Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Zionald BLUMPF said:
I did the math in my head the first time. Here's the corrected.

2016 Trump Voters Who:

Voted for Romney: 96.7%

Voted for Romney (accounting for population increase over the 4 years): 99.1%

The Romney votes inevitably include NeverTrumpers who voted for Hillary; however, they were only 0.0792324% of the vote (massively overhyped by the media lol) and are therefore statistically irrelevant.

EDIT: I assumed a 4% Romney--> Hillary/Libertarian/not voting pipeline, it was actually 2% LMAO. Not gonna redo my math but the point is that NeverTrumpers/LincolnPedos/Shapiros are completely irrelevant and should be ignored for the FAGGOTS they are.
Click to expand...
Hmmmm, interesting.

2012: 59,134,475 Red
2016: 62,984,825 Trump
Never Trump republican types like Benny Shapiro can indeed be ignored.

Florida (as a reference, they were Blue in 2012, note that all Floridan votes are definitely counted, you'll know why a bit later)
2012: 4,235,270
2016: 4,617,886

Around 4 million turn 18 each year, it's also said that 2.5 million die each year due to various reasons. This can't really be used because of some virus and different sources use different measures, but whatever. Of course, only citizens can vote (lol). So let's just say each year, there's 2 million extra voters. 4 gives 8 million. Assume 50% swings red, that's more or less the same once the 4 million is added to 2012 numbers.

It's hard to calculate the number of overt neocons because searching for it results in garbage sources. Rubbish sites like Conservopedia and RationalWiki (I wish there's a way to remove them from search results) come first, then your standard "83278487258242453295 reasons Jews are bad" types.

So if we assume the neocon population more or less stayed the same, then yes, people who voted for Romney also voted for Trump. Those who didn't were just huge outliers.

We run into a new problem. Trump won the electoral college before all the votes were counted, right? People love talking about Hillary's popular vote, but most intentionally ignore this tiny pesky detail. Journalists know as much about statistics as a street hobo, but similar to a hobo, they are good at lying (lying down VS lying to us, get it? Alright, this joke was cringe, I'll eat a bullet).

www.investors.com

Did Trump Actually Get Fewer Votes Than Mitt Romney? | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD

Stories claiming that Donald Trump not only got fewer popular votes than Hillary Clinton, but fewer votes than Mitt Romney did in 2012, are all wrong.
www.investors.com www.investors.com
As of this writing, Clinton has 60.1 million votes to Trump's 59.8 million, according to CNN. But if you look closely at the table on the CNN website, there's a little notation in the corner informing readers that only 93% of the ballots have been counted. (UPDATE: CNN has since removed that notation.)

After doing a little math, that means that there could be roughly 9.5 million votes are still outstanding.
Click to expand...
So assuming the distribution is similar (no, it's not, depends on the state), obviously Trump would still be behind Hillary regarding the popular vote at a surface's glance, but it's more or less very similar, certainly not 3 million in differences. If the numbers are really crunched out, and if voting illegals (70% illegals vote Democrat, by the way) are tallied out, then Trump might have won even the popular vote.

Anyway, yeah. Your conclusion stands. Most Romney voters also voted for Trump, so did most ziocon boomer and qtard types.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Dislike
Reactions: SmokingPig, handsomegamer1488, Boingo and 4 others
Zionald BLUMPF said:
My 2/4% "Never Trump Republicans" came from 10 polls regarding Trump's Republican disapproval rating from Nov 2016 --> Jan 30 2017. One can't just go off voter data since people like Ben Shapiro didn't vote. Irregardless, it really shows just how overhyped they've been by the media for the last 5 years when they are <0.1% of the vote (and, not that I included it, massively disproportionately rich, literal donor neocons lol, not the base)
Click to expand...
Polling is also a shit form of number gathering. The appropriate method will be population sampling, preferably derived from several questions.

But of course the MSM is too lazy to bake up something scientifically sound, they'd rather hype up stories based on a yes or no tick box. Using disapproval rates is even dumber. I disapprove of most Scotty's shit but I'm still going to support the libs over Labor. I like many One Nation's policies (more than Liberals) but I'll likely never vote for them.
 
  • Agree
  • Dislike
  • Dumb
Reactions: Boingo, What has to be done, longtimelurkerfirsttimepo and 2 others
Regarding Trump vs. Romney, there’s some interesting insights here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/realsp...-clintons-votes-stack-up-to-obama-and-romney/

6E073D59-E82E-4525-8BA2-46D111AFE3F5.jpeg

This map shows where the gains come from. Losing lots of votes from Utah isn’t surprising but you see a lot of Trump’s gains come from the rust belt, which is what cinched the election for him. Trump won on razor thin margins in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

A lot of magatards pretend 2016 was such a smash victory but it wasn’t. Trump talked about doing something about immigration, trade, infrastructure and the opiate addiction crisis, things that were just written off as inevitabilities by Obama. Notice that those three states flipped back to Biden. Trump doing little or nothing about those issues is what cost him those states and the election.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Kanuckski, Skarlatvoros, Nein Inch Nales and 18 others
chainlinktrillionaire said:
That "irrelevant" 2% flipped Georgia, Pennsylvania, and several other states to Biden.

