Superstraight Containment Station - No superphobes allowed!

Parasaurolophus said:
It was regarding specifically hookups, and the person before even spoke about only focusing on genitals. It never was about friendship or any other kind of relationship and I always tried to say exactly that: That attraction isn't limited to purely one aspect

I did express myself rather autistically though and accept the negrates for it. They are deserved.

Also, what's your team, @Megatardingo? I like your avatar ;>
Click to expand...
Attraction for hookups is strictly limited to sexuality which is tied to sexual organs duh. If you ain't a gay/bi dude you absolutely cannot see a cock and think "yummy" that's a certainty, but that's without even getting into wound-fuckers, they're their own brand of mental. What were you trying to say that if a faggie sees a tranny even if he has a cock the fag's still gonna go "nuh uh" because of the whole teehee amgirl uwu? That's correct I guess, which is why this unholy alliance of alphabet soup and straights are teaming up on the tranny menace.

As for my team I'm obviously a communist incel bee supremacist trying to secure the means of our honey fighting both the matriarchy and the wasps opressing us poor drones. (If you like the avie check out @Justtocheck thread, he's doing a great jobbu)
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Windows XP Home Edition, 𓇋𓈖𓊪𓅱𓃣, ScenarioOfTLoU2 and 3 others
taa said:
Some things can never remain unseen.

I plan on keeping it unseen.
Click to expand...
To borrow from 'Atlantis - the Lost Empire':

"So, what's the SRS story?"
"You don't wanna know, trust me. Farmers, don't tell him. You shouldn't have told me, but you did and now I'm telling you, you don't wanna know".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: On a Journey, Struggle Cakes, IAmNotAlpharius and 2 others
taa said:
Some things can never remain unseen.

I plan on keeping it unseen.
Click to expand...
i saw on reddit once, hopefully never again.

found a couple of things on twitter.
FIVEKEKS.jpg

TWOKEKS.jpg
to all these archives i say this:
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Parasaurolophus, ScenarioOfTLoU2, Gone Ham and 1 other person
Megatardingo said:
Attraction for hookups is strictly limited to sexuality which is tied to sexual organs duh. If you ain't a gay/bi dude you absolutely cannot see a cock and think "yummy" that's a certainty, but that's without even getting into wound-fuckers, they're their own brand of mental. What were you trying to say that if a faggie sees a tranny even if he has a cock the fag's still gonna go "nuh uh" because of the whole teehee amgirl uwu? That's correct I guess, which is why this unholy alliance of alphabet soup and straights are teaming up on the tranny menace.

As for my team I'm obviously a communist incel bee supremacist trying to secure the means of our honey fighting both the matriarchy and the wasps opressing us poor drones. (If you like the avie check out @Justtocheck thread, he's doing a great jobbu)
Click to expand...
I guess you do have a point with hookers. Never thought about paying someone for sex, not to mention, just picking someone up from the sidewalk, but there must be people out there who pay them, right? Though, even then, wouldn't you wanna choose someone you can stand to be with for that time at least? Are there people who just care about matching geni- Okay, okay. Maybe I've been ignorant all along. Maybe some people just care about the equipment sometimes.

And yea, something like that. You might be into dick, but if the rest doesn't match, why bother? Can't imagine it to be enjoyable

Also, thanks for the suggestion. Didn't think to get an answer like that, tbh, but he really does do great shoops. I'll leave some support in form of stickers ^^
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Whatsup bud? and TVStactic
Parasaurolophus said:
I guess you do have a point with hookers. Never thought about paying someone for sex, not to mention, just picking someone up from the sidewalk, but there must be people out there who pay them, right? Though, even then, wouldn't you wanna choose someone you can stand to be with for that time at least? Are there people who just care about matching geni- Okay, okay. Maybe I've been ignorant all along. Maybe some people just care about the equipment sometimes.

And yea, something like that. You might be into dick, but if the rest doesn't match, why bother? Can't imagine it to be enjoyable

Also, thanks for the suggestion. Didn't think to get an answer like that, tbh, but he really does do great shoops. I'll leave some support in form of stickers ^^
Click to expand...
That's the crux of it. There ARE people who just want to get off and aren't that fussy about who with: Go do your thing with them, no-one is saying troons aren't allowed their happy time.

But the very idea that that doesn't include the entire human population for them to pick and choose from sends them into a raging tower of autistic seethe.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: MichaelScarn, blue gopher snakes and Whatsup bud?
Vesperus said:
That's the crux of it. There ARE people who just want to get off and aren't that fussy about who with: Go do your thing with them, no-one is saying troons aren't allowed their happy time.

