Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Just saw this comment chain on r/transgender_surgeries. It's definitely not trans folk responsibility for coddling another trans person in their safe space community made for trans people. After all it's the straights/gays/TERFs bigots responsibility for coddling and making trans people feel accepted by being forced to suck on their girldicks, eat out their stinkditches, or being prodded by a flesh tube.


View attachment 1997274
Never question the stinkditch. If you're unhappy with the surgery just quietly go kill yourself. You wouldn't want to upset the other troons, would you? It really must be a full-time job for them to guard their nasty house of cards.
 
Bizarre how queers are all for abolishing government until it comes to the government involving itself in the private lives of citizens they hate - then government is good and has the best interests of the little guy at heart.

Similar to how many are whiny anti-business and anti-capitalists, until someone says they don’t want to date troons and then they’re celebrating the rights of a private business to do whatever they please. One minute they’re suing a bakery for not baking a cake, and then the next minute they’re supporting Twitter because “it’s a private platform, they can serve whoever they want.”
 
I think the transgender lobby is pretty powerful, and I think they are sinister and know exactly what they are doing. I think its a deliberate push by perverted rich white men, to corrupt and confuse the narrative about equality and feminism. It feels like an undercover men's rights movement. Like how a cuckoo lays its egg in another bird's nest. Women supporting this shit don't realise the tranny chick kicked out all the real women's causes and they're just left supporting the tranny
I think you're nuts and don't understand progressive narratives or ideologie if you think this is even remotely true. Trans "rights" is just the current crusade along with black "liberation". The whole narrative structure of progressive ideologie necessitates a collective view point of the oppressed minority vs society/white collective.

Once upon a time women and racial minorities had some legitimate gripes, but instead of tackling them from an individualist standpoint they went about it via collectivist means. They even got these ideas enshrined in law. Of course once people saw how effective collectivist talking points could be paired with the victim narrative the cat was out of the bag.

It doesn't really matter where you personally draw the line with this stuff because it's going to keep marching forward until it destroys itself or society. You don't get to start a line of logic then end it when you personally feel its reached its conclusion, if there are still further jumps to be made someone is going to do it and you're just a long for the ride.

People have been predicting where we're at for years because it's so obvious how these ideas progress and manifest themselves. Gays are crying out that they shouldn't be associated with trannies, but they used the same tools to get their way. They've just fallen by the way side because they no longer have a legitimate argument for any type of "oppression". You might come back and argue neither do trannies, but in the progressives eyes they're just the most oppressed class yet.

Wokes who say we've gone too far and just need to take a step back fail to see how their movement even functions. Even if trannies are successfully stopped and course is reversed, if people hang on to this horrible way of thinking we're just going to end up where we are now with another group. Even if there are a bunch of "rich white men" (the left's jews lmao) funding the trans movement they're the same people funding and donating to a slew of other progressive causes.
 
saveas.PNG

Well, maybe I have symptat....oh wait this is another grift
 
Wait, when did Abighoul say "transwomen aren't women is like saying black women aren't women!". This is even too retarded for his niveau. The black before woman describes your ethnicity/race which is a product of biology and culture. Even if you're so racist and claim that "all black women look like men!" you should be intelligent enough to know that biologically black women are biological women.
I found this on his tumblr https://realphilosophytube.tumblr.c...-do-you-and-other-trans-rights-activists-feel

Its like a wordier way to say "since black woman are woman men can be too!!!" which just feels hilarious coming from a british tranny.

View attachment 1997831
Well, maybe I have symptat....oh wait this is another grift

How the fuck are hormones adequate care, since the penis is female why aren't your testosterone levels female too, jamie? Philosophy troon said the same thing, that tranmen getting the tit chop is life saving, You got a boi puss whats wrongs with boy tits aiden?
 
I think you're nuts and don't understand progressive narratives or ideologie if you think this is even remotely true. Trans "rights" is just the current crusade along with black "liberation". The whole narrative structure of progressive ideologie necessitates a collective view point of the oppressed minority vs society/white collective.

