Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[jje100010001]

But what happened? People did not revolt against the government in first world capitalist's countries. Why? Why didn't they revolt, but the poor people in Russia did? It was because of the middle class system. You see, when people are able to make a decent living to provide their families food, clothes and the essentials, they are not going to complain about the system. Cause the system works, why change it. The reason Communist took off in Russia was because majority of the people were poor. It was unfortunate that Pyotr Stolypin was assassinated in 1911. He stated that he'll be able to turn Russia into a prosperous nation in 20 years. And he might of, had he lived. But again people revolted cause they were poor and they believed that the current government was the problem.

The End results was, people were still poor. The Bolshevik revolt didn't make things any better. Which is why World War 2 happened. Because a bunch of socialist leaders, Hitler, Mussolini and FDR wanted to rebuild the world. FDR praised Hitler and what he was doing in Germany. It was the reason why he didn't go to war against Hitler in 1939. If you read history you'd know that when Hitler and Russia invaded Poland, people wanted to go to war in the US. But the government were divided on that issue and FDR didn't want to fight against Germany. We only got involved in WW2 because of Japan.

Imperial Russia was essentially a two-speed economy, with standards comparable to France in the cities, and near-subsidence lifestyles in the countryside. In the effort to level the two, some people theorize that around 75% of the wealth & potential GDP of Imperial Russia, and half its human potential was destroyed during the 20s-30s by the Bolsheviks.

Not redistributed, straight up destroyed, whether intentionally or unintentionally.

Same in China, Cambodia (among other communist states), and now Venezuela as the newest victim. Fundamentally, communists and socialists have never solved the human aspect of their theoretical utopias- the theory starts to fall apart beyond the village level and has always resulted in hybrid systems or totalitarianism.

 

[Ilmseil]

The takeaway I'm getting from all this faggy shit is that communists need to be dragged out and shot

 

[Captain Syrup]

The New Deal policies worked in spite of the economy at the time, the economy soaring during that era was not because of the new deal.

FDR was a mental cripple as well as a physical one.

And Reagan's brain was Cream-of-Wheat. What's your point?

Then as now, there was immense pushback against Keynes. The prevailing sentiment was (and still is) Mellonism, or boom-and-bust: Let the weak die off and leave the spoils to the fit. The ass-hats who crash the world economy are bailed out, and get even bigger.

Roosevelt's staunchest allies turned against him, like Father Coughlin. Not because he took his foot off the gas too early. (He did.) They viewed him as having as much credibility as Trotsky, and having a similar political philosophy, as well.

Flash forward sixty years. Clinton allows the Reagan tax cuts to expire. You can trace Limbaugh (and pretty much the entire talk radio apparatus) to that.

And who was Rush's sugar daddy? Richard Mellon-Schaife. Nothing has changed. They are still prone to "reds under the bed"-type thinking. Unless someone has taken the time to learn about macro-economics, those lies can't be dismantled.

 

[Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER]

The takeaway I'm getting from all this faggy shit is that communists need to be dragged out and shot

The take away is that people need to ask our politicians the questions that needs to be asked.

https://theconversation.com/7-5-bil...rican standard of living.&text=Water is vital.

If you read that article according to Worldwatch Institute the Earth can only support 1.5 billion people. We are close to 8 billion. which leads to the question that everyone should be asking. How are we going to bring the population of the Earth down to 1.5 billion, if that is considered the optimal solution to quote on quote "save the earth?"

That is the question that we need to be asking cause, if everyone right now stop having children only about 60 million people will die off naturally a year. So if we need to get to 1.5 billion, it'll take about 16.66666666667 years for 1 billion people to die off naturally. which means that it'll take roughly around 90-96 years for us to get to 1.5 billion population. However, young people will need to have some children born between now and the year we get to 1.5 billion. So, I am going to add an extra 15 years for the world to reach that goal, just to be safe. Or at least so that there are at least people alive during their child-baring age. So roughly, it'll take about 105-111 years for us to naturally get to that point.

However, with the Great Reset/New World Order and Agenda 2030, by 2030 our world leaders wants us to be at 1.5 billion, if not at exactly 1 billion. Which means that roughly more than 500,000,000 million people will have to die every year for the next 10 years. Mass genocide on a global scale would have to take place, and then birth control would be implemented to keep the human population down below 1.5 billion. Which means lost of the basic human rights of marrying and having children. Cause the government will be in charge of how many kids you can have and possibly with whom.

