Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Let's ignore that the rise in trans murders and assaults on Asians are nearly entirely committed by blacks, I guess.
That is the fault of the white man, silly. How? Dunno, but it's whitey's fault anyways.
I also wonder with this fucking lockdown how troon murder went up.
 
E9628398-485D-48F2-A013-06D9118DAB6E.png
 
Social justice and all of its affliated movements never take responsibility for anything. Nothing is ever their fault. Nothing is ever their problem. There are always deflections and excuses. Instead of improving themselves or making productive contributions to society as a whole, they're rather blame other people or steal or destroy what other people have. Worse yet, nothing is ever good enough so it becomes a vicious cycle of abuse, neglect, and blame. If anything improved, then it would take away their precious validation. I guess when you're a pathetic or mediocre person with no direction or purpose in life, then, by SJW logic, the next best thing is to be a perpetual victim who is pitied and doted on by others.

This is why ideologies like socialism and feminism can never improve because they're not supposed to. Improvement is anathema to rigid dogmatic ideologies because instead of helping everyone being better off, they would rather make sure someone else is worse off than them while not bettering themselves. Granted, this isn't limited to left-liberal ideologies, but since they're the focus of this thread I am directing it them.

Considering the vast majority of SJWs are women, are you surprised that social justice, et al., avoids and deflects responsibility?

Idiot tax in 2nd image -
1616363634553.png

1616363674884.png
 
View attachment 2015541

Reminder these pink all opsition to mass media projects like this as a right wing conspiracy, litteraly calling it "alt right pipeline"
To be fair, Doomcock is full of shit and there is a distinct likelihood he's a Nazi LARPer. I don't give a shit about this Ketwolski guy, but it's a good 4 minute point about Doomcock's activities and the retardation that infests "The Fandom Menace." There's criticizing all the garbage in Disney, and there's whining about SJW's every 30 seconds while you tell weird lies about Star Wars. Thinking social justice ideology was the main thing wrong with the new Star Wars movies is like thinking Tommy Wisaeu's wardrobe choices were what really made The Room so insane. Calling Doomcock an altright pipeline is overdramatic, but not too far off, because the YouTube algorithm starts pushing the same edgy rightoid shit when you start watching him.
 
Is that supposed to be offensive? I think it sounds funny! It's stupid, but funny.

Despite this, they'll never stop being offended at everything under the sun. You don't even have to try and offend them. For example, I could call a feminist a hoflake and she'd have a meltdown. I just pulled that word out of my ass too!
 
View attachment 2016007

Everything is gamergate, everything is incels, everything is white supremacy, and you have to point it all out.
Yes, certainly the current crop of insufferable TikTok addicted obese women have nothing to do with it. "The juice isn't worth the squeeze."
 
Is that supposed to be offensive? I think it sounds funny! It's stupid, but funny.

Despite this, they'll never stop being offended at everything under the sun. You don't even have to try and offend them. For example, I could call a feminist a hoflake and she'd have a meltdown. I just pulled that word out of my ass too!
Considering its just a slight twist on 'Snowflake' they must really think that term still stings. I wonder if the definer of this joke realizes that "Ethnic" does not just apply to non-whites. This is a step to the left of calling a black man 'urban'.
 
It's true, the Left can't meme.

But the Right sucks at every other form of entertainment.
The issue I think is fundamentally structural- Cluster B socjus warriors really believe in what they believe in and back that belief in emotional vitrol. This allows them to endlessly work towards their goals of institutional capture (which in itself is really quite boring of a process). They want those institutional positions and are willing to sit through those boring meetings in order to implement their goals. This has allowed them to progressively capture an institution every generation, starting with education, then culture/entertainment, then cities, and finally state and federal government.

Secondly, most people are not disagreeable enough to fight through an endless stream of socjus vitrol (i.e. cancellation, doxxing, violence). They're willing to stay quiet if they won't suffer, and that really only leaves a few individuals who are either inexhaustible in their beliefs or who love the fight to go up against them (i.e. Trump).

Traditional liberalism as a state-of-being doesn't really lend itself as strongly as the utopia of the left, as people are already 'raised in it'. They benefit from it, but it elicits relatively little emotion- as such, they also don't see how green the grass really is on their side of the fence, while the utopia of the left promises even greener grass.

Simultaneously, Western Nationalism has been systematically demolished throughout the last 40 years, with an almost-fatal blow coming from the Forever Wars in the Middle East (Patriotism discredited), and a second blow coming from the 2008 Recession (Capitalism discredited). Same could be said about the Church as an institution- having lost its position within the last 20 years or so.

I can see some parallels to the tired institutions of Late Imperial Rome, and the rapid rise of Christianity, though obviously in darker tones today- there is neither forgiveness nor salvation in this modern cult of equity.
 
Last edited:
I think it's because memes work when there's an element of truth to them, entertainment works when it crafts a comforting fantasy instead of the harsh truth.
Not always. Norman Lear's works were successful because they weren't cookie cutter fantasy Americana, for example. Married With Children was successful because it showed that, yes, married people can be miserable. That's just two examples.
 
Back