Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

Oats12345 said:
I will pray that one of these days it comes out that he was really a Disney employee and all of this was Disney playing with TFM crowd
Click to expand...
sadly, I think that by this point the average Star Wars consoomer could literally see a Disney employee make an announcement, that they staged all this shit for marketing, just like this - and they still wouldn't care and would continue consooming. there really is no cure for being a nostalgic idiot.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: PseudoScrooge, Mary the Goldsmith and Admiral Mantoid
Mississippi Motorboater said:
By the way, with the news that Genndy Wars is coming to Disney Plus, I'd advise backing up/archiving the fan remastered version on YouTube, because you know Disney will be gunning for it.
Click to expand...
Has anybody tried to do an AI upscale of Genndy Wars?
 
The Valeyard said:
(Archive)


And I had almost forgotten that Lando fucks droids in the new canon. (:_(
Click to expand...
I wasn't aware Wendig's and Miller's black Empress Rae Sloane was considered "queer", but it definitely makes sense considering how obnoxiously they portray her much like their other BBQ characters.

I also expect that the Lando cover will be the shitty Donald Glover "Landonis", because they've already teased that the shitty Lando show on Disney+ may be "queer". And FYI its not just droids, the moronic writers even said he was attracted to Han and that Billy Dee's portrayal was "totally sexually fluid". And this was Jon Kasdan's son, and his father then implied Billy Dee was being fucking "flirty" with Han. Its like these people have never seen a smooth talking conman before while ignoring his obvious actual flirting towards Leia to the point where he wanted the Empire to let him keep her.
web.archive.org

'Star Wars' Writer Confirms Donald Glover's Character Is Pansexual

A “Solo” writer opened up about Lando Calrissian’s fluid sexuality and his desire for “a more explicitly LGBT character.”
web.archive.org web.archive.org
There was also that wretched Last Shot story that had Lando apparently visiting an alien+droid orgy and flirting with an octopus iirc.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwi Lime Pie, The-Mad-Asshatter, PseudoScrooge and 8 others
Ghostse said:
If all the shit about Disney burning Star Wars for datamining is true, it'd make sense.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I mean, what's more profitable than standing by your product? Social media clout, forgotten and remembered engagement, but shallow all the same. Like, fuck the product itself, this is a widespread phenomenon where optimism for a product is burning bright for consumers, who then put on a fake smile as it all crumbles apart immediately. It's an instance of conversation that means essentially nothing but pays off for data miners.

Being a paper thin optimist first, then a blind stepford-smile consoomer later as relevancy is thrown out the window.

That's what defines an end-product now, digital farts.
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter, Mary the Goldsmith and make_it_so
After the nuking of Carano, the addition of a rock navigator and the upcoming desecration of Durge by Doctor Aphra, you might be asking yourself what fresh cringe do you have to look forward to this morning?

Marvel comics celebrates alphabet smuggler character Sana Starros for pride month this June. The character will be featured on a variant cover for Doctor Aphra #11.

niggerdyke.jpg

Curiously several other characters were mentioned in the pride celebration including:

"Rae Sloane will grace the cover of Darth Vader #13 as drawn by J.J. Kirby, Doctor Aphra will get into mischief on War of the Bounty Hunters #1 with art from Babs Tarr, Yrica Quell will be captured by artist Jacopo Camagni on the cover of Bounty Hunters #13, Jedi twins Terec and Ceret from Star Wars: The High Republic will be portrayed by artist Javier Garron on a variant for issue #6, and the smooth-talking scoundrel Lando Calrissian will be decked out in style on the cover of Star Wars #14, illustrated by Stephen Byrne."

I couldn't give a shit about Rae Sloane but looks like she's a dyke now? Occasional droid fucker Lando Calrissian is officially being referred to as one of the alphabet characters now too? RIP

A fresh article from some shill on GameRant about how "Star War Needs a Fully independent story" that moves away from the Skywalkers and Solos. While the article's author makes some points I agree with, he completely loses me with one of the closing paragraphs:

"It would allow a lot more freedom and creativity in the writers' room and allow for different types of stories to be told, ideally ones with much more diversity than the trilogies Star Wars currently has. They could do a story with no human characters at all if they wanted to, or experiment with different genres rather than just doing straight adventure stories."

