7/23 Court Date

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is an excellent point. There's really nothing to be gained by revealing her identity to the forums at large.

However, I think the photos of both the alleged reporter and the WK should be revealed to any Kiwis planning to attend future trials. This way, they will know who to look out for and, should they see that person heading their way, they can prepare for a confrontation.
Seems to be the majority opinion around here. It would come in handy depending on how the October date is planned and what to expect by then assuming more WK's won't emerge on the scene).
 
I have a feeling that if Chris isn't lurking here, then perhaps his WKs are. Then we can expect more to pop out of the woodwork.

If you're listening, hangers-on, I hope you're siphoning money out of Barb faster than Rob Bell on crack. Your client is a lost cause to the courts and to humanity in general. Many have tried, all have failed. You can't change him, so I hope you're at least bilking his insane mother for her hoard money.
 
Either way, I'm still considering whether to release the footage or not. I mean, neither my face or identify are revealed aside from my voice. So I don't think I have anything to fear. But like Based @AnOminous pointed out, there really is no point revealing her unless we find out what her purpose is and I doubt it's anything more than maybe she's the PD's assistant or something.
There's a possibility that releasing the WK video might make it harder for field agents at court dates in the future, whether it's you or someone else. From what you said, it sounds like she was already confrontational with you and probably monitoring the forums. If the video gets released it might make her (or other white knights) even more hostile in the future, especially if some ween manages to doxx her.

Even though you're 100% within your legal rights to film on public property unless a cop tells you to stop and gives a valid reason (and if she actually touched you/tried to grab your camera that's assault), in my opinion it's not worth the risk of making her even more aggressive at future court dates.
 
I give huge props to Ramspieller and Lipitor for their dedication in chronicling the court stuff, since I am far more interested in this stuff than I am the eBay nonsense. Perhaps, however, considering the announcement Null made this morning, it would be a good idea to withhold the content regarding the white knight woman. I would hate it if the court reporting would be compromised, since the last court date will be especially important, whenever that may be.
 
My money says the lady in red is a social worker and nothing more. No one would give Chris this much attention unless she was being paid. The person who gave Rammspieler shit knows her way around a courthouse, is aware of Chris's trolls, and is looking out for him. That spells social worker or public defender. It's already been confirmed that it's not a journalist. I don't think it's a big mystery and I think people are making too big a deal out of it. At any rate we'll see in October.
 
Minor thoughts: Nobody needs to be doxxed, that's never a good idea for anybody. But it's natural to be curious as to why this person thinks she has the right to confront strangers at the courthouse, demanding why they are there. If she has some sort of official capacity, she's obliged to reveal that upfront, especially if asked. (I hope she confronts the wrong person on a bad day and gets severely verbally blasted.)

It's kinda sad that the forums are forced to suppress material because of the lowest common denominator on the site, the we.ens. Understandable but still sad.

@DrTremolo you still didn't define pickle. If you did indeed watch the unedited video, did you see something to indicate that the lady has more balls than previously photographed?

...his WKs ... we can expect more to pop out of the woodwork.
Well, it took them long enough, it's been 8 years. And if they are lurking here, they should consider this:
If Chris doesn't want attention, he should stay out of trouble.
 
Last edited:
My money says the lady in red is a social worker and nothing more. No one would give Chris this much attention unless she was being paid. The person who gave Rammspieler shit knows her way around a courthouse, is aware of Chris's trolls, and is looking out for him. That spells social worker or public defender. It's already been confirmed that it's not a journalist. I don't think it's a big mystery and I think people are making too big a deal out of it. At any rate we'll see in October.
Did you notice anyone at your thing.
Integrity of the CWCki forums? Who gives a shit.
Release the full footage.
Tell you what. When you take some of the risks I'll let you call the shots.
 
I think what is lost on some people here is that while what @Rammspieler did was 100% legal (from my understanding of public venues), the recording of someone in public who is clearly mentally ill and is done to document someone who has received an epic amount of negative attention will provoke the attention of people who want to protect him. For example, why should @Null, the host of this board, have to receive communications from this person or others who will assert inaccurate claims or quote the law inaccurately in response to these videos being posted on here? Why should @Rammspieler be left exposed to being harassed in the same way? They aren't lawyers and they shouldn't have to have one on retainer to consult with about people saying that they are liable for X, Y and Z, even if the Terms of Use of the site indicate A, B and C and only L, M N, O, P were done. That can be stressful. Think about this. Do you really believe that the laugh or information gained from seeing a 30 second snippet of the video is greater than or equal to the pain in the ass they could have to deal with? All this shit adds up and @Null having to wake up every day and reading emails from pissed off people and having to take what they say seriously enough to consider the merits of their arguments can add up. The guy isn't living in his Mom's basement (I presume) and @Rammspieler has his own life. Unless she stopped and said to him "I am X and I am with <SJW Group Here> and we are taking full responsibility for Christine and his beautiful Mother so BACK THE FUCK OFF or we will get serious", then what's it worth, really? It's probably just her walking away and over to Barb. Hell... She might just be the PDs friend or wife or another PD who was hanging around that his PD asked to help. Might be a clerk or something, who cares?

We're here to document and laugh at Chris. No shit is too minor, but is this TRULY shit that matters? Do we need to know the name of the girl who serves him at the MuckyD's in C-ville, too because she facilitates his weight gain?
 
@asperhes has the lady in red by any chance the same woman you describe here?

"Another lawyer, a pretty young woman, joined them, and she was also all smiles. Chris complimented her clothing, and she replied, "I like your color too.""
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
And believe me that the footage is nothing special, unless you like cameras pointed at the ground, shaky cam and hot ladies with nice asses in red dresses, helping old ladies like Barb onto cars.

I think I may have a lead on her identity.

Lisa.jpg
 
My money says the lady in red is a social worker and nothing more. No one would give Chris this much attention unless she was being paid. The person who gave Rammspieler shit knows her way around a courthouse, is aware of Chris's trolls, and is looking out for him. That spells social worker or public defender. It's already been confirmed that it's not a journalist. I don't think it's a big mystery and I think people are making too big a deal out of it. At any rate we'll see in October.
Just to clarify, was it confirmed that she isn't a journalist, or was it merely confirmed that she wasn't the journalist @Lipitor encountered last time?
 
@asperhes has the lady in red by any chance the same woman you describe here?

"Another lawyer, a pretty young woman, joined them, and she was also all smiles. Chris complimented her clothing, and she replied, "I like your color too.""

Yes, this is possible. They have the same build. They are both professionally dressed. I did not get a good look at her, though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back