Careercow Jack Russell Scalfani / Cooking With Jack / Jack on the Go Show / jakatak - YouTube "Celebrity" "Chef", Living Encyclopedia of Gluttony-Induced Maladies, Salmonella Elemental

[AnOminous]

Muscle atrophy also happens, though. If the muscle isn't moved, it gradually wastes away until it's too small to move even if you wanted to. If you've got no muscle to move and no brain to move it with, you're pretty much beyond help, and Jack's probably in that category now because of his laziness.

It's absolutely mind-boggling to me that someone could be as stupid and lazy as Jack and literally lose a limb permanently, so it's basically just a bag of meat at his side, just because of stupidity and laziness. Rehab sucks. There's a reason they call them "physical terrorists." But if a doctor tells you "your arm will be completely nonfunctional unless you do X, Y, Z" and you literally are just too lazy and stupid to do that, that's amazing. Jack is such a worthless fucker. Imagine not even being able to wipe your own ass because you allowed yourself to turn into a completely helpless gimp. No wonder Tammy hates him and cucks him at every opportunity.

 

[CatFace]

It’s been discussed, as have the possible reasons that you mentioned. No one really knows why he does it. It’s strange that it’s been in so many videos. It’s one of the weird things along with the meat booger to check if the pan is hot that Jack constantly puts in videos for no discernible purpose.

I’m probably just drunk and frustrated. The meat boogie I almost get. Almost. It’s weird but not as weird as constantly reminding people to turn on their stove.

 

[captkrisma]

I'm going to post This link before Jr gets all hyped up, but Nike sued MSCHF for trademark infringement as expected.

Jr will be confused saying Lil Nas X is being sued (he's not), and say some weird christian shit about how this is what you get for being associated with the devil, then not care about the results of the trial.

The trial itself will be most likely thrown out, as the shoes would fall under fair use. The shoes are transformative in nature and the advertisement of the sales did not directly imply Nike's involvement or endorsement. Nike somewhat shot themselves in the foot by publicly distancing themselves from the artist first, rather than lawyering up and sending out a C&D. Nike doesn't go after anyone else making customs, and didn't go after MSCHF before for making customs, so I see MSCHF coming out on top with this.

 

[AnOminous]

The trial itself will be most likely thrown out, as the shoes would fall under fair use. The shoes are transformative in nature and the advertisement of the sales did not directly imply Nike's involvement or endorsement.

Fair use is a copyright doctrine. They're not suing over copyright, but trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. And the test there is whether confusion is likely as to the origin of the product. The fact is not only was it likely, it actually occurred, with many people condemning Nike despite their immediate denial of any involvement in the project.

There are probably better things to criticize Nike for, like their use of Third World slave labor to produce their overpriced products, but I think they have pretty solid trademark dilution and trademark disparagement claims.

 

[captkrisma]

Fair use is a copyright doctrine. They're not suing over copyright, but trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. And the test there is whether confusion is likely as to the origin of the product. The fact is not only was it likely, it actually occurred, with many people condemning Nike despite their immediate denial of any involvement in the project.

There are probably better things to criticize Nike for, like their use of Third World slave labor to produce their overpriced products, but I think they have pretty solid trademark dilution and trademark disparagement claims.

In regards to the Lanham Act, MSCHF could cite First Sales Doctorine (but this defense has some holes in it and might get thrown out), but the real defense is the platform on which the shoes were sold (MSCHF's phone app). By downloading the app and willingly purchasing the shoes, you know exactly what they are and that these aren't the same shoes sold in stores.

The argument against First Sales Doctorine would have Nike saying that altering their products without passing quality control measures would result in damaging their brand by reselling unsafe products. MSCHF can counter this by saying the shoes are art and not designed to be worn (they are an art collective after all).

It will be an interesting case for sure, but I guarantee Jack Jr will miss the point and think this is divine retribution or some shit.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Fair use is a copyright doctrine. They're not suing over copyright, but trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. And the test there is whether confusion is likely as to the origin of the product. The fact is not only was it likely, it actually occurred, with many people condemning Nike despite their immediate denial of any involvement in the project.

