Milwaukee County children's court judge arrested on child porn charges - Pedos? In my lgbtq activism?

I'm immediately reminded of this video from a while back. I'm glad to see this dude is finally vindicated:

As for the discussion about gay dudes and fucking kids, I think just tossing all homos into one bin is kind of unfair. I'm pretty sure it's simply easier to notice the ones who turn out to be predators specifically because of how they revel in shoving their degenerate shit in the faces of unwilling participants; whether it's deliberately acting like a fruity dipshit in public because we're here we're queer get used to it, or screwing children, it's just different shades of the same predatory behavior: someone isn't comfortable with what they're doing, but they're going to do it anyways because they get off on the fact their targets can't or don't know enough to stop them.
You'll notice that with transbians too; they aren't gay, they're just incels and rapists who love the idea of forcing women to be close or have sex with them through social extortion just like they love forcing uncomfortable people in public to call them "Ma'am".

On the other hand, I struggle to believe online figures like The Right Opinion or J Aubrey who've done entire documentary length videos bringing attention to people abusing children (J Aubrey did an enormous like 1.5 hour long video about Lionmaker Studios [a pedophile minecraft youtuber, although that's redundant. He has a thread here] not long ago) are out there screwing kids or were even necessarily raped. It's just that they try to act like normal men and shut the fuck up about wanting to bang dudes so a lot of people aren't even going to know they're gay.

My point is there's a distinct selection bias when we're talking about any demographic and their association with predators, because the predators are going to be the most narcissistic and attention seeking, while also being the ones with the greatest victim complexes who are the quickest to use actual victims as human shields against consequences.

Furthermore, this older study shows that there are predictable non-genetic factors in the likelihood of a person being gay, in this case specifically that there's a ~33% increase in the chances of a person being gay for every older brother they have, and I find it very unlikely that that could be attributed to rape, because that would be troubling on a whole different level.


PS: Thanks for all the info @Secret Asshole, heinous as it may be.
 
I would bet a substantial sum of money that he is. You just don’t have a couple of married gays with only one pedo. Plus even though they haven‘t positively identified any of the kids in the CP they’ve found so far as being his kids, one of the articles said the kids were in protective custody. If they’re not leaving them with the husband, why? I’m fairly certain in most CP possession cases, the kids aren’t immediately taken away from the wife.

ETA: then again, an earlier article said he was allowed unsupervised access to his kids. So, that would contradict the one stating the kids were with protective services. Idk man. I do know that there is no way they’re not both pedos though. Since when does one gay hide his perversions from his partner? That is the boring prudish heterosexual behavior the gays will gleefully tell straight men they should find tiresome in their marriages, that terrible ol’ straight female limiting factor preventing the poor straight men from being able to be the fully open degenerates they long to be and so they should just fuck dudes, for freedom.
Wouldn't be surprised especially if its there kids.
 
I'm immediately reminded of this video from a while back. I'm glad to see this dude is finally vindicated:

As for the discussion about gay dudes and fucking kids, I think just tossing all homos into one bin is kind of unfair. I'm pretty sure it's simply easier to notice the ones who turn out to be predators specifically because of how they revel in shoving their degenerate shit in the faces of unwilling participants; whether it's deliberately acting like a fruity dipshit in public because we're here we're queer get used to it, or screwing children, it's just different shades of the same predatory behavior: someone isn't comfortable with what they're doing, but they're going to do it anyways because they get off on the fact their targets can't or don't know enough to stop them.
You'll notice that with transbians too; they aren't gay, they're just incels and rapists who love the idea of forcing women to be close or have sex with them through social extortion just like they love forcing uncomfortable people in public to call them "Ma'am".

On the other hand, I struggle to believe online figures like The Right Opinion or J Aubrey who've done entire documentary length videos bringing attention to people abusing children (J Aubrey did an enormous like 1.5 hour long video about Lionmaker Studios [a pedophile minecraft youtuber, although that's redundant. He has a thread here] not long ago) are out there screwing kids or were even necessarily raped. It's just that they try to act like normal men and shut the fuck up about wanting to bang dudes so a lot of people aren't even going to know they're gay.