Not only that, but we'll be forced to stop eating meat cause it'll be too damn expensive, and we'll be malnourished and weak to fight back against the government or New World Order I should say. Things out of sci-fi post-apocalyptical movies like Equilibrium, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 will come to reality. And this is scary to think about but we have reached the point where what's considered an improvability is now a reality.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

The take away is that people need to ask our politicians the questions that needs to be asked.

https://theconversation.com/7-5-billion-and-counting-how-many-humans-can-the-earth-support-98797#:~:text=The average American uses about,an American standard of living.&text=Water is vital.

If you read that article according to Worldwatch Institute the Earth can only support 1.5 billion people. We are close to 8 billion. which leads to the question that everyone should be asking. How are we going to bring the population of the Earth down to 1.5 billion, if that is considered the optimal solution to quote on quote "save the earth?"

That is the question that we need to be asking cause, if everyone right now stop having children only about 60 million people will die off naturally a year. So if we need to get to 1.5 billion, it'll take about 16.66666666667 years for 1 billion people to die off naturally. which means that it'll take roughly around 90-96 years for us to get to 1.5 billion population. However, young people will need to have some children born between now and the year we get to 1.5 billion. So, I am going to add an extra 15 years for the world to reach that goal, just to be safe. Or at least so that there are at least people alive during their child-baring age. So roughly, it'll take about 105-111 years for us to naturally get to that point.

However, with the Great Reset/New World Order and Agenda 2030, by 2030 our world leaders wants us to be at 1.5 billion, if not at exactly 1 billion. Which means that roughly more than 500,000,000 million people will have to die every year for the next 10 years. Mass genocide on a global scale would have to take place, and then birth control would be implemented to keep the human population down below 1.5 billion. Which means lost of the basic human rights of marrying and having children. Cause the government will be in charge of how many kids you can have and possibly with whom.

Not only that, but we'll be forced to stop eating meat cause it'll be too damn expensive, and we'll be malnourished and weak to fight back against the government or New World Order I should say. Things out of sci-fi post-apocalyptical movies like Equilibrium, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 will come to reality. And this is scary to think about but we have reached the point where what's considered an improvability is now a reality.

If we said then Africa should stop having children, we'll hear lots of folks shouting "that's racist".

 

[Captain Syrup]

Not only that, but we'll be forced to stop eating meat and we'll be malnourished and weak to fight back against the government or New World Order I should say.

And there it is.

Look, I've got relatives who are pushing this "Great Reset" nonsense. That something could happen automatically means it does.

I don't doubt your sincerity. Just reexamine your claims for a moment. The World Economic Forum is chaired by people like Tony Blair, who arguably despises the left even more than conservatives do. A one-world government is the farthest thing from these folks' minds, trust me. I mean, just read their literature. They think they're the thin, blue line between us and Mao.

 

[X Prime]

View attachment 2004860

This guy's tweets are protected, and his banner looks suspiciously furry.

Wonder why?

 

[Ilmseil]

lol, just like with climate change, only the west and wypipo are actually expected to "stop having children", only the west and white people countries are expected to be "carbon neutral", China and India are totally given a pass. Daring to bring this up is racism.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

This guy's tweets are protected, and his banner looks suspiciously furry.

Wonder why?


View attachment 2005470

He's a former Navy furry?

I'll bet he can build you a flow chart of how dicks taste and how to tell who that dick had been in prior to his mouth.

 

[Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER]

And there it is.

Look, I've got relatives who are pushing this "Great Reset" nonsense. That something could happen automatically means it does.

I don't doubt your sincerity. Just reexamine your claims for a moment. The World Economic Forum is chaired by people like Tony Blair, who arguably despises the left even more than conservatives do. A one-world government is the farthest thing from these folks' minds, trust me. I mean, just read their literature. They think they're the thin, blue line between us and Mao.

Meat prices are rising. Not only that but the WHO stated that mealworms are alright for human consumption. Joe Biden new taxes are going to make the cost of living higher.

There should be nothing to gain from stopping people from eating meat. Yet, we're told that you are wrong for wanting to eat meat cause animals have feelings too. Why do we have meat substitutes? Why should we stop eating meat?

