These people don’t get why these far right movements will never ever take off in the real world mainstream. They think that suddenly the thousands and thousands of people who have right wing views are gonna come out of their hiding spots online and support this movement “in person” but they forget the reason they are hidden online is to avoid getting “cancelled” (no doubt they are content to vote whatever way they want and keep their mouth shut when Black Lives Matter or other left wing stuff is shoved in their face) that’s why it’s impossible to cash in on this massive online far right presence in the real world.
Pretty much said it all. Even a basic cost/benefit analysis will tell any public figure with have a brain to stay away.
Costs:
-Nick keeps personal tabs of anyone who slights him, and will turn on an emotional dime if you step out of line, throwing his ravenous fans at you. His associates like Milo literally keep hard drives of dirt on people, so you can expect all your interactions with Nick to be recorded by default.
-Even if you take the catboy cock, the media is definitely going to ruin you, and I wouldn't be surprised at this point if services like PayPal would ban you for endorsing Nick.
-By associating with Nick, you fall under the same category of miscreants like Beardson and Baked Alaska, which is almost worse than what the media could ever do to your dignity.
-Aside from left wing hacks, who might call you x/y/z regardless of association, you would also be banned from CPAC and similar, thus shutting your potential outreach to only the AF crowd.
-If you think endorsing Nick will give you access to his "plan", prepare to be disappointed. If Patrick didn't have the sauce as "CEO", you sure as hell aren't going to get a lick of information. You'll just be a capo marionette for the mexican child leader of the white race.
Benefits:
+Get to go to his new house?? There's no reason to ever want to go there, so this isn't really a positive.
+Possibly a cut of his bitcoin donation? Again, I highly doubt that.
+Mild e-celeb dopamine from a niche internet corner, far smaller than IRL voter pools who actually live near you and are the actual voters.
I'm
really trying to think of potential positives for a public figure to associate with Little Nick. Sure, he might say something that listeners agree with, but that doesn't necessarily mean he even believes them himself. The advice he gave about a year ago, on being "sleeper agents" who never tell anyone about anything political is still the smartest advice he's given, and now he's giving advice completely antithetical to that.
Honestly, a smart public representative would do exactly what TPUSA and CPAC did, which is to adopt the growing positions adjacent to AF, without ever mentioning his name. If Nick wasn't a homo grifter, he would take this overton change as an absolute win, but instead he bemoans on twitter about having his "brand stolen" (even though he stole it from trump) and burns bridges with anyone who dares use his rhetoric without bowing before their manlet overlord.