Once upon a time women and racial minorities had some legitimate gripes, but instead of tackling them from an individualist standpoint they went about it via collectivist means. They even got these ideas enshrined in law. Of course once people saw how effective collectivist talking points could be paired with the victim narrative the cat was out of the bag.

How could black people or women advance any of their causes via "an individual standpoint"? Do you think every single black person or woman should have previously fought only against his or her own personal racist or sexist experiences, and ignored everyone else's? What a weird idea and they'd all still be slaves/unable to vote or own property in that case.

But nice of you to concede they had "some legitimate gripes".

Don't lump the current tranny idiocy in with the real actual issues that black people and women have historically faced. Trannies are not persecuted or discriminated against except by reason of the stupid things they have deliberately caused to happen to themselves. If a mentally ill dude puts on a wig and a dress and doesn't get the job interview, or a depressed girl gets her tits chopped off and then gay men won't date her, it is in no way synonymous to a black man being shot by police for being black, or a woman being raped by a gang of men on a bus because she's a woman. For just 2 simplified examples.
 
Wait, when did Abighoul say "transwomen aren't women is like saying black women aren't women!". This is even too retarded for his niveau. The black before woman describes your ethnicity/race which is a product of biology and culture. Even if you're so racist and claim that "all black women look like men!" you should be intelligent enough to know that biologically black women are biological women.
I found this on his tumblr https://realphilosophytube.tumblr.c...-do-you-and-other-trans-rights-activists-feel

Its like a wordier way to say "since black woman are woman men can be too!!!" which just feels hilarious coming from a british tranny.
There's also this tweet. He may not have said it word-for-word, but it's an uncommon argument I see from trans activists, and PhilosophyTube was the first big name I know of who had the balls (heh) to self-drag and post that like it's a good take. He must've realized how racist it sounds afterward since it was deleted, lol...
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    72.1 KB · Views: 271
How the fuck are hormones adequate care, since the penis is female why aren't your testosterone levels female too, jamie?
Something something trans "women" have birth defects that's why their balls produce testosterone blah blah blah

Troons always come up with insane & biological impossible explanations
 
He's got a Youtube channel as well.

Here he is without makeup.
View attachment 1997931
He went to the butcher Dr. Bart Van De ven. This guy is terrible. Total pretentious twink before all this, and an even more insufferable troon afterward. It's amazing what fags will go through to secure that straight dick.
 
Unsupported random theory: Anime attracts mentally ill people. I have no solid proof of it, but it checks out with my personal experiences. Because it seems all troons love the cute desu anime, and other mentally ill shits like it too.
It is the bimbofication. Troons and other maladjusted males favor the kind of anime that feature high-pitched, clumsy girls with infantile faces, huge tits, and cat ears that complement their dependent demeanor befitting a house pet.
 
Last edited:
I found this on his tumblr https://realphilosophytube.tumblr.c...-do-you-and-other-trans-rights-activists-feel

Its like a wordier way to say "since black woman are woman men can be too!!!" which just feels hilarious coming from a british tranny.
Cant remember if I said it in this thread or another but they always use this excuse as to why they should be viewed as women and its just telling that in reality they view black women as being manly. Most online "terfs" are, as they put, WOC and are called transphobic for speaking about sex based violence in their countries and communities.

And the biggest fucking irony is that most transwomen are straight white men (I read somewhere they make up 83% of the transwoman population). For all the screetching they do about how "straight white cisgender men" are the greatest evil these troons manage to be the most whiniest, entitled sociopaths who threaten everyone with violence online but insist its everyone elses fault for not seeing them as the delicate little oppressed flowers they are. There's certainly some projection going on there.
 