I'm certainly looking forward to the ditching of adventure stories, which were the whole point of the Star Wars franchise and the inevitable diverse replacement series like Sex and the Starship.

With all the talk recently in the thread about old EU characters being brought back into canon, a CBR article "Star Wars: How Mara Jade's Death Predicted the Force Awakens" actually gives the EU some credit for inspiring the Sequel trilogy, in a rather disingenuous way.

"The sequel trilogy in the Skywalker Saga borrowed heavily from Star Wars Legends, and Mara Jade predicted the fall of Kylo Ren."

"The sequel trilogy borrowed many aspects from the Legends canon, including Palpatine's clone and the turn to the Dark Side by a son of Han Solo. While Mara Jade's story is impossible to develop in the current Star Wars universe, some rendition of the character may still appear in The Mandolorian or one of the many other upcoming Disney+ Star Wars projects."

I celebrate the inevitable bisexual, strong woman of color portrayal of Mara Jade coming to Disney+ in future so she can further destroy what's left of Luke Skywalkers legacy.

The next Star Wars Film "Rogue Squadron" has been announced for December 2023 and will be directed and written by Patty Jenkins. The article claims that Jenkins will be drawing on source material for the film:

"Jenkins has confirmed that it’ll follow an original story but will be taking inspiration from the rich history of novels, comics, and video games chronicling the adventures of these pilots."

Interestingly the article takes a realistic look at the reception citing 10 reasons why fans may be excited or skeptical, the skeptical reasons including: Disney has yet to make a great Star Wars movie, WW1984 was underwhelming, Disney keeps meddling in Star Wars movies, It could be set in the Sequel era and Star Wars fans are fatigued of the franchise. I can't be bothered listing the reasons to be excited, because quite frankly I am not.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter, Cactuar King, The Valeyard and 9 others
Smug Freiza said:
"Jenkins has confirmed that it’ll follow an original story but will be taking inspiration from the rich history of novels, comics, and video games chronicling the adventures of these pilots."
Click to expand...

Wait, what rich history? Kennedy told us there was no source material for her use when making the ST.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter, Cyril Sneer, The Valeyard and 11 others
Ghostse said:
Marvel is expanding into Woke, but has not gone full woke accross the board. They are just making sure nothing 'red pilled' gets the through that'd get wokes up in arms.
Lets also separate Marvel in to the Comics and the MCU; Traditional Comics are pretty much dead and the domain of manchildren now. Which is why they are trying to appeal to the soy face crowd because they are already dropping minimum $10 a hit on FunkoPops - there be gold in them-there receding hairlines.

MCU is toe-dipping on woke with Captain Marvel and That One Scene (you know the one) from End Game, but you still have the main releases that are sticking to fundamentals. We'll see if that continues to bear out as we head towards "Phase II" or whatever the fucking term they using to delineate the movies with RDJ & the ones with out (and very likely to delineate the ones with without from the ones where they are forced to resurrect him).

MCU going woke is due to their Fox acquisition. Star Wars is out, Fox stuff is out, their only competition is Warner DC Batman, and Universal Jurrassic Park.

I'm going to go admittedly full tinhat sperg here:
but the tl;dr is Disney is pushing the woke narrative to try to cancel everything pre-CURRENT YEAR to make money.

You've read scrolled past my posts. You've read my disclaimer about admitting I'm going full tinfoil.
You do this because now all those old toys from the 80s that are still kicking around (and anything pure-plastic from about 84? lasts for fucking ever. Paint gets worn, but the toys are still playable and posible) now need to be tossed out. All those old childrens DVDs & VHSes need tossed for the woke-consistent life-action reboots.

Burn all the books in the library, now you've got to buy new books. And looks who's right here to sell them to you - the guy who whipped up the mob.

Disney wants to become the Popes of Woke because they can dictate terms to parents. "Not buying your kids the Woke Avengers, the BLTBBQ++++A friendly toys that include Woman Man the first Trans+ Pansexual Character in a children's cartoon? Well, you might as well be enrolling your kids in the hilter youth, you fucking bigot"

This is part of a greater push like we've seen with Gina - Disney wants to control actors. They can do by saying "don't toe the line and jump when we say jump? We'll toss you to twitter". Anyone gets too uppity and independent? They just throw the tranny twitter mafia a decidely unwoke tweet you made to take out of context, and now you're radioactive garbage and you're stuck working for Ben Shapiro.
Click to expand...

