Pedophiles of Sluthate AND Lookism (MRZ, Brian Peppers and many more!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date

Which user is a bigger faggot?

  • @drz

  • Marijan Siklic


Results are only viewable after voting.
You do know that fucking minors (anyone under 18) is considered rape right? So basically, it's fucking obvious that you would rape someone you disgusting pedophile.

Do you realize that the age of consent in the majority of the USA is 16 years old (and no, let's get it out of the way, this isn't close in age exceptions)? Do you realize that the age of consent in Germany is 14? And in Spain is 13? Of course you don't, because you live in some secluded ass region of the USA and think that the morality of your little community is global, despite this not being the case.
 
I don't know why it matters what pictures I look at when I jack off, it's not like it affects anyone at all. If I actually molested or raped or anything like that then I would have a hard time to feel like a good person, but I honestly just don't give a fuck about looking at pictures lol. Like, I don't feel like a war criminal when I look at pictures of the holocaust, and I don't feel like a child molester when I look at pictures of children being molested.

If you witness a murder and fail to report it you can be charged as an accessory to that murder. Someone abused those kids in the first place to make the media and by consuming it you are an accessory to that crime. For someone so smart it's hard to see how you can miss this point.
 
You accidentally agreed with me.
No, she didn't. Everyone here thinks you are full of shit and a disgusting sack of rotting ballsacks. As I said before, it's only evident that you are definitely going to get your depraved shit-filled ass in prison and will probably end up being a prison waifu, just like Nick Bate and MadThad0890.
 
I don't know why it matters what pictures I look at when I jack off, it's not like it affects anyone at all. If I actually molested or raped or anything like that then I would have a hard time to feel like a good person, but I honestly just don't give a fuck about looking at pictures lol. Like, I don't feel like a war criminal when I look at pictures of the holocaust, and I don't feel like a child molester when I look at pictures of children being molested.
See again there's this kinda false fallacy that happens here with this shit. Every peadophile I have EVER talked to has said stuff like "Well I look at gore pictures and they don't make me a murderer!" etc etc, the worrying part isn't even that you look at this stuff, it's that this stuff makes you pop a boner and you're PROUD OF IT.
I've talked to guys who have said that they're attracted to young kids before but that it's a source of shame for them and they don't act on it in any way, those guys I have respect for because they at least have the decency to understand that the safety of children is more important than them getting their rocks off. You're spouting this shite like its a good thing, like 'hooray I look at teeny weeny titties and everyone else should too!" You don't feel like a child molestor when you look at these pics and sure good for you but you should at least be feeling a LITTLE remorse or guilt for fapping to forced photos taken of a minor.
 
If you witness a murder and fail to report it you can be charged as an accessory to that murder. Someone abused those kids in the first place to make the media and by consuming it you are an accessory to that crime. For someone so smart it's hard to see how you can miss this point.

If you look at pictures of people being murdered and don't report them, there is no law against that. I don't see how it is being an accessory to the crime to look at pictures of it, that isn't the case with any other sort of picture. Am I an accessory to the holocaust for looking at holocaust pictures? Doesn't it seem strange to you that you have two separate belief systems, one that applies to pictures of children, and one that applies to pictures of everything else?

No, she didn't. Everyone here thinks you are full of shit and a disgusting sack of rotting ballsacks. As I said before, it's only evident that you are definitely going to get your depraved shit-filled ass in prison and will probably end up being a prison waifu, just like Nick Bate and MadThad0890.

Well I'm still waiting. What's taking them so long?
 
If you look at pictures of people being murdered and don't report them, there is no law against that. I don't see how it is being an accessory to the crime to look at pictures of it, that isn't the case with any other sort of picture. Am I an accessory to the holocaust for looking at holocaust pictures? Doesn't it seem strange to you that you have two separate belief systems, one that applies to pictures of children, and one that applies to pictures of everything else?

Isn't it incredibly selfish to think that your sexual wants are more important than the welfare of children?
 
I don't see how my sexual wants are harming the welfare of children, I never contributed to producers or told them to produce or to abuse children, if I never existed child abuse rates would be identical to how they are today.
So in short you don't give a shit about being part of the solution, aka reducing the demand for this shit by just one person, because it wouldn't immediatly fix the problem and therefore isn't worth depriving your boner?
 
Do you realize that the age of consent in the majority of the USA is 16 years old (and no, let's get it out of the way, this isn't close in age exceptions)? Do you realize that the age of consent in Germany is 14? And in Spain is 13? Of course you don't, because you live in some secluded ass region of the USA and think that the morality of your little community is global, despite this not being the case.

I think you're missing crucial elements. It is not black and white that anyone can have sex with a 14 year old in Germany. I know, in Germany at least, there are all sorts of exceptions. One is that someone 20 or older cannot have sex with someone under 16. But even then it's a case-by-case basis and you're 21 and exploiting a 16 year old, it is illegal.
 
I don't see how my sexual wants are harming the welfare of children, I never contributed to producers or told them to produce or to abuse children, if I never existed child abuse rates would be identical to how they are today.

Supply and demand economics retard. If weirdos like you didn't beat their meat to kids producers of cp would have no reason to abuse kids. You are directly contributing to the abuse of children.
 
So in short you don't give a shit about being part of the solution, aka reducing the demand for this shit by just one person, because it wouldn't immediatly fix the problem and therefore isn't worth depriving your boner?

A lot of research indicates that a better solution is to allow people to look at CP, because for a significant chunk of people they use CP in place of actually abusing children, more so than abuse children because of CP if the statistics are anything to go by. The issue is primarily that you are not interested in lowering child abuse rates primarily, but rather are interested in fucking over anyone with sexual interests that go against your sensibilities, regardless of if those interests actually cause real harm to anyone or not, and indeed even if your war against them leads to more harm to the group you claim to want to protect.
 