This guy is terrible.
Who, the Troon or the Dr? :smug:
He went to the butcher Dr. Bart Van De ven.
First items that come up in the search suggestions is Bart Van de Ven botched. Reddit bubbles up with unhappy customers.
From Chad Chin to Slow Joe
1615784364917.png
(:_( Hearsay, but claims are he ignores patients requests on their own surgery.
1615784394964.png
"He shouted at me when I mentioned to him I'm not happy with the result. He also said his work on me is a "miracle" and "godsend" and I should be thankful for it. I think NOT, as my nerves are damaged and he TOOK so much bones off my jaw WITHOUT my CONSENT instead of just a little on the chin alone."

I have to do some digging, but I remember this Doc commenting on a review website of ones of his patients voicing his displeasure and he was actually revealing details on what he did.

EDIT: Found it, someone posted it on reddit. Trying to find the website I saw it on.

1615783887252.png
Also in the thread it circles round back to bitching about Kathy Rumer "the Butch of Ardmore" :story: :story:
 
Last edited:
There's this bananas channel called Transvestigation where a batshit crazy guy who talks in a creepy whisper for some reason is claiming all the Hollywood actresses are trans.
By pointing out the tiny "masculine gives" in the most beautiful women in the world like Jessica Alba, Olivia Wilde, Julia Roberts, Eva Mendes etc, he's validating all the actual trannies out there. Its beyond retarded to think women who've had children could actually be born men, and I can't help think that deluded MTFs watch this guy and think "see, Taylor Swift has masculine features, therefore my brow ridge, huge shoulders and chad chin must pass fine"

Anyways here's one of his videos if you want to feel stupider

 
Who, the Troon or the Dr? :smug:

First items that come up in the search suggestions is Bart Van de Ven botched. Reddit bubbles up with unhappy customers.
From Chad Chin to Slow Joe
View attachment 1998172
(:_( Hearsay, but claims are he ignores patients requests on their own surgery.
View attachment 1998174
"He shouted at me when I mentioned to him I'm not happy with the result. He also said his work on me is a "miracle" and "godsend" and I should be thankful for it. I think NOT, as my nerves are damaged and he TOOK so much bones off my jaw WITHOUT my CONSENT instead of just a little on the chin alone."

I have to do some digging, but I remember this Doc commenting on a review website of ones of his patients voicing his displeasure and he was actually revealing details on what he did.

EDIT: Found it, someone posted it on reddit. Trying to find the website I saw it on.

View attachment 1998159
Also in the thread it circles round back to bitching about Kathy Rumer "the Butch of Ardmore" :story: :story:
Look at what he did to "Kellie" Maloney.
LINK
1615791678438.png
 
Last edited:
BIID is basically just an analogue of AGP. And, exactly like in AGPs it is not a real, singular condition, but a product of interactions between social factors and (usually) more generally abnormal behavior.

In fact, it's actually startling how similar they are. To start with you commonly see the same pattern of other-directed sexual attraction which combines with or leads to self-directed attraction. So, in AGPs this would be jacking off to tranny porn then progressively coming to self-insert as the tranny while in BIID, it's arousal by amputees/amputation to arousal of being/becoming an amputee. This then graduates into an obsession that metastasizes into the subject's non-sexual fantasies and eventually they develop a powerful affective association with the mere concept of being a woman/amputee.

And just like in troons, this confounds researchers who recognize the obviously sexual element, but also observe that it evidently isn't purely sexual. Also, just like in troons some researchers postulate elegant "not a mental illness" brain-related etiologies, but fail to turn up any real evidence beyond some vague non-specific associations here and there. In BIID this is even more true since you don't have the confounding from HSTS's or from HRT. There is a view that it has something to do with right parietal lobe (the sensory homunculus), but the evidence is weak and what does exist is probably just a case of fMRI studies not being very reliable. My bet is that even if statistical differences in right parietal lobe grey matter (causal relevance of which would still be less than certain) is reliably replicable it's probably just because BIID patients are generally unusual for other reasons.

