Science World's rarest great ape is on the brink of extinction - Ape escape?


Less than 800 Tapanuli orangutans remain confined to the small mountainous region of Batang Toru in North Sumatra, Indonesia.
Recognized as a separate species only in 2017, the Tapanuli orangutans suffered a staggering 83 percent decline in just three generations, and retain a mere 2.7 percent of their original habitat occupied 130 years ago.

tapanuli-orang-utan-sumatra.jpg

According to Erik Meijaard, lead author of the recent study and founder of conservation group Borneo Futures, if more than 1 percent of the adult population is extracted — that is killed, translocated or captured — from the wild every year, the species’ extinction is inevitable, which would signal the first great ape extinction in modern times

Screenshot_20210330-132323_Chrome.jpg

By analyzing previously unknown and unpublished historical records, the newly released research contradicts existing scientific claims with two main arguments: Firstly, the Tapanuli orangutans are driven toward extinction in their original habitat due to unsustainable hunting and habitat fragmentation which continue to plague the species.

Secondly, because they were forced out from their natural habitat, they are not adapted to living in highland conditions, and should instead occupy a more diverse range of environments for a better chance of survival, including lowland forests and peatlands.

Hydropower project threatens remaining habitat

Among the many threats faced by the species, a planned hydroelectric power plant along the Batang Toru River in South Tapanuli Regency came under international scrutiny for encroaching on the last remaining habitat of the Tapanuli orangutans.

Although the company responsible for building the dam, PT. North Sumatra Hydro Energy (PT NHSE) claims that the land occupied by the project — around 122 hectares — is negligible, Meijaard and others have pointed out that the issue is not the size of the power plant, but its location.

Pongo_tapanuliensis.jpg

The project sits at the intersection of three subpopulations of Tapanuli orangutans which could be permanently separated if the dam is built. According to the Sumatran Orangutan Conservation Programme (SOCP), the Western block is considered the only genetically viable population in the long run, so connecting it to the Eastern block and two smaller nature reserves are critical to preventing inbreeding and disease, and increasing genetic diversity and thus the survival rate of the species.

Construction for the dam has been temporarily suspended in January 2020 because of COVID-19, and as the Bank of China, slated to become one of the main financiers of the project, has seemingly withdrawn funding, the project faces a delay of up to three years.

Meijaard and co-author Serge Wich, co-vice chair of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) primate specialists’ section on great apes (SGA), have questioned the scientific validity and objectivity of the environmental impact assessment that was carried out by individuals hired by PT NHSE.

They urge to use the suspension of the project as an opportunity to carry out an independent investigation in collaboration with all stakeholders, including the developer, the government, SOCP and IUCN.

Lack of transparency

PT NHSE could not be reached for an interview, but the IUCN released a fact-checking report in 2020 which refutes in detail claims made by the company on the minimal impact of the hydro project on the Tapanuli orangutans and their surrounding ecosystems, and efforts undertaken to mitigate this impact.

Allegations about widespread crackdown on those who spoke up against the hydro dam abound, although PT NHSE denied these claims. Defamation charges and the dismissal of conservationists on the ground were compounded by the suspicious death of an environmental activist and legal aide who at the time was working on a lawsuit aimed to revoke the environmental permit for the dam.

Many of the conservationists and scientists involved on the ground declined a request for comments on the state of the hydro project or efforts to protect the Tapanuli orangutan, often citing fear of backlash. Reluctance to share information publicly reflects a lack of transparency over the issue, says Wich.

Government officials, including Minister of Environment and Forestry Siti Nurbaya, said that the Tapanuli orangutan is at no risk of extinction, and that the hydropower project will have no detrimental impact on the species’ living conditions.

Other threats faced by the species

Wich also cautions against letting the hydropower project divert efforts from addressing some of the other risks faced by the Tapanuli orangutans. Habitat loss in the area has over the years been exacerbated by a variety of extractive activities, including logging, gold and silver mining and geothermal power generation.

SOCP has successfully advocated for a status change in 2014 for 85 percent of the Batang Toru Ecosystem from “production” to “protection forest” which would prohibit any extractive activities. The remaining area, however, is still home to the highest density — 10 percent — of the remaining Tapanuli orangutan population.

Unsustainable hunting and weak law enforcement

In addition, according to Meijaard, orangutan conservationists tend to focus on deforestation and habitat loss, when in reality, the biggest risk is the unsustainable hunting and capture of the species that have been a regular practice for centuries based on the historical records examined in his latest study.

