I don't know what's dumber, that he's saying this in public, or that he thinks we'll believe he's doing cases in three different counties.
Just curious if him tweeting about his clients case like this is grounds for malpractice, I mean he's always being a "lawyer" for sport but would be funny if one of his clients sued him for his tweets.
He was bitching about this last week.
Use a browser extension that does a full page screen capture. If the thread goes on too long, as T. Greg's often does, capture the archive'd page instead.
But it's the legislature's fault. They changed it without telling him!
Nick makes a living literally calling people garbage and fat. While I believe some part of Nick likes to pit his wits against prosecutors and win (and likes to help people in need of a lawyer), it's either that or literally make money staying at home and shooting the breeze on the internet.
And somehow this dipshit didn't see the potential scheduling conflict here a mile out and do anything about it until the very day of trial?
Especially if he's been giving that client some bullshit song and dance about how good a job he is doing (when he in fact does nothing but tweet all day).
Mmmm, yeah. Well, about that.
lawandcrime.com
Oh goody, so there's another to find. Or he could have just realized he fucked up and threw out a red herring. Since I'm not going to search anything but Durham and adjacent counties, like Wake, I'll wait a bit. There are ways of finding these things out later.
Well he was representing at least one in Wake County yesterday.
This is one of those citations that should be followed by a But see signal, in this case to Goldwater v. Ginzburg. No direct evidence that the defendant actually knew the psychological analysis they published of Barry Goldwater was false, or even that they entertained serious doubts as to its truthfulness, but the Second Circuit upheld the verdict for the plaintiff.
Actual malice is different from the malice you're describing. Actual malice is reckless disregard for the truth or knowledge of falsity. The malice you're talking about is the general definition of malice, i.e. wishing harm on someone. Regular malice can be used as evidence for actual malice (e.g. you hate Vic so much you knowingly spread harmful lies about him) but they're not the same thing.
That could be an interesting result, but it could also be incredibly funny. Some of Ron's arguable fact statements were Ron personally knew of several women who Vic had assaulted. That could lead up to a chain of events where Ron has to admit that Monica and the Yost twins lied to him.
Except, aren't the VAs and the main part of KV going so hard that you could nail them for either one?