There are probably better things to criticize Nike for, like their use of Third World slave labor to produce their overpriced products, but I think they have pretty solid trademark dilution and trademark disparagement claims.

It's fucking bullshit. It's like selling your car with aftermarket parts and getting sued by Ford because you didn't rip the Ford logos off it first.

 

[AnOminous]

The argument against First Sales Doctorine would have Nike saying that altering their products without passing quality control measures would result in damaging their brand by reselling unsafe products. MSCHF can counter this by saying the shoes are art and not designed to be worn (they are an art collective after all).

Throwing in literal human blood really muddies those waters. The fact is they were reselling Nike products, and listed them as such. This is from the actual tweet included in the complaint:

If you're going to do shit like this, you need to make it really, really clear it isn't an authorized use.

Similarly, the website (archive) lists them explicitly as Nike and does not disclaim in any prominent way that they are completely unauthorized:

It's probably not important but I'll note the website currently lists "30 Artist Proofs," whatever the fuck that would mean in this context, while the archived version from two days ago lists 20. Nice grift, fuckers.

And they include a bunch of tweets from people saying they'll never buy Nike again because of this shit. And when judging trademark dilution or infringement, the sophistication of the audience is a very important factor, and what kind of fucking idiot buys Nike in the first place? This is not a sophisticated consumer base.

It's fucking bullshit. It's like selling your car with aftermarket parts and getting sued by Ford because you didn't rip the Ford logos off it first.

Disagreed. It's more like buying a bunch of Fords, selling them as Fords, but putting a bunch of Nazi swastikas all over them to the point people think Ford is endorsing Nazism (even though Henry Ford almost sort of kind of did).

 

[Kosher Salt]

Disagreed. It's more like buying a bunch of Fords, selling them as Fords, but putting a bunch of Nazi swastikas all over them to the point people think Ford is endorsing Nazism (even though Henry Ford almost sort of kind of did).

If the header at the top says "Kosher Salt's Ford Did Nazi This Coming Edition" it's a tough call to say that I'm misrepresenting anything and people aren't just morons.

It's a stupid lawsuit and they need to settle it out. There's no reason why both sides can't just agree to issue appropriate disclaimers and call things even.

 

[captkrisma]

And they include a bunch of tweets from people saying they'll never buy Nike again because of this shit. And when judging trademark dilution or infringement, the sophistication of the audience is a very important factor, and what kind of fucking idiot buys Nike in the first place? This is not a sophisticated consumer base.

These are the same people that also said they'd never buy Nike again after the company endorsed Colin Kapernick. Nike's sales actually increased because of it. They're going to have to prove actual damage to sales or their shares in the company stocks...and currently both have risen.

 

[Kulee Baba]

Maybe he subconsciously doesn't want his arm to heal:

-If it heals, Tammy may tell him to get a day-job since the income from his dying channel is drying up.

-If it doesn't heal, then Jack can just fall back on it as an excuse not to get a day job and keep doing his cooking show ad infinitum.

As despicable & sick as that sounds it's more likely than just subconscious. By being stroked out Jack gets disability and medicaid ontop of whatever Tammy's employer gives her.

Wouldn't be surprised at all if Jack is already considered federally retired.

 

[AnOminous]

It's a stupid lawsuit and they need to settle it out. There's no reason why both sides can't just agree to issue appropriate disclaimers and call things even.

This is Nike. They are as litigious as Disney. It was absolutely predictable they'd sue over this and they don't want a disclaimer, they want to make an example by curb stomping this guy.

As despicable & sick as that sounds it's more likely than just subconscious. By being stroked out Jack gets disability and medicaid ontop of whatever Tammy's employer gives her.

Wouldn't be surprised at all if Jack is already considered federally retired.

He's enough of a grifter he's probably at least heard of the grid rules, and at age 54, he quite possibly grids out and qualifies for disability.

 

[Kulee Baba]

This is Nike. They are as litigious as Disney. It was absolutely predictable they'd sue over this and they don't want a disclaimer, they want to make an example by curb stomping this guy.

