Game of Thrones Thread

I think he's terrified of failure because he recognizes the book series, above all else, is his magnum opus He cannot let his series unravel and become as universally hated as the show. I think he lives in constant fear, and considers the short amount of time he likely has left worrying about the outcome of his story rather than actually being productive with it.

He dreams and tells himself what he'll do once Winds is over, in reality he doesn't biologically have the time. The story became way the fuck out of whack after Feast and Dance. It's way beyond the scope he originally envisioned and he's terrified about the reality that he cannot wrap up the story in 7 books and he would be lucky to resolve the story in 10.

also lmao fat
I don't think it's a matter of scope but rather a matter of the plot being very much obvious at this point. Everything is way too telegraphed so the SUVERTING MAH EXPECTATION the series is known for will not work without risking massive changes. Which is a fitting fate for this kind of post modern type of writing.
 
It would have been smart to grab a couple somewhat experienced fantasy writers, tell them to write up a few short stories set in Westeros that will be released in an anthology and look whose style fits well into RR Martin's writing. Then have the best of those write a full novel or two set in Westeros and make sure they don't repeat the "I hate this character, therefore I will make him an idiot"-shit that Dumb and Dumber did.
And then, if push comes to shove, use those writers to conclude the story with Martin or at least set them up with notes and plot ideas for the future in case Martin bites it.

If he dies now, our best shot will be fanfiction tier writers. The publishers won't let this story remain without a propper end, they will hire someone the moment Martin keels over (hell, maybe that's what they are actually waiting and hoping for?)... the question is: Will it be worth it? And given how quality usually drops in events like these, all signs point to no.
Flanderization was a huge issue when the books were translated into the show and by S8 every remaining character was a carricature of his original self, it would hard to avoid that with books. And if the writer goes "tits, gore and swearing, that's what the kids love about these books!", it'll be an abortion on page 1.
the show was always dumbed down and always lacked ASOIAF's greatest asset: it's unbelievable complexity and believability in world building. However this dumbing down got worse and worse until by season 5 the show essentially just became a serialized Marvel movie.

George RR Martin works with several other editors, he works with editors that he works with personally and he works with editors that work for his publisher. This is common for writers but the editors are much more important in his case due to his age and the intricacy of the world he built.

If youre familiar with Martin's other work and you pay close attention to the themes of the series then you'll know how the series will end. RR Martin is a hippy who grew up in the 70s and believes that love conquers hate. He's not naive to political reality, but fundamentally he's a free love hippy whos married to an old school 70s feminist. Humanity, or at least the Westerosi, will most likely come to the understanding (after a horrific amount of violence) that the Others are not people but persons, and will most likely intermarry etc etc. Point is - I don't think he fully understands what this means yet or how he's going to get there. We'll see (just kidding he'll be dead before then).

In terms of Flanderization I'm not tooooo worried about that. George RR Martin's pretty naive to a lot of aspects of combat, the heavy prevalence of warrior women is cringe inducing and out of touch with how pre-industrial societies operated. But I'll let him have his jerk off material since it's clearly what he gets off to.
I don't think it's a matter of scope but rather a matter of the plot being very much obvious at this point. Everything is way too telegraphed so the SUVERTING MAH EXPECTATION the series is known for will not work without risking massive changes. Which is a fitting fate for this kind of post modern type of writing.
I agree, subverting expectations isn't a virtue and the novelty wears off pretty quickly. One thing I appreciate though is that he's (sometimes) self aware of how fucking edgy and stupid a lot of the books and scenes sound and uses this to his advantage.

Brienne's series of misfortunes is so absurd and edgy that, I think, it's meant to be hidden comedy instead of the common soy reaction of "oh my god! so brutal! go girl!" when the correct reaction should be "lol what a fucking idiot." Similar thing with the Sand Snakes. We haven't seen much of them yet, but I have a feeling their over the top edginess and larping levels of meticulous planning will just mean they will die anticlimactically.

