Fat Acceptance Movement / Fat Girlcows

[Reepicheep]

 

[rocknrollmartian]

View attachment 2030706View attachment 2030707View attachment 2030708View attachment 2030709

I'm confused: Is that study then suggesting that people should eat some sugar daily or not at all?

Also, healthcare isn't just cruelly being "withheld" from 500+ pounders. It's often either impossible to provide at that weight or too risky.

 

[Clovis]

The entitlement. I love that there are all these fat loons trying to get into eating disorder treatment for validation and think it's fatphobia that they're being turned away. As if a fat person who feels bad is as much in need of a ED treatment resources as a thin person with actual physical complications of malnourishment and disordered behaviour.
I mean, yeah, you are compromising your health with obesity but binge eating or compulsive overeating yourself into slow decline is in no way comparable to the health needs of someone underweight and purging daily. Not to mention, people actively starving are generally in much greater psychological distress than the ones who just can't (won't) put down the fork. The false equivilency is ridiculous. And treatment providers have limited resources (I know, an alien concept to deathfats) and have to prioritise who they treat. So reeee.
Not content with eating all the food and taking up all the space, they feel entitled to all the therapy, all the 'validation' of a super serious eating disorder diagnosis and then asspats for oppression.

 

[Fìddlesticks]

View attachment 2030706View attachment 2030707View attachment 2030708View attachment 2030709

Which meta study? These fatties never link the study so we can scrutinise the sample size methodology and funding... wonder if they are afraid we are going to unsugar coat that truth for them? also anyone can easily find a lot of contradicting evidence. Pick your view point and a study is easily found. In science, the concept that it is not what you can find to support your hypothesis that gives evidence and credence to your theory, but rather the lack of anything to contradict your hypothesis. But this is something beyond there sugar addled minds and bodies to understand as it isn't instant gratification for their lizard brains.

There is a reason we say sugar helps the medicine go down and sugar is used to placate children (lollies after dentists and desserts and treats to overcome bad experiences) is for its pharmacological effects. It was often used on new babies as pain relief.

OT but related. The one set of babies sugar as a pain relief never worked for? Babies addicted to heroin.

Edit. Grammar. I tried.

 

[Reepicheep]

another fatty eating disorder faking.

 

[annikaguts]

This video is bonkers:

Her husband seems to barely tolerate her and for her part she seems like she's in a medicated dreamworld most of the time. The way her glassy eyes look into the camera gives me the heebie jeebies. Apparently they are moving to a bigger city soon; I can't wait for that arc. She seems overwhelmed even as a stay at home dog mom. How is she going to handle big city traffic and people? Should be enterataining.

There is something so creepy about her. I can barely stomach a minute of her videos, and I watch Chinny's livestreams if that tells you anything. I think one day she's going to fucking snap and murder someone.

I hope she never, ever has children. She'd totally pull an Andrea Yates.

 

[Clotso Coof]

I had to read her drivel twice and I still have no idea what the fuck she is talking about. What does this have to do with self care or being fat? What is "her truth" exactly and why does she think she has the goddamned right to say no one is allowed to comment on it? What if my truth is that your truth is a steaming cauldron of bullshit and cope? I'm so confused.

It's like the SJW claim that free speech is "literal violence" if it means disagreeing with a "marginalized person", or that we're genociding troons if we don't want them taking group showers with little girls in locker rooms.

View attachment 2029886
It's probably just me but my first impression is that she's actually four or five midgets hiding under that mammoth tarp sitting on each other's shoulders.

I realize that sweater is machine knitted, but I still like to imagine that some poor sweatshop worker with knitting needles got assigned the 6X sweater and a wheelbarrow full of yarn.

Can you imagine if she actually did ever lose all the weight? She'd have an extra 200 pounds in loose skin alone.

She already has three hanging folds of skin visible on each leg, they just happen to be full of fat. She wouldn't look any weirder if the fat was gone and it was five loose folds instead of three puffy folds.

That's what the super-fats don't get about the "what about loose skin?' theoretical complaint. They already have skin bags hanging everywhere. They already look like freakshows.

 

[Lunete]

another fatty eating disorder faking.
View attachment 2031111
View attachment 2031112

Jesus Christ she's shaped like a bag of potatoes.

 

[rocknrollmartian]

another fatty eating disorder faking.
View attachment 2031111
View attachment 2031112

Is she claiming to have a restrictive eating disorder...? I looked over her Tik Tok but can't tell.

It seems she never leaves her yard/house, though. I'm not sure if she can fit in a car.

 

[Bobsmyuncle]

Is she claiming to have a restrictive eating disorder...? I looked over her Tik Tok but can't tell.

It seems she never leaves her yard/house, though. I'm not sure if she can fit in a car.

According to her tags she claims to have bulimia. I beleive she has also mentiomed suffering from bed too... but i could be wrong..

 

[rocknrollmartian]

According to her tags she claims to have bulimia. I beleive she has also mentiomed suffering from bed too... but i could be wrong..

Ah, OK. At least that's somewhat believable, though there have been many, many days where she's binged without purging.

Her body is remarkable in its grotesqueness: flat chest, even worse Hank Hill ass than Bully Lenza, Quasimodo back fat humps and that massive gunt. She's built backwards and gives every signal possible that she's a genetic dead end.



Thank you for sharing this one, @Reepicheep.

 

[Fìddlesticks]

According to her tags she claims to have bulimia. I beleive she has also mentiomed suffering from bed too... but i could be wrong..

Apologies for posting in quick succession..

If she is claiming bulimia then she failed. You are meant to purge the food not just eat it, obese ignoramus.

