Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

KiwiFuzz said:
It's not worth looking up the post, but someone on here in a different thread was sperging about how women don't have it that bad in the US in Anna Santana 2021.

I think the thing that men do not get and will never get is the constant, nagging feeling of "Am I about to get raeped or assaulted while minding my own fucking business?"

And the fact of the matter is that unless a man is a known gold star faggot or a literal child, there's always a risk. Men are stronger and if they want to knock your ass sideways, this is always an option for them. If both sexes were equally strong, women would never get raped.

The difference between a 10-year-old girl getting non-consensually finger-fucked in the bathroom on the ferry versus staying safe is 100% up to how Jonathan Yaniv is feeling that day. If he wants to do it, he can do it. Knowing how much time he spends thinking about it, it's surprising that he hasn't.
Click to expand...
The comic reminded me of the random.txt "Your penis is a weapon". It's an insane sentiment but, yeah, if it's on a violent man whether he's a troon or not, it can be. And just the difference in physical strength and speed like you say. That's why we segregate toilets in the first place, it's too easy for opportunistic predators to attack in them.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Troonologist PhD, Giga Brainlet, crimsonmoon and 7 others
KiwiFuzz said:
It's not worth looking up the post, but someone on here in a different thread was sperging about how women don't have it that bad in the US in Anna Santana 2021.

I think the thing that men do not get and will never get is the constant, nagging feeling of "Am I about to get raeped or assaulted while minding my own fucking business?"

And the fact of the matter is that unless a man is a known gold star faggot or a literal child, there's always a risk. Men are stronger and if they want to knock your ass sideways, this is always an option for them. If both sexes were equally strong, women would never get raped.

The difference between a 10-year-old girl getting non-consensually finger-fucked in the bathroom on the ferry versus staying safe is 100% up to how Jonathan Yaniv is feeling that day. If he wants to do it, he can do it. Knowing how much time he spends thinking about it, it's surprising that he hasn't.
Click to expand...
Something that my father taught me is the lesson of sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. Sheep are not necessarily idiots, sheeple, etc.- they are people too weak to defend themselves. Wolves are men who use their strength to prey on sheep, and sheepdogs are men who use their strength to defend sheep. My father taught me that I should be a sheepdog: I may never feel that constant fear of being raped- but it is something I am aware of and take steps to mitigate when a strange woman is in my presence (e.g., don't stare, keep interactions brief and polite, etc.) To be male is to be powerful enough to hurt others- to be a man is to be strong enough to keep that power under control, and use it to protect the weak from the strong. I feel not enough boys are taught this fundamental lesson.

I know some Kiwis will disagree with me here, but I really think the current "troons preying on women" madness derived from the feminism of the mid to late 1900s. In particular, it came from the belief that chivalry was inherently sexist- that a man using his strength to protect a woman is somehow wrong. Of course, men could have used their strength and whatever cultural hegemony they had to push back, but that would have been using their strength on women- something they had been taught not to do. So the sheepdogs bowed out, because they were told they were too much like wolves and any pushback was interpreted as them behaving in a wolfish manner. So now the real wolves are circling the flock, and there are no sheepdogs to protect the sheep.

Consider: it is largely women pushing back against the troons. Men simply don't step in unless they, or a woman they care about, is personally threatened. Otherwise, they simply watch as J. K. Rowling is #Canceled, as Jonathan Yaniv forces poor migrant women to wax his balls, and as trannies demand lesbians to suck that girldick. They sit on their hands as Labelle demands access to women's only spaces, as Kevin Gibes spouts his mysoginistic screeds under the guise of transgender rights, and as boys pretend to be girls so they can dominate women's sports. They have been told that women are equally capable as men and that using their strength to protect women is wrong, so they do nothing but watch the flock get devoured.

But men sitting by while women suffer is nothing new. Edmund Burke, an Irish stateman, saw Marie Antoinette when she was the dauphiness and firmly believed all of France would cry for war if someone even looked at her wrong. When he heard she had been dragged screaming to the guillotine, he wrote the following:

Edmund Burke said:
But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever. Never, never more, shall we behold that generous loyalty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that dignified obedience, that subordination of the heart, which kept alive, even in servitude itself, the spirit of an exalted freedom.
Click to expand...