To really drive home just how much these are essentially the same phenomenon: BIID probably has the same comorbidity associations. Firstly, they have lots of paraphilias (pedophilia, transvestism or other fetishism):
View attachment 1996059
As an aside note how many of them had exposure to amputees; being exposed to amputees is apparently a major risk factor, which again you would expect since where else would they get the idea from? This all seems very familiar:
View attachment 1996061
Additionally, a huge fraction of them also are troons or want to be troons, at least:
View attachment 1996062
It seems likely that they are more often psychotic. There is also a tentative association with personality disorders:
View attachment 1996063
No clear evidence of any association with obsessive-compulsive tendencies, but small literature and it can still be noted that in specific case studies patients are described as having an obsessive-compulsive relationship with amputation etc., which is basically what you see in troons as well except in connection to gender. I would bet that a thorough investigation would turn up some at least weak association.

Interestingly enough, I'm not aware of any association with autism in the literature. A PubMed search turns up no hits for any combination of BIID and autism or ASD. However, there is BIID sub-reddit (naturally) and they are apparently very autistic:
View attachment 1996064
Note also the "more likely to be gender diverse" thrown in there as well. I would also suspect that there is a association with autistic-ness more generally which would extend into the sub-clinical range.

Also there is - and I'm not shitting you on this - a kind of overlap with diaper fetishism where the individual wants to be rendered incontinent e.g. by having their spinal cord severed.

In conclusion, AGP-driven troonism is of the same family of psychological disorders as BIID; two different variants of identity-based coomsumption.


I broadly agree, but I'd more strongly emphasis the influence of post-pubertal social failure. This isn't really related to over-protective parenting or anything, but rather to the underlying psychological abnormalities present in a lot of troons. Autism or at least spergy tendencies loom large here. For a lot of autists, the end of childhood proper is difficult; they struggle with forming or even understanding romantic and sexual relationships, they often get bullied for making faux pas and bullying in general increases massively at around the same time. At the same time, making friends often becomes harder and they may become more conscious of their failure in this area. Further to this, the transition to secondary school denies them the ability to bond with younger kids which in my experience seems to be a very common coping mechanism for autists who struggle to make friends.

All of these factors, and particularly that last one can could drive a young autist to strongly idealize and want to return to their elementary school years when everything was better. Moreover, following from that last point you can very easily see how pedophilic tendencies could easily develop; feeling rejected or unable to associate with age-peers, they can easily look back at that say 4th grader who they played with when they were in 6th grade. And, like all romantic/sexual attractions that manifest at this stage, once they get into the brain, they don't tend to get out all that easily.

This story also explains why the phenomenon has both sexual and non-sexual components. I feel as though the diaper sort of stuff could be roughly analogous, just taken a few steps further. There may also be some abnormal sensory processing related stuff involved as well and there is something generally abnormal about autistic sexual development.
I have to disagree with you there, amputees really aren't that widely sexualized and even if they were it's a category that can mostly only exist in the form of erotic drawings or a few photoshopped images. I think I've only unintentionally seen anything even related to amputee porn a handful of times in my life.

I think that BIID is a genuine mental illness, akin to the actually dysphoric trannies. It's not an uncommon symptom of various psychoses that someone believes that some part of their body is fundamentally wrong. I've mentioned before that about a fifth of schizophrenics report gender dysphoria at some point in their lives, but I'd imagine that if the idea of, for example, having your right and left eyes switched was as culturally prevalent as the idea of switching gender roles (even before modern troonery there have been plenty of gender swap/crossdressing/subversions of accepted gender role stories in many cultures, possibly because of AGP/AAP) then we'd see plenty of eyeball dysphoria in these patients too.

And maybe some alleged BIID sufferers are just amputation fetishists, but if so I'm sure that that's mostly an extension of hardcore BDSM practitioners and I'd think (admittedly, I don't have hard data here) that anyone who seriously wants to be an amputee for fetish reasons would first work their way up through all the other BDSM body-mods/lifestyle things and would have long since moved past the need to be coy about their reasons for wanting to be a daruma.

Look at what he did to "Kellie" Maloney.
LINK
View attachment 1998369

Jesus, he looks like a harlequin baby
 
Back