Skitzocow Naruhide / Naru / menherawhide - 🧮BAN COUNTER: 6🧮Come see the daily clown show, back every 24 hours after getting banned for tagging the forum's admin!

[LoverofPi]

Get Smarter Through ‘Deep’ Reading

Deep reading is the active process of thoughtful and deliberate reading carried out to enhance one's comprehension and enjoyment of a text.

www.thoughtco.com

https://www.livescience.com/21569-deduction-vs-induction.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_reasoning

None of that addresses anything I said to you. Also thanks for letting me you're throwing a tizzy.

 

[N A R U]

None of that addresses anything I said to you. Also thanks for letting me you're throwing a tizzy.

Are you sure about that? Excerizing deductive and analytical reasoning may quickly prove you wrong.

Not that I would know. I'm self-educated. Unlike you. Obviously.

 

[LoverofPi]

Are you sure about that? Excerizing deductive and analytical reasoning may quickly prove you wrong.

Nah. I'll still be right even after all the angles are examined by all the methods.

Not that I would know. I'm self-educated. Unlike you. Obviously.

So what level of schooling did you fail out of?

 

[N A R U]

Nah. I'll still be right even after all the angles are examined by all the methods.


So what level of schooling did you fail out of?

I look forward to you proving me wrong using the plethora of screencaps of things I've said on Steam available here in this thread.

 

[LoverofPi]

I look forward to you proving me wrong using the plethora of screencaps of things I've said on Steam available here in this thread.

Why would I waste my time doing a pointless thing like that? You're the specimen, not the audience.

 

[N A R U]

Why would I waste my time doing a pointless thing like that? You're the specimen, not the audience.

Because failure to do so proves to everyone with eyes that you're projecting about insecurities pretty hard rn.

 

[LoverofPi]

Because failure to do so proves to everyone with eyes that you're projecting about insecurities pretty hard rn.

Except not? I'm guessing this is about my hypothesis of your attention and validation seeking behaviors, which you are still engaged in as we speak, no need to do anything with screencaps.
You're clearly very butthurt about all this.
Anyways what level of schooling did you fail out of? High School? Middle school?

 

[N A R U]

Except not? I'm guessing this is about my hypothesis of your attention and validation seeking behaviors, which you are still engaged in as we speak, no need to do anything with screencaps.
You're clearly very butthurt about all this.
Anyways what level of schooling did you fail out of? High School? Middle school?

>links article about deepreading in response to this clown not exercizing deepreading skills
>the clown continues pestering about what grade I dropped out of while claiming my posting it was a nonsequitur
>all in response to my dismissive remarks about his claims that I post random offtopic shit that has no relevance to the dicussion at hand
>which I'm about to do again by posting another video he won't be able to figure out the context of despite me alluding his inability to read well enough to figure out the answer to his most burning desire in this paragraph and the video I've linked

Well, he is a LoverOfPi. Not necessarily logic.

 

[LoverofPi]

>links article about deepreading in response to this clown not exercizing deepreading skills

Oh, I have been using deep reading and inductive and deductive logic on you. Don't you worry about that.
Exercising, by the way. And deep reading. Two words.

>the clown continues pestering about what grade I dropped out of while claiming my posting it was a nonsequitur

Which it was. Non sequitur. Two words. And I keep asking you about it because it's having an effect on you. Remember, this is the farms. Cows doing stupid shit and getting angry is all part of the game.

>all in response to my dismissive remarks about his claims that I post random offtopic shit that has no relevance to the dicussion at hand

Now who's failing at reading, never mind deep reading? I'm sure you can figure that one out, you're a clever boy. See, I never said it had no relevance, I said it wasn't clever. You are not clever. And this has clearly made you mad as fucking hell. And it is hilarious. Please, do go on.

>which I'm about to do again by posting another video he won't be able to figure out the context of despite me alluding his inability to read well enough to figure out the answer to his most burning desire in this paragraph and the video I've linked

Well, he is a LoverOfPi. Not necessarily logic.

Okay, a three and half minute clip of the main character of Kaguya being in denial that she's in love. Naru, I'm flattered, but I'm taken and you're an attention seeking moron. It would never work out.