I know some people will agree, and some will disagree. This is just some old man's rambling thoughts on the topic; take them as you will.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick, Kiwi Lime Pie, RadicalCentrist and 59 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Something that my father taught me is the lesson of sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. Sheep are not necessarily idiots, sheeple, etc.- they are people too weak to defend themselves. Wolves are men who use their strength to prey on sheep, and sheepdogs are men who use their strength to defend sheep. My father taught me that I should be a sheepdog: I may never feel that constant fear of being raped- but it is something I am aware of and take steps to mitigate when a strange woman is in my presence (e.g., don't stare, keep interactions brief and polite, etc.) To be male is to be powerful enough to hurt others- to be a man is to be strong enough to keep that power under control, and use it to protect the weak from the strong. I feel not enough boys are taught this fundamental lesson.
Click to expand...

Your stance is admirable, but I'm going to disagree with your metaphor. I have cousins in Europe who raise sheep. I tried it for a summer one time. And I can assure you, sheep really are stupid, in addition to ugly and smelling bad. No one raises sheep except to fleece them for their wool or slaughter them for their meat.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick, sanguis draconis, AMHOLIO and 19 others
Wallace said:
Your stance is admirable, but I'm going to disagree with your metaphor. I have cousins in Europe who raise sheep. I tried it for a summer one time. And I can assure you, sheep really are stupid, in addition to ugly and smelling bad. No one raises sheep except to fleece them for their wool or slaughter them for their meat.
Click to expand...
I agree, sheep are idiots. But the metaphor is simply that they're weak compared to wolves and sheepdogs.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Aaa0aaa0, Vibri, Marvin and 5 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
I agree, sheep are idiots. But the metaphor is simply that they're weak compared to wolves and sheepdogs.
Click to expand...
That's the interesting thing about using metaphor as an aid to understanding, sometimes the metaphor can highlight a structure beyond what was originally intended.

It's an interesting one to chew on some points to consider

-the sheepdog is, itself, a modified wolf (subejcted to external selection and training pressure)
-Sheep are prey animals
(that could be a rich topic itself, but one that immediately comes to mind is expected attrition. Also flocking/grouping behavior as a protective means and when an individual is not protected by the system.
in the marine environment, a baitball is an interesting expression of it which is fluid enough to show some reasonably pure math)

-the entire system is under the purview of a overseer ...the human shepherd and driven by utility for the overseer
-the wolf's role has been subsumed by the overseer and the wolf is "bad" or "baaaaahd" as the case may be b/c it puts the wolf in competition with the overseer -- the attrition being euphemistically conceived of as "harvest"


hardy exhaustive or conprehensive in any of those points, just things to consider in the analogy
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Vibri, The 8 Of Spades, Lizard Pope and 6 others
Wallace said:
Your stance is admirable, but I'm going to disagree with your metaphor. I have cousins in Europe who raise sheep. I tried it for a summer one time. And I can assure you, sheep really are stupid, in addition to ugly and smelling bad. No one raises sheep except to fleece them for their wool or slaughter them for their meat.
Click to expand...

Not true. The Welsh and New Zeelandeese raise them for sexual purposes. This makes them approximately three times more useful than women.
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: FramerGirl420, chroma, Vibri and 28 others
fuckidunno said:
That's the interesting thing about using metaphor as an aid to understanding, sometimes the metaphor can highlight a structure beyond what was originally intended.

It's an interesting one to chew on some points to consider

-the sheepdog is, itself, a modified wolf
-Sheep are prey animals
(that could be a rich topic itself, but one that immediately comes to mind is expected attrition. Also flocking/grouping behavior as a protective means and when an individual is not protected by the system.
in the marine environment, a baitball is an interesting expression of it which is fluid enough to show some reasonably pure math)

