Lolcow Leonard F. Shaner Jr. - Autistic Pedophile / Foamer / Shitlord

Do you prefer Shaner to get permabanned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 63 36.6%
  • No

    Votes: 109 63.4%

  • Total voters
    172
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is gonna get locked because of ween fuckery, and then Len will take credit for it as if it's a victory. Calling it now.

If you don't want Len to be smug, then stop trying to impersonate him. Null will come down on this thread with righteous and furious anger.

Facebook said they reviewed the "Can Colebrookdale be trusted?" and it didn't break their rules, but they're still pending for the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one and I can't see how that will slide past the regulations too. Time will tell.

Welp, the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one didn't violate their community standards either. That's actually surprising. You can make pages blatantly harassing someone, even with their picture fully shown, and that's totally cool? But Facebook shat themselves over me having a middle name that wasn't my actual one? Priorities...

Edit: These four comments got compressed into one, I guess that's a hint from the moderators to stop shitposting so heavily. Lmao. Sorry guys.
 
Last edited:
Welp, the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one didn't violate their community standards either. That's actually surprising. You can make pages blatantly harassing someone, even with their picture fully shown, and that's totally cool? But Facebook shat themselves over me having a middle name that wasn't my actual one? Priorities...

That's because your real name leads to all kinds of interesting data, and so does being a raging asshat. In fact, raging asshats are really easy to run sentiment analysis on.
 
Facebook said they reviewed the "Can Colebrookdale be trusted?" and it didn't break their rules, but they're still pending for the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one and I can't see how that will slide past the regulations too. Time will tell.

Welp, the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one didn't violate their community standards either. That's actually surprising. You can make pages blatantly harassing someone, even with their picture fully shown, and that's totally cool? But Facebook shat themselves over me having a middle name that wasn't my actual one? Priorities...

I got the same result, sadly.

2ac3694700bddd03fb045799a8816eda.png
 
That's because your real name leads to all kinds of interesting data, and so does being a raging asshat. In fact, raging asshats are really easy to run sentiment analysis on.

I'm actually still really baffled as to how they knew the middle name wasn't mine; it wasn't a weird one or anything, it was a completely normal and quite common middle name, but it went well with my first name as a kind of non-obvious pun that sounded like a particular comic book character I like. So it was (common first name) (common middle name that isn't mine) (last name), and they knew it wasn't the real one though?

I'm guessing some asshat must have reported it, but honestly, it wasn't a super obvious pun and it was just a personal in-joke really, yet Facebook knew? Some 1984 shit going on here.
 
Facebook said they reviewed the "Can Colebrookdale be trusted?" and it didn't break their rules, but they're still pending for the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one and I can't see how that will slide past the regulations too. Time will tell.

Welp, the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one didn't violate their community standards either. That's actually surprising. You can make pages blatantly harassing someone, even with their picture fully shown, and that's totally cool? But Facebook shat themselves over me having a middle name that wasn't my actual one? Priorities...

I got the same result, sadly.

2ac3694700bddd03fb045799a8816eda.png
Yeah, same result for me, too. I'm surprised Len hasn't popped by to RAEG at us yet.
 
I'm actually still really baffled as to how they knew the middle name wasn't mine; it wasn't a weird one or anything, it was a completely normal and quite common middle name, but it went well with my first name as a kind of non-obvious pun that sounded like a particular comic book character I like. So it was (common first name) (common middle name that isn't mine) (last name), and they knew it wasn't the real one though?

I'm guessing some asshat must have reported it, but honestly, it wasn't a super obvious pun and it was just a personal in-joke really, yet Facebook knew? Some 1984 shit going on here.
Probably someone with a grudge. Every now and then they run a huge inference engine over all your interactions and see if anything linguistically matches a mention of names which is then passed on to The Fun Police™, but that method is pretty bork: I got false positived with my real name.
 
Yeah, same result for me, too. I'm surprised Len hasn't popped by to RAEG at us yet.

At least we tried, I guess. We have a track record of trying to do the right thing by the people Len doxxes, which might not account for much but it still establishes us as people who have a certain ethical code. Same with how we weren't cool with him attacking someone's wife randomly. There is a quite strong sentiment on this forum of justice and what is "deserved", which is really interesting to see in action. And we're pretty much always unanimous on it, apart from when it might stem the milk flow, that's when some people might speak up against.

Probably someone with a grudge. Every now and then they run a huge inference engine over all your interactions and see if anything linguistically matches a mention of names which is then passed on to The Fun Police™, but that method is pretty bork: I got false positived with my real name.

Ick. Sorry Snowden, I know you tried to warn us that Facebook is skeevy af and that we shouldn't use it, but damn it, it's so convenient (:_(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welp, the "Can (person's name) be trusted?" one didn't violate their community standards either. That's actually surprising. You can make pages blatantly harassing someone, even with their picture fully shown, and that's totally cool? But Facebook shat themselves over me having a middle name that wasn't my actual one? Priorities...

This is what you get when your frontline support people are about as dumb as Len himself.
 
