Celebrity James Charles / James Charles Dickinson - Male Ambassador

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
according to...what, exactly? certainly not biology.

also, I'm not comparing twinks to women, I'm comparing straight mens' preferences to gay mens' preferences.
I'm not saying women are completely hairless but compared to men, we don't have coarse facial hair, inner thigh hair, chest hair, or back hair. If the sexes were as interchangeable as you try to make it seem, human beings would become extinct because only men would have the urge to fuck each other day and night.

LOL, edited to say that people are mad because men are different from women.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying women are completely hairless but compared to men, we don't have coarse facial hair, inner thigh hair, chest hair, or back hair. If the sexes were as interchangeable as you try to make it seem, human beings would become extinct because only men would have the urge to fuck each other day and night.

LOL, edited to say that people are mad because men are different from women.

That doesn't change the fact that women are still expected to shave what hair they do grow on their legs, armpits, genitals, arms, etc. I'm not saying they're interchangeable, either. Just that there's not much difference between a straight man wanting a hairless woman and gay men wanting a hairless man. Neither option makes either one a pedophile.
 
I read this thread an all I see is people talking about women shaving, what the fuck does this have to do with James and his grooming? Say what you want to say about Keem but he is right, too many times this has happened with James and its gotten to point that there is no doubt he has a thing for young guys.
 
I read this thread an all I see is people talking about women shaving, what the fuck does this have to do with James and his grooming? Say what you want to say about Keem but he is right, too many times this has happened with James and its gotten to point that there is no doubt he has a thing for young guys.
You know how in high school you knew at least one group of kids that hung around with an adult that would end up fucking one of them? James Charles IS that adult. Come on, people. Where there's smoke, there's very much often fire.
 
Yeah, it's really weird to see James Charles doing some shit that would cause pages and pages of discussion in another thread, and here we are with a fucking three page court room argument on whether all gay men are pedophiles and the defense would like to cite exhibit A: women shave their pits. I neither know nor, for the purposes of this thread, care about whether all gay men are pedophiles. James Charles is a millionaire who, at the age of 21, is thirsting over not rich boys who are young enough that they could plausibly have parental restrictions on their internet usage. Mom says they can't film another tik tok until they finish their 10th grade biology homework and this literal adult man is trying to see their dicks. That's creepy.

There are still people who refer to Charles as a kid or a boy, and I don't know if that's part of why people just seem to be maybe, kinda outraged about it. Sort of outraged. A soupçon of fury. It's super weird. The whole thing with Tati muddied the waters, because she clearly has some personal issues with gay men, and when the lines were drawn everyone just wanted to go "oh she's a homophobe and she's appealing to the gay panic inside all of us". Tati is homophobic, at least a little, but some of the concerns she raised were valid. Is it weird that she assumed the waiter was straight? Super. And the dude coming out and going "nah I was bicurious and everything was consensual" doesn't actually change one major thing: when Tati said that Charles' rebuttal to the claim that the waiter was straight was "doesn't matter, I'm rich". The thing about Tati's video is that she never truly outright lied; she assumed, she exaggerated, she obfuscated, and she believed others without proof, but you can tell that she always kept that layer of personal deniability, that she was able to justify her words to herself. When she later said "I never lied" she really believed that. So, going back to the waiter thing, we have an assumption (the waiter is straight) and then a very clear and explicit recounting of something she directly witnessed (it doesn't matter, I'm rich). And, in my opinion, James Charles absolutely said that. And that's gross. And now that we have proof that he'll creep after 16 year olds, is it fair to wonder what other things he thinks his money can overcome?

(It is)
 
Yeah, it's really weird to see James Charles doing some shit that would cause pages and pages of discussion in another thread, and here we are with a fucking three page court room argument on whether all gay men are pedophiles and the defense would like to cite exhibit A: women shave their pits. I neither know nor, for the purposes of this thread, care about whether all gay men are pedophiles. James Charles is a millionaire who, at the age of 21, is thirsting over not rich boys who are young enough that they could plausibly have parental restrictions on their internet usage. Mom says they can't film another tik tok until they finish their 10th grade biology homework and this literal adult man is trying to see their dicks. That's creepy.

