Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

[Creep3r]

View attachment 2009231
Confirmed shill, he tweeted out that people who are upset about Snyder's actions should still watch the Snyder Cut because THE FANDOM MENACE FOUGHT FOR THIS

lmao Doomcuck at his finest.

 

[Xerxes IX]

View attachment 2009245
lmao Doomcuck at his finest.

Why is the Fandom Menace even taking credit for the Snyder Cut? Release the Snyder Cut had been going on for years and was mostly Snyderbros. The Fandom Menace were more aligned with the people who thought Snyder's DCEU sucked, at least when making videos about BvS being terrible was popular

 

[The Valeyard]

View attachment 2009245
lmao Doomcuck at his finest.

He's delusional. AT&T just needed exclusive content to push their HBO Max streaming service.

 

[Adamska]

View attachment 2009245
lmao Doomcuck at his finest.

"CONSOOM THE PRODUCT THAT I TELL YOU TO! PRODUCT GOOD" ~ Doomcuck

Seriously, comments like that are why I would not be surprised if it turned out that Doomcock was in actuality a guerrilla form of marketing to try and take fan anger and keep it alive to bolster sales. Because apathy is the true death of media, which this stooge even alludes to before he does dumb shit like this.

I mean why the fuck not at this point; Disney buys commissions and pretends they're fan-art, they lie to their investors and make vaporware to lie about having product to consoom, they also make botnets to bolster ratings on sites they own and on twitter. This isn't that radical of an idea at this point.

Why is the Fandom Menace even taking credit for the Snyder Cut? Release the Snyder Cut had been going on for years and was mostly Snyderbros. The Fandom Menace were more aligned with the people who thought Snyder's DCEU sucked, at least when making videos about BvS being terrible was popular

Because they need imaginary wins to keep these clicks a'goin.

 

[Oats12345]

"CONSOOM THE PRODUCT THAT I TELL YOU TO! PRODUCT GOOD" ~ Doomcuck

Seriously, comments like that are why I would not be surprised if it turned out that Doomcock was in actuality a guerrilla form of marketing to try and take fan anger and keep it alive to bolster sales. Because apathy is the true death of media, which this stooge even alludes to before he does dumb shit like this.

I mean why the fuck not at this point; Disney buys commissions and pretends they're fan-art, they lie to their investors and make vaporware to lie about having product to consoom, they also make botnets to bolster ratings on sites they own and on twitter. This isn't that radical of an idea at this point.

Because they need imaginary wins to keep these clicks a'goin.

I will pray that one of these days it comes out that he was really a Disney employee and all of this was Disney playing with TFM crowd

 

[Xerxes IX]

Seriously, comments like that are why I would not be surprised if it turned out that Doomcock was in actuality a guerrilla form of marketing to try and take fan anger and keep it alive to bolster sales. Because apathy is the true death of media, which this stooge even alludes to before he does dumb shit like this.

I mean why the fuck not at this point; Disney buys commissions and pretends they're fan-art, they lie to their investors and make vaporware to lie about having product to consoom, they also make botnets to bolster ratings on sites they own and on twitter. This isn't that radical of an idea at this point.

He'd make great controlled opposition for the media giants, he and his community are pathetic enough to think they're going to MAKE POP CULTURE GREAT AGAIN. And what have they accomplished but jack fucking shit. Capeshit is going woke and Gina Carano got fired because they don't want people with her politics.

I will pray that one of these days it comes out that he was really a Disney employee and all of this was Disney playing with TFM crowd

Why's he simping for Warner Bros now? I guess this could be a case of corporate collusion, it's much easier to pay the same shill than to get their own.