-the entire system is under the purview of a overseer ...the human shepherd and driven by utility for the overseer
-the wolf's role has been subsumed by the overseer and the wolf is "bad" or "baaaaahd" as the case may be b/c it puts the wolf in competition with the overseer -- the attrition being euphemistically conceived of as "harvest"


hardy exhaustive or conprehensive in any of those points, just things to consider in the analogy
Click to expand...
I actually made that point in my original post:
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
I know some Kiwis will disagree with me here, but I really think the current "troons preying on women" madness derived from the feminism of the mid to late 1900s. In particular, it came from the belief that chivalry was inherently sexist- that a man using his strength to protect a woman is somehow wrong. Of course, men could have used their strength and whatever cultural hegemony they had to push back, but that would have been using their strength on women- something they had been taught not to do. So the sheepdogs bowed out, because they were told they were too much like wolves and any pushback was interpreted as them behaving in a wolfish manner. So now the real wolves are circling the flock, and there are no sheepdogs to protect the sheep.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vibri, Derped223 and KiwiFuzz
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Something that my father taught me is the lesson of sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. Sheep are not necessarily idiots, sheeple, etc.- they are people too weak to defend themselves. Wolves are men who use their strength to prey on sheep, and sheepdogs are men who use their strength to defend sheep. My father taught me that I should be a sheepdog: I may never feel that constant fear of being raped- but it is something I am aware of and take steps to mitigate when a strange woman is in my presence (e.g., don't stare, keep interactions brief and polite, etc.) To be male is to be powerful enough to hurt others- to be a man is to be strong enough to keep that power under control, and use it to protect the weak from the strong. I feel not enough boys are taught this fundamental lesson.

I know some Kiwis will disagree with me here, but I really think the current "troons preying on women" madness derived from the feminism of the mid to late 1900s. In particular, it came from the belief that chivalry was inherently sexist- that a man using his strength to protect a woman is somehow wrong. Of course, men could have used their strength and whatever cultural hegemony they had to push back, but that would have been using their strength on women- something they had been taught not to do. So the sheepdogs bowed out, because they were told they were too much like wolves and any pushback was interpreted as them behaving in a wolfish manner. So now the real wolves are circling the flock, and there are no sheepdogs to protect the sheep.

Consider: it is largely women pushing back against the troons. Men simply don't step in unless they, or a woman they care about, is personally threatened. Otherwise, they simply watch as J. K. Rowling is #Canceled, as Jonathan Yaniv forces poor migrant women to wax his balls, and as trannies demand lesbians to suck that girldick. They sit on their hands as Labelle demands access to women's only spaces, as Kevin Gibes spouts his mysoginistic screeds under the guise of transgender rights, and as boys pretend to be girls so they can dominate women's sports. They have been told that women are equally capable as men and that using their strength to protect women is wrong, so they do nothing but watch the flock get devoured.

But men sitting by while women suffer is nothing new. Edmund Burke, an Irish stateman, saw Marie Antoinette when she was the dauphiness and firmly believed all of France would cry for war if someone even looked at her wrong. When he heard she had been dragged screaming to the guillotine, he wrote the following:



I know some people will agree, and some will disagree. This is just some old man's rambling thoughts on the topic; take them as you will.
Click to expand...
Hard disagree. The men who most often hurt women are their husbands, recent ex-husbands, that “nice guy” she goes on a date with, or that “nice guy” who offers to walk her home. How are you going to be a sheepdog in that circumstance? And why blame it on feminism? The fact is that almost always men are physically stronger than women, and *some* men are sick fucks who want to hurt women. Short of stalking the streets like a comic book hero, you can’t fix this on your own. I’m very glad you care, but we need society to change.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AssistantWeasel, cuddle striker, rosechupacabra and 24 others
Screenshot_2021-03-14 Sophie Labelle, cartoonist sur Twitter.png

Screenshot_2021-03-14 Sophie Labelle, cartoonist sur Twitter(1).png

Screenshot_2021-03-14 Sophie Labelle, bédéiste sur Twitter.png

Screenshot_2021-03-14 Sophie Labelle, bédéiste sur Twitter(1).png

Ewc5gjxWUAEn4oF.jpg

Ewc5hfdXIAAiBcF.jpg

Ewc5iipWgAAk5tZ.jpg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Vibri, Doppio Vinegar, Marvin and 14 others
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
I actually made that point in my original post:
Click to expand...

I'm unclear on which point (your quote of mine included multiple points)


Your reply
"But the metaphor is simply that they're weak compared to wolves and sheepdogs."
Would appear counter to my thesis as it specifies limit (the metaphor is simply....) of scope of the metaphor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back