 

[N A R U]

I can't tell if you actually want people to take you seriously or if you just want to argue for arguments sake.

Who says I can't have both? Especially when none of you guys seem to want to argue seriously.

Oh, I have been using deep reading and inductive and deductive logic on you. Don't you worry about that.
Exercising, by the way. And deep reading. Two words.


Which it was. Non sequitur. Two words. And I keep asking you about it because it's having an effect on you. Remember, this is the farms. Cows doing stupid shit and getting angry is all part of the game.


Now who's failing at reading, never mind deep reading? I'm sure you can figure that one out, you're a clever boy. See, I never said it had no relevance, I said it wasn't clever. You are not clever. And this has clearly made you mad as fucking hell. And it is hilarious. Please, do go on.


Okay, a three and half minute clip of the main character of Kaguya being in denial that she's in love. Naru, I'm flattered, but I'm taken and you're an attention seeking moron. It would never work out.

The fact that you assumed the video I linked was implying you're in love with me is jsut as telling as the fact you've resorted to nitpicking spelling errors to try and roast me when I intentionally avoiding going for the low hanging fruit of pointing out where you've dropped a word or two of the failed state of our education system. Of course, you also claimed my video drops weren't clever while simultaneously misinterpreting it even when I went out of my way to give you the proper context on a silver platter.

Still waiting for you to prove I don't want to deprogram ANTIFA.

 

[I am vomit]

Who says I can't have both? Especially when none of you guys seem to want to argue seriously.

Your first mistake was assuming we want to do more than laugh at your retardation.

 

[N A R U]

Your first mistake was assuming we want to do more than laugh at your retardation.

I'm not sure where you got the idea I assumed you wanted any more. If anything, the person I was responding to seems to think some of you want to.

 

[Mister Loser]

Who says I can't have both? Especially when none of you guys seem to want to argue seriously.

Let me rephrase that: I think I understand where you're coming from, you want to try and engage in discussion to show that your opinion is "correct". I'm the same way a lot of the time, arguments are engaging.
But like many people I've argued with, you seem to not really have a wish to debate for the sake of personal interest, you just want to whine about whatever the latest right-wing talking point is. Frankly, even as far as right-wingers on this forum go, you sure seem to like randomly spewing rhetoric without trying to explain your arguments in depth. Some people have given reasonable arguments on this forum from a right-wing standpoint— from what I have seen so far, you have not. You just wanna bring them up whenever possible so you can get somebody to take your bait and let you go off.
And I understand that you don't want to explain to people who can't understand your posts, so I'm probably not going to interact with you any further. If you wanna keep acting smug for smugness' sake, be my guest. I'll take you calling me ANTIFA or a libtard.

 

[LoverofPi]

The fact that you assumed the video I linked was implying you're in love with me

Wow, you literally cannot read plain English. I was sarcastically implying you were in love with me.

is jsut as telling as the fact you've resorted to nitpicking spelling errors to try and roast me when I intentionally avoiding going for the low hanging fruit of pointing out where you've dropped a word or two of the failed state of our education system.

Oh, I would never resort to just pointing out your spelling mistakes to roast you. They are merely akin to sprinkles on the cupcake of my pointing out you cannot write for shit. Like in the above where you smash a completely unrelated clause at the end of an otherwise complete sentence.

Of course, you also claimed my video drops weren't clever while simultaneously misinterpreting it even when I went out of my way to give you the proper context on a silver platter.

You were trying to make a point in a very stupid way, so I tried to make it funny instead. Shame about your complete inability to comprehend humor.

Still waiting for you to prove I don't want to deprogram ANTIFA.

Wait, THAT'S what you wanted me to prove?

Oh, and apologize for double posting.

