- Joined
- Apr 25, 2018
I wasn't saying that normie boomers and such should be more inclined to come here, my bad. What I was trying to say was that it would be quite difficult to supply a good, mainstream alternative due to the troon lobby making it so difficult. Thus, this is what we have, and so a lot of people against trans ideology end up in places like this by default. Unless you specifically make a stance against it, your spaces are inevitably going to be infiltrated by trans ideology.I wouldn't change this site. But its nature makes it less credible. We can say people would just ignore it as much as we want, but at the end of the day, the info hasn't been put out in an easy-to-access AND digestable way. Sounds like Jesse Singal and Abigail Shrier are the closest so far in the sphere, but SRS itself needs a documentary or something (not done by Project Veritas or some radfem group that calls themselves WOLF). Tranny side shows are shielded by social media and other media, so it's hard of course. But it seems like SRS could be such a slam dunk for the right journalist or documentary asshole or just wiki-autist. Get some stinkditch montages out to the general public.
I think you have a very valid point here, even if I don't entirely agree. Their overall line of reasoning regarding men may have helped give steam to the modern trans movement, but I don't think they themselves ever wanted anything like this to happen. I think giving women the vote and more political power has changed society and politics quite a lot, including ways in which it's eventually served to bite us in the ass. To be clear though, I don't personally label myself as a feminist, though I've gotten increasingly warm to terf/radfem politics as of late.Nah feminists (including radfems, who literally just hate trannies because they hate all men) are at least partially responsible for this shit. You wanted to destroy traditional gender roles? You got it. Feminists have been trying to destroy men’s spaces for years (the Boy Scouts, the priesthood, etc). They portray even healthy masculinity as “toxic.” I bet there would be many less troons if men had strong male role models and groups. Plus, women are overwhelmingly responsible for voting for “progressive” laws that led to this stuff in the first place. Now the Frankenstein that they helped create has come back to bite them in the ass.
Like I said before, notice how even the radfems who openly oppose trans ideology only ever talk about FTMs when they discuss children being trooned out. They don’t give a shit about the Jazz Jennings of the world, or the thousands of vulnerable young autistic/depressed men being groomed into it by the Internet.
I see the “WIMMEN ARE QUEENS! THEY COULD NEVER DO ANYTHING WRONG!” mob has arrived already lol. Just so you know, I literally am a women so I think I’m entitled to speak on this
Yeah, people who are actually marginalized don't constantly get their way in society. There's such a thing as a powerful minority exerting its will over the masses, being a minority doesn't correlate with being oppressed if there's power and money involved.I think it's also more of a woke liberal mindset with right think and wrong think as well. Unless you completely bow down to SJWS and the illogical woke ideology, forget it. BLM, liberal/mainstream Feminism, and LGBTQ+ organizations have so much influence and backing. It's funny and ironic to see the activists claim they're oppressed when they're funded and lavished for thinking "correctly".
I regret to inform you that not all FTMs date other FTMs (although this particular one is dating a woman) and that a lot of them do try to hook up with gay guys. Going back to the 80s, even (look up Lou Sullivan).
So, she's apparently largely responsible for the idea that sexual orientation and gender identity are distinctly unrelated? Well thanks a bunch Lou, we couldn't have done it without you. Thanks for making a generation of young gay people believe that their discomfort with their gender requires medical intervention...
Last edited: