Milwaukee County children's court judge arrested on child porn charges - Pedos? In my lgbtq activism?

Oof. There's nothing wrong with being attracted to people of the same sex but if you're so desperate to coom that you're willing to literally kill yourself and others over it, that's pure mental illness. Why weren't they willing to calmly stop being promiscuous until the buttplague died down a bit? The gay guy who got death threats for speaking sense ought to be a cultural icon.

The problem with pedophiles is the same, really. They're turbocoomers enslaved by their desires.
It was written in 1982, before safe sex became prevalent in parts of the medical community.

It was titled How to Have Sex in an Epidemic. You might notice some similarities from then and today.

As expected, How to Have Sex did receive significant criticism from other gay men and gay organizations for its critical take on promiscuity. Callen and Berkowitz had attempted to tone down their critical tone from their first major publication, "We Know Who We Are: Two Gay Men Declare War on Promiscuity" in a 1982 issue of the New York Native, which had harshly condemned the "excessiveness" and "pigging out" that was occurring in the gay nightclub scene.[33] They incorporate consistent affirmation of gay sex throughout the forty pages, including sentences like the following:[4]

As you read on, we hope we make at least one point clear: Sex doesn't make you sick — diseases do. Gay sex doesn't make you sick — gay men who are sick do.

Many gay community members and leaders saw the writing in How to Have Sex as moralistic and attributed the advice against some types of sex to internalized homophobia, self-hatred and an "anti-sexual sense of guilt."[17] A response written by Michael Lynch and Bill Lewis in the Toronto Politic, a Canadian gay newspaper, criticized Callen and Berkowitz for blowing the epidemic out of proportion and allowing the medical community to "pathologize" gay men, and the authors faced frequent accusations of victim-blaming and siding with the religious right.[15][7] It was not an easy message for some gay men to receive: in an interview for Berkowitz' biographical film, Sex Positive, Larry Kramer described it as a blast of "cold water in the face."[30]

And by that, I mean a complete lack of self-introspection.
>the video description of the toddler crying as someone sodomizes it




Really looking forward to this one being ignored by the mainstream media because we can’t have normies waking up to the rampant pedophilia within the LGBT that libs help cover up.
73KB.gif
100% Sexual sadist. No fucking doubt in my mind. And a sociopath, too, which most pedophiles are.
PS: Thanks for all the info @Secret Asshole, heinous as it may be.
I did my bachelor's thesis in Forensic Psych on this sort of shit. I know entirely too much about it. So feel free to ask away.
Thought this might be useful to contribute since it lends credibility to the idea he might have shared homemade CP of his own kid(s) if he was caught with CP on Kik. Clipped from a short Journeyman doc about NGOs and even UN workers having rampant pedophile problems in places like Nepal. Adds to what @Secret Asshole was saying about how pedophiles like Brett behave and operate

View attachment 2010394
Yeah, what this woman is talking about is exactly right. Pedophiles are sociopaths as well and will integrate themselves in the community. They will go to great lengths to get close to children. That earlier video of the guy shooting the pedo in the head?

He was a family friend for years. Supported him. Paid for his meals. Kept him out of the cold when he was homeless. The pedo made friends with the man all so he could abuse his son, a relationship he groomed for years. He didn't tell his wife, but he planned to go there and kill him. His wife's response was: "Well, you could at least have told me so I could drive you to the airport." Basically the guy got off for 1st Degree murder. Which he did deserve because no jury on Earth would convict him.

That's what pedophiles are. And why they're not discovered. They don't get close to kids by being sick psychopaths. They get close by being manipulative. They not only manipulate children, but adults as well, to completely disarm them. Even if they're not in a job close to kids, they'll get close to families with them, maybe single mothers or parents who work a lot or like the guy above play the sympathy card. They will integrate, groom and sometimes wait years before they act.

Its basically like a serial killer. They will fantasize about the act for years in advance before they act on it. When I was researching it, pedophilia and serial killers share a LOT of the same pathologies. Manipulative, obsessive and fantasize about the act before doing it.
 