The problem is, woke shit doesn't make any money. In fact, judging by how the anti-woke crowd rallied behind the Snyder Cut, and how half of the Mandalorian's success was pandering to the non-woke audience by parading Luke Skywalker's corpse, going full woke to dictate terms to parents is a great way for Disney to lose what's left of their lingering audience. The parents can just as easily buy toys from other franchises, like the increasingly kid-friendly Halo franchise, Fortnite, the Transformers franchise, the increasing amounts of Japanese anime toys that have been popping up in western stores like Target, old movie toys like the Terminator and Aliens that also have been showing up, toys based on successful DC animated films, among others. The MCU was selling strong BECAUSE movies were coming out, movies that aren't woke and were just made for broad appeal and simple family fun that can rake in millions of viewers. Now that said phenomenon is going out the window, why should parents buy the next toy for their kids? To appeal to a woke market the kids don't like or understand?

Superhero films in the past year have been growing less and less profitable, ever since the Thanos arc ended and superhero MCU shit began to smell like week-old fish. Without new movies that appeal to a broad, wide audience, the MCU is going to stall, and its appeal to kids will also stall, since they still have the toys from the MCU's heyday, but nothing new is coming out to inspire them to buy more. Combine that with the fact that the COOF PANDEMIC has made spending on toys less appealing as jobs and money are becoming more and more tight, with even union workers losing jobs because they voted like idiots, buying the next Marvel boondoggle when there's no smash blockbuster to go with it doesn't make sense. At most, you can get longtime comic fans to buy new Marvel figures based on old comics, like Doctor Doom or Marvel Zombies and the like, but the average normie has no reason to splurge on Marvel stuff when they still have a veritable plethora of that crap that they've bought in the past few years, as well as the fact that there's no real blockbuster that can rake in the populace. The most we've gotten in recent days that can rake in people is the Snyder Cut of the Justice League, and that's just WB making money off the anti-woke grifters who have been demanding it.

Speaking of which, anti-woke has become a definite source of income. WB used them to support the Snyder Cut of the Justice League, and we saw how the anti-woke crowd folded like sheep and started praising Season 2 of The Mandalorian for merely parading a version of Luke Skywalker who wasn't a complete and total loser. If they went further with that kind of crap, Disney, WB, and other corporations can make some real money, especially since many in the anti-woke crowd are adults who are capable of splurging excess money on merchandise. Not only would you have an audience ready to CONSOOM PRODUCT when it comes to movies and TV shows, but they're also an audience that can be marketed merchandise to.

Unlike the normies whose belts are getting tighter and whose tendencies for spending money on merchandise withers away the longer the pandemic lasts, these anti-SJW "TROO FANS" can and will spend money on stuff that appeals to them, and what appeals to them? Basic Capeshit/SW content that isn't infected with wokeness. Which is why the Snyder Cut of the Justice League had so much support from the anti-woke crowd even though Zack Snyder would sooner throw them under the bus, and why Season 2 of the Mandalorian had so much support even from people who hated the Sequels. Even though the latter had flaccid action scenes where cardboard cut-out Stormtroopers were massacred as if it were Dynasty Warriors with blasters and laser swords, it wasn't shoving woke bullshit down your throat, which is why people took it in and treated Dave Filoni and Jon Favreau as if they were the Second Coming of George Lucas.

Point being, TLJ and the ensuing panic after it proved to us that wokeness doesn't sell, MCU capeshit is beginning to be less appealing since they don't have as strong a movie presence as before, and anti-wokeness has proven itself to be a surefire source of income. Will this turn Disney into a Red-Pill company? Doubtful. But I can't see them turning a profit by going woke. More likely, they will piss away the last vestiges of profit that they gained from S2 of The Mandalorian by going woke, and they'll have to borrow more money since new strains of the China Coof would ensure that their parks remain closed. And if they can't make the money back, those lenders are going to come down like a tidal wave on Disney. Disney already pulled the whole "if you don't buy our shit, you're a racist, sexist, homophobic bigot" crap with TLJ and its merchandise, and people responded to that with "LOL, don't care, go blow it out your SJW asses." Which is how TLJ merchandise ended up in the dumpster. Once Marvel goes woke (which it already is in the process of) the Marvel merchandise will join the TLJ merchandise in the landfill.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska, Admiral Mantoid and Drag-on Knight 91873
Curzon said:
Probably the latter. I can't imagine a movie company paying Doomcock, seeing as what he does is... well, you know.
Click to expand...
I legit can, mainly because in this time period where getting 500k drooling retards to sit in front of a TV to watch some actual garbage is "enough justification" to keep making seasons of said garbage, a weird autist in a bucket helmet that gets you a few thousand hatewatches is worth it.