I think often the series feels driven by the retarded fan base of wholesome redditors. when the series should just be appreciated for what it is.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Chester Rigby
Humanity, or at least the Westerosi, will most likely come to the understanding (after a horrific amount of violence) that the Others are not people but persons, and will most likely intermarry etc etc.
Nah. There is literally nothing in his book to suggest that he's setting up "the Other are just misunderstood, we need to build bridges" hippy dippy bullshit. If anything, the Other are a personification of hatred, war or even a force of nature - I could make a far more convincing argument that they embody climate change (as foundationless and nonsensical as that is) than what you suggest here.
The way the story is set up, the big idea is that there is a large threat to all of humanity and humanity is too fucking dumb to pull their shit together, get over their ignorrant and petty little squabbles to unite against that existential threat. Which is kind of the main failure of GoT S8, when it makes Cersei the final boss. It's literally the antithesis to what the book is going for.
George RR Martin's pretty naive to a lot of aspects of combat, the heavy prevalence of warrior women is cringe inducing and out of touch with how pre-industrial societies operated.
Brienne of Tarth and Asha Greyjoy are like the only female fighters worth a damn in the entire book series and Brienne is mocked or pitied by literally everyone she's ever met for being a female warrior - including Catelyn Stark who takes her into her service. The Sand Snake sisters amount to neither jack nor shit in the books iirc. I wouldn't call 2 characters, one of which is treated like a joke by everyone, a heavy prevalence.
Also, female warriors (both historical and as literary figures) have been around for thousands of years. Atalanta, Boudica, Joan of Arc and Tomoe Gozen, just to name a few.
I don't think it's a matter of scope but rather a matter of the plot being very much obvious at this point. Everything is way too telegraphed so the SUVERTING MAH EXPECTATION the series is known for will not work without risking massive changes. Which is a fitting fate for this kind of post modern type of writing.
The thing with Martin's writing in ASOIAF isn't so much that it subverts expectations, it takes an axe to certain established tropes and replaces them with a strong internal logic.
In a regular fantasy story, a noble deed by a main character would be either successul or at least have a positive outcome/payoff later on for him, in ASOIAF, it can get that character killed.
Ed Stark, for instance, spared Cersei, tried to do the right thing about her bastards and he got incarcerated for it. He believed the promises of being send to the Wall if he pleads guilty to protect his family and he gets his head chopped off. Why? Cause he sucked at court intrigue and expected people like Littlefinger to be honorable.
The Red Wedding was another culmination of a character paying for an earlier mistake. In this case, someone broke his marriage vow and thus insulted a really, really vindictive motherfucker. His attempt to mend the situation didn't pan out, cause said motherfucker shopped around for better alternatives and sold him out to the Lannisters.

Point being, in the books, actions have logical and consistent consequences based on character goals, their emotions, experiences and so on. People make mistakes and this drives the plot, but it happens in a believable manner. Characters have goals and work towards meeting those goals and their actions realistically reflect that, based on the characters personality, limitations and conflicts with other characters.
Dumb and Dumber, however, thought that the story and its popularity relied on Shyamalan-tier "WHAT A TWEEEEST"-crap, so they procedurally employed more and more tropes that the books originally tried to avoid, in order to set up shit. Suddenly, you have plot armor, deus ex machinas and utterly illogical shit popping up left and right.
Their goal was no longer to make a story that progresses in a believable and logical manner, their goal became coming up with twists as outrageous and unexpected as possible, cause in their eyes, that's good storytelling. S8 is a giant failure extravaganza without even a single plot-twist that isn't utter garbage, chosen only to go "LOL DIDN'T EXPECT THAT, DID YA?!".
 
Yes, I agree with you 100% but he can finish it in 5 months or less, especially if he contracts out some writing. He can write what all day long and let an editor sort it out. He may not be 100% pleased with it but at least it will have ended, to everyone's satisfaction.

I will bet money a fanfiction writer could do it, maybe even do it better.

These are all things he should have considered and done years ago. He can't because he doesn't want to end it. All the fans, the emails, all that diminishes the moment its over. So he just puts it off.

He won't. He's previously been on record as saying that he won't farm it out to any other writer. He is also vehemently against all fan fiction.