 

[make_it_so]

Still, I have a bad feeling about this. I know its probably lame of me, but should I be concerned about Snyder using that article that called SW critics alt-right racists as a valid source to dunk on Jeremy? I mean, yeah Jeremy deserves to get dunked on and lose any credibility he has for being a grifter and closet shill who smacks Disney only go around and suck their cock when its convenient (or if Ahsoka's involved), but I feel like using a woke arguing point like accusing the guy of racism is the worst way to go about it instead of just calling him what he actually is, a grifting conman like Doomcock, which is a valid reason to ruin the guy, and in the long run I feel like this will be used to Disney's benefit to prove that everyone that smacktalks their films is a racist/sexist/whatever and fence sitters will believe it if someone like Snyder, who is being overglorified as the "Anti-Kennedy" right now, starts claiming it. However if no one actually takes Snyder's word for it and all this does is make Jeremy look like an absolute cuck btfo by his idol then I can laugh at ease.

I don't really care one way or the other about Geeks+Gamers, but the fact that a major Hollywood figure would agree to a charity stream, and then would immediately try to portray one of the people that set up that stream, on air, as a hate-group without even knowing them or ever having watched their content is slimy as fuck.

And no, you shouldn't feel lame for having a bad feeling about this ("a ha ha, he said it, he said it!") - I would not at all be surprised if G+G a bunch of others Fandom Menace channels got financially deplatformed in the coming weeks, because that's always what happens whenever these large corporations give any acknowledgement to the deranged fantasies of these woke parasites. The idea that some youtubers - shill or not, lolcow or not - can have their entire career and ability to financially support themselves uprooted just because some anonymous retards didn't like their criticism of latest Consoomer Product, and that the industry behind Consoomer Product will go along with this loudly and proudly, should be fucking repulsive and terrifying to anyone.

View attachment 2009245
lmao Doomcuck at his finest.

Fucking hell, whatever happened to "Without Respect, We Reject" Doomcock?

 

[Ghostse]

"CONSOOM THE PRODUCT THAT I TELL YOU TO! PRODUCT GOOD" ~ Doomcuck

Seriously, comments like that are why I would not be surprised if it turned out that Doomcock was in actuality a guerrilla form of marketing to try and take fan anger and keep it alive to bolster sales. Because apathy is the true death of media, which this stooge even alludes to before he does dumb shit like this.

I mean why the fuck not at this point; Disney buys commissions and pretends they're fan-art, they lie to their investors and make vaporware to lie about having product to consoom, they also make botnets to bolster ratings on sites they own and on twitter. This isn't that radical of an idea at this point.

Because they need imaginary wins to keep these clicks a'goin.

My guess would be its even gayer than that, and he's a disney employee's puppet. Leak just enough (exogol) but get everything else wrong. Make him your Emmuel Goldstein. Or I guess if you want to stay with Disney properties, Ben Kingsley's Mandarin.
If all the shit about Disney burning Star Wars for datamining is true, it'd make sense.

 

[make_it_so]

If all the shit about Disney burning Star Wars for datamining is true, it'd make sense.

Now this is a new one - source?

 

[Creep3r]

My guess would be its even gayer than that, and he's a disney employee's puppet. Leak just enough (exogol) but get everything else wrong. Make him your Emmuel Goldstein. Or I guess if you want to stay with Disney properties, Ben Kingsley's mandarian.

If all the shit about Disney burning Star Wars for datamining is true, it'd make sense.

Honestly, Doomcock doesn't even deserve credit for the Exogol leak. The final fight was getting leaked around along with most of the movie as far back as September 2019, with the name Exogol and much of the film being leaked and talked about on that Bespin podcast, 4chan, Reddit and MakingSW way before Doomcock even knew the word Exogol existed. Hell by November Doomcuck was still pushing that "Palpatine is a hologram" bullshit that no other leak source was claiming while everyone else was talking about Rey and Palpy's final battle.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/star-w...kywalker-spoilers.32492/page-708#post-5396793

I'm surprised how much of these early leaks were accurate though and even the wrong ones turned out to be actual deleted scenes or rejected concepts, like the spider thing and flood planet being Endor.

after burying items belonging to Luke, Han and Leia near the Lars homestead. Rey is then seen by a local who asks that "its been a long time... since I've seen anyone here... Who are you?" She answers: "Rey... Rey Skywalker."

Considering how much of this film got leaked, it was probably on purpose to see what reactions were and which scenes people best responded to before editing could be finalized. In the end, Doomcock was a useful idiot or actual employee designed to spread disinfo on purpose.