There are still people who refer to Charles as a kid or a boy, and I don't know if that's part of why people just seem to be maybe, kinda outraged about it. Sort of outraged. A soupçon of fury. It's super weird. The whole thing with Tati muddied the waters, because she clearly has some personal issues with gay men, and when the lines were drawn everyone just wanted to go "oh she's a homophobe and she's appealing to the gay panic inside all of us". Tati is homophobic, at least a little, but some of the concerns she raised were valid. Is it weird that she assumed the waiter was straight? Super. And the dude coming out and going "nah I was bicurious and everything was consensual" doesn't actually change one major thing: when Tati said that Charles' rebuttal to the claim that the waiter was straight was "doesn't matter, I'm rich". The thing about Tati's video is that she never truly outright lied; she assumed, she exaggerated, she obfuscated, and she believed others without proof, but you can tell that she always kept that layer of personal deniability, that she was able to justify her words to herself. When she later said "I never lied" she really believed that. So, going back to the waiter thing, we have an assumption (the waiter is straight) and then a very clear and explicit recounting of something she directly witnessed (it doesn't matter, I'm rich). And, in my opinion, James Charles absolutely said that. And that's gross. And now that we have proof that he'll creep after 16 year olds, is it fair to wonder what other things he thinks his money can overcome?

(It is)
I'm not gonna say his grooming Gage wasn't fucking creepy (it was, and it pisses me off that it literally nobody believed him until Tati made her video), but the reason people were iffy on it the first time is that Tati is notoriously a shit stirrer. She was happy to let that fake drama continue for a whole fucking week but then suddenly wanted it to end when the drama began to affect her negatively.
 
If there's any truth to these allegations, it'll all be water under the bridge once they troon out. Money, connections, and the tranny pass? They'll be immune to all criticism/censure.
Is it weird that she assumed the waiter was straight? Super.
Lol what? It's "super weird" to assume the 92% chance?
Like, I personally don’t give a shit if it’s a 35 year and and a 50 year old.
lmao
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Pizza Steve
Lol what? It's "super weird" to assume the 92% chance?
For the purposes of filming a 40 minute long callout video where one of the lynchpins is this random dude's sexuality yeah, it was. She could have asked him directly, I suppose, but she honestly didn't have to mention it at all. By making a big deal about the fact that Charles was hitting on a ~straight guy~ she gave him ammunition for his rebuttal, because all he had to do was prove that the guy wasn't straight and boom, Tati BTFO.

But, since it seems to matter, let me rephrase it: I don't care that she told Charles that he shouldn't hit on someone because the dude was straight (it just made her sound like someone's clueless mom), I think it's super weird that she brought up that point during her video as if it mattered, and then spent forever crying about this poor straight man being terrorized by James Charles when his actions as described would have been gross regardless of who his victim's preferred sexual partners are. And she did later make an extremely valid point about Charles using his fame and money to coerce or groom people into doing what he wanted, and everyone just ignored it as part of her appeal to gay panic.

Also, 92%? Fuckin please, this was a waiter in LA. Maybe 50% at BEST.
 
Beauty YouTuber and social media star James Charles has faced a number of accusations in recent weeks. In February, a 16-year-old fan alleged in a TikTok video that the YouTuber sent nude pictures of himself before “pressuring” the fan to do the same.

Showing screenshots of the alleged exchange in the video, the fan said that “he [Charles] started making the conversation very sexual, and it made me really uncomfortable.”

The 21-year-old responded afterward with an online statement, calling the accusations “completely false.” He claimed that the fan had initially said they were 18, and said that when he found out the fan was underage, he told the fan he was “really uncomfortable” with the situation and unfriended him.

Shortly after, two other accusations came to light from other fans who had been conversing with James on Snapchat. One 17-year-old claimed that he’d been upfront with age towards James, but the YouTuber had continued to flirt with him.

