of boredom and then a retard comes out of the woodwork and into the buckaroo zone we go.
Alas I am trying to bait responses from the troons I know but I only managed to get a janny seething to the point of ragequitting social media.
 
Back