The problem is, his ego is just too large. Once again, have a look at the Wheel of Time. Brandon Sanderson's ending to the series significantly showed up the last few Robert Jordan instalments, mainly because nothing happened in them. GRRM won't take that risk. His ego won't let him. He's already got to that stage of "entire novel in which nothing happens." I think the problem is that he never really knew what he wanted the ending to be other than a vague idea. In the mid 2000s the fandom invented the term "Meereenese Knot" to refer to how Dany wasn't doing what she intended to but wasting time as Queen of Slavers' Bay. So even then the rot had set in.

In fact, a far better character development would have been for Dany to become satisfied with being Queen out there and washing her hands as Westeros goes to shit. Rather than have an improbable series of events involving being picked up by Drogon.
 
He won't. He's previously been on record as saying that he won't farm it out to any other writer. He is also vehemently against all fan fiction.

The problem is, his ego is just too large. Once again, have a look at the Wheel of Time. Brandon Sanderson's ending to the series significantly showed up the last few Robert Jordan instalments, mainly because nothing happened in them. GRRM won't take that risk. His ego won't let him.
That's why I think the publisher waits for him to keel over, so they can hand the series to some other writer, who will crank out the last few books. In their eyes, an unfinished series might as well be preferable over yet another filler book or a bad ending. Depends on how the rights to the books are handled and if Martin can only prevent interference of other writers as long as he's alive or if there's some clause that prevents it after his death.

The publishers would like to just throw out the final books with a thin veneer of "based on Martin's notes and plans for the last books" kinda like what happened to Pratchett's last works.
 
Nah. There is literally nothing in his book to suggest that he's setting up "the Other are just misunderstood, we need to build bridges" hippy dippy bullshit. If anything, the Other are a personification of hatred, war or even a force of nature - I could make a far more convincing argument that they embody climate change (as foundationless and nonsensical as that is) than what you suggest here.
on they surface they're climate change, sure that's given, but they're also clearly intelligent beings with their own language and society. He even termed them "Others," a term used to describe dehumanized and marginalized peoples. I think there's going to be an adapt or die scenario between the Others and Westerosi, in a way similar to how humanity must adapt or die to climate change, mass migration, etc. I don't believe George would paint an entire society of intelligent beings as a purely savage force of nature, I think he wants us to think that.

Brienne of Tarth and Asha Greyjoy are like the only female fighters worth a damn in the entire book series and Brienne is mocked or pitied by literally everyone she's ever met for being a female warrior - including Catelyn Stark who takes her into her service. The Sand Snake sisters amount to neither jack nor shit in the books iirc. I wouldn't call 2 characters, one of which is treated like a joke by everyone, a heavy prevalence.
Also, female warriors (both historical and as literary figures) have been around for thousands of years. Atalanta, Boudica, Joan of Arc and Tomoe Gozen, just to name a few.
There's a lot more significant female warriors you're missing out on - it's a clear theme throughout the series. The Mormonts of a Bear Island, Yghritte and the tradition of Spear Wives, many of the Targaryen women, Meera Reid, Danny Flint, Arya, Nimeria, there's an entire page on the ASOIAF wiki dedicated to warrior women because of how many there are. Most of the warrior women you mentioned were leaders/queens and not soldiers (with the exception of Joan of Arc), while the ones I've mentioned are soldiers. Also, Catelyn takes Brienne into her service largely out of pity and then necessity.

George RR Martin is such a feminist that he refuses to call himself a feminist because it takes femininity away from women. He's an oldschool feminist and his wife was a radical feminist (probably still is). He believes strongly in showing the liberation of women through force and will. That's cool - I feel like soldiering is just a poor outlet for that, especially when he describes many of these women as under 5'3. I'm a big fan of Brienne for that reason, whos freakish strong and freakish tall, and could imagine soldiering as her outlet.
 
Last edited:
Ygritte got sniped by a 10 year-old potato farmer. You seem more offended at the concept of warrior women than they're portrayal, because they're generally portrayed as weak and ineffective.