A lot of research indicates that a better solution is to allow people to look at CP, because for a significant chunk of people they use CP in place of actually abusing children, more so than abuse children because of CP if the statistics are anything to go by. The issue is primarily that you are not interested in lowering child abuse rates primarily, but rather are interested in fucking over anyone with sexual interests that go against your sensibilities, regardless of if those interests actually cause real harm to anyone or not, and indeed even if your war against them leads to more harm to the group you claim to want to protect.
Fucking a dude you couldn't even comprehend my sexual preferences, I'm kinky as shit and what gets your rocks off means exactly fuck all to me. My problem isn't with what YOU do in the grand scheme of things. It's what happens to the kids who are abused to create the wank material you use. If there was a way for kids to consent to this with full understanding of what they're doing and a guarantee of their safety then I would be happy for you to jerk it to pics and vids like this. But the fact of the matter is the VAST majority of this shit is created through exploitation and deception and even then the kids lack the mental maturity to truly understand even if they did consent. So you're SOL and JWF on this one and playing the 'you're a prude' card won't work on me I'm afraid cupcake.
 
I think you're missing crucial elements. It is not black and white that anyone can have sex with a 14 year old in Germany. I know, in Germany at least, there are all sorts of exceptions. One is that someone 20 or older cannot have sex with someone under 16. But even then it's a case-by-case basis and you're 21 and exploiting a 16 year old, it is illegal.

In Germany anyone is allowed to have sex with 14/15 year olds regardless of their age, with the exception of law enforcement and teachers (who are restricted to 18+). 14/15 year olds have special laws protecting them from manipulation though, it is illegal to manipulate a 14/15 year old into having sex with you if you are 21+, but 16+ year olds don't have the special manipulation laws protecting them. Manipulation is defined as things such as buying gifts in exchange for sex, and various other things such as false claims of love prior to fucking and chucking them. If a 14/15 year old or their legal guardians claims manipulation, a forensic psychologist examines the 14/15 year old and the situation and determines if manipulation was involved, then reports these findings to a judge who determines if the sex was legal or illegal. 16/17 year olds don't have these special anti-manipulation laws protecting them, and 18/19/20 year olds don't have to follow the anti manipulation rules when it comes to having sex with 14/15 year olds.

A 30 year old can legally have sex with a 14 year old in Germany, provided the 30 year old doesn't violate the anti-manipulation laws, and is not a teacher or law enforcement.
 
A lot of research indicates that a better solution is to allow people to look at CP, because for a significant chunk of people they use CP in place of actually abusing children, more so than abuse children because of CP if the statistics are anything to go by. The issue is primarily that you are not interested in lowering child abuse rates primarily, but rather are interested in fucking over anyone with sexual interests that go against your sensibilities, regardless of if those interests actually cause real harm to anyone or not, and indeed even if your war against them leads to more harm to the group you claim to want to protect.

Fine I'll call your bluff. I want three peer reviewed studies by nationally accredited scientific institutions or government agencies along with a sources cited page in MLA or APA format to back up your claims.

Professor Ruin expects this on her desk in a hour.
 
Yo @CatParty, or anyone really, who is this drz cat? Dude amusing or just wack?

In Germany anyone is allowed to have sex with 14/15 year olds regardless of their age, with the exception of law enforcement and teachers (who are restricted to 18+). 14/15 year olds have special laws protecting them from manipulation though, it is illegal to manipulate a 14/15 year old into having sex with you if you are 21+, but 16+ year olds don't have the special manipulation laws protecting them. Manipulation is defined as things such as buying gifts in exchange for sex, and various other things such as false claims of love prior to fucking and chucking them. If a 14/15 year old or their legal guardians claims manipulation, a forensic psychologist examines the 14/15 year old and the situation and determines if manipulation was involved, then reports these findings to a judge who determines if the sex was legal or illegal. 16/17 year olds don't have these special anti-manipulation laws protecting them, and 18/19/20 year olds don't have to follow the anti manipulation rules when it comes to having sex with 14/15 year olds.

A 30 year old can legally have sex with a 14 year old in Germany, provided the 30 year old doesn't violate the anti-manipulation laws, and is not a teacher or law enforcement.
Yo you realize Germany is all kinds of fucked up right? Not for nothing but I wouldn't bring up Nazi central as a place to look at for guidance.
 
@drz is mrz from sluthate. he's lying about being a pedophile
So just a typical pedo from SH. Shame he isn't more funny.

It's mrz under yet another account to get around his ban.

He apparently has "50,000" proxies or servers, or whatever, so if we ban him again, he'll just pop back under another name.
So he will come back over and over just to go "No but really guys, I'm totes a creep." What a shitty existence dude must have.
 
Supply and demand economics exceptional individual. If weirdos like you didn't beat their meat to kids producers of cp would have no reason to abuse kids. You are directly contributing to the abuse of children.

This is a very simplistic understanding of reality. In some cases the "consumption" of CP may contribute to production. There are two clear cases. One is in paying for CP. The other is in being a member in a group mechanism that requires contribution in order to maintain membership. However, simply viewing CP that is obtained for free from public sources cannot be thought of as intrinsically leading to the production of CP, and indeed as I previously mentioned, the distribution mechanism of information theoretically secure single server private information retrieval mathematically proves that supply cannot intrinsically correlate with demand, for otherwise demand would be measurable through supply, but information theory dictates that no information about demand can leak through the observation of inputs and outputs to this mechanism, and therefore supply cannot intrinsically correlate with demand.

That said, probably a minority of CP is produced for commercial reasons entirely, by which I mean the majority of people producing CP will abuse kids even if they don't feel a need to take photographs or videos of it. Your logic is essentially that if it were not for adult pornography nobody would have sex.
 
Back