Furry Fandom and Drama General

A lot of the big names start getting incredibly pissy about any perceived slight not because they're actually genuinely upset about it but because when they push most of the fandom buckles.
It might be a smart choice, too. Showing weakness or seeming passive is a great way to get eaten alive by the clout-chasing piranhas in the fandom. So it's best to appear pissy and stamp your feet just to remind people you still have opinions on things.
 
Is this just general hate or does he have a past? Off the top of my head I don't recall any particular tsam drama but reminders help.

I think some people had issues getting their "Mikpholio" or something that they paid money for and he'd disappeared for awhile online after the sale?

Mik's original dragon/fox design was lifted directly from Jennadelle/Commissionsbyj's OG fursona, Mimi and Tsamp changed her to her current otter design after CBJ contacted him about it and how uncool it was to have her personal character being recycled for porn. They're both chill now though and have done some collabs together, so.
 
Is this just general hate or does he have a past? Off the top of my head I don't recall any particular tsam drama but reminders help.
There is some but from what I remember its all super luke warm opinions on dumb shit like Troons and TRUMP, the super generic virtue signal shit.
I know a few trannies have said his shitty OC donut gender adroginous characters "helped them come out" and he has virtue signaled over that shit
 
Oh man, did I miss people talking about "terminology discourse"? That's one of my favorite stupid niche furfag discourses.
Ironically using the term Intersex for any of these Futanari type characters is exactly what Intersex people don't want you to do. It's hentai fantasy fetishist shit, not reality, and hilariously, not woke. The term they want is altersex.
I actually haven't noticed people use "altersex" that often anymore, I'm pretty sure it's because SpottyJaguar (the artist who coined it) has been canceled by the woke coomer crowd for drawing "trap" art (along with other content like cub/non-con/etc.), so any good idea that person had is now tainted by association, or something like that.
e621 had a 'tag by visual' rule which I'm not sure is still a thing. Basically it was if you see a dick, character can be tagged as male because people wanting to find dicks might still want that in their search. Stuff like that. It means most sfw art gets tagged 'ambigious gender' too, though.
e621 still has a "tag what you see" policy but they now have "lore" tags that refer to the personal identity details of characters, and the unsavory words like "cuntboy" and "shemale" have been replaced by "andromorph" and "gynomorph".
 
The fuck is a transmasc?
Late but to expand on what's already been said it generally covers anyone who is trans, female assigned at birth, and considers themselves 'masculine of centre'. Originally this meant presents visually masculine, but I've seen some pretty feminine looking people use it just because they're female assigned and call themselves trans.

Edit: not saying I agree with it just giving the full definition as per sjws since there seems to be some confusion
 
Last edited:
Late but to expand on what's already been said it generally covers anyone who is trans, female assigned at birth, and considers themselves 'masculine of centre'. Originally this meant presents visually masculine, but I've seen some pretty feminine looking people use it just because they're female assigned and call themselves trans.
Like every other term of these freaks, it means "I am a mentally ill weirdo and an attention whore, ignore everything I say and do anything within your power to avoid ever interacting with me."
 
"andromorph" and "gynomorph".
I'm surprised yet also somehow completely unsurprised that furries have their own branch of brainless arguments about gender/sex terminology.
Also, "andromorph" would just mean "man shaped" and "gynomorph" would just mean "woman shaped". So, in the end, they just ended up defining male and female the same but used new words for them?
 
I'm surprised yet also somehow completely unsurprised that furries have their own branch of brainless arguments about gender/sex terminology.
Also, "andromorph" would just mean "man shaped" and "gynomorph" would just mean "woman shaped". So, in the end, they just ended up defining male and female the same but used new words for them?
e621 tagging is its own little world where OCD meets autism. Renaming tags for PCness or just someone's spergy notion of accuracy is so common they've put code in the search mechanism that will see you typing in an old tag and show you what it's been migrated to.
 
