Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend

That shows he doesn't care about progressivism nor change, he just wanted the benefits and hide under the guise of "helping others". Plus he is a disgrace for Libleft. Left Libertarians focused on the welfare of the individuals (healthcare and poverty alleviation) for a better society, but he does not care all about that. He only cares for himself.
 
That shows he doesn't care about progressivism nor change, he just wanted the benefits and hide under the guise of "helping others". Plus he is a disgrace for Libleft. Left Libertarians focused on the welfare of the individuals (healthcare and poverty alleviation) for a better society, but he does not care all about that. He only cares for himself.
Nah mate, he's not making them look bad, he's just upfront about what they believe in.
 
You forgot the hilariously ironic tweets that preceeded that. Yeah guyzzzz remember that calling a dograpist makes you an evil nazieee.

View attachment 2018678
I know you completely lack the ability to read and do not have have an ounce of reading comprehension, not to mention can't research worth a single shit, Buck, but you're genuinely completely off base.

"Degenerate" does not have roots Nazism or racially charged pseudoscience, the Nazis quite literally adopted or essentially stole the word to use for the term "degenerate art", which they used to refer to basically all art that wasn't German, and sometimes specifically for Jewish artists. The word itself is NOT related to Nazism.

Secondly, if you are talking about the earliest usage of the word, it also has a very literal definition: off from your birth. Losing your ancestry. A loss in quality. A decay of morals. Anyone attaching racism to that is doing so purposefully and forcefully.

Quit acting like you have some kind of moral or personal superiority when any superiority you feel pertains to arguments that have no basis in fact. You have made up definitions for these things, you have invented a platform to stand on that does not exist. In order to defend yourself, you have to make things up, Buck. Your soap box is both imaginary and invisible.

Sperging over, sorry for that!
 
Charles is coping about fucking animals again:

1616633254536.png


1616633314358.png


I'm going to assume AASECT certified therapists must be grad students or a place for the individuals who have worthless psych majors go when they realize they have picked a dead end profession.
 
Thank you jannie for your hard work removing scum, o7 ^

In reply to OP, I'm surprised it took this many years for him to get outed. He's been a notoriously shitposty zoofuck in the Twitter chronosphere for a long time (as far back as the Kero shitfest).

good work space cowboys.
 
Charles is coping about fucking animals again:

View attachment 2026301

View attachment 2026303

I'm going to assume AASECT certified therapists must be grad students or a place for the individuals who have worthless psych majors go when they realize they have picked a dead end profession.
Why the fuck is he talking about the nuances of the therapeutic field with his therapist and not about his problems? Either he's lying or therapy is a joke. This is like an electrician coming into your house to chit-chat about the ins and outs of the building code instead of running some wire.

There's literally not a single practicing addiction therapist on the continent whose interested in keeping his job and telling gay people that their gay sex is an addiction. That's retarded.

The movement to associate Furry Fandom with gay people in the public consciousness is dear ole' Ronny Raegans wet dream. Not even the most psychopathic psy-op specialists in the CIA could conceive of a plan to make all gay people look like dangerous anti-social misfit perverts by associating them with losers who fuck in animal costumes. They're all their own worst enemies in terms of PR. Absolutely brilliant.
 

Yeah. The book is a little sympathetic towards him. But she gives Spink no quarter when it comes to his animal abuse.
yes it's basically just zoophilia apologist bullshit. i got through maybe 3 chapters before i had to stop reading for my own sanity

the woman who wrote it showed up in spink's thread iirc but i dont really remember what she said

(slight derail) I ended up taking the plunge and have been reading the book about Spink for the last few days and it's...weirdly informative? I thought it was interesting (it goes into his childhood and relationship with family in one chapter, which is something I wonder about most paraphiliacs like him) until it had this suspiciously neutral approach to ~zoos~ in general. I'm not done with it yet but I wonder what the author thinks about his death, lol.

I'm going to assume AASECT certified therapists must be grad students or a place for the individuals who have worthless psych majors go when they realize they have picked a dead end profession.
I've linked to this article before (sorry), but from what I've looked into, AASECT-certified therapists are literally trained to be supportive of degeneracy.