The answer is control. Control people through food. Meat is needed for nutrients, cause you can't live off of fruits and vegetables alone.

 

[haurchefant]

Who cares if it's racist, just bring it up anyway, good lord. Stop apologizing to these people and stop ceding ground to them.

If the Jews are really going to make us stop eating meat and try to switch us to bugs then just, you know, don't let them? Jesus Christ. Imagine masturbating to a future where you foresee le bugs le pod le birth control and just sitting on your ass wailing about it while obediently holding your mouth open to accept the meal worm flour.

Right wingers are faggy and weak.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Assuming HR1 passes, what happens? Are we as fucked as I assume?

 

[ForTheHoard]

View attachment 2004860

This is why you never thank a sailor for their service. You call them a squid faggot and walk away. He/she/it poses no real threat to you unless you're rust on the side of a ship.

 

[haurchefant]

Assuming HR1 passes, what happens? Are we as fucked as I assume?

They seem intent on licking that third rail.

 

[Corpun]

You know, I try to separate characters from their actors, but sometimes it's hard. Maybe it's their most famous role that is heavily shaped by the actor (RDJ to Tony Stark), or maybe their vocal style is so consistent and iconic that you end up connecting them by force of habit. Either way, it hurts watching social media destroy pedestals in a way you wouldn't see before.

I dread the day I see Viggo Mortensen tweeting some Orange Man Bad.

Found this guy reacting over a stupid and bit that crowder did View attachment 2003981

Glad I don't watch that faggot.

 

[Captain Syrup]

I dread the day I see Viggo Mortensen tweeting some Orange Man Bad

He doesn't really set truck by social media, or even talk show appearances.

As funny as it was watching washed-up game show hosts and comedians show affinity with Trump on twitter, the real tragedy was what happened to the left. They became a funhouse mirror of MAGA.

It's something which Trump does very well. He encourages you to go low and cheap and stop thinking critically.

Suddenly, everyone was Keith Olbermann. Every D-list actor and youtube personality was a pundit. They really bought into the idea that they were gonna save the Republic. And it was painful to watch.

Who platformed Trump in the first place? Over twenty appearances on Letterman. Over twenty film and TV cameos. Trump hosted SNL twice. He was a fixture in rap music, FFS.

They loved him until he started making rich people look bad. That's literally it. The left tolerated the shit out of him for decades.

Meat prices are rising. The answer is control. Control people through food. Meat is needed for nutrients, cause you can't live off of fruits and vegetables alone.

The price of everything is rising.

No one's taking your McRib away. Michelle and Mike couldn't even pass a pissant tax hike on soft drinks.

The irony is you've likely never had a genuine ham or chicken sandwich in your life. Factory farms do not produce tasty meat, they produce cheap meat. The lifestock are kept immobile and pumped with drugs.

There is literally no upside to this practice. It's a big payday for cattle grazers and Chinese investors. I promise: you get nothing out of it.

 

[The Great Chandler]

The irony is thick enough to serve in a bowl with some crackers. Oh and they even depicted him with the dog because somehow owning a pet is a major positive trait to get people to like him. This is some boilerplate astroturf account posting.

Reminds me of a certain Austrian fella who also owned a pet dog

 

[Captain Syrup]

Didn't Bill have a cat? Socks, or whatever.

I just like the idea of a cat in the Oval Office, puking and spraying and acting like it owns the place. That rules.

 

[JustSomeDong]

The price of everything is rising.

No one's taking your McRib away. Michelle and Mike couldn't even pass a pissant tax hike on soft drinks.

The irony is you've likely never had a genuine ham or chicken sandwich in your life. Factory farms do not produce tasty meat, they produce cheap meat. The lifestock are kept immobile and pumped with drugs.

There is literally no upside to this practice. It's a big payday for cattle grazers and Chinese investors. I promise: you get nothing out of it.

I get free range chickens stoned before butchering them in my friends garage.

Its easier than you think, kids! And mexican farmers basically throw them at you when you do a favor for them, at least in my experience.

 

[EnemyStand]

Didn't Bill have a cat? Socks, or whatever.

I just like the idea of a cat in the Oval Office, puking and spraying and acting like it owns the place. That rules.

Well, that cat did learn from the best.