Although orangutans are protected by both national laws and international conventions, “there appears to be a lack of political will to convict people who illegally poach, harm or own orangutans, compared to other wildlife crime,” says Julie Sherman, Executive Director at non-profit Wildlife Impact.

Citing a scientific study, Shearman contrasts the prosecution rate for the illegal poaching and trade of tigers at 90 percent compared to only 0.1 percent for orangutans.

Translocation should remain last resort

Based on figures shared by Meijaard, approximately $80 million is spent on orangutan conservation every year, yet the population numbers of all three orangutan species — the Bornean, the Sumatran and the Tapanuli orangutans — continue to dwindle.

The current focus on orangutan translocation, rehabilitation and reintroduction to the wild is very expensive, and there is limited data available on the welfare or survival rate of the orangutans due to limited post-translocation monitoring, says Meijaard.

Once they are reintroduced into the wild, it’s challenging to track the orangutans remotely because there is no technology available yet, such as chips implanted into the released animals, that’s both reliable and safe for the orangutans, explains Ian Singleton, director of the SOCP.

2018_07_11_49104_1531298807._large.jpg

SOCP, a partnership between the PanEco Foundation, the Foundation for Sustainable Ecosystem (YEL) and the Directorate General of Nature Resources and Ecosystem Conservation (Ditjen KSDAE), operates the only orangutan rehabilitation center in the area.

“Whilst [translocation] may sometimes be in the best interests of the individual orangutans concerned, namely getting them out of a situation in which they are likely to die or be killed, it is not really a sustainable solution to the problem of human-orangutan conflicts, nor is it likely to make much of an impact on the long term conservation prospects for the species, at least at the present time,” adds Singleton.

Translocation does not negate the need to address the wider issues of habitat loss and weak law enforcement, says Panut Hadisiswoyo, founder of the non-profit Orangutan Information Centre (OIC).

While critics warn that translocation is often considered an easy fallback option because the government has made it so easy to report a trespassing orangutan, Hadisiswoyo believes that it’s best to be immediately alerted to a potential human-orangutan conflict so it can be addressed without loss of life.

Prevention and education

Both the SOCP and the OIC place great emphasis on preventative measures to reduce the need for translocation, including the education of local communities on the value of safeguarding orangutans and their ecosystems.

“A coordinated approach is desirable… to tackle not only the drivers of habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, but also community issues that often result in the killing of orangutans in conflict situations,” says Singleton.

Initiatives include building buffer zones of plants to prevent orangutans from crossing over to villages, or conflict mitigation training. The OIC, for example, is teaching locals how to make and use noise-making tools such as bamboo cannons to scare away crop-raiding orangutans without injuring or killing them.

Primatologist Wanda Kuswanda argues in his recent study for the need to offer non-cash support to local communities, including seeds for plants that cannot be consumed by orangutans such as coffee, cocoa or snake fruit. He also recommends developing orangutan ecotourism ventures to demonstrate the economic value of protecting the species.

COVID-19 exacerbates extinction risk

The COVID-19 pandemic has, however, made conservation efforts imminently more challenging.

Although there is limited information on the health impact of COVID-19 on great apes and there are no known cases of infected orangutans, conservationists cannot risk even a small chance of infection for a species that is so close to extinction already.

Screenshot_20210330-132407_Chrome.jpg

Although rescue, translocation and rehabilitation efforts continue, no orangutans have been released into the wild by SOCP since March 2020, and most research studies focused on wild orangutans have been suspended in the past 12 months to mitigate contagion risk.

SOCP’s captive orangutan facilities are operating with strict precautionary measures which have incurred considerable costs at a time when conservation organizations grapple with dwindling funds from both donors or income-generating activities such as tourism.

In addition, based on satellite imagery and other sources, Singleton warns that illegal activities have increased in the forests, as have orangutan killings. Tolerance for the crop-raiding great ape is decreasing as villagers struggle to earn a livelihood amidst the COVID-19 economic crisis.

Despite the grim situation, conservationists and scientists such as Wich or Hadisiswoyo believe that there is still a chance to save the Tapanuli orangutans from extinction, but only if a robust action plan is put in place. Efforts need to focus on protecting their remaining habitat, mitigating human-orangutan conflict without having to translocate the animals, and the improved enforcement of wildlife protection laws.
 
