The reasons themselves are the non sequitur. Even if they are true, you provide none of the connective tissue that leads you there, making you come across as having disjointed thinking.
Not in the slightest. Stating you answered with a non sequitur states that your answer comes across as coming out of logical left field, both of them do, but they're both also very vague answers, showing very little evidence of whatever thought you put into them. I assume there is a process, but it is opaque. You seem to think it should be self evident why these motivations lead to your odd methods, and that's why I have commented about your ill developed theory of mind.
I have yet to see evidence that a non-zero amount of people see any merit to your bizarre arguments. Even the people that want to agree with your conclusions cannot support the thinking you used to arrive at them.
Yeah, I'm not gonna waste my time watching a 10 minute youtube video just because you can't actually make an argument. Also, love "non-sequiturgate" by the by. Really lets me know just how not totally buttmad about all this you are.