BED is also accompanied with purging so. Jesus, these bitches are so lazy they can't even do the second step of their claimed disorder.

 

[Bobsmyuncle]

Ah, OK. At least that's somewhat believable, though there have been many, many days where she's binged without purging.

Her body is remarkable in its grotesqueness: flat chest, even worse Hank Hill ass than Bully Lenza, Quasimodo back fat humps and that massive gunt. She's built backwards and gives every signal possible that she's a genetic dead end.
View attachment 2031286
View attachment 2031287
View attachment 2031290
Thank you for sharing this one, @Reepicheep.

Apologies for posting in quick succession..

If she is claiming bulimia then she failed. You are meant to purge the food not just eat it, obese ignoramus.

BED is also accompanied with purging so. Jesus, these bitches are so lazy they can't even do the second step of their claimed disorder.

Yup. I don't think she knows how to purge but she thinks she does.

 

[lottalove]

I'm confused: Is that study then suggesting that people should eat some sugar daily or not at all?

Also, healthcare isn't just cruelly being "withheld" from 500+ pounders. It's often either impossible to provide at that weight or too risky.

The study is just stating the fact, they didn't think the link between neurochemical reactions and sugar as being addictive has been sufficiently proven.
Some scientists extensively work with that theory. And, like this journalist (what was his name - Gary Taubes) found out, most studies were flawed because of the sugar industry funding them. So that a study suggesting the contrary from the early 20th century was buried under all these other diet-narratives we were taught.

But for this "FA-activist" this is enough proof. Sugar is not addictive, just when it is withheld from you. You should always, always include sugar in your daily feed. Just don't restrict!

Which meta study? These fatties never link the study so we can scrutinise the sample size methodology and funding... wonder if they are afraid we are going to unsugar coat that truth for them? also anyone can easily find a lot of contradicting evidence. Pick your view point and a study is easily found. In science, the concept that it is not what you can find to support your hypothesis that gives evidence and credence to your theory, but rather the lack of anything to contradict your hypothesis. But this is something beyond there sugar addled minds and bodies to understand as it isn't instant gratification for their lizard brains.

There is a reason we say sugar helps the medicine go down and sugar is used to placate children (lollies after dentists and desserts and treats to overcome bad experiences) is for its pharmacological effects. It was often used on new babies as pain relief.

OT but related. The one set of babies sugar as a pain relief never worked for? Babies addicted to heroin.

Edit. Grammar. I tried.

This is the study from 2016

 

[GenociderSyo]

This is a clothing brand blog....

 

[Azovka]

Ah, OK. At least that's somewhat believable, though there have been many, many days where she's binged without purging.

Her body is remarkable in its grotesqueness: flat chest, even worse Hank Hill ass than Bully Lenza, Quasimodo back fat humps and that massive gunt. She's built backwards and gives every signal possible that she's a genetic dead end.
View attachment 2031286
View attachment 2031287
View attachment 2031290
Thank you for sharing this one, @Reepicheep.

Yeah no, gluttony isn't the same thing as BED or bulimia. Hell, with bulimia, there's usually no apparent weight gain or weight loss unless you stop without changing your habits, and even then, it takes way more than "35 days" to balloon to her size.

Those fucking back rolls look like some huge ass kysts or tumours. It's disgusting ; thank you for sharing this !
Wonder how many people from those 108k views came to stare in mute amazement at the horror show that she's presenting to the world.

 

[rocknrollmartian]

Yeah no, gluttony isn't the same thing as BED or bulimia. Hell, with bulimia, there's usually no apparent weight gain or weight loss unless you stop without changing your habits, and even then, it takes way more than "35 days" to balloon to her size.

It seems there's a trend where the mobese claim to have some sort of eating disorder to garner sympathy. Sometimes it's a Munchie-like ploy for attention; other times it's just an excuse that allows them to be passive victims instead of active decision-makers who choose to overeat. This ED narrative is rarely true aside from full-fledged unaddressed BED, and broaching BED is not popular in FA circles for obvious reasons. The best is when a massively obese person claims to have long-term anorexic behaviors, e.g., Marianne Kirby.

 

[Reepicheep]

View attachment 2031435
This is a clothing brand blog....

how the fuck is she marganalised when she can afford to maintain that size.

 

[rocknrollmartian]

how the fuck is she marganalised when she can afford to maintain that size.

She does disgusting feeder porn to buy her family-size bags of chips and corn dogs, lol; her gross "fans" probably send her grocery store gift cards for all I know. And she's so marginalized that she met a sicko fat admirer who has a lucrative career and does everything for her; she now owns a house with him as far as I can tell. She was also able to live in his expensive downtown Toronto apartment spending her days loafing on a couch and bingeing nonstop while he worked. What a life, truly the same as a sweatshop slave. Won't someone release her from her chains?

 

[Fìddlesticks]

The study is just stating the fact, they didn't think the link between neurochemical reactions and sugar as being addictive has been sufficiently proven.
Some scientists extensively work with that theory. And, like this journalist (what was his name - Gary Taubes) found out, most studies were flawed because of the sugar industry funding them. So that a study suggesting the contrary from the early 20th century was buried under all these other diet-narratives we were taught.

This is the study from 2016

Really enjoy Gary Taubes work.

Thanks for link... interesting they state this and then ... scroll scroll near the bottom....


Ah the same wellcome foundation created by one of the largest pharma families out there of Glaxosmithklein - the world's 4th wealthiest charity and definitely largest health focused charity with a reported 1bn spent in grants in 19/20 alone?

Call me cynical but the only people who profit from poor health is pharma and they have 0 interest in making anyone better. Healthy people do not make revenues grow.