The only future for monky is to see them in zoos and reservations if nobody actually manages to develop a viable export in the third world that isn't just farming in deforested rainforest.
They have reservations but park rangers make more money taking bribes from the guys who go in there and shoot them to sell as bushmeat/sell to Chinamen as medicine. Apes need to hurry up and invent the bow and arrow or something to fight back.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Toolbox
They have reservations but park rangers make more money taking bribes from the guys who go in there and shoot them to sell as bushmeat/sell to Chinamen as medicine. Apes need to hurry up and invent the bow and arrow or something to fight back.

I wonder how hard it would be to tell the Chinamen medicine men that niggers cause the biggest dick growth and then stick them on the migrants?
 
No more uh oh, stinky le monke? Save these orangutans, we must keep the stinky going!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox
Sad, but not surprising. The way humans treat their closest relatives is horrendous. I hope conservationists can protect the habitats of Tapanuli and all other orangutan species. I know deforestation for palm oil farming is a huge threat orangutans face, as is poaching and capturing babies as illegal pets (which usually involves killing the mother because orangutan mothers almost never abandon their babies or give them up without a fight).

Tapanuli orangutans are cool, they were only recently discovered and are the first great ape species to be discovered since bonobos in the 1920s.
 
Last edited:
Also I know A&H loves to shit on Africans and black people, but most of the people involved in primate conservation in africa are black. Including badass park rangers with machine guns to shoot poachers with and vets that go deep into the mountains to care for critically endangered mountain gorillas (all attempts at keeping them in captivity have failed, so vets monitor wild ones and provide treatment when they get ill or injured). People that live local to these areas generally are the best able to help work out conflicts between other locals and animals, as well as navigate the terrain.

Likewise most of the people involved in orangutan conservation are Indonesian. I'd imagine the best solution to this issue will come from Indonesian conservationists talking with the other citizens, educating them on wildlife, negotiating with the government, etc.

Whitey kinda screwed over with monke since neither europe nor the US have had any non-human primates in millions of years, so we generally dont have the privilege of growing up around them or seeing them in the wild where we live.

I guess tl;dr for every Indonesian or African person that does something bad like kills an ape for bushmeat or steal a baby to sell to poachers, theres another working diligently to help save them and stop things like that.

And tbh the US can be pretty fucked with the way it treats animals too, people here do shit just as bad as killing apes for bushmeat and shit. People treating animals like shit is like slavery, everyone has done it on every continent.
 
Also I know A&H loves to shit on Africans and black people, but most of the people involved in primate conservation in africa are black. Including badass park rangers with machine guns to shoot poachers with and vets that go deep into the mountains to care for critically endangered mountain gorillas (all attempts at keeping them in captivity have failed, so vets monitor wild ones and provide treatment when they get ill or injured). People that live local to these areas generally are the best able to help work out conflicts between other locals and animals, as well as navigate the terrain.

Likewise most of the people involved in orangutan conservation are Indonesian. I'd imagine the best solution to this issue will come from Indonesian conservationists talking with the other citizens, educating them on wildlife, negotiating with the government, etc.

Whitey kinda screwed over with monke since neither europe nor the US have had any non-human primates in millions of years, so we generally dont have the privilege of growing up around them or seeing them in the wild where we live.

I guess tl;dr for every Indonesian or African person that does something bad like kills an ape for bushmeat or steal a baby to sell to poachers, theres another working diligently to help save them and stop things like that.

And tbh the US can be pretty fucked with the way it treats animals too, people here do shit just as bad as killing apes for bushmeat and shit. People treating animals like shit is like slavery, everyone has done it on every continent.
Everyone has done it on every continent yet Africa has not created a sustainable society, destroying their environment steadily. Sure, you could say this is the same for the west, but at least park systems are established. Most countries out there can't stay stable long enough to keep anything together, despite a ton of natural resources. Now they're getting screwed over by China who gives no shits about conservation.
 
Bank of China. So I guess excess orangutans will be made into penis hardening soup?

The only way to "solve" these crises would be for the West to stop giving Africa gibs, for all major population centers/ megacities in Asia and Africa to be nuked, and most crops in these nations to be ruined repeatedly. Of course none of this will ever be done, so environmentalists will just continue to ree at local governments of these areas to do something, when all they care about is the economic growth of their country with no limits. It's why China was able to build a massive dam on the Nile river to indebt an African country despite that kind of thing basically nuking the aquatic population anywhere it's put. And they placed it in one of the most ecologically important rivers in the world. Nowadays the only thing that western countries can really do it attempt to promote the ecology of their own lands, because none have the backbone to stop everywhere else from turning into a desert, and while it's working for some areas, I can see the massive import of third worlders completely reversing any or all of these attempts. Especially in Europe.