Facebook has really strange rules about what's considered bad and good. It allows you to criticize as long as you don't harass and this is what keeps a lot of Shaner's hate pages from being taken down even though I'm sure they are getting reported like crazy. So if you made a page saying something like "Leonard F. Shaner Jr.: Train Obsessed Pedophile" he could take it down as harassment but if you played his game and made a page called "Can The Owner Of Journey Back In Time Productions Be Trusted?" then it's probably fine as long as you don't go too nuts with your posts.

However, with proper manipulation, Shaner broke the rules and that's why I was able to report his post on the Dangerous page and get it taken down. This combined with other posts being nuked and the metric crap ton of people reporting this page put it under greater scrutiny by FB. It's getting reviewed right now so it's offline for now.

Tldr: My Facebook district manager is better than Shaner's.
 
This is what you get when your frontline support people are about as dumb as Len himself.
Actually, they're a bunch of underpaid "Content Analysts" in the developing world.

Facebook has really strange rules about what's considered bad and good. It allows you to criticize as long as you don't harass and this is what keeps a lot of Shaner's hate pages from being taken down even though I'm sure they are getting reported like crazy. So if you made a page saying something like "Leonard F. Shaner Jr.: Train Obsessed Pedophile" he could take it down as harassment but if you played his game and made a page called "Can The Owner Of Journey Back In Time Productions Be Trusted?" then it's probably fine as long as you don't go too nuts with your posts.

However, with proper manipulation, Shaner broke the rules and that's why I was able to report his post on the Dangerous page and get it taken down. This combined with other posts being nuked and the metric crap ton of people reporting this page put it under greater scrutiny by FB. It's getting reviewed right now so it's offline for now.

Tldr: My Facebook district manager is better than Shaner's.
The trick to remember is facebook doesn't give a shit and just wants more data. The only reason they take anything down is if it's a legal liability.
 
Len doesn't bother attempting to "intimidate" me anymore because I respond to all of his messages with "HAHAHA WEIRDO YOU LIKE TO SHIT IN DIAPERS DONT YOU YOU BIG FAT BABY."

That's basically what I'd recommend all of you do going forward. Len is devoid of any understanding of either wit or logic. A lot of you respond to his doxxing threats by trying to come up with a thought out and clever response. The problem with doing that is Len doesn't understand even the tiniest point of your argument and will just interpret your long elaborate explanation as proof that he is getting in your head and making you scared. Next time he attempts to intimidate you, just remind him that he likes to shit in diapers.
 
Len doesn't bother attempting to "intimidate" me anymore because I respond to all of his messages with "HAHAHA WEIRDO YOU LIKE TO SHIT IN DIAPERS DONT YOU YOU BIG FAT BABY."

That's basically what I'd recommend all of you do going forward. A lot of you respond to his doxxing threats by trying to come up with a thought out and clever response. The problem with doing that is Len doesn't understand even the tiniest point of your argument and will just interpret your long elaborate explanation as proof that he is getting in your head and making you scared. Next time he attempts to intimidate you, just tell him that he likes to shit in diapers.
I feel like I'm missing out on something, I have no messages from Mr Ploppy.
 
That's basically what I'd recommend all of you do going forward. Len is devoid of any understanding of either wit or logic. A lot of you respond to his doxxing threats by trying to come up with a thought out and clever response.

If I bother with any response to Len more complicated than HA HA YOU GAY POOPY PANTS, it's not for his benefit.
 
I always wondered why the Shaner page was barely ever featured. I guess the mods feature threads based on their opinion instead of popularity or what the community thinks in general.
 
Sigh... more Shaner fuckery for you all this evening...

@Kirby that's good advice. New plan going forward, thank you.:semperfidelis:

View attachment 38438 View attachment 38439

HAHAHAHA HE COPIED US FROM WHEN WE ALL MADE JOKES ABOUT BUBBA.

Literally all his insults and threats are shit we've already thrown at him (Bubba, IP address being the same, you're fat, you're in trouble with the law, etc).

Jokes on him, "Bubba" wasn't a metaphor, we actually know a guy there, Len. He's waiting for you.
 
I always wondered why the Shaner page was barely ever featured. I guess the mods feature threads based on their opinion instead of popularity or what the community thinks in general.
My second thread on him was briefly featured. You're usually not gonna see threads get featured more than once unless some huge update happens and a mod feels that it's important enough to make it that way. Cartoonfreak666's was featured once even when Cartoonfreak himself came over here to argue with everyone.

Hey Len. I hear you were still looking for the Kiwi Farms. Well someone found it for you.

a_little_sport_before_dying_by_thekirbykrisis-d925izf.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My second thread on him was briefly featured. You're usually not gonna see threads get featured more than once unless some huge update happens and a mod feels that it's important enough to make it that way. Cartoonfreak666's was featured once even when Cartoonfreak himself came over here to argue with everyone.
I like to regularly check Kiwi Farms for a short bit when I'm doing other things, so I get a good idea of how long threads are featured. The Shaner threads were featured for a much shorter time than all the other threads that were featured. At least that's what I saw.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: melty
I like to regularly check Kiwi Farms for a short bit when I'm doing other things, so I get a good idea of how long threads are featured. The Shaner threads were featured for a much shorter time than all the other threads that were featured. At least that's what I saw.
Probably because it exploded almost immediately as soon as Lennay got butt mad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back