But the very idea that that doesn't include the entire human population for them to pick and choose from sends them into a raging tower of autistic seethe.
Click to expand...
A good quarter of this site would beg to differ.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: X Prime, CheezzyMach, secret watcher and 5 others
Banditotron said:
I mean, if their "happy time" is the way they act like perverts in public and shit up everything they touch, then yeah I guess you could say I beg to differ.
Click to expand...
I guess I should have chosen my words more carefully. I forgot to take into account what makes degenerates happy.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: TVStactic
Vesperus said:
I guess I should have chosen my words more carefully. I forgot to take into account what makes degenerates happy.
Click to expand...
Essentially, I do not care for a moment what someone does behind closed doors. Unless it involves children or animals. In which case, bust down the closed door with a swat team. But I digress: if someone wants to pretend to be a woman or man or a magical gender fairy while under the covers with a consenting partner, I wouldn't care.
The issue is is that they want their sexual game to continue into every facet of their life and want everyone else to play along no matter what.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: MichaelScarn, Caecia, Struggle Cakes and 13 others
Drachenlord said:
The super straight thing is dead now, right? Seems like a power flex by big tech was enough to kill it, as always backed by the usual journalists. The whole movement would’ve probably had way more longevity if they made superlesbians the poster child for some real woke infighting.
Click to expand...
It's still alive and well on Twatter.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Babs Dixon II, Toolbox, TVStactic and 6 others
Drachenlord said:
The super straight thing is dead now, right? Seems like a power flex by big tech was enough to kill it, as always backed by the usual journalists. The whole movement would’ve probably had way more longevity if they made superlesbians the poster child for some real woke infighting.
Click to expand...
No.

In America, now it's only a matter of weeks before we see the first Title IX lawsuit. It's not getting memory-holed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kate Farms Shill, PresidentTerf, Toolbox and 3 others
Drachenlord said:
The super straight thing is dead now, right? Seems like a power flex by big tech was enough to kill it, as always backed by the usual journalists. The whole movement would’ve probably had way more longevity if they made superlesbians the poster child for some real woke infighting.
Click to expand...
The only women the journalists would have cared about were the super"lesbians".
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: PresidentTerf, Toolbox, TVStactic and 1 other person
Drachenlord said:
The super straight thing is dead now, right? Seems like a power flex by big tech was enough to kill it, as always backed by the usual journalists. The whole movement would’ve probably had way more longevity if they made superlesbians the poster child for some real woke infighting.
Click to expand...
Definitely dead on reddit.
EweJ5j6WgAUryqe.png

Well, maybe it's not completely over since camwhores on twitter started to use this hasgtag to attract clients.
Screenshot_2021-03-15 #superstraight - Twitter Search Twitter.png
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: MichaelScarn, Cilleystring, Positron and 12 others
KimCoppolaAficionado said:
A good quarter of this site would beg to differ.
Click to expand...
yeah and we make fun of them too as much as the crazy troons.

how crazy you may ask?

this crazy:
WHATINTHEFUCK.png


and bandito's point is right, you can literally see this happening by searching superstraight on twitter or even reddit, these people are insane.

teh superstraight ruqqus is showing interesting pictures:
REDDITMOMENT.jpg

HEY.jpg
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Exterminatus, Caecia, On a Journey and 11 others
  • Feels
Reactions: Gone Ham, Wilhelm Bittrich and Toolbox
Gone Ham said:
if helping rape victims is a bad thing, then I don’t want to be right
Click to expand...
100% agree. As the definition of ‘rape’ broadens, there are more rape victims than ever before. Slept with a creepy Jew fuck to advance your movie career? Rape. Had kinky sex with a weirdo musician within a relationship? Rape. As a middle-aged woman, had to pay off a teenaged boy you seduced in order to avoid jail time? Rape.
These women need our help and consideration, some of them are down to their last ten or fifteen million dollars.
Stare rape, fart rape, positional rape, catcall rape, post-coital regret rape- we MUST channel funds into making a societal difference so we can continue to pathologise male sexual behaviour into smaller and smaller boxes of acceptability.
The women in our society cannot be said to be truly safe and free until they know they can walk down the street completely naked except for pasties made out of $1000 bills. Is it too much to ask that we develop a society in which women are 100% protected from every conceivable form of expression of sexual interest from guys who aren’t hot and rich? The measure of our culture’s success must be gauged by the freedom with which women are able to do anything they want in public with absolutely zero consequences.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Winner
  • Dumb
Reactions: Cake Farts, Cryonic Haunted Bullets, Bleeding Heart and 52 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back