Last couple of days, Angelmaws and crew have been going apeshit because a minor was drawing NSFW art and another artist expressed concern about it, and this lead to this clique attacking them for "sexualizing a minor's art". It's been interesting to see people who claim to be against stuff like cub porn and sexualizing of minors jumping to defend a minor drawing NSFW art because "breasts aren't sexual". It doesn't matter what your personal perception of what is or isn't NSFW is, it matters what the law says. If you can't pop your tits out in public, then it's NSFW.
nippledrama.png
nippledrama2.png


Exv96YIUcAAsC0M.jpeg

angelmaws.png
 
Last couple of days, Angelmaws and crew have been going apeshit because a minor was drawing NSFW art and another artist expressed concern about it, and this lead to this clique attacking them for "sexualizing a minor's art". It's been interesting to see people who claim to be against stuff like cub porn and sexualizing of minors jumping to defend a minor drawing NSFW art because "breasts aren't sexual". It doesn't matter what your personal perception of what is or isn't NSFW is, it matters what the law says. If you can't pop your tits out in public, then it's NSFW.
View attachment 2047426View attachment 2047441

View attachment 2047434

View attachment 2047435
"I'm not a pedo, you are!!!"
 
e621 tagging is its own little world where OCD meets autism. Renaming tags for PCness or just someone's spergy notion of accuracy is so common they've put code in the search mechanism that will see you typing in an old tag and show you what it's been migrated to.
That was apparently what got the genderwarriors to mostly shut the fuck up and end tag-war bitchfits, that and the lore-tags. Good enough for me.
 
That was apparently what got the genderwarriors to mostly shut the fuck up and end tag-war bitchfits, that and the lore-tags. Good enough for me.
Sorry, lore tags?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, lore tags?
I think It's supposed to represent some meta-knowlege, that is not present on the picture.
As for the time of the posting, the biggest of 'lore' tags is incest_(lore) with around 26k entries. Second place goes to male_(lore) with around 3k entries. P for Priorities, I guess. And don't ask how is it supposed to be different from regular incest tag, because I don't know.
Ok, here's some defining examples:

e19b0ed6b6aa5a8941db11892ee21471.jpg
This tagged as -male. Comments under the picture make it clear, that original uploader tagged -female, but then came some mod, tagged -male and locked the tag. BTW, comments under some of these are quite entertaining to read. But, I'm afraid, this is an old drama, since all recent pics tagged as -female and no-one writes essays in comments any more. Unless some mod will get sand in vagina and go on another retagging spree.

b1bc0599104ff2a2eeea407d44b6fbf5.jpg
Also tagged lore_(female). Somebody thought, that this is needed. A worn-out shoe is my only comment.
 
Last couple of days, Angelmaws and crew have been going apeshit because a minor was drawing NSFW art and another artist expressed concern about it, and this lead to this clique attacking them for "sexualizing a minor's art". It's been interesting to see people who claim to be against stuff like cub porn and sexualizing of minors jumping to defend a minor drawing NSFW art because "breasts aren't sexual". It doesn't matter what your personal perception of what is or isn't NSFW is, it matters what the law says. If you can't pop your tits out in public, then it's NSFW.
View attachment 2047426View attachment 2047441

View attachment 2047434

View attachment 2047435
How fucking hard is it to say "Minors shouldn't post art containing nudity, representing their personal character that represents themselves, publicly" for these dumb fucks?

It's the child's fursona.

It's nude.

In effect, it's art of a real, naked, child.

What kind of dumb fucking shit encourages that?
 
How fucking hard is it to say "Minors shouldn't post art containing nudity, representing their personal character that represents themselves, publicly" for these dumb fucks?

It's the child's fursona.

It's nude.

In effect, it's art of a real, naked, child.

What kind of dumb fucking shit encourages that?
Guess you could say it's possibly started by the tasteful nudes of live subject gesture drawing, though the purpose there is for the sake of anatomy study... Then corrupted by degenerate internet pedophiles into making illustrated erotica of their character.

On the flip side, minors have been taught to clout chase to the point of eating fucking tide pods and posting porn of their fursona, in exchange for clicks

If anything, blame the fact that twitter doesn't even cater to protecting minors by hiding their posts from adults and vise versa. (Assuming the minor even gave their real age)
 
Back