U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Niggas still mad.
Also they're misappropriating doses of Covid vaccine all over Chicago. https://news.yahoo.com/news/state-rep-la-shawn-ford-143200745.html

The propaganda is working, they're convincing niggers to steal this shit. I wonder what sinister purpose this covid vaccine really serves.
When I see something being suddenly desired and/or coveted by the majority of the general public for no sensible reason at all, my intuition tells me to stay far, far away from it. I like to think that this has served me well, but I'm not sure why others are like that.
 
They already know; hence why they're so adamant on failures being propped up on the basis of "compassion".
You don't recruit druggies and homeless faggots to go and champion ghetto rats and pedophiles otherwise.

However, some of them will get to destroy and chimp out, then completely live on their pampered lives with no repercussions for their actions. They may hate dat capitalizm, but they sure love what it affords them, just like the fat tard who looks like Santa Claus and wrote that book they love so much.
Most of Antifa are young idiots from well of families who don't care what their policies bring. Just like those people who are voting green: city people who don'T have a glimpse of how life outside the city is and think they know better then anyone. Fuck this idiots.
 
They’ll be fine. Their opposition is too psychologically broken at this point.
Until other races like Hispanics and Arabs get pissed and start their own wars against them or if China stops funding them not because they’re disgusted or offended but instead they’ll figure another way to break down the US and the West

 
Last edited:
Until other races like Hispanics and Arabs get pissed and start their own wars against them or if China stops funding them not because they’re disgusted or offended but instead they’ll figure another way to break down the US and the West

The Biden Administration is making it pretty easy for the CCP
 
When I see something being suddenly desired and/or coveted by the majority of the general public for no sensible reason at all, my intuition tells me to stay far, far away from it. I like to think that this has served me well, but I'm not sure why others are like that.
Give me all your money if that's the case.
 
I love the narrative that these thugs attacking Asians have anything to do with Trump or his rhetoric...you show me anyone of these attackers that listen to or agree with any of his points in general, let alone Chyna, let alone vote republican (or at all!)...

Ffs the reason people CANT put some of the blame where it lies is because the low i.q. and violent tendencies of a very specific people is putting the cart before the horse here. Its just another cudgel. Soft bigotry of low expectations extends towards the dumbing down of all national discourse because you're afraid what your perpetually belligerent dummies may do...why be truthful at all? Good thing truth and politics are generally like oil and water.
 
I love the narrative that these thugs attacking Asians have anything to do with Trump or his rhetoric...you show me anyone of these attackers that listen to or agree with any of his points in general, let alone Chyna, let alone vote republican (or at all!)...
In that case, it shows that 1) words can be powerful towards impressionable folks and 2) we act just as impressionable as the other side. Find something to blame, don't take accountability.

Like children.
 
Are we gonna get a separate thread for Oakland giving out checks and blatantly saying they won't give any to whites? I don't see how they can do this shit front and center and the most you get calling it out is Daily Mail.
If they were actually legally challenged, mistaken of these would likely be tossed out as unconstitutional under current constitutional standards, but there's also a chance they could get affirmed. Either way, the fact that conservatives refuse to engage in lawfare is part of the reason this shit keeps happening
 
If they were actually legally challenged, mistaken of these would likely be tossed out as unconstitutional under current constitutional standards, but there's also a chance they could get affirmed. Either way, the fact that conservatives refuse to engage in lawfare is part of the reason this shit keeps happening
I question which lawyer would dare take that kind of case.

Did you forget what happened to the lawyers who took Trump's election cases? You had judges waving away professional harassment by other lawyers and only awkwardly acknowledging something shouldn't have happened when it was presented as MeToo-esque issue by a female attorney.
 
I question which lawyer would dare take that kind of case.

Did you forget what happened to the lawyers who took Trump's election cases? You had judges waving away professional harassment by other lawyers and only awkwardly acknowledging something shouldn't have happened when it was presented as MeToo-esque issue by a female attorney.
It really is a question of personal bravery and how much money would be behind them. Yes, they'd probably be persona non grata within their local bar associations and professional friend groups, but if there's enough financial support behind a person they'd probably be willing to take on a case. Most right wing lawyers tend to be Chamber of Commerce corporate types who may find such laws distasteful but don't really care if they're not personally affected by it. The firebrand activists who go into public interest are diehard lefties, and they're the ones pushing the civil rights law discourse by being the ones most commonly engaged in it.

Alternatively, you could find some people eventually taking on such cases on a pro bono basis, but like you said, it would probably result in damage to their business depending on who their clients are.
 
It really is a question of personal bravery and how much money would be behind them. Yes, they'd probably be persona non grata within their local bar associations and professional friend groups, but if there's enough financial support behind a person they'd probably be willing to take on a case. Most right wing lawyers tend to be Chamber of Commerce corporate types who may find such laws distasteful but don't really care if they're not personally affected by it. The firebrand activists who go into public interest are diehard lefties, and they're the ones pushing the civil rights law discourse by being the ones most commonly engaged in it.
All of this is correct, but I'd like to remind that the Democrats are increasingly the party of the professional class and moneyed elite. Thus, there's an increasingly-shallow pool of where the financial backing to fight this stuff is going to come from.

It's really not looking good.
 
All of this is correct, but I'd like to remind that the Democrats are increasingly the party of the professional class and moneyed elite. Thus, there's an increasingly-shallow pool of where the financial backing to fight this stuff is going to come from.

It's really not looking good.
So how long before the legal avenues are disregarded in Minecraft?
 
Either way, the fact that conservatives refuse to engage in lawfare is part of the reason this shit keeps happening
It really is a question of personal bravery and how much money would be behind them. Yes, they'd probably be persona non grata within their local bar associations and professional friend groups, but if there's enough financial support behind a person they'd probably be willing to take on a case. Most right wing lawyers tend to be Chamber of Commerce corporate types who may find such laws distasteful but don't really care if they're not personally affected by it. The firebrand activists who go into public interest are diehard lefties, and they're the ones pushing the civil rights law discourse by being the ones most commonly engaged in it.

Alternatively, you could find some people eventually taking on such cases on a pro bono basis, but like you said, it would probably result in damage to their business depending on who their clients are.
To be fair, the Law field is about 75% Democrat:
Screenshot_20210326-121954_DuckDuckGo.jpg

(One of the slimiest professions out there is overwhelmingly liberal? SurprisedPikachu.jpg)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back