The Sand Snakes get locked up within minutes of hatching their asinine plan. Ariana has to enlist a dude to help her kidnap a little girl. Ygritte gets immediately overpowered and captured by Jon at their first meeting. Arya has only managed to kill unarmed people and children. Brienne is an oafish and incompetent "knight" who barely manages to survive her encounters by being better armored than her foes. Asha spends multiple books as a captive and hostage after leading her crew to their deaths. The list goes on.

on they surface they're climate change, sure that's given, but they're also clearly intelligent beings with their own language and society. He even termed them "Others," a term used to describe dehumanized and marginalized peoples. I think there's going to be an adapt or die scenario between the Others and Westerosi, in a way similar to how humanity must adapt or die to climate change, mass migration, etc. I don't believe George would paint an entire society of intelligent beings as a purely savage force of nature, I think he wants us to think that.
George has been writing these books since the 90s. Liberal opinion has flipped flopped a dozen times since then, so who knows what anything is supposed to represent at this point. Hell, by the time A Dream of Spring comes out, he might advocate genociding the Others because they represent white people and winter represents white people colonizing africa or some shit.
 
Ygritte got sniped by a 10 year-old potato farmer. You seem more offended at the concept of warrior women than they're portrayal, because they're generally portrayed as weak and ineffective.

The Sand Snakes get locked up within minutes of hatching their asinine plan. Ariana has to enlist a dude to help her kidnap a little girl. Ygritte gets immediately overpowered and captured by Jon at their first meeting. Arya has only managed to kill unarmed people and children. Brienne is an oafish and incompetent "knight" who barely manages to survive her encounters by being better armored than her foes. Asha spends multiple books as a captive and hostage after leading her crew to their deaths. The list goes on.
I'm talking about the books, not the show. What happens in the books is very different. My problem was with characters who are previously described as being small and nimble suddenly becoming Conan the Barbarian. This happens with Tyrion as well.
George has been writing these books since the 90s. Liberal opinion has flipped flopped a dozen times since then, so who knows what anything is supposed to represent at this point. Hell, by the time A Dream of Spring comes out, he might advocate genociding the Others because they represent white people and winter represents white people colonizing africa or some shit.
sure?
 
on they surface they're climate change, sure that's given
My point isn't that the Other are a personification of climate change, my point is that what you suggest makes even less sense than claiming the Other being a personification of climate change.

He even termed them "Others," a term used to describe dehumanized and marginalized peoples.
The term is used more akin to the "He who must not be named" stuff that I assume happens in Harry Potter, it's not so much an instance of (cultural) otherization and more of an instance of something being so evil, even just speaking its name bodes ill. Sympathetic magic is a strong aspect of many superstitions, part of the reason why Christians don't refer to God by his name for instance and why the "true name" of certain mythical creatures is such a big deal.
What you suggest also does not line up with the othering already happening in the books in regards to the people north of the wall, which are all dubbed Wildlings by the Westerosi. Why are the Other not part of these Wildlings? One hornblow to announce the return of the Watch, two for a Wildling attack and three for the Other.
It is a kind of otherization that is going on here, but it's not about culture or marginalized people, it's about a mystical differentiation between the living and the living dead, the natural and the unnatural/supernatural.

I think there's going to be an adapt or die scenario between the Others and Westerosi, in a way similar to how humanity must adapt or die to climate change, mass migration, etc.
The Other have no language, no culture, no society, so I have absolutely no clue where you get that idea from. They are a mindless horde of monsters that kill everything in their path and there has been no hint at even the most basic notion of them being anything else. Everything in the plot so far precludes the suggestion that there is going to be some sort of mediation between the Other and the humans. This whole thing is entirely based on your notion that Martin is a hippy and nothing else, as far as I can tell.

The Mormonts of a Bear Island, Yghritte and the tradition of Spear Wives, many of the Targaryen women, Meera Reid, Danny Flint, Arya, Nimeria,
I'll give you Ygritte, anyone else is either just mentioned in passing, part of the historic background of the setting or rather insignificant in terms of being a warrior.
It's not like a bunch of female supersoldiers tear asunder army after army with their bare hands due to their Mary Sue powers.
This is more of a non-issue to me tbh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vulgar
My point isn't that the Other are a personification of climate change, my point is that what you suggest makes even less sense than claiming the Other being a personification of climate change.