The environmental refugee crisis that is sure to be a disaster is something I hope doesn't happen in my lifetime.

Turned your country into a toxic wasteland? Please come and help ruin ours too.

Way too many people and not enough resources to go around. The logical answer is to stop having twelve babies each. But that ain't happening. African cultures encourage having as many kids as possible.

China loves to pollute and has horrible standards in factories both for production and workers.

I guess it's up to us Westerners. But it's a losing battle. The Earth's gonna look like Arakkis in the coming centuries and I'm not optimistic that it's a train we can stop from crashing.
 
Are the Indonesians raping this species of orangutan too? I know those sick deforesting fucks love to use Bornean orangutans as prostitutes and have probably inadvertantly created some human-orangutan hybrid (because they caused the poor monkey to miscarry).

That's the terrifying part. Current population growth scenarios show Africa will be tied with Asia in population by 2100 at current rates. India will be NUMBAH WAN in population by then (China is rapidly declining at NUMBAH TWO and Nigeria is fast approaching a billion people). If you think the Chinese are bad, imagine a continent full of people who think nothing of going into the jungle, shooting a gorilla, and eating it. That's where AIDS came from, because there was a famine in Africa and they wanted meat so they butchered a bunch of gorillas and didn't give a shit they got their SIV (monkey AIDS) infested blood all over them. And because Africa has almost all the ape species, there's a fuckton of viruses, bacteria, and parasites that evolved alongside them that can infect humans, that's why the continent is so full of disease. Not that it will matter since Africans will eat all the apes long before they'll create COVIDAIDS or whatever.

Africa needs to do something (or someone needs to do something about Africa lol), because their countries can't sustain many more people and Africans will swarm over the world like a horde of locusts and bring about the literal dark ages.
Capture.jpg
This raped monke is more attractive than the trannies on this site.
 
Ah, so it's a subspecies of orangutan that has maybe one or two different genetic quirks but whose primary distinction is that it lives in a particular place.

Step one: name a new species whose population numbers in the low thousands.

Step two: immediately start shrieking that this species is endangered despite not knowing what the maximum population was to begin with.

Step three: extort, coerce and shame people into going along with your crusade to save this "new species".

Step four: profit (literally).

The funny thing is to what great lengths environmentalists go to conserve specific populations of animals with their own specific traits. I mean, these are just Orang-Utans. You could import Orang-Utans from other populations, or evacuate this population to other ones. But that is unacceptable; after all we need to conserve the purity of the specific subspecies, variant or population.

...right then. Purity of specific populations is important when it comes to animals. All except one animal species.... ? 🤔

That's how nearly all extinction event propaganda goes. They'll sound the alarms over 10,000 species going extinct per second, but if you look up the list it's almost entirely "regular tree frog except specifically located on this one island" or "one of a billion identical subspecies of bacteria". But people don't know that. When they hear about a species going extinct they're thinking of dogs or gorillas or something.

It's an open secret that the word "species" does not mean anything. The closest we have to a definition is that if two animals can't produce fertile offspring then they're different species, except also not depending on if the Definitely Real Scientists Association feels like making the exception, which they do with greater frequency every year.

It's really not a hard border. You absolutely do get cases where population A can interbreed with population B, and population B can interbreed with population C, but populations A and C can't crossbreed. Which means the definitions end up being very arbitrary indeed.
 
The funny thing is to what great lengths environmentalists go to conserve specific populations of animals with their own specific traits. I mean, these are just Orang-Utans. You could import Orang-Utans from other populations, or evacuate this population to other ones. But that is unacceptable; after all we need to conserve the purity of the specific subspecies, variant or population.
That's the TLDR version of what I was saying, yes.
 
Nowadays the only thing that western countries can really do it attempt to promote the ecology of their own lands, because none have the backbone to stop everywhere else from turning into a desert, and while it's working for some areas, I can see the massive import of third worlders completely reversing any or all of these attempts. Especially in Europe.
This is why I'm a huge proponent of zoos, and breeding and raising foreign endangered animals in zoos and on reserves and ranches in secure countries. As ideal as it is to have them in the wild, it's just not a safe place at all for many animals in unstable countries. Look at rhinos, one horn alone is worth around $30,000 to superstitious chinamen. Despite this, I've only heard of one isolated incident in the West where someone broke into a zoo and killed a rhino for its horns.

Simply said, if we keep these animals mostly in their native ranges, many are just going to disappear and we'll no longer have then. Foreign animal refugees are definately something I would back.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox
Back