- Joined
- May 9, 2015
It reads like a dating profile.This was posted much, much earlier, but look at the obscene level of detail the media has been allowed to publish about the jurors. I think #2 and #118 are particularly bad, but also 55, 27 and 19. Why should we know or care whether they are married, their religion, what sports they play, or what kind of dogs they have? I’ve never heard of anything like this before, and wonder if it’s unique to the USA.
“Juror No. 2 likes candlelit dinners and long walks on the beach. She is looking for something casual, but is open to the idea of a long-term relationship.”