Which part? The one where you guys literally made up things about me and then got angry at me for "lying" because I am exactly what I said I was and not what you guys made up? I was totally played.
Why was Vic mentioned? Because that’s a signal for KV to be sicced onto something Vic is up to.
Because when you quietly bow out, it doesn't leave a paper trail of reasons for exiting. When conventions quietly cancelled or black listed Vic, and it was brought up later, people complained that since it wasn't out there publicly, it didn't exist.
Because how else would you virtue signal that you stand against the Bad Vic Man.
That makes the assumption that they were quiet because they had indeed blacklisted him. We have no evidence that he was blacklisted from any con prior to 2019. They made up the fiction of Vic being banned or blacklisted when he wasn't to support current year narrative.
That's probably why he did it.
So the basis is if you personally were able to ascertain a reason or not? This is my point exactly. You disagree with him being blacklisted from any cons prior to 2019 because they didn't publicly say "we blacklisted Vic". So in order to "provide evidence" that he is being blacklisted or that people are discontinuing projects due to him, that means people need to publicly say their reason so you can't go back in the future and claim there is no evidence.
You're being obtuse.
You don't need to be a lawyer to be part of the rabble that is LawTwitter.
BT is a great example of this by the way. He has cited LawTwitter in the past when it came to discussing Vic's lawsuit.
And unless they publicly announce it, you will call it "make-believe".
That's because every single last person accusing Vic of being a sex predator/rapist/whatever is lying. Regardless whether if it's intentional or if they are mentally ill, they ARE lying.
IRL you say? Interesting choice of words yet again...
It's not hard to understand. They're either liars or they're virtue signalers jumping on a social zeitgeist to further the damage against a man.
There we go. That's what I wanted you to admit to. Thank you. No matter what evidence exists or will exist, it will all be lies to you. That doesn't sound like someone who evaluates things based on evidence. I thought that's what you guys said you did?
"Hide your powerlevel. Avoid revealing intimate, embarrassing details about yourself. Declaring a post powerleveling does not magically exempt you from this rule."
It is, because it proves they’re full of shit. Because they show they’re lying. Until this whole thing happened, Vic was still getting work and going to cons. Nobody disinvited him despite all rumors; they still employed them. Even cons who no longer want anything to him were still reinviting him. But now all of a sudden, they’re saying they were banning him back then? Come on.
What I am hearing is that because you personally weren't privy to private information that it didn't exist. Those things are not mutually exclusive.
The reasons why the "Vic was banned from such-such con" prior to 2019 gets such flak are A) much of those cons that many in KickVic claim he was banned from ended up inviting him again the next year. Obviously, the people making these claims are not in management and thus are not involved in decision-making for the con. B) If any documented records of Vic being banned from a convention prior to 2019 exist, then they have not surfaced. Take Peter Gaudoin, the current CEO of Tekkoshocon, for example. When Jennifer Lynn Hunt claimed Vic was banned from Tekkoshocon, Gaudoin came out and said that were no records in his possession that Vic was ever banned from the convention. Granted, Gaudoin said that prior management might have, but such records were not passed to him when he became the owner. You would think such archived reports would be important for future owners to have, right? You know, "for the safety of congoers"? That being said, there are two possibilities: such records got lost when convention management changed or they never existed in the first place.
Where’s the proof he did anything he’s accused of? Still waiting for it.
You're also conflating the record keeping by conventions as efficient and not primarily by word of mouth. These are for the most part fan run events and have no legal guideline or responsibility for record keeping. Yes, that sucks and is on the cons, but your logic is based on an assumption based on flawed logic.
Seeing as literally anything presented to you results in you covered your ears and yelling "nanananana its all lies" as shown by your buddy above, I would say that the standards of evidence for you versus the legal system are 2 different things. Good thing your standards aren't what matter in his employment decisions.