 

[Uranus Pink]

Fucking hell, whatever happened to "Without Respect, We Reject" Doomcock?

There is the possibility that Doomcock got minecrafted or receive a horse head and nope out. While the current Doomcock is a cooperate employee(s) or owned meat puppet.

 

[Adamska]

Fucking hell, whatever happened to "Without Respect, We Reject" Doomcock?

Went out the window when he either took a check from WB or delusionally came to believe he was responsible for the Snyder Cut.

 

[0-0-----0]

Went out the window when he either took a check from WB or delusionally came to believe he was responsible for the Snyder Cut.

Probably the latter. I can't imagine a movie company paying Doomcock, seeing as what he does is... well, you know.

 

[Ghostse]

Now this is a new one - source?

nothing official but educated speculation.
There's a link earlier from an industry guy who said when he was sitting on meetings with corporate studio guys, they would do things specifically to provoke fan reactions so they could data mine comments to figure out where to push their advertising.

Basically, speculation is that Lucas film was bought primarily to deny it to Fox. Once bought, it was decided that since Star Wars fans are a chatty and spergy bunch (Points at a thread with nearly 2000 fucking pages of posts) you can kill two birds with one stone: you give Star Wars over to the wokescolds to earn woke points to deflect any criticism from the BLTBBQ alliance, and doing so lets you get an immediate temperature check on communities because people can't not talk about Star Wars.

You also have the Star Trek Discovery paradigm: to TL;DR this, after the CBS/Viacom split, there was no one on the CBS board who gave a shit about Star Trek - no one who had worked with a Trek property. Les Moonves the Chairman & CEO was on record as saying how much he disliked Star Trek. So when they decided that they needed to make something woke to kickstart CBS all access, and they needed to do it with an established brand, they decided to make that sacrificial brand Star Trek because no one in the board saw Star Trek as anything other than a IP they owned.
So same thing; Star Wars is an import to the Disney stable. No one on Disney's board has a personal stake in keeping it from being the burnt offering to the wokescolds.

Additionally on the merch front, while kids/parents are not buying Star Wars toys, what they are buying is Marvel Toys - so the SW merchandize 'losses' aren't really losses from a disney balance sheet perspective, just shifted to Marvel.

The more you think about it, the more it makes sense, and the only way I can see anyone let LTJ get ok'ed.

You might think 4 billion is a lot of money to waste on a social experiment. Except you must remember, that Frozen made 1.3 billion on a 150 million dollar budget. TFA made 2 billion on a 300 million budget - greater risk, less return, especially if you adjust for inflation. What I'm saying is even if Disney just decided to completely make Lucas films acquisition a total loss by tossing it wholesale on a bonfire, if by doing that they can double the take on four Disney Princess films, they have broken even.

But they aren't just bonfiring it. Because remember how everyone was jizzing their pants for weeks over 40 seconds of digizombie Luke not being a total cuck? Remember how our friendly Mantid general admiral civilian Head of the Joint Chiefs of Sperg posted the fucking awful plot two months before release, and still you had people in this thread dedicated to autists making long wordy posts about how much Disney Wars sucks ass coming in to post their amateur humiliation fetish porn about how they spend $20 to be disappointed by something they knew they'd be disappointed by? The reactions to the complete fake,gay Lucas film "civil war"?

Basically it has been proven repeatedly all Disney has to do if they want to turn Star Wars back into profitable product to is release something that isn't an insult to fans and everyone gets back to consuming product and getting excited for next product.

 

[LORD IMPERATOR]

nothing official but educated speculation.
There's a link earlier from an industry guy who said when he was sitting on meetings with corporate studio guys, they would do things specifically to provoke fan reactions so they could data mine comments to figure out where to push their advertising.

Basically, speculation is that Lucas film was bought primarily to deny it to Fox. Once bought, it was decided that since Star Wars fans are a chatty and spergy bunch (Points at a thread with nearly 2000 fucking pages of posts) you can kill two birds with one stone: you give Star Wars over to the wokescolds to earn woke points to deflect any criticism from the BLTBBQ alliance, and doing so lets you get an immediate temperature check on communities because people can't not talk about Star Wars.