The term is used more akin to the "He who must not be named" stuff that I assume happens in Harry Potter, it's not so much an instance of (cultural) otherization and more of an instance of something being so evil, even just speaking its name bodes ill. Sympathetic magic is a strong aspect of many superstitions, part of the reason why Christians don't refer to God by his name for instance and why the "true name" of certain mythical creatures is such a big deal.
What you suggest also does not line up with the othering already happening in the books in regards to the people north of the wall, which are all dubbed Wildlings by the Westerosi. Why are the Other not part of these Wildlings? One hornblow to announce the return of the Watch, two for a Wildling attack and three for the Other.
It is a kind of otherization that is going on here, but it's not about culture or marginalized people, it's about a mystical differentiation between the living and the living dead, the natural and the unnatural/supernatural.


The Other have no language, no culture, no society, so I have absolutely no clue where you get that idea from. They are a mindless horde of monsters that kill everything in their path and there has been no hint at even the most basic notion of them being anything else. Everything in the plot so far precludes the suggestion that there is going to be some sort of mediation between the Other and the humans. This whole thing is entirely based on your notion that Martin is a hippy and nothing else, as far as I can tell.


I'll give you Ygritte, anyone else is either just mentioned in passing, part of the historic background of the setting or rather insignificant in terms of being a warrior.
It's not like a bunch of female supersoldiers tear asunder army after army with their bare hands due to their Mary Sue powers.
This is more of a non-issue to me tbh.
the Others arent a mindless horde, they do have culture and a society.


their society, language, and culture is so fundamentally different from ours that many interpret the Others as being an unintelligent horde.

After all, the Night King betrayed his Watch for an Other female. This may be just a story, but the frequency this story is mentioned makes me think theres a lot of truth to it.

my problem with warrior women was that I felt it betrayed the grim reality the series is meant to present, on both a societal level and a physical one. Focusing in on warrior women was stupid on my end because theres plenty of other examples that portray the betrayal of this vision better.

Brienne is one of my favourite characters and to me represent a lot of the sacrifices needed for soldiering that often get ignored with other characters for some reason.
 
The thing with Martin's writing in ASOIAF isn't so much that it subverts expectations, it takes an axe to certain established tropes and replaces them with a strong internal logic.
In a regular fantasy story, a noble deed by a main character would be either successul or at least have a positive outcome/payoff later on for him, in ASOIAF, it can get that character killed.
Ed Stark, for instance, spared Cersei, tried to do the right thing about her bastards and he got incarcerated for it. He believed the promises of being send to the Wall if he pleads guilty to protect his family and he gets his head chopped off. Why? Cause he sucked at court intrigue and expected people like Littlefinger to be honorable.
The Red Wedding was another culmination of a character paying for an earlier mistake. In this case, someone broke his marriage vow and thus insulted a really, really vindictive motherfucker. His attempt to mend the situation didn't pan out, cause said motherfucker shopped around for better alternatives and sold him out to the Lannisters.

Point being, in the books, actions have logical and consistent consequences based on character goals, their emotions, experiences and so on. People make mistakes and this drives the plot, but it happens in a believable manner. Characters have goals and work towards meeting those goals and their actions realistically reflect that, based on the characters personality, limitations and conflicts with other characters.
Dumb and Dumber, however, thought that the story and its popularity relied on Shyamalan-tier "WHAT A TWEEEEST"-crap, so they procedurally employed more and more tropes that the books originally tried to avoid, in order to set up shit. Suddenly, you have plot armor, deus ex machinas and utterly illogical shit popping up left and right.
Their goal was no longer to make a story that progresses in a believable and logical manner, their goal became coming up with twists as outrageous and unexpected as possible, cause in their eyes, that's good storytelling. S8 is a giant failure extravaganza without even a single plot-twist that isn't utter garbage, chosen only to go "LOL DIDN'T EXPECT THAT, DID YA?!".
Subverting expectations is axing tropes and replacing them with logical progression, but the problem is that it's done so poorly/consistently today that it just created a new genre of worse tropes. But even then the subverted expectation in GoT isn't as good as people make it out to be, killing Ned Stark was dumb as shit move that was retconned to be done on the spur of the moment by Geoffrey, making it's only logical sense is that a little bitch tyrant will act like a little bitch.
The red wedding was also a retarded move, when you have a war for legitimacy, ending it by going against one of the most sacred rules of your culture will guarantee you'll never be seen as legitimate (which probably lead up directly to the purple wedding), especially when at that point Rob was on the backfoot after over-extending his forces. A direct suprise ambush with the Freys and Boltons would had been bloodier but would have guaranteed that the Lannisters will come out clean.
I did like the healer fucking over Daenarys in the first book, after the latter expected the former to be grateful from being savagely raped by her own men and having her family butchered.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Chester Rigby
the Others arent a mindless horde, they do have culture and a society.