Another person claimed that James had messaged him using words such as “daddy” and “babe” despite previously telling the claiming that he wasn’t looking for anything other than friendship.

In a TikTok by user @jakecherryy, a video compiling screenshots from Snapchat shows him conversing with James Charles and sending pictures back and forth. Several images show James describing Jake as “cute.”

Following screenshots posted by Jake appear to show that James was angry he had posted messages between them to his private Snapchat story and then accused him of lying about his age, which Jake denies.

Meanwhile, YouTube has confirmed James Charles will not return to host Instant Influencer for season 2, amidst the grooming allegations.

Beauty YouTuber and social media star James Charles has faced a number of accusations in recent weeks. In February, a 16-year-old fan alleged in a TikTok video that the YouTuber sent nude pictures of himself before “pressuring” the fan to do the same.

Showing screenshots of the alleged exchange in the video, the fan said that “he [Charles] started making the conversation very sexual, and it made me really uncomfortable.”

The 21-year-old responded afterward with an online statement, calling the accusations “completely false.” He claimed that the fan had initially said they were 18, and said that when he found out the fan was underage, he told the fan he was “really uncomfortable” with the situation and unfriended him.

James Charles has faced a number of accusations in the past few weeks.
Shortly after, two other accusations came to light from other fans who had been conversing with James on Snapchat. One 17-year-old claimed that he’d been upfront with age towards James, but the YouTuber had continued to flirt with him.

Another person claimed that James had messaged him using words such as “daddy” and “babe” despite previously telling the claiming that he wasn’t looking for anything other than friendship.

In a TikTok by user @jakecherryy, a video compiling screenshots from Snapchat shows him conversing with James Charles and sending pictures back and forth. Several images show James describing Jake as “cute.”

Following screenshots posted by Jake appear to show that James was angry he had posted messages between them to his private Snapchat story and then accused him of lying about his age, which Jake denies.

Meanwhile, YouTube has confirmed James Charles will not return to host Instant Influencer for season 2, amidst the grooming allegations.
(s/a)

Again, he can't keep his dick in his pants around prepubescent boys. I'm sure all the LGBTQ+++ will back him up as they always do. Sickening.
 
(s/a)

Again, he can't keep his dick in his pants around prepubescent boys. I'm sure all the LGBTQ+++ will back him up as they always do. Sickening.
I really hope these accusations get to be so much that I never have to see his mpreg fetishist ass plastered all over Twitter or see any drag-fetish faghag teenage girls gushing over him ever again.
It's pretty obvious that he's a sex pest, anybody who makes their sexuality the centerpiece of their personality or image is 10/10 times a giant fucking pervert.
 
A Complete Timeline of the James Charles Allegations and Controversies

I think this is a new accusation:


March 2021

A 15-year-old teenage boy used TikTok to share screenshots from conversations and photos he had exchanged with Charles. After the boy started sharing their messages on his Snapchat Story, he claimed Charles had blocked him and accused him of lying about his age even though, he said, Charles had always been aware of his age.
 
(s/a)

Again, he can't keep his dick in his pants around prepubescent boys. I'm sure all the LGBTQ+++ will back him up as they always do. Sickening.
Its funny. I see straight men accused all the fucking time of being rapists purely on the basis of their attraction to women, but I, and I say this as a fag myself, see far more rape culture in the gay community.

I say this a lot and get accused of being an internalized homophobe, and apparently the fact that I downright got sexually assaulted by a gay dude isn't enough to convince people the contrary.
 
Its funny. I see straight men accused all the fucking time of being rapists purely on the basis of their attraction to women, but I, and I say this as a fag myself, see far more rape culture in the gay community.

I say this a lot and get accused of being an internalized homophobe, and apparently the fact that I downright got sexually assaulted by a gay dude isn't enough to convince people the contrary.
you'd like it if he wasn't an ugly monkey fuck
 
Back