You also have the Star Trek Discovery paradigm: to TL;DR this, after the CBS/Viacom split, there was no one on the CBS board who gave a shit about Star Trek - no one who had worked with a Trek property. Les Moonves the Chairman & CEO was on record as saying how much he disliked Star Trek. So when they decided that they needed to make something woke to kickstart CBS all access, and they needed to do it with an established brand, they decided to make that sacrificial brand Star Trek because no one in the board saw Star Trek as anything other than a IP they owned.
So same thing; Star Wars is an import to the Disney stable. No one on Disney's board has a personal stake in keeping it from being the burnt offering to the wokescolds.

Additionally on the merch front, while kids/parents are not buying Star Wars toys, what they are buying is Marvel Toys - so the SW merchandize 'losses' aren't really losses from a disney balance sheet perspective, just shifted to Marvel.

The more you think about it, the more it makes sense, and the only way I can see anyone let LTJ get ok'ed.

You might think 4 billion is a lot of money to waste on a social experiment. Except you must remember, that Frozen made 1.3 billion on a 150 million dollar budget. TFA made 2 billion on a 300 million budget - greater risk, less return, especially if you adjust for inflation. What I'm saying is even if Disney just decided to completely make Lucas films acquisition a total loss by tossing it wholesale on a bonfire, if by doing that they can double the take on four Disney Princess films, they have broken even.

But they aren't just bonfiring it. Because remember how everyone was jizzing their pants for weeks over 40 seconds of digizombie Luke not being a total cuck? Remember how our friendly Mantid general admiral civilian Head of the Joint Chiefs of Sperg posted the fucking awful plot two months before release, and still you had people in this thread dedicated to autists making long wordy posts about how much Disney Wars sucks ass coming in to post their amateur humiliation fetish porn about how they spend $20 to be disappointed by something they knew they'd be disappointed by? The reactions to the complete fake,gay Lucas film "civil war"?

Basically it has been proven repeatedly all Disney has to do if they want to turn Star Wars back into profitable product to is release something that isn't an insult to fans and everyone gets back to consuming product and getting excited for next product.

The problem is, they're also offering Marvel to the woke crowd. I can understand if they kept Marvel safe and family-friendly so that non-SJWs can continue to buy and enjoy it, while they use Star Wars as a test bed for SJW pandering, but they've also begun to move the mainstream Marvel content to the left bit by bit, with Captain Marvel and other properties being closer to TLJ rather than the classic, family-friendly MCU that the kids have been consuming for years. (Check: turning Thor into a fat guy by the end of the Thanos arc.)

It won't be long before the kind of woke bullshit that's overtaken the Marvel comics and the Star Wars properties gets transferred over to the mainstream Marvel content, which at that point, they can kiss all profits goodbye. At most, maybe they can parade around Luke Skywalker or Captain America in the odd non-woke product, but that's akin to putting rivets on a sinking ship. Sure, you can put in the 2003 Clone Wars or put the Jedi Knight Games and Republic Commando on Nintendo Switch, but that's barely going to make up for the Marvel movie money drying up. And once both the MCU and Star Wars get lost to the woke bug forever, no one's going to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again. Especially since if they pull back on the woke content to try and appease the fanboys, they'll get demonized by the mainstream media for trying to appease the "manbabies". And since Disney doesn't listen to the shareholders when they complain about things like Kathleen Kennedy or the firing of Gina Carano, they'll just pull their money out when it's obvious that the SW fountain has dried up.

Frozen is no longer making money like it used to. TFA made money because it was the first SW film in a while, but the tanking of profits after SOLO shows that the SW movie franchise is also a dead end. The most they can do is pad out Mando and their spinoff shows, or sell the odd Legends merchandise with Black Series figures or with re-releasing Legends content that most people already have, and that's not enough, unless they go and fully embrace the Filoniverse SW and erase the Sequels to give Dave Filoni full creative freedom to do as he wishes.