He's enough of a grifter he's probably at least heard of the grid rules, and at age 54, he quite possibly grids out and qualifies for disability.

FYI they're only going after the company, not Nas X. I don't blame them, they have an image to protect and they don't want this to be common place where a company takes their shoes in collaboration with a pop star and makes stupid money reselling.

Satan Nike's don't fall under parody ala "Dumb Starbucks." Nike would rather keep the marketing/publicity stunts to themselves. They could have gotten Woke Good Boy Points by having Nas X endorse some stupid Gay Pride Nikes.

 

[captkrisma]

So...today I found out that Jack stole from Babish as far back as 2009. Babish's new video today brought back an old video of him cutting a pineapple. One video that Jack takes immense pride in is his miracle blade review specifically because he claims to be one of the first youtubers to cut a pineapple on a string.

Apparently Babish did something similar some two years prior to Jack. It was one of Babish's first videos he uploaded back in 2006.

 

[Aaway]

So...today I found out that Jack stole from Babish as far back as 2009. Babish's new video today brought back an old video of him cutting a pineapple. One video that Jack takes immense pride in is his miracle blade review specifically because he claims to be one of the first youtubers to cut a pineapple on a string.

Apparently Babish did something similar some two years prior to Jack. It was one of Babish's first videos he uploaded back in 2006.

jack would immediately boys club someone who mentions that in the chat. not only because he thinks that he was the OG cooking channel on YT, but because he loves pretending like he doesn't know who babish is

 

[DontEatThat]

So...today I found out that Jack stole from Babish as far back as 2009. Babish's new video today brought back an old video of him cutting a pineapple. One video that Jack takes immense pride in is his miracle blade review specifically because he claims to be one of the first youtubers to cut a pineapple on a string.

Apparently Babish did something similar some two years prior to Jack. It was one of Babish's first videos he uploaded back in 2006.

I still cant believe he thinks thats a highlight in his make believe career. Now granted he was taking things seriously and people all over were doing this, but the delusions and mental gymnastics he takes to make himself feel special. Imagine being so proud at something as nonsensical in your life as cutting a pineapple in the air (by a string), copying an infomercial. Thats truly pathetic.

 

[Charlie Delicious]

I'd wear Satan Nike

 

[The Cum Consumer]

So...today I found out that Jack stole from Babish as far back as 2009. Babish's new video today brought back an old video of him cutting a pineapple. One video that Jack takes immense pride in is his miracle blade review specifically because he claims to be one of the first youtubers to cut a pineapple on a string.

Apparently Babish did something similar some two years prior to Jack. It was one of Babish's first videos he uploaded back in 2006.

Seems more like a coincidence than anything.

 

[TurdFondler]

If it was literally anybody else I'd believe it was coincidence. Jack steals all of his content though.

 

[stets]

If it was literally anybody else I'd believe it was coincidence. Jack steals all of his content though.

I'm curious if he's ever released a video that featured a recipe he put together from scratch. It seems like his modus operandi is taking other people's recipes and making them worse. Even his stupid meme recipes like the bacon explosion that seem like they should have originated in Jack's demented, cholesterol-clogged brain are stolen. The only things I can think of off the top of the head that may be Jack Originals are the vile """chili""" concoctions he makes, but even those seem like they're based off of those lazy '70's throw-a-bunch-of-cans-of-stuff-in-a-pot recipes.

 

[The Cum Consumer]

I'm curious if he's ever released a video that featured a recipe he put together from scratch. It seems like his modus operandi is taking other people's recipes and making them worse. Even his stupid meme recipes like the bacon explosion that seem like they should have originated in Jack's demented, cholesterol-clogged brain are stolen. The only things I can think of off the top of the head that may be Jack Originals are the vile """chili""" concoctions he makes, but even those seem like they're based off of those lazy '70's throw-a-bunch-of-cans-of-stuff-in-a-pot recipes.

No way the salad night was anything other than the product of his disturbed mind.