They're actually more important to the Republicans than the AF retards will ever be. Those guys are actually willing to vote for the Democrats unlike Nick and his cult, who will hapily bend over and vote for the Romney types every election or at best just not vote.
Click to expand...
I know you're not very bright, but you could attempt to engage in your own thread without being an insanely salty disingenuous bitch who adds nothing in addition to shilling for pedo groups like The Lincoln Project.
Imagine being so totally retarded you claimed a pedo group like the Lincoln Project / NeverTrumpers won Biden the election, even though no poll indicates that :story:

5% of white men who felt betrayed won Biden the election, that same 5% voted for Trump in 2016. You wouldn't get it though, cuck.
1604820895800 (1).png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Nein Inch Nales, SmokingPig, plattschwanz and 9 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
I know you're not very bright, but you could attempt to engage in your own thread without being an insanely salty disingenuous bitch who adds nothing in addition to shilling for pedo groups like The Lincoln Project.
Imagine being so totally retarded you claimed a pedo group like the Lincoln Project / NeverTrumpers won Biden the election, even though no poll indicates that :story:

5% of white men who felt betrayed won Biden the election, that same 5% voted for Trump in 2016. You wouldn't get it though, cuck.
View attachment 2014872
Click to expand...

Actually plenty of people noticed and wrote about how elderly and suburban Republican voters flipping to Biden lost Trump the election. But I forgot that you're so retarded that you think that simply pointing this out is equal to shilling for neocon pedo groups lol.

Maybe if you researched this topic as intently as you "research" blacked anime porn you could understand this this :lit:
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Dislike
Reactions: Skarlatvoros, Rotollo 2, plattschwanz and 6 others
BiggieSlonkLoyalist said:
Imagine Nick ever giving this guy a legitimate position in his movement. Groypers seem are so devoid of personality all they do is mirror Nick's and parrot his ideas from 4 years ago. No wonder they flock to him when they're completely unhinged and antisocial. It's rich he's always moralizing on the internet when he only recently married his girlfriend AFTER having two kids out of wedlock. Very based and trad.
View attachment 2016165

Twitter (now public)
Archive

Edit: he is trying to become e-famous and has made a podcast. He even copies the Fuentes skyline backdrop. This cow will need a thread of his own soon.
View attachment 2016210
Click to expand...
We will also need a thread on the Canadian Fuentes Tyler Russell
 
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Skarlatvoros, handsomegamer1488, 981 and 3 others
tantric_depressive said:
protip to toupee-groyper : skyline backgrounds are supposed to have the opposite effect of those glaring ugly eyerape graphics you have taking up too much of your screenspace
Click to expand...
He wished himself happy birthday on Twitter. So dob 3/23/93. This guy is a fool. He gives away so much personal info (his dob is the least of it).
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ChristIsBurgerKing, REGENDarySumanai, BasedCanuck and 2 others
ciarraighe_ocosgraigh said:
He wished himself happy birthday on Twitter. So dob 3/23/93. This guy is a fool. He gives away so much personal info (his dob is the least of it).
Click to expand...
Zoomer moment
Also he can't be born in '93 or he wouldn't even be a zoomer. He is 23 I believe so he must have been born in 1998.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Holiday of no return, Ged'sForth, REGENDarySumanai and 3 others
Stanley Tit said:
View attachment 2025763
Click to expand...
What a fucking loser. Seriously though what is it with these early 20s pedo millenials that call themselves "zoomers"? The "Hehehe Pokemon SpongeBob I'm just like you fellow zoomers" routine Nick does. Except Nick actually goes to homes of his underage fans and probably molests them. He knows he's a fraud and that's why he goes on 50 minute tirades about Jeffery Epstein and calls Dave Robin a "Jewish Pedophile" in what's supposed to be a Paleo Conservative news show. Nick's overcompensating for his own sexual predeliction and he knows it, this dumbass is just mimicking Nick in order to get money chats.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: the new ford bronco, Nein Inch Nales, DonDaLemon and 6 others
soulgains said:
What a fucking loser. Seriously though what is it with these early 20s pedo millenials that call themselves "zoomers"? The "Hehehe Pokemon SpongeBob I'm just like you fellow zoomers" routine Nick does. Except Nick actually goes to homes of his underage fans and probably molests them. He knows he's a fraud and that's why he goes on 50 minute tirades about Jeffery Epstein and calls Dave Robin a "Jewish Pedophile" in what's supposed to be a Paleo Conservative news show. Nick's overcompensating for his own sexual predeliction and he knows it, this dumbass is just mimicking Nick in order to get money chats.
Click to expand...
I’m guessing that Beardson is trying to make a living off livestreams. I’ve yet to see any evidence that he has a day job. There are a few Matthew Evans just in Paducah so it’s hard to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back