Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Isn't this pretty obvious when Catholics only make up 20% of the population and prots make up 43%? The entire idea that America would be catholic anytime in the next 40 years is pretty laughable. It seems like a huge marketing blunder for Nick to get particular with the Catholicism over general Christianity and I've known Christians who have been turned off of Nick for that specific reason.
Listen my dude, discussing race openly would alienate the normies - it's not like it was the open policy of the United States until 1965 or anything - we have to be Catholic Integralist monarchists instead if we wanna be popular.
 
Nick advocates for a lot of things, but one thing that he does not advocate for is Catholic state religion
I have heard Nick on several occasions advocate for Francoist type policy where Catholicism or Christianity(he has said both on different occasions) is the state religion before. In this specific debate Nick advocates for removing secularism and advocates for Catholicism as the state religion.
Regardless that's not what people here are talking about, people are referring to his marketing, not what state religion he would determine. It's about the fact his core message appeals to 1/3rd the people he could get if he just marketed himself as a Christian.
 
Isn't this pretty obvious when Catholics only make up 20% of the population and prots make up 43%? The entire idea that America would be catholic anytime in the next 40 years is pretty laughable. It seems like a huge marketing blunder for Nick to get particular with the Catholicism over general Christianity and I've known Christians who have been turned off of Nick for that specific reason.
I could understand him getting particular with it if he was a clear devout Catholic, but it doesn't seem like he regularly attends Mass or does basically anything to show that he's deep in his faith other than giving it some lip service, so it comes off like he went on /pol/ and saw too many of the tradcath posts and decided that's the way to go. It's a really bizarre choice, especially when more and more White Americans associate it with imagery of Mexicans and other hispanic nationalities.

Nick advocates for a lot of things, but one thing that he does not advocate for is Catholic state religion
Are you an AF/Groyper type? If so, I'd genuinely like to hear your opinions on how Fuentes is actually going to do anything for the historic American nation when everything about him is the prototypical "new American".
 
I remember Cenk having that pac, but I don't remember him using it solely as a means of self-promotion, or publicly associating his own identity and ego to the pac/it's politicians in any way that'd poison their prospects. Thus, I must conclude that Fuentes is an even bigger, dumber, more egotistical and narcissistic blowhard lolcow self-promoter than fuckin Cenk Uygher :story:
Cenk actually had a fair bit of popularity and a media operation running for him. With a large fanbase you can mobilize people to vote and encourage your fans to canvas, spreading your message and ideology to others and personalizing it while also getting the current guy elected. Nick has never had either of these things, and his fanbase is filled with 15 year old spergs and/or fags that have never canvased or taken part in an political campaign at any point in term. Nick obsession with optics isn't just ironic because he's an ugly retard, it's ironic because he has no political tact, no manners, no spirit, no personality, and no wit beyond what he's tricked his gullible followers into believing he has. I forgot who but someone else said in the thread a while ago, but the right is failing intellectually and Nick is a prime example of that phenomenon. Hes a College dropout that can't return to complete his education, and intellectually he's still on the level of a teenager. Nick's not only tactically inept but he's intellectually inept, spreading misinformation and not even following the ideologies he espouses.
 
I was referring to the GOP's views, and less on Fuentes. Merit based immigration was attacked hard during groyper wars, and as such many Republicans now are expressly against to it, as opposed to the tacit approval it had before. Even CPAC is now expressly pro-trump (for better or for worse) when I would argue it wasn't just a year or two ago.
As far as AF though? They're desperately trying to go mainstream, and as such they're ditching a lot of old rhetoric (anti jew, white majoritarian), and trying to appeal to as many others as they can without being overtly against their previous beliefs.
In 1992 Pat Buchanan got 32% of the GOP primary vote running on an expressly "paleocon" platform. No ambiguous dogwhistles, no disavowals, no tactical irony: just fully fledged America First on every possible topic, from immigration to trade to family values to foreign policy.
I don't see the MAGA base having a clear position on any of those issues, let alone promoting them politically.
Saying that America is pivoting in a more traditionalist direction is a total historical error.


Is this intentional? "Athiest"

View attachment 2009282

This thing is full of typos and bad English.
College dropout indeed.
 
Last edited:
Nick's ego stroke .png

i guess no matter what you can't disavow nick
 
View attachment 2010272
i guess no matter what you can't disavow nick
A weird question, to be honest. If I were Nick the last thing I'd want is people asking my political stooges about my many regrettable quotes and them defending me. I'd rather they just said what they had to in order to get the press off their back and kept taking the money and voting in favour of my causes.
 
Nick advocates for a lot of things, but one thing that he does not advocate for is Catholic state religion
He has advocated for that -and then says "I was being ironic (or was I!)"

It's all a grift. He's a liar who began using the label of traditional Catholicism (and later just Catholicism/muh Christian movement) to advance his brand. He does not go to Mass, knows very little about the Faith, and does not participate in any confraternal, devotional, catechetical, or apologetic activity. His entire program is grifting money from teenagers and building a homo-erotic cult around his person.
 
Some screen grabs from the latest court filing involving Chris Secor. Highlights include Pepe phone, large cash supply, unregistered firearms, plans to evade law enforcement, and "secret ops."
View attachment 2011611
View attachment 2011658
Edit: the smashed phone is likely the result of Fuentes telling his fans to destroy evidence following the Capitol incident
lol @ the government has grave concerns about the defendent's access to weapons that are not registered to him.
 
Some screen grabs from the latest court filing involving Chris Secor. Highlights include Pepe phone, large cash supply, unregistered firearms, plans to evade law enforcement, and "secret ops."
View attachment 2011611
View attachment 2011658
Edit: the smashed phone is likely the result of Fuentes telling his fans to destroy evidence following the Capitol incident
Outstanding post, Loyalist. Are you subscribing to a court filing system or just really good at catching new smack that the feds are dropping?
 
Do these people believe that smashing the screen will destroy the data in the phone?
Or maybe the phone was smashed during the capitol insurrection 9/11*10,000,000 but the MSM functions on circular logic, much like their conspiratard counterparts.

"Fuentes said destroy evidence, oh here's a phone with a cracked screen, that's evidence!".

I personally think this is more plausible than tossing one's phone at the wall to "destroy evidence", but hey, Fuentes' fans are massive retards. Smash your $600+ consoomer toy to secure the existence of our people and a future for Mexican children.
 
Last edited:
Back