 

[N A R U]

Let me rephrase that: I think I understand where you're coming from, you want to try and engage in discussion to show that your opinion is "correct". I'm the same way a lot of the time, arguments are engaging.
But like many people I've argued with, you seem to not really have a wish to debate for the sake of personal interest, you just want to whine about whatever the latest right-wing talking point is. Frankly, even as far as right-wingers on this forum go, you sure seem to like randomly spewing rhetoric without trying to explain your arguments in depth. Some people have given reasonable arguments on this forum from a right-wing standpoint— from what I have seen so far, you have not. You just wanna bring them up whenever possible so you can get somebody to take your bait and let you go off.
And I understand that you don't want to explain to people who can't understand your posts, so I'm probably not going to interact with you any further. If you wanna keep acting smug for smugness' sake, be my guest. I'll take you calling me ANTIFA or a libtard.

I'm not sure how you came to any of those conclusions when I gave a genuine answer to someone who asked a genuine question.

Wow, you literally cannot read plain English. I was sarcastically implying you were in love with me.


Oh, I would never resort to just pointing out your spelling mistakes to roast you. They are merely akin to sprinkles on the cupcake of my pointing out you cannot write for shit. Like in the above where you smash a completely unrelated clause at the end of an otherwise complete sentence.


You were trying to make a point in a very stupid way, so I tried to make it funny instead. Shame about your complete inability to comprehend humor.


Wait, THAT'S what you wanted me to prove?

You are the one who said my line about ANTIFA was a complete nonsequitur or something equally stupid.

"Oh, and apologize for double posting."





No.

 

[LoverofPi]

You are the one who said my line about ANTIFA was a complete nonsequitur or something equally stupid.

Because it was completely unrelated to what you had been asked and what you were just talking about. Do you not know what a non sequitur is?

"Oh, and apologize for double posting."

No.

Oh isn't that cute. You think you're a rebel.

 

[N A R U]

@N A R U
Usually, cows suffer from genuine mental retardation/autism - given that you're the least retarded cow i've seen so far, and that you're somewhat receptive to the farmers here, i'd like to ask you a (banal, futile) question:
Why do you feel the need to argue with people all the time? Especially on Steam, of all places, as you post a herculean amount of random off-topic stuff.
Please humour me.

Because it was completely unrelated to what you had been asked and what you were just talking about. Do you not know what a non sequitur is?


Oh isn't that cute. You think you're a rebel.

Do YOU know what a non-sequittur is? I was asked why I argue as I do. I answered why I argue as I do.

 

[Gigasneed]

This guy comes off very much like your average poster on /v/, even more so when you take into consideration the fact he posts on threads about specific games to complain about Antifa.

 

[LoverofPi]

Do YOU know what a non-sequittur is? I was asked why I argue as I do. I answered why I argue as I do.

So the answer to why you argue like you do is "Antifa are disposable idiots" which is very much a non sequitur. It does not coherently follow from or explain the question it responds to.

I think I see the problem here, however. You have an incomplete theory of mind, and so while in your broken brain there's a connection there, you can't see that to the rest of the world it's just a complete tangent. I really ought to stop giving schizocows the benefit of the doubt on having a working theory of mind. I mean, if yours worked you might not be lolcows.

 

[N A R U]

I enjoy being creative. Which is something I don't think most posters here would understand, given most of the insults being put on display are more autistic than even I am being accused of.

Plus groups like ANTIFA are dispoable idiots and I'd like to wake them up before they get thrown into the incinerator like the trash they are if I might be so lucky.

I mean FFS they spell antifascist as one word. That's not an anti-fascist. It's a fascist without typical fascist qualities. Big difference.

Antifa has a rapid response team that targets alt-right organizers

Members of the anti-fascist movement are tracking right-wing activists in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond, creating a database of known targets.

www.pri.org

So the answer to why you argue like you do is "Antifa are disposable idiots" which is very much a non sequitur. It does not coherently follow from or explain the question it responds to.

I think I see the problem here, however. You have an incomplete theory of mind, and so while in your broken brain there's a connection there, you can't see that to the rest of the world it's just a complete tangent. I really ought to stop giving schizocows the benefit of the doubt on having a working theory of mind. I mean, if yours worked you might not be lolcows.

Plus in this case being interchangeable with "in addition [to the preceeding point]". Deep reading my dude. If you learn to use it, you might also find out where I answered your repeated question already and how that ties into Hayasaka being a stand-in for people such as the person I was answering in the first place that led into you royally embarrassing yourself.

When the lolcow is actually a lolbull