Those of you who read the horrifying description of the videos will already know this but from the perspective of forensic psychology this degenerate is dangerous. Forensic psychologists typically divide child abusers into situational abusers and preferential abusers (see Holmes & Holmes's go-to textbook Profiling Violent Crimes, LibGen PDF here). Situational abusers do not "prefer children" but offend under certain conditions; preferential abusers "prefer children" (i.e. are true 'pedophiles'). Each type of abuser has sub-types. Both situational and preferential abusers have sadistic subtypes, which surely fit this degenerate, as follows:

The morally indiscriminate molester is an abuser of all available persons. Children are just another category ofvictims. The morally indiscriminate offender has a basic motivation toward sexual experimentation: He is a “try-sexual”—that is, willing to try anything. He may be involved in a wide variety of sexual practices including tyndarianism (mate-swapping), bondage and discipline, triolism, and other forms of unusual sexual practices. He may involve his biological children, or children by marriage, in these sexual practices. As one can see, this molester does not have a sexual preference for children; they are simply there for the taking.
(Holmes & Holmes 2008: 116)

As within the broad category of situational molesters, the preferential type contains several different types of molesters. One type has made the vital connection between sexual gratification and extreme personal violence: the mysoped (Holmes & Holmes, 2001). This type of pedophile is usually male and has made a vital connection between sexual arousal and fatal violence. Typically, the child is a stranger to this aggressive and sadistic child offender. This type of offender may stalk the child, rather than use any form of seduction (the method typical of many pedophiles). The mysoped will often abduct a child from places where children gather: playgrounds, schools, shopping centers, and other such places. He will usually not attempt to seduce or otherwise induce the child to go with him; he simply takes the child by force. A scenario that includes pain inflicted upon the child, followed by the child’s death, follows the abduction. This type of pedophile has no real sexual interest in children in the traditional sense, although he may sexually abuse them. His interest is primarily rooted in torturing, humiliating, and mutilating his young and vulnerable victims to whom he feels greatly superior. If the victim is a young boy, the child’s penis may be cut off and inserted into the child’s mouth. Small girls are also brutally assaulted and the physical violence is often directed toward the child’s genitals. This sexual sadist often terrorizes the child with some type of weapon, and the crime is premeditated and ritualized. There are other obvious examples of the mysoped. Westley Dodd, an executed child killer, was considered an aggressive and sadistic child offender. Dodd was considered to be a loner in high school—but honest and dependable according to many of his teachers. The band teacher, for example, remarked that Dodd was quiet, always did what he was told, and was not a behavioral problem. Dr. Al Carlisle, a psychologist from Utah, interviewed Dodd. Dodd stated that he considered himself a humanitarian sociopath. He said that if a child fell off his bicycle, he would be the first one to reach the child and tender aid. But how could he intend to inflict so much pain and suffering on children whom he also loved in the way that he did? Dodd killed three young boys—two brothers and one 5-year-old child. The last victim was abducted from a public park while his older brother played with some friends. He took the boy home with him and over a period of several hours sexually abused the boy before finally murdering him. He placed the body in the closet, and after he came home from work later that afternoon, he retrieved the corpse and committed anal sex and other forms of sexual abuse before he disposed of the boy’s body. The police apprehended Dodd as he attempted to abduct a fourth young boy at a neighborhood theater. He was later executed by hanging (his choice) in Washington State. Cases of sadistic child offenders are not rare. Albert Fish, the “moon maniac” in the early part of the 20th century, is yet another example. Fish, an elderly grandfatherly type, was finally arrested after years of careful investigation in New York. When arrested, police found body parts that apparently came from various children. Fish took his final victim from her home under the pretense of taking her to a birthday party on Long Island. He transported her to an abandoned area, killed her, and then cooked portions of her body for his own consumption. More than a pedophile and a cannibal, Fish was also involved in infibulation, self-torture of one’s sexual bodyparts. When he was executed in the electric chair at Sing Sing, the autopsy discovered 29 sewing needles implanted in his penis and scrotum (Schechter, 1990).
(Holmes & Holmes 2008: 117)

Don't wanna PL too much here but suffice it to say I've encountered individuals of both sub-types and that these horrifying video descriptions were not the first of that kind of shit I've had to endure. The videos of abuse he was watching are focused on more than just (pre)pubescent genitalia: they involve significant humiliation, domination and sadism which certainly places him in one of the above sub-types. It's hard to know which of the sub-types he fits into but they are both dangerous and recidivism is typically high. The first sub-type can go on to do all kinds of horrifying acts of degeneracy and violence if these issues are not nipped in the bud. The second sub-type is true horror story category, as you can see. If you encounter someone presenting with any kind of sadistic fantasy involving children, you need to act IMO and IME. It is therefore unthinkable that CPS has not removed his children from the home immediately. I do not understand who made that decision and how but I see no other way other than corruption or complete incompetence or both.

FYI those on the gay rights are a slippery slope of degeneracy train, you should look more into the 'try-sexual' sub-type - it's basically a psychological profile for that.
 
Good thing he makes it so easy for the cops to link him to crimes when he uses his real name in an email account used to upload his deplorable collection.
I feel sympathy for the people who have to watch his videos to compile the transcript in the court document, it sickens me to read halfway through the first charge and he actively masturbated to this.


Give him the chair, the world won't miss him.
 
You know what they say about patterns...

On-topic, I hope this sick freak gets the chair. Dead certain he has done worse than just looking at CP.
bruh he's got unrestricted access to two kids, of course he has.
Edit
Can we just take a moment to appreciate the brazenness of this faggot registering to a messaging app to distribute cheese pizza using his real name?
You mistake brazenness for lack of a single intelligent bone in his body. These people don't think about this shit, they think they're invincible. Also I believe it was actually stated that pedos tend to be average to lower than average intelligence.
I just realized if he's spreading cp at least some of it was probably of his kids. Oh God oh fuck how many pics and vids of those poor kids being raped by this asshole (or touching each other) while Daddy #2 films are out there? Oh God oh fuck get it out of my head
 
Last edited:
I'm this specific case I think that there could be a possibility that the investigation is going to lead to some massive problems for the sick fucks that are still advocating for that Troon storytime hour sick fuckery. Any of us that have followed this from the beginning have been saying that these men are mentally ill predators, using the victim card to hide their deviant behavior.

I honestly think the massive campaign of this hardcore extreme Troon shielding has been perpetuated by sick fucks like this, that have a lot of power, and a lot of connections. This shit is a disease and the only cure for it would resemble a concrete cell block for life. There is no reform for these people and with the level of power this guy was welding, he should be getting water boarded to give up his accomplices.

It's also lolzworthy that in everyone of these cases it's always some fucking retard sharing his sick fuck material through a personal email address. What is even more bizzareo is why he would be sharing that in his office at work. That is just levels of arrogant and extreme that are worthy of never seeing the light of day again. Not to mention he works in the area of the law that would of given him access to vulnerable children. Fuck this guy, the day of the rope for pedophiles hasn't come fast enough. How somebody could victimize and hurt such a defenseless thing are fucking monsters.
 
I did my bachelor's thesis in Forensic Psych on this sort of shit. I know entirely too much about it. So feel free to ask away.
Not to give away your age (or mine) but did you encounter a sympathetic view of pedophiles and pedophilia while getting your Bachelor's? I didn't during my college years (never took Forensic Psych, just broader Psych) but it seems to have kicked up more in broader Psych fields today and in schools. Stuff like this:

One of the worst aspects of the sexual revolution was pathologizing evil. We can't just call it evil and identify them as evil people. Absolutely everything needs to be tied to some genetic origin or psychological pathology, thus retarding the actual truth of their total culpability in order to squeeze in an asinine sense of sympathy, hence the Dick Masterson thing of, "Have a heart! They simply can't help themselves!"

Sure for some it might be a compulsion in proper definition, but pedophilia is not like schizophrenia or Tourette's syndrome. As you said, it shares a lot of similarities to serial killing in how calculated it is in practice, and yet only a retard would say the BTK Killer was simply a slave to compulsion and we should be sympathetic. The levelheadedness of pedophiles in their planning, the open-eyed purpose of everything they do should be enough to revoke the idiotic notion of them being like some crying, self-harming addict.

Edit: There's a difference between categorizing certain behavioral/psychological tendencies and traits for identification, as with Forensic Psych it seems, and treating everything like a mental illness which needs hugs and pills to be cured.

Don't wanna PL too much here but suffice it to say I've encountered individuals of both sub-types and that these horrifying video descriptions were not the first of that kind of shit I've had to endure. The videos of abuse he was watching are focused on more than just (pre)pubescent genitalia: they involve significant humiliation, domination and sadism which certainly places him in one of the above sub-types. It's hard to know which of the sub-types he fits into but they are both dangerous and recidivism is typically high. The first sub-type can go on to do all kinds of horrifying acts of degeneracy and violence if these issues are not nipped in the bud. The second sub-type is true horror story category, as you can see. If you encounter someone presenting with any kind of sadistic fantasy involving children, you need to act IMO and IME. It is therefore unthinkable that CPS has not removed his children from the home immediately.
Good stuff and I see your point there. CPS is already on thin ice in a lot of areas regarding hypocrisy so I wonder if it's a matter of sensitivity training and them not wanting to seem homophobic or someone just having connections to let the kids stay in his arms' reach.
 
