skjora
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
It feels a bit like destiny has gotten his a bunch of his viewpoints from communicators who've packaged various perspectives in a palatable ways that "make sense", but is feeling a lot of frustation when personally confronted with the crazy people that are the basis of these sanitized viewpoints. Started with the right years ago, but is now focused on the left.As I reminder, I made a post a couple months ago explaining the scuffle Destiny had with DemonMama, the story behind the "WHAAAT?" video:
Regarding that tranny podcast panel, I'd like to highlight a comment Destiny made during the livestream (before he joined and was only listening from the outside) that didn't make it into his edited YouTube video:
After that, I was surprised to see that he not only went back to listening after seemingly quitting, but also joined the panel directly. Even so, I think it's remarkable that he appeared to go by without explicitly laying out what he believes about trannies, rather positioning himself as a "just asking questions" guy, a way he talks about the issue that I've noticed before. He even subtly laid out the "I identify as an attack helicopter" memetic argument using "chair" instead, which DemonMama recognized. Destiny has been coming across as a closeted trans-skeptic who wants to be a believer, only to then become frustrated when nobody he talks to can provide pro-trans reasoning that's sensible enough for him to agree with and adopt. As Destiny has been recently building out his "positions" website as a one-stop shop for the ideological battles he gets in with Leftists, I wonder when or even if he's going to write a section that explains what he actually believes regarding trannies. At the moment, the only mention is under the "Social Justice" section, stating, "In general, the government should work to protect the rights of minority groups, including trans people." As Destiny himself remarked, to elaborate further is very dangerous territory, more so than any of his other positions.
As for DemonMama, I'm amused that his much-discussed absurd recursive definition of "woman" (i.e., a woman is someone who identifies as a woman) comes across as a desperate attempt to assert (even to himself) that he is, in fact, a woman. He can't find or come up with any other definition in which he can confidently insert himself into that category.
This frustration is compounded by the fact that he has not been able to functionally understand or relate to his fellow man without reading what is effectively esoteric philosophical instruction manuals for human psychology. I don't believe he's autistic, but he does strongly lack in the empathy department.