My point is there's a distinct selection bias when we're talking about any demographic and their association with predators, because the predators are going to be the most narcissistic and attention seeking, while also being the ones with the greatest victim complexes who are the quickest to use actual victims as human shields against consequences.

Furthermore, this older study shows that there are predictable non-genetic factors in the likelihood of a person being gay, in this case specifically that there's a ~33% increase in the chances of a person being gay for every older brother they have, and I find it very unlikely that that could be attributed to rape, because that would be troubling on a whole different level.


PS: Thanks for all the info @Secret Asshole, heinous as it may be.
I'm Bi and i'm not a pedo and so is my gay uncle. Pedophilia means your attracted to kids and don't get me started with the woke pan sexuality that nomalizes fucked up fetishes and pedophilia. My point is you can be striaght and still be a pedo only banging little girls not boys.
 
You know, similar to how the S+ thing did some heroic work simply lighting up
normie radars since 99.999% of the normie world had no idea that they’d been signed up against their will and without their knowledge to subscribe to the Available To Fuck Trannies tier of heterosexuality so they might want to change their account settings to Super+ to avoid confusion, black churches might be a useful inflection point.

I had a conversation with a black lady who works in another department when we had to be on site for an audit last October. Her husband is a minister. In the midst of her expressing discomfort with the riots but believing it was Antifa, aka rich white kids, causing most of the real trouble, I mentioned that it seemed like a lot of other groups were latching on to black people’s issues, like LGBT, and trying to ride along and take advantage, and she nodded and agreed wholeheartedly.

Black churches are an excellent site of resistance. They don’t give a fuck about gays or anything connected to gays, so awaring them should be similarly productive. And clearly they are willing to stand up to Drag Queen story hour level deviance, and they can get away with it.

I have been considering starting to go to church. I am an atheist and a liberal. But, I am also very Southern and everyone always assumes I must be a religious Republican, and I don’t correct them because why would I plus most of my coworkers are white male Christians and I love my coworkers, so I think I can attend church successfully. Just to increase the numbers of white people going to church. Increasing the ability of normies to find other normies across the lines of race, religion, etc. Degenerates certainly have no problem uniting to support and further degeneracy, why should normies let anything stand between us and supporting and furthering a return to decency?
 
brett.png

Cream City One. 800 million groomers living in the ruins of the old world.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of male pedophiles who target female children. Girls experience sexual abuse at a higher rate than boys. If experiencing sexual abuse as a child "turned you gay" there'd be a lot more gay women in the world.
You’re operating on the assumption that 100% of sexually abused children become gay, which is kinda retarded.
 
To be honest, this guy has probably has done far more than look at child pornography. He looked at pictures of toddlers, which only the most sadistic and depraved of offenders do. If he could mentally justify that, then there's no telling what he did. He had easy access to children, a high profile job and political contacts. I'd pin him under a sadistic pedophile because you can't look at pictures of infants and not know they're in pain. Every area of his life needs to be ripped apart, because I guarantee there's a lot more there.
He has two very young kids. And now he’s back home with them (:_(
 
Last edited:
The conditions of his bail was that he could not be with a minor unsupervised I believe
There seems to be conflicting info on this point. One article says the kids are in protective custody, the other says they are not. Supervised by whom? His husband, their other parent?

The overall point is he had two potential victims at home, he doesn’t even need his access to children via his job to have a victim pool.
 
All the people who were upset with the drag Queen story hour are going to go apeshit.

It must be a pretty airtight case. You don’t arrest a judge unless it’s a slam dunk. Wonder if they got a search warrant to go through his home and office too?
I really wish you didn'y use "airtight" to describe a case involving child sex abuse...
 
Their splitting hairs over the difference between a leadership position and a fiscal sponsor reminds me of a gold mine near where I live. They claim their company has operated for years and years with no accidents as a testament to their safety, because every time a truck has driven over a cliff it was a contractor driving it and not an employee and so they technically were not responsible for it. Fiscal sponsorships are kind of like the nonprofit version of buying stock. A fiscal sponsor manages the money going in and out of a non profit organization and depending on what their agreement is can vary anywhere from an bookkeeper to a de facto director. But they're not official employees of the organization, so it doesn't count when he gets busted for child porn.
 
Last edited:
Back