DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

The_Grudge_movie.jpg
 
He must live in constant fear of Panda returning and spilling the beans on their early relationship. That would be the one thing that could truly end him.

Yeah on the one hand I'm glad Panda has moved on with her life and is actually doing something besides playing vidja and working a dead end job to support Dave.

On the other hand I would probably pay money for her to do some kind of one time only tellall stream about her time in the pigpen.
 
He must live in constant fear of Panda returning and spilling the beans on their early relationship. That would be the one thing that could truly end him.

If there were anything damning he would just try to turn it around on her. His parents could speak out against him publicly and he would still make himself into the victim. He's not popular enough that anyone of note would bother covering it, so he could just write it off and no one would care. The one thing that can truly end Phil is Phil. Like him dropping an N bomb on stream (he's come damn close recently) would have a bigger fallout and would likely be more hilarious than anything anyone else can do to him. But regardless he can only go so long without fucking something up for himself.
 
Yeah on the one hand I'm glad Panda has moved on with her life and is actually doing something besides playing vidja and working a dead end job to support Dave.

On the other hand I would probably pay money for her to do some kind of one time only tellall stream about her time in the pigpen.
I wouldn't be surprised if DSP manipulated pandalee into signing some non-disclosure agreement. sounds like something he would do
 
It will never not be hilarious seeing this grown man hype up his birthday "festivities" with balloons and decorations and shit like some kind of child-like retard rofl.
Fuck Phil,he didn't wish Derich a happy birthday, he shouldn't get cake or birthday week tips for neglecting his number one fan.
 
The most enlightening aspect of DSP's review of Civil War, beyond the ambient stupidity permeating through his inability to interpret and remember things, is that sentence: "You're watching a comic book movie, you're gonna have a few WTF moments". This is DSP to a T, no expectations, no standards, "it has sucked for some time so why expect improvement".

It's also a fantastic insight into the below-average consumer's ability to overlook writing flaws to then clap at the pretty pictures (That we unfortunately do not get much of because these aren't the type to consistently and publicly go in-depth about their consumption of what they consider a throwaway product). I want more of this, in length and in number, I want to see how a complete moron watches movies, or even reads comics.
here's a quick thing I cooked up
 
I had to go back and transcribe this 🌙

"Ladies and gentleman, I am going to be honest with all of you. Last night, it was a pretty, you know, dud of a stream except for the very generous contribution from OIC of those subs. Outside of that, it was really slow. I'm hoping that today for today's stream I can make up for the fact that last night's stream was incredibly slow for support. So if you like what I'm doing today *blah blah blah*"

LMAO. So if he goes over $100 he still needs $100 for the next stream, but if he gets less than $100 you have to make up for it.
 
The irony of this is the reply he left in the comment section of his video.

"+Cristian Reyes wrong. YOUTUBE's definition of "reaction" is watching something live and doing all kinds of overexaggerated facial expressions for views (which people, for some reason, tend to eat up and I'll never understand). But that's not what a reaction is by definition. This isn't "Phil's Live Reaction" at all, it's my after-the-fact reactions to the film. I'm telling you what I liked and disliked, but I'm not scoring the film nor am I ranking it in any kind of a system against other films, so it's not a review."
 
I had to go back and transcribe this :lunacy:

"Ladies and gentleman, I am going to be honest with all of you. Last night, it was a pretty, you know, dud of a stream except for the very generous contribution from OIC of those subs. Outside of that, it was really slow. I'm hoping that today for today's stream I can make up for the fact that last night's stream was incredibly slow for support. So if you like what I'm doing today *blah blah blah*"

LMAO. So if he goes over $100 he still needs $100 for the next stream, but if he gets less than $100 you have to make up for it.

$1,260 in cash over the past 7 days. I repeat: twelve hundred and sixty dollars in cash over the past seven days.


March 15 early stream: $111
March 15 late stream: $26

March 16 early stream: $152
March 16 late stream: $120

March 17 early stream: (no streams)
March 17 late stream: (no streams)

March 18 early stream: $57
March 18 late stream: $112

March 19 early stream: $160
March 19 late stream: $130

March 20 early stream: $107
March 20 late stream: $148

March 21 early stream: $121
March 21 late stream: $16
=====================================
early total: $708 + late total: $552 = $1,260

That's $1,260 / 12 streams = $105 on average per stream.

It's never enough for him. You can give him almost $400 in 3 days, but if the next day isn't on par, those 3 days are instantly memory-holed. And the paypigs keep falling for it. But hey, I guess that's what literal retardation does to people.
 
Last edited:
I love how bad he is at his "jahb". He claims emulation is a resource burden on a computer, it's nearly impossible to capture a ps3, there is a shortage of working ps1 and ps2 systems, ps1 and ps2 physical copies are ridiculously expensive, on and on like he's never experienced things outside of what he assumes.
"My computer is out of memory!"
Probably hasn't defragged once. I have a feeling if he took an hour to clean and organize his PC it would be perfectly fine to use for most games. LAZINESS!!
 
We basicly knew he doesnt do charity. He is the kinda guy who would brag about it. We know from the scamruptcy papers he doesnt donate, fact.

So why is he still pushing his narrative that he does charity but it should be in private is fuckin beyond me...

Well one has to look at Phil's and people like Phil "unique" perspective of the world. You see blockhead genuinely believes that everything that people do like donating to charity or volunteering at a homeless shelter must have a ulterior motive.

For example let's look at Dolly Parton. I think it was either mid or late last year Dolly Parton had donated alot of money for Covid research. Most if not everybody would see that as a good thing; meanwhile Phil and people like Phil would see the immediate negative and say she is clout chasing.

This charity nonsense tells alot about Phil's psychology about people and how, to him anyway, nothing good comes from anything.

Edit: if one were to think about it Phil just may be butthurt at the fact that he can't do the same thing and be recognized for doing a good since it would be obvious he is simply clout chasing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back