https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Others
their society, language, and culture is so fundamentally different from ours that many interpret the Others as being an unintelligent horde.
What is anything you just said based on? Certainly not the wiki entry, unless I skipped over the respective part.
 
What is anything you just said based on? Certainly not the wiki entry, unless I skipped over the respective part.
mentions having a language which sounds like lake ice breaking.

during their encounter with the Royce ranger they fear him at first before easily defeating him, and the. laughing and taunting him.

they practice the religious capture of human children and sacrifice.

they wield arms and armour and use tactics to defeat men.

the Night King had a sexual relationship with an Other.

you might be confusing the Wights , their undead slaves, with the Others, who are not undead but a sort of ice elf.

to me this indicates culture and intelligence that may be radically different from humanity but is intelligent none the less
 
Brienne is an oafish and incompetent "knight" who barely manages to survive her encounters by being better armored than her foes
One exception though: Brienne wins Renly's tournament and becomes part of his king's guard. Of all the female warriors, her and Asha are the strongest I'd say, even though Asha is mainly a raider, so beating up unarmed fisherfolk to steal their meager wealth isn't exactly the stuff of legends.
Brienne is a fairly decent warrior and she does manage to stand her ground on a couple of occasions.

What happens in the books is very different.
Indeed, the female "warriors" are even less impressive in the books.

But even then the subverted expectation in GoT isn't as good as people make it out to be, killing Ned Stark was dumb as shit move that was retconned to be done on the spur of the moment by Geoffrey, making it's only logical sense is that a little bitch tyrant will act like a little bitch.
Both in the book and the show, Littlefinger put that flea into Geoffrey's ear to advance his own petty schemes. Partially, I assume, he did so to get Ed out of the picture so he can either get into Catelyn's or Sansa's pants. Or both I dunno.

The red wedding was also a retarded move, when you have a war for legitimacy, ending it by going against one of the most sacred rules of your culture will guarantee you'll never be seen as legitimate
The disgrace lies entirely with the Freys though, the Lannisters come out clean as fresh snow. All that happened, was a guy known for being a dickwad, committed a rather substantial and fucked up misdeed, but since no one really respects the old fuck and his filthy family of bridge toll collectors, neither Walder Frey nor Tywin could give less of a shit. Rob was killed and his rebellion stomped out in a way that will tell everyone not to fuck with the Lannisters in no uncertain terms and it fits into the "Rains of Castamere" kind of symbolism that Tywin has been fond of in the past.
In that regard, I think that move was really smart, albeit a severe break of etiquette.
Tywin never beat Rob in a field battle and right before the Red Wedding, Rob had been burning his way through Lannister lands if my memory serves me correctly... his wife was from a family who were lieges of the Lannisters, after all. Tywin got rid of that pesky rebellion, installed a new lord in the Riverlands and he did so at a bargain without risking even just one of his own soldiers in one fell swoop. For all of GoT's wrongs, the scene where Tywin talks to Tyrion on this matter is rather well executed and highlights this rather well.
This would by no means impede the legitimacy of Geoffrey in any way whatsoever either. It just put a traitor to the sword and if there are any qualms about the ethics of killing someone during a wedding, the Head Sept can easily hand out absolution to the sinner.
I mean, Robert the Bruce killed John Comyn in a chapel and he was absolved by the bishop of Glasgow.

mentions having a language which sounds like lake ice breaking.

during their encounter with the Royce ranger they fear him at first before easily defeating him, and the. laughing and taunting him.

they practice the religious capture of human children and sacrifice.

they wield arms and armour and use tactics to defeat men.

the Night King had a sexual relationship with an Other.