Last edited:
Not to give away your age (or mine) but did you encounter a sympathetic view of pedophiles and pedophilia while getting your Bachelor's? I didn't during my college years (never took Forensic Psych, just broader Psych) but it seems to have kicked up more in broader Psych fields today and in schools. Stuff like this:

One of the worst aspects of the sexual revolution was pathologizing evil. We can't just call it evil and identify them as evil people. Absolutely everything needs to be tied to some genetic origin or psychological pathology, thus retarding the actual truth of their total culpability in order to squeeze in an asinine sense of sympathy, hence the Dick Masterson thing of, "Have a heart! They simply can't help themselves!"

Sure for some it might be a compulsion in proper definition, but pedophilia is not like schizophrenia or Tourette's syndrome. As you said, it shares a lot of similarities to serial killing in how calculated it is in practice, and yet only a retard would say the BTK Killer was simply a slave to compulsion and we should be sympathetic. The levelheadedness of pedophiles in their planning, the open-eyed purpose of everything they do should be enough to revoke the idiotic notion of them being like some crying, self-harming addict.

Edit: There's a difference between categorizing certain behavioral/psychological tendencies and traits for identification, as with Forensic Psych it seems, and treating everything like a mental illness which needs hugs and pills to be cured.


Good stuff and I see your point there. CPS is already on thin ice in a lot of areas regarding hypocrisy so I wonder if it's a matter of sensitivity training and them not wanting to seem homophobic or someone just having connections to let the kids stay in his arms' reach.
When I was in college, absolutely not. There was just absolutely no way. It was seen as a pathological disorder that was dangerous and largely untreatable. But it wasn't much talked about outside of forensic psych. Even Sexual Psych didn't touch upon it, even though it did touch upon LGBT and paraphilias.

The so-called Virtuous Pedophile shit and minorly attracted person garbage just didn't exist. It was pretty much inconceivable, even to the most progressive of professors. I mean, there were varying amounts of "They can't help themselves, but they can't be treated so they should be kept far away from children" to "We don't know much about non-offending pedophiles, so we can't say". There was nothing like sympathy or support.
 
Those who are refusing to or only half heartedly condemning him should be forced to read the absolutely disgusting descriptions of those child porn videos...except, I fear they'd get off to it.

When I was in college, absolutely not. There was just absolutely no way. It was seen as a pathological disorder that was dangerous and largely untreatable. But it wasn't much talked about outside of forensic psych. Even Sexual Psych didn't touch upon it, even though it did touch upon LGBT and paraphilias.

The so-called Virtuous Pedophile shit and minorly attracted person garbage just didn't exist. It was pretty much inconceivable, even to the most progressive of professors. I mean, there were varying amounts of "They can't help themselves, but they can't be treated so they should be kept far away from children" to "We don't know much about non-offending pedophiles, so we can't say". There was nothing like sympathy or support.
The modern psych idea that if someone can't help but repeatedly be a danger to others, that's fine because they can't help it, was a fucking mistake. Pathologizing evil led to the idea that you can love and care the evil away. You can't. Especially not when it's the type of evil that's universally reviled, like raping kids.
 
I just realized if he's spreading cp at least some of it was probably of his kids. Oh God oh fuck how many pics and vids of those poor kids being raped by this asshole (or touching each other) while Daddy #2 films are out there? Oh God oh fuck get it out of my head
Reminds of what happened to Masha Allen, who was adopted by a single man and of whom an exceedingly large volume of videos were made depicting her sexual abuse and torture at the hands of her adopted father. She was eventually removed from his custody and the sadistic fuck jailed, but even her next adoptive guardian exploited her by doing the Oprah and talk show rounds while physically abusing her and treating her as a pet rather than a child who needed help and dedicated care. She's the namesake of Masha's law, where children violated through the production of child porn can sue for damages the people who are caught with it as well as those who made it (Kiwilawyers, correct me if I have this wrong please). For their sake, I hope his adopted children were spared his abuse, bring on the rainbows.
 
Good thing he makes it so easy for the cops to link him to crimes when he uses his real name in an email account used to upload his deplorable collection.
I feel sympathy for the people who have to watch his videos to compile the transcript in the court document, it sickens me to read halfway through the first charge and he actively masturbated to this.


Give him the chair, the world won't miss him.
I don't know if it was an actual article, or an Anon just making a claim. But I remember hearing that the people Facebook hired to look at flagged content which often would include CP would end up quitting in a few months time because it just damaged their psyches.

