The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%

  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%

  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%
  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
General Disarray said:
Yup. Replies:
View attachment 2046466

Racist bitch, should have reserved my reaction gif from a few pages ago for this.
it's his handle but still....
Click to expand...
oof, she's getting lit up in the replies.
1617222467126.png

1617222506798.png

1617222558478.png

1617222605994.png
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Clotso Coof, cactus, EvaBraunsGhost and 15 others
BusyMaribo said:
nope a few news publications hav ealready dox'd them to an extent, i know when you become a juror theres some public info recorded, but in this day and age thats all thats needed to find out everything about someone.
Click to expand...
I’ve had a couple glasses of wine watching this, so maybe I’m in my feels- but goddamn thank you for your service being on this jury. Especially when your whole life including your boyfriend in the 4th grade can be out there. I’d act ray ray af just to avoid doing this
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Discourteous Discourse
Dergint said:
How would people get caught knowing about it anyways? Can you ask about it when doing Jury selection without mentioning it by name?
Click to expand...
You can ask about anything that would prevent a juror from applying the law and following the judge's instructions. Not sure you'd actually want to ask this directly, though, because then you'd have to explain it. And if they didn't know about jury nullification, well, now, they do.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lolwut, luigismanslave and Fomo Hoire
X Pac Heat said:
God damn, how hard is it to follow basic commands?
Click to expand...
When you’re off your tits on fent and meth, probably quite.

I seen he did this exact same tactic during an arrest in 2019 too, I think he thought he would garner sympathy from the cops by freaking out. Didn’t work the first time, definitely didn’t work the second time. Low IQ as fuck.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Clotso Coof, EvaBraunsGhost, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob and 9 others
Dergint said:
Can the jury do it if they don't know it's an option? Like go through a series of actions that amount to a Jury Nullification. It'd be hard but not impossible to use if you filtered out anyone who was aware of it.

Or do they need to formally invoke it by name, so if they didn't know about it going in its impossible to use?

How would people get caught knowing about it anyways? Can you ask about it when doing Jury selection without mentioning it by name?
Click to expand...
Very few people actually want to serve on a jury. It's a tremendous waste of time and people will abandon all dignity to make up all kinds of stories that they think will make the lawyers believe them too biased to serve on the jury.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: cactus, Ample Cheeks, greengrilledcheese and 3 others
The Grimace said:
Has the court made any effort to protect the jurors' identities? I remember something about the first batch leaking and they had to form a new jury?
Click to expand...
BusyMaribo said:
nope a few news publications hav ealready dox'd them to an extent, i know when you become a juror theres some public info recorded, but in this day and age thats all thats needed to find out everything about someone.
Click to expand...
Only active jury tampering by the Newspaper of Record.
Screenshot_20210331-152825_DuckDuckGo.jpg

All of NYT's employees should get a life sentence in GITMO for this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Timetwister, George Oscar Bluth and 82 others
Had said:
View attachment 2046504
Click to expand...
Can AOC not look like a crazy bitch in any photo taken of her?

Nooooo.

Meat Target said:
Only active jury tampering by the Newspaper of Record.
View attachment 2046580
All of NYT's employees should get a life sentence in GITMO for this.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure if this was a case they backed the defendent on, saying the names of the Jurors would be shadowed banned everywhere. And even hinting that you had the ids of the jurors would get you kicked off every social media platform.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 6thRanger, Clotso Coof, Enjoy_the_Soylence and 12 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back