And given how the MCU has stalled after the Thanos arc, it's not like kids are going to keep buying MCU toys when there's no good content to go with them. The MCU is an empty fad with little substance, fully reliant on the hype machine, and without the massive hype surrounding new movies that are coming out, there will be nothing that will drive new toy sales for Marvel. It's highly unlikely that the new slate of woke Marvel films will attract the same kind of broad appeal as the older MCU stuff, which means the toy sale figures will drop off, too. Just as the prodigious toy sales from TFA and Rogue One dropped off after TLJ made a joke of the SW franchise, and Disney SW toys began to pile up on the landfills. That will happen to the Marvel toys once they start going woke, and we've already begun to see that happen.

With all the parks still closed because of the China bug (and with new variants of said bug rearing their ugly heads) Disney will eventually face a choice: abandon the woketards and go full nostalgia boner to appease both the Marvel and SW fanbase, or watch as what happened after TLJ repeats all over again with the woke Marvel crap and High Republic driving sales back down to pathetic numbers.

 

[ShonenHump]

Thoughts on speculation about Durge being in one of these Disney+ series? Do we even want that?

 

[White Devil]

On a lighter note.
View attachment 2009220

EDIT: It's worth noting that Disney is letting Paramount use the masters for the 4K, but for someone reason they won't let Paramount have the Disney-era Miramax masters (despite the fact Paramount owns Miramax's catalog now).

Four movie collection? Did they make a Young Indiana Jones TV movie sometime after Last Crusade or something?

 

[Ghostse]

The problem is, they're also offering Marvel to the woke crowd. I can understand if they kept Marvel safe and family-friendly so that non-SJWs can continue to buy and enjoy it, while they use Star Wars as a test bed for SJW pandering, but they've also begun to move the mainstream Marvel content to the left bit by bit, with Captain Marvel and other properties being closer to TLJ rather than the classic, family-friendly MCU that the kids have been consuming for years. (Check: turning Thor into a fat guy by the end of the Thanos arc.)

It won't be long before the kind of woke bullshit that's overtaken the Marvel comics and the Star Wars properties gets transferred over to the mainstream Marvel content, which at that point, they can kiss all profits goodbye. At most, maybe they can parade around Luke Skywalker or Captain America in the odd non-woke product, but that's akin to putting rivets on a sinking ship. Sure, you can put in the 2003 Clone Wars or put the Jedi Knight Games and Republic Commando on Nintendo Switch, but that's barely going to make up for the Marvel movie money drying up. And once both the MCU and Star Wars get lost to the woke bug forever, no one's going to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again. Especially since if they pull back on the woke content to try and appease the fanboys, they'll get demonized by the mainstream media for trying to appease the "manbabies". And since Disney doesn't listen to the shareholders when they complain about things like Kathleen Kennedy or the firing of Gina Carano, they'll just pull their money out when it's obvious that the SW fountain has dried up.

Frozen is no longer making money like it used to. TFA made money because it was the first SW film in a while, but the tanking of profits after SOLO shows that the SW movie franchise is also a dead end. The most they can do is pad out Mando and their spinoff shows, or sell the odd Legends merchandise with Black Series figures or with re-releasing Legends content that most people already have, and that's not enough, unless they go and fully embrace the Filoniverse SW and erase the Sequels to give Dave Filoni full creative freedom to do as he wishes.

And given how the MCU has stalled after the Thanos arc, it's not like kids are going to keep buying MCU toys when there's no good content to go with them. The MCU is an empty fad with little substance, fully reliant on the hype machine, and without the massive hype surrounding new movies that are coming out, there will be nothing that will drive new toy sales for Marvel. It's highly unlikely that the new slate of woke Marvel films will attract the same kind of broad appeal as the older MCU stuff, which means the toy sale figures will drop off, too. Just as the prodigious toy sales from TFA and Rogue One dropped off after TLJ made a joke of the SW franchise, and Disney SW toys began to pile up on the landfills. That will happen to the Marvel toys once they start going woke, and we've already begun to see that happen.