I really can't blame cops & detectives for becoming miserable bastards and drunkards. Your sheltered suburb normie doesn't understand how fucked up people can be. One of my first jobs ever was gas jockey at the ghetto and I almost beat the shit out of a cunt mother who was relentlessly hitting her toddler daughter. If I were a cop I'd likely be in prison for executing a deserving "suspect."
 
When stuff like this breaks for higher ranking individuals I'm always left wondering if them "taking the hit" for this kind of stuff if to cover up a bigger crime going on in the background and they've been picked as the fall guy to take the heat off of something more sinister. Guy has gotten away with this for a long time and felt safe enough to not care about opsec when sharing this sick shit, makes me wonder if he was being protected by people in higher places and something happened that made them pull it. Doesn't help that he seemed super well connected to a lot of big names and organizations that make wonder something fierce about what was going on there. I can't believe that absolutely no one was aware of what he was doing if he was this sloppy. Will have to see if he gets the book thrown at him and the quickly "accidentally" is killed/dies after arriving in prison since no one would be surprised at a convicted pedo being a target in prison.

I'm also not super aware of how it works, but would him getting convicted do anything to the cases he's overseen? Would they have to be reviewed by a third party investigation team?
 
bruh he's got unrestricted access to two kids, of course he has.
Edit

You mistake brazenness for lack of a single intelligent bone in his body. These people don't think about this shit, they think they're invincible. Also I believe it was actually stated that pedos tend to be average to lower than average intelligence.
I just realized if he's spreading cp at least some of it was probably of his kids. Oh God oh fuck how many pics and vids of those poor kids being raped by this asshole (or touching each other) while Daddy #2 films are out there? Oh God oh fuck get it out of my head
Brett seems to be something of a dull bulb. His pronouncements during his election campaign were the usual woke talking points obviously fed to him by his handlers. Nothing original or insightful, just another boring ass white liberal being air lifted into a safe blue district.

So how come such an unremarkable faggot got to play judge? Serving on the city planning authority one minute (a job he was also unqualified for but got put in anyway) and the next a county judge? I mean how many rich and powerful perverts was he lending his kids out to?
Reminds of what happened to Masha Allen, who was adopted by a single man and of whom an exceedingly large volume of videos were made depicting her sexual abuse and torture at the hands of her adopted father. She was eventually removed from his custody and the sadistic fuck jailed, but even her next adoptive guardian exploited her by doing the Oprah and talk show rounds while physically abusing her and treating her as a pet rather than a child who needed help and dedicated care. She's the namesake of Masha's law, where children violated through the production of child porn can sue for damages the people who are caught with it as well as those who made it (Kiwilawyers, correct me if I have this wrong please). For their sake, I hope his adopted children were spared his abuse, bring on the rainbows.
Children should not be living with adults who aren't their biological relations. I get that sometimes it's unavoidable but as soon as a strange man shacks up with the single mom a certain percentage of them are going to start looking at the kids as potential playthings.
This doesn't happen with blood relatives, likely we're hard wired that way.
 
From the complaint. I just can't understand the sexual attraction to a toddler. It's beyond comprehension.
Is it nature or nurture?
In cases like this I suspect it's sexual sadism rather than a direct attraction to toddlers. A more "true" pedophile would get off to toddlers in physically gentler situations. Based on this description this is a toddler being brutally raped and tortured. Someone watches this because they are sexually aroused by extreme suffering in others, and a toddler is an easy or more satisfying target.
Half of all pedos are homosexual men who rape young boys. Gay men are 1% of the population.

Most exploitation of young girls happens in the family home by men who are not related to them by blood. Step dads/ boyfriends are at least 100 x more likely to engage in this than a child's biological father.

But in current year we cannot discuss the actual problem (single moms and faggots are a protected class) and we choose to abandon children to their fate.

I would never leave my children alone with a homosexual man. Yes most gays are not pedos (no need to sperg) but the statistics tell me a gay man is far more likely to be a pedo so I've decided not to risk it.
Oh my god will you shut the fuck up? This entire thread is full of wildly off-topic powerlevelly sperging and nobody gives a shit about your trash kids. Talk about this actual case for five seconds instead of your personal no-no feelings about gay men.
His husband counts as supervision.
I want to say that plenty of people have married monsters without realizing it. Like Secret Asshole said upthread, these people are extremely good at manipulation in order to get closer to a target. It's not necessarily a foregone conclusion that the husband is in on it.

That said, if the husband lets this piece of shit into the family home or allows him any access to the kids at all, he's either in on it or a piece of shit enabler who shouldn't have custody of a fruit bat.
 
Back