Secret Asshole
Expert in things that never, ever happened
Forum Staff
⚡ Thunderdomer ⚡
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
It was written in 1982, before safe sex became prevalent in parts of the medical community.Oof. There's nothing wrong with being attracted to people of the same sex but if you're so desperate to coom that you're willing to literally kill yourself and others over it, that's pure mental illness. Why weren't they willing to calmly stop being promiscuous until the buttplague died down a bit? The gay guy who got death threats for speaking sense ought to be a cultural icon.
The problem with pedophiles is the same, really. They're turbocoomers enslaved by their desires.
It was titled How to Have Sex in an Epidemic. You might notice some similarities from then and today.
As expected, How to Have Sex did receive significant criticism from other gay men and gay organizations for its critical take on promiscuity. Callen and Berkowitz had attempted to tone down their critical tone from their first major publication, "We Know Who We Are: Two Gay Men Declare War on Promiscuity" in a 1982 issue of the New York Native, which had harshly condemned the "excessiveness" and "pigging out" that was occurring in the gay nightclub scene.[33] They incorporate consistent affirmation of gay sex throughout the forty pages, including sentences like the following:[4]
As you read on, we hope we make at least one point clear: Sex doesn't make you sick — diseases do. Gay sex doesn't make you sick — gay men who are sick do.
Many gay community members and leaders saw the writing in How to Have Sex as moralistic and attributed the advice against some types of sex to internalized homophobia, self-hatred and an "anti-sexual sense of guilt."[17] A response written by Michael Lynch and Bill Lewis in the Toronto Politic, a Canadian gay newspaper, criticized Callen and Berkowitz for blowing the epidemic out of proportion and allowing the medical community to "pathologize" gay men, and the authors faced frequent accusations of victim-blaming and siding with the religious right.[15][7] It was not an easy message for some gay men to receive: in an interview for Berkowitz' biographical film, Sex Positive, Larry Kramer described it as a blast of "cold water in the face."[30]
And by that, I mean a complete lack of self-introspection.
100% Sexual sadist. No fucking doubt in my mind. And a sociopath, too, which most pedophiles are.>the video description of the toddler crying as someone sodomizes it
Really looking forward to this one being ignored by the mainstream media because we can’t have normies waking up to the rampant pedophilia within the LGBT that libs help cover up.
![]()
I did my bachelor's thesis in Forensic Psych on this sort of shit. I know entirely too much about it. So feel free to ask away.PS: Thanks for all the info @Secret Asshole, heinous as it may be.
Yeah, what this woman is talking about is exactly right. Pedophiles are sociopaths as well and will integrate themselves in the community. They will go to great lengths to get close to children. That earlier video of the guy shooting the pedo in the head?Thought this might be useful to contribute since it lends credibility to the idea he might have shared homemade CP of his own kid(s) if he was caught with CP on Kik. Clipped from a short Journeyman doc about NGOs and even UN workers having rampant pedophile problems in places like Nepal. Adds to what @Secret Asshole was saying about how pedophiles like Brett behave and operate
View attachment 2010394
He was a family friend for years. Supported him. Paid for his meals. Kept him out of the cold when he was homeless. The pedo made friends with the man all so he could abuse his son, a relationship he groomed for years. He didn't tell his wife, but he planned to go there and kill him. His wife's response was: "Well, you could at least have told me so I could drive you to the airport." Basically the guy got off for 1st Degree murder. Which he did deserve because no jury on Earth would convict him.
That's what pedophiles are. And why they're not discovered. They don't get close to kids by being sick psychopaths. They get close by being manipulative. They not only manipulate children, but adults as well, to completely disarm them. Even if they're not in a job close to kids, they'll get close to families with them, maybe single mothers or parents who work a lot or like the guy above play the sympathy card. They will integrate, groom and sometimes wait years before they act.
Its basically like a serial killer. They will fantasize about the act for years in advance before they act on it. When I was researching it, pedophilia and serial killers share a LOT of the same pathologies. Manipulative, obsessive and fantasize about the act before doing it.