T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

1615858208219.png
1615858177037.png

1615858268513.png
1615858387022.png


1615858303833.png

1615858330046.png
1615858432166.png


1615858468206.png


edit

1615858934571.png

 
Last edited:
And his finances are still rioting.
Greg Doucette also collected money to deliver a laughable package of crap to poor people that couldn't be used to make even a single family meal, almost assuredly horribly disappointing the recipients, who had to travel miles to get it.

For sport.
 
Greg Doucette represented a "boogaloo boy" who was arrested for protesting. After his arrest, and the media attention, he found out people thought he was a white supremacist who wanted to start a race war. It's either that or he's dumb as rocks.
Remember, you are now automatically a "white supremacist" or a "Nazi" if you merely disagree with the prevailing orthodoxy of "critical race theory." You can think whites and blacks are moral equals and we should be judged not on the color of our skin but by the content of our character (you know like notable coon Martin Luther King), but unless you completely agree with everything a bunch of Maoists say, you are literally a Klansman. Even if you're black! That's the fun part.

And I forgot the point. I mean Jesus, Doucette is literally defending the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan, or the Imperial Cyclops, or some other weird Klan shit that I forget. I dunno. But anyway, Greg is a hireling of the Klan, he is literally a Nazi, he literally WORKS FOR THE NAZIS. Why is this freak not canceled? He's obviously a skinhead, you can tell just by looking at him.
 
Twitter doesn't own what you post on it's platform. The content is yours. I think it's just funny seeing him get upset at people who want to read what he writes on medium that's not spread out across dozens of tweets.

If he cared that much about people stealing his tweets he should start a blog.
This is kind of sort of true. You retain your actual ownership of the copyright of material you post on twatland, but you grant them an irrevocable, permanent license for twatter, as well as anyone on twatter, to use, redistribute, quote, comment on, or otherwise use your content.

You can see the current version of it, which they update from time to time, here:

Needless to say, Dumbford is Dumb.
 
Question Can Twitter sell any tweet you made or do you have to say "My tweet # 00000 is for sale"?
I can see Marzcunt trying to sell her infamous Hastag Tweet soon at some point or T Greg or others trying that.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PorkeyDuck
Question Can Twitter sell any tweet you made or do you have to say "My tweet # 00000 is for sale"?
I can see Marzcunt trying to sell her infamous Hastag Tweet soon at some point or T Greg or others trying that.
So far as I can tell, there's little to no legal basis for this bullshit. I suppose they can sell their actual copyright ownership in the tweet, but it's immediately subordinate to the irrevocable right they've granted to the public to quote or use it in any way they please otherwise. So they're selling nothing.

I wonder if it's even a binding contract because the "right" to a tweet is meaningless and worthless. So there's no consideration on one side. I suppose if it's worth even a penny or a peppercorn, it might mean something, but how could you even breach such a contract? What would it mean?

It's just one of the dumber grifts these weirdoes of lawl twitter have conjured into semi-existence. Imagine entertaining such dimwitted bullshit.
 
Back