Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I've written before about how having someone committed to a facility due to mental illness is difficult in Canada, and holding them for over 48 hours is very very difficult.. again, this is one of those frequent times that using an American paradigm to speculate on what might happen to JYYS just doesn't work..

I don't feel like typing, so I'll just quote from https://dialalaw.peopleslawschool.ca/hospitalizing-a-mentally-ill-person/

(The rules for) hospitalizing a person against their will are strict. A person can become an involuntary patient through a doctor’s certificate or a court order. As well, the police can take a person to hospital in an emergency.

While a voluntary patient may be admitted to any hospital with psychiatric services, involuntary patients can be admitted only to certain hospitals in BC. If a hospital doesn’t have a bed available, they may not be able to admit the person. In that case, the person would be sent, under supervision, to another hospital that has room.

A doctor’s certificate to keep a person with a mental disorder in hospital is valid for up to 14 days before admission. Involuntary patients can be kept in hospital for only 48 hours


To keep the patient longer, the hospital must get a second doctor to examine the patient and produce a second doctor’s certificate within the 48 hours. The patient can then be kept for up to one month.

also,
a person being involuntarily has a right to have the matter reviewed.

On top of that there are matters regarding the Canadian Charter of Rights that have not been fully resolved.

Then there's the additional matter of needing someone to petition either a physician or the court to get the involuntary hold. Unless that person is a family member or caregiver, it won't happen.

In a very brief search, there have been no non-criminal related successful psychiatric holds in BC that have not been initiated by a caregiver/family member.

File this one under Fantasy Outcome... Unless JJYS kills someone and succeeded at convincing a judge or jury that he was suffering from a mental disorder that rendered him incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act he was committing.
 
Last edited:
The fact that they would send a student and not even an attorney shows what priority defense counsel places on this case.
No lawyer, unless they have a solo practice, will attend a scheduling appearance. It would be an incredibly inefficient way to practice law if they did. They will nearly always send a minion

FYI in Canada, the term Attorney and Lawyer are not exactly synonymous like the terms are in the USA. In Canada, the person representing JJYS should be called a Lawyer, or formally a Barrister and Solicitor.
 
Last edited:
What does he honestly have left? He's a fat, unemployed, disgusting, universally-hated man without a penis. He's spent years making other people miserable and now, lo and behold, he's miserable. I'd hate to lose this cow but I don't see why he would continue living what must be a hellish existence. Literally the only people who are going to miss him are us. If that's not a legitimate reason to kill yourself, then I don't know what is.
 
What does he honestly have left? He's a fat, unemployed, disgusting, universally-hated man without a penis. He's spent years making other people miserable and now, lo and behold, he's miserable. I'd hate to lose this cow but I don't see why he would continue living what must be a hellish existence. Literally the only people who are going to miss him are us. If that's not a legitimate reason to kill yourself, then I don't know what is.
I think he has spite left. In his mind, he believes he is constantly being wronged in one way or another, and he wants to exist as an "out and proud" trans woman for the rest of his life. I'm sure the only rush he has left is when he knows he's at the very least inconvenienced someone. When he can insert a "well actually" into a conversation or movement. I'm sure he loves when some woketard on Twitter blindly gets outraged on his behalf and defends him as well.

We'll see if he joins the 41%, but I doubt he would end up going through with it. Won't stop the suicide baiting and manipulation on Twitter though.
 
Last edited:
No lawyer, unless they have a solo practice, will attend a scheduling appearance. It would be an incredibly inefficient way to practice law if they did. They will nearly always send a minion

FYI in Canada, the term Attorney and Lawyer are not exactly synonymous in Canada like the terms are in the USA. In Canada, the person representing JJYS should be called a Lawyer, or formally a Barrister and Solicitor.
Actual question, do they wear white wigs?
 
Actual question, do they wear white wigs?
I don't think they wear the wigs here in Canada (maybe in the UK however) although attorneys are often seen in their special black smock-suit (I don't know what it's called) with the flat white tie looking thing around their neck. That was a horrible description.