you might be confusing the Wights , their undead slaves, with the Others, who are not undead but a sort of ice elf.

to me this indicates culture and intelligence that may be radically different from humanity but is intelligent none the less
Seems to me you're reading way too much into them using weapons and extrapolating from there that this is going to go down a route that has never been hinted at even by the smallest of margins. They are cunning but that doesn't mean they have a culture.
Calling them mindless might have been a bit of an overstatement on my behalf, but I think you're reading a culture into them where I see none and interpret that to mean that there is going to be some sort of "Jon Snow will hug the Night King and all will be well"-hippy-message that I just can't see happen at all. Ie: You interpret something in what I think is a faulty way and use that to extrapolate a really questionable conclusion to a story that did exactly nothing to as much as vaguely hint that outcome might even be on the menu.
The Other so far have not shown any willingness to communicate with anyone or have shown off any goal other than killing all humans. So where is that "everyone will let bygones be bygones and love will unite them" supposedly going to be based on?

Also, the foundation for that Night King/Other relationship is a legend in a setting where legends are notoriously vague, filled with errors or even just complete fabrications.
 
FINISH WHAT YOU STARTED GEORGE GODDAMN

The fact that this obese buffoon entertained comparisons as the American Tolkien is fucking embarrassing. At least Tolkien finished his main work before indulging in the meandering worldbuilding material in the Silmarillion. This fucker is finding every excuse he can to work on things besides A Song of Ice and Fire.
I'm just thankful that people stopped calling the fat hack that or saying that he would surpass Tolkien and would go down in history as the greatest writer of all time. JFC.

 
I'm just thankful that people stopped calling the fat hack that or saying that he would surpass Tolkien and would go down in history as the greatest writer of all time. JFC.

View attachment 1997377
It's just so goddamn depressing. ASOIAF is a terrific book series with only a handful of flaws here and there, and Martin doesn't seem to have any intention of even trying to finish it. The staggeringly awful Game of Thrones Seasons 6-8 are going to be the "canon" ending. I know this is going to make me sound like an asshole, but the worst part is that he has no children. So it's not like there's a son who will be able to cobble together his drafts and publish them, the way Tolkien's son did with the Silmarillion. Once he drops dead (which is probably any day now, since he's an obese man in his 70s), that's it. A great story, almost 30 years in the making, gone. And all we have to fill in the blanks is a rushed, shitty job by two hacks who had their eyes on the next Star Wars trilogy (which thank God they won't get).
 
I feel really bad for the fans who have been here since the 90's. I fully believe that after all of the time and the money that the fans have invested in this story, they are entirely owed a satisfying ending. I'll even unironically say that the fans are ENTITLED to an ending.

My gut tells me that Season 8 of GoT was much closer to George's plan than he cares to admit. It's either that, or he doesn't have a fucking clue on how to end it.

At the end of the day, George R. R. Martin is a fat asshole and a hack. A Song of Ice and Fire has shaped up to being nothing more than a gigantic waste of time. Its legacy is already just a fart in the wind because of how disastrous the final few seasons of GoT are.
 
Brienne of Tarth and Asha Greyjoy are like the only female fighters worth a damn in the entire book series and Brienne is mocked or pitied by literally everyone she's ever met for being a female warrior - including Catelyn Stark who takes her into her service. The Sand Snake sisters amount to neither jack nor shit in the books iirc. I wouldn't call 2 characters, one of which is treated like a joke by everyone, a heavy prevalence.
Also, female warriors (both historical and as literary figures) have been around for thousands of years. Atalanta, Boudica, Joan of Arc and Tomoe Gozen, just to name a few.
The thing about women warriors is that it's hard to differentiate between women who fought in the field with weapons and women who were camp followers/support staff. Both would qualify as warriors in my estimation, just like there are many soldiers in the world today who never fire a weapon in their entire period of service.

As for GRRM, the success and money that came his way because of his book and TV series might have led to him becoming lazy and disinterested or intimidated by the pressure of finishing a massive media franchise with thousands of characters and loose ends. It's also possible that he just ran out of steam. Sometimes authors only have a few good books in them, then their talent sputters out. (For an example, see everything Rowling has written after Harry Potter.)
 
Back