Especially if you can trick them into shilling for your corporate trash with fake and gay us v. them mentality. Especially given this is the period in time where companies are more willing to lie about making money and product and seeding audiences than actually making fucking product.
Admiral Mantoid said:
I wasn't aware Wendig's and Miller's black Empress Rae Sloane was considered "queer", but it definitely makes sense considering how obnoxiously they portray her much like their other BBQ characters.

I also expect that the Lando cover will be the shitty Donald Glover "Landonis", because they've already teased that the shitty Lando show on Disney+ may be "queer". And FYI its not just droids, the moronic writers even said he was attracted to Han and that Billy Dee's portrayal was "totally sexually fluid". And this was Jon Kasdan's son, and his father then implied Billy Dee was being fucking "flirty" with Han. Its like these people have never seen a smooth talking conman before while ignoring his obvious actual flirting towards Leia to the point where he wanted the Empire to let him keep her.
web.archive.org

'Star Wars' Writer Confirms Donald Glover's Character Is Pansexual

A “Solo” writer opened up about Lando Calrissian’s fluid sexuality and his desire for “a more explicitly LGBT character.”
web.archive.org web.archive.org
There was also that wretched Last Shot story that had Lando apparently visiting an alien+droid orgy and flirting with an octopus iirc.
Click to expand...
Uh-huh. That's why I really doubt they'll nut up and actually have him and a man kiss on TV. They are so full of shit on this when it comes to "big products". Remember when they intentionally tried to brag about a lesbian kiss that was in the background, was done in less than a second, and was designed to be easily edited out for countries that want gays to do flips off buildings?

Same shit I'm predicting here. We're just going to get mincing stereotypes with this bootleg Lando, because Disney and LFL will lack the balls to actually have Lando full on kiss some dude on TV. They refused to follow the gay ship between Finn and Poe, so no. They ain't gonna do it beyond just having the actor hit on everyone sometimes.
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: 0-0-----0, Ghostse, Uranus Pink and 4 others
Adamska said:
Same shit I'm predicting here. We're just going to get mincing stereotypes with this bootleg Lando, because Disney and LFL will lack the balls to actually have Lando full on kiss some dude on TV. They refused to follow the gay ship between Finn and Poe, so no. They ain't gonna do it beyond just having the actor hit on everyone sometimes.
Click to expand...
It's like why cartoons will have two girls get together but not two guys. They know more people will think gay men are disgusting compared to thinking lesbians are disgusting, so they won't go that far because they don't want real backlash for having gay characters. And that's why Lando being a "queer character" will go as far as him being attracted to aliens and robots and some JKR-tier Word of God telling us he totally fucked a man one time.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Hog On Ice, Oats12345, Ghostse and 4 others
Adamska said:
I legit can, mainly because in this time period where getting 500k drooling retards to sit in front of a TV to watch some actual garbage is "enough justification" to keep making seasons of said garbage, a weird autist in a bucket helmet that gets you a few thousand hatewatches is worth it.

Especially if you can trick them into shilling for your corporate trash with fake and gay us v. them mentality. Especially given this is the period in time where companies are more willing to lie about making money and product and seeding audiences than actually making fucking product.
Click to expand...
The only part you got wrong is that they pay him. The best part is, just like any tranny janny, he'll do it for FREE. Hell I'd bet any competent "source" could get Doomcuck to pay them, as his grift relies soley on hater shekels so the rumor spigot can never ever be turned off. All you have to do is dick tease him with little actual info, let's say 10%, all of which you can and do spin to friendly sites anyway. At least shills like collider were very obviously paid, received free tat, and vacations for placing their tongue right down the back of Disney's trousers. Cuck is just a useful free marketing idiot.

Seriously when was the last time he was right about something that didn't originate on bleedingcool or similar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oats12345, Adamska and Admiral Mantoid
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back