Supreme court judges wear a hideous looking red and white fur cape if I remember correctly.
 
I think he has spite left. In his mind, he believes he is constantly being wronged in one way or another, and he wants to exist as an "out and proud" trans woman for the rest of his life. I'm sure the only rush he has left is when he knows he's at the very least inconvenienced someone. When he can insert a "well actually" into a conversation or movement.

We'll see if he joins the 41% though, but I doubt he would end up going through with it. Won't stop the suicide baiting and manipulation on Twitter though.
You have a good point. Besides if he did join Club 41 he probably would do it in a lame, boring way like hanging and not the public self-immolation that I imagine.
 
I don't think they wear the wigs here in Canada (maybe in the UK however) although attorneys are often seen in their special black smock-suit (I don't know what it's called) with the flat white tie looking thing around their neck. That was a horrible description.

Supreme court judges wear a hideous looking red and white fur cape if I remember correctly.
British here: they don't wear wigs in "trivial shit though" court in the UK, either.

Admittedly, they DO do that in "adult court". It's actually pretty fascinating - not so much for the wigs as for the rhetorical sparring.
 
I don't think they wear the wigs here in Canada (maybe in the UK however) although attorneys are often seen in their special black smock-suit (I don't know what it's called) with the flat white tie looking thing around their neck. That was a horrible description.

Supreme court judges wear a hideous looking red and white fur cape if I remember correctly.

They used to, but not in small claims. Supreme court I recall seeing a judge wearing a wig once, but it was decades ago. I was a little shit at the time, and my father was suing a former business partner who screwed him out of 40k. In today's money that was more like 150k.

I think they settled, I'll have to ask the old man. Far more satisfyingly though, a couple years later Dad and one of his employees actually caught the motherfucker down a dark alley in Vancouver. It couldn't have been set up better by God himself as he saw Dad coming and darted down the first alley he saw, which was both a dead end and totally empty of any witnesses and they beat 8 shades of yellow and blue out of his snivelling grovelling ass. GodBearDAMN would I have loved to have seen it.
 
Last edited:
Attempting to dunk on Donald.
1.PNG
 
This is late, but in countries such as Germany if I'm correct, you cannot sue companies or organisations for certain accidents or choices unless they hid vital information from you or never fixed anything faulty. I think they may have to implement this regulation in Canada considering how often Yanny abuses the system for pointless lawsuits.
 
This is late, but in countries such as Germany if I'm correct, you cannot sue companies or organisations for certain accidents or choices unless they hid vital information from you or never fixed anything faulty. I think they may have to implement this regulation in Canada considering how often Yanny abuses the system for pointless lawsuits.
I think instead of implementing new laws that restrict the average persons ability to seek justice, it would be more prudent to just enforce the existing vexatious litigant procedure (or perhaps make it less onerous on the courts to declare people like JY as vexatious).
 
British here: they don't wear wigs in "trivial shit though" court in the UK, either.

Admittedly, they DO do that in "adult court". It's actually pretty fascinating - not so much for the wigs as for the rhetorical sparring.
In Scotland lawyers wear little white curly toupées even in the Sheriff Court where trivial cases are dealt with. Little white curly toupées with long curly tails and black velvet bows, while judges wear the full Louis XIV white curls. I suppose wearing a costume helps with the roleplaying that they absolutely believe someone is innocent/guilty even when they know full well they're guilty/innocent.
 
This is late, but in countries such as Germany if I'm correct, you cannot sue companies or organisations for certain accidents or choices unless they hid vital information from you or never fixed anything faulty. I think they may have to implement this regulation in Canada considering how often Yanny abuses the system for pointless lawsuits.
Germany (along with the majority of Europe) practices Roman as opposed to Common Law.

IANAL, but, in a nutshell: some of the major stuff is based upon pretty different basic assumptions.
 
Back