With all the parks still closed because of the China bug (and with new variants of said bug rearing their ugly heads) Disney will eventually face a choice: abandon the woketards and go full nostalgia boner to appease both the Marvel and SW fanbase, or watch as what happened after TLJ repeats all over again with the woke Marvel crap and High Republic driving sales back down to pathetic numbers.

Marvel is expanding into Woke, but has not gone full woke accross the board. They are just making sure nothing 'red pilled' gets the through that'd get wokes up in arms.
Lets also separate Marvel in to the Comics and the MCU; Traditional Comics are pretty much dead and the domain of manchildren now. Which is why they are trying to appeal to the soy face crowd because they are already dropping minimum $10 a hit on FunkoPops - there be gold in them-there receding hairlines.

MCU is toe-dipping on woke with Captain Marvel and That One Scene (you know the one) from End Game, but you still have the main releases that are sticking to fundamentals. We'll see if that continues to bear out as we head towards "Phase II" or whatever the fucking term they using to delineate the movies with RDJ & the ones with out (and very likely to delineate the ones with without from the ones where they are forced to resurrect him).

MCU going woke is due to their Fox acquisition. Star Wars is out, Fox stuff is out, their only competition is Warner DC Batman, and Universal Jurrassic Park.

I'm going to go admittedly full tinhat sperg here:
but the tl;dr is Disney is pushing the woke narrative to try to cancel everything pre-CURRENT YEAR to make money.

You've read scrolled past my posts. You've read my disclaimer about admitting I'm going full tinfoil.

Spoiler: You've had ample warning

You do this because now all those old toys from the 80s that are still kicking around (and anything pure-plastic from about 84? lasts for fucking ever. Paint gets worn, but the toys are still playable and posible) now need to be tossed out. All those old childrens DVDs & VHSes need tossed for the woke-consistent life-action reboots.

Burn all the books in the library, now you've got to buy new books. And looks who's right here to sell them to you - the guy who whipped up the mob.

Disney wants to become the Popes of Woke because they can dictate terms to parents. "Not buying your kids the Woke Avengers, the BLTBBQ++++A friendly toys that include Woman Man the first Trans+ Pansexual Character in a children's cartoon? Well, you might as well be enrolling your kids in the hilter youth, you fucking bigot"

This is part of a greater push like we've seen with Gina - Disney wants to control actors. They can do by saying "don't toe the line and jump when we say jump? We'll toss you to twitter". Anyone gets too uppity and independent? They just throw the tranny twitter mafia a decidely unwoke tweet you made to take out of context, and now you're radioactive garbage and you're stuck working for Ben Shapiro.

 

[Jub-Jub]

My guess would be its even gayer than that, and he's a disney employee's puppet.

I had a similar thunk whenever we were last dunking on him and didn't end up posting it because the conversation was winding down. I was thinking that he does have Disney sources, problem is that they are competing to see who can make doomcuck repeat the most stupid shit to his followers.

"Ignore those exegol leaks that all line up, palpy's a hologram"
"Why no we are not trying to retcon the OT with every move we make, in fact Disney's going to retcon the ST!"
"Civil war, Doomcuck, lucasfilm civil war!!!!11!1"

 

[The Valeyard]

https://www.starwars.com/news/marvel-star-wars-pride-month-covers

(Archive)

This Pride Month, gay and transgender artists will pay homage to some of the LGBTQ+ characters inhabiting a galaxy far, far away in a special line of variant comic book covers.

Among those featured in the June issues of Marvel’s Star Wars comics, Rae Sloane will grace the cover of Darth Vader #13 as drawn by J.J. Kirby, Doctor Aphra will get into mischief on War of the Bounty Hunters #1 with art from Babs Tarr, Yrica Quell will be captured by artist Jacopo Camagni on the cover of Bounty Hunters #13, Jedi twins Terec and Ceret from Star Wars: The High Republic will be portrayed by artist Javier Garron on a variant for issue #6, and the smooth-talking scoundrel Lando Calrissian will be decked out in style on the cover of Star Wars #14, illustrated by Stephen Byrne.

And I had almost forgotten that Lando fucks droids in the new canon.