Why the fuck is he talking about the nuances of the therapeutic field with his therapist and not about his problems? Either he's lying or therapy is a joke. This is like an electrician coming into your house to chit-chat about the ins and outs of the building code instead of running some wire.

There's literally not a single practicing addiction therapist on the continent whose interested in keeping his job and telling gay people that their gay sex is an addiction. That's retarded.
I don't doubt there's been scenarios where someone ends up seeing a therapist that has some kind of bias against their (non-illegal) lifestyle, but I could've sworn that therapists aren't even supposed to let their personal views slip in unless it's 100% relevant to their client or explicitly asked (and even then I don't know if they're obligated to share that)?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: 820㎌Cap
(slight derail) I ended up taking the plunge and have been reading the book about Spink for the last few days and it's...weirdly informative? I thought it was interesting (it goes into his childhood and relationship with family in one chapter, which is something I wonder about most paraphiliacs like him) until it had this suspiciously neutral approach to ~zoos~ in general. I'm not done with it yet but I wonder what the author thinks about his death, lol.


I've linked to this article before (sorry), but from what I've looked into, AASECT-certified therapists are literally trained to be supportive of degeneracy.


I don't doubt there's been scenarios where someone ends up seeing a therapist that has some kind of bias against their (non-illegal) lifestyle, but I could've sworn that therapists aren't even supposed to let their personal views slip in unless it's 100% relevant to their client or explicitly asked (and even then I don't know if they're obligated to share that)?
you'd be surprised how many therapists overshare.
 
Why the fuck is he talking about the nuances of the therapeutic field with his therapist and not about his problems? Either he's lying or therapy is a joke. This is like an electrician coming into your house to chit-chat about the ins and outs of the building code instead of running some wire.

There's literally not a single practicing addiction therapist on the continent whose interested in keeping his job and telling gay people that their gay sex is an addiction. That's retarded.

The movement to associate Furry Fandom with gay people in the public consciousness is dear ole' Ronny Raegans wet dream. Not even the most psychopathic psy-op specialists in the CIA could conceive of a plan to make all gay people look like dangerous anti-social misfit perverts by associating them with losers who fuck in animal costumes. They're all their own worst enemies in terms of PR. Absolutely brilliant.
Remember that he is a chronic liar. They all are. You cannot trust what he's saying at all just find small pieces that makes up the bigger pics of Charles. Dude is a full on sociopath and a dangerous one at that. I'm glad he lives in a shithole at least. People like this would molest kids if they could as they're both vulnerable victims like animals. I'm in a way happy Charles seem to prefer getting fucked by dogs and not fucking them themselves and possibly causing internal injury. But human feces on dog dicks...God makes me jut puke. I hope he stays away from kids at least but knowing he's into cub....

Tl:dr
Take what Charles says with a grain of salt.
(But there are indeed relly crazy people in psychiatry/sociology out there, just look at people like John money and those people diagnosing kids as trans" and so on.
 
I finished Uniquely Dangerous. I just felt the whole thing to be massively depressing. Spink seemed like somebody who could have been a great person in a parallel reality, instead he chose THAT hill to die on. I noticed the book made no mention of 'zoosadism', the individuals she deals with are all presented as having a love for animals which steps over widely accepted moral boundaries. Instead, they point out the hideous mistreatment 'normals' subject animals to whilst despising 'zoos'. It just felt like overlooking the sadists made that narrative somewhat incomplete.

I notice the zooier than thou podcast makes significant use of left wing talking points and they've adopted the fashionable sentiments of our age. They're geared towards love and universalism and engaged in a struggle against hate and intolerance. They're fighting for a place on the Born this Way bandwagon, somewhere between Desmond is Amazing and Bugchasers. They clearly feel it'd be easier to shoehorn their way into the left than it would the right. The BLM support is also interesting. I'd love to see Toggle the rat cross paths with the average inner city Footlocker looter. Or even Saint Floyd himself. I imagine the outcome of that encounter could be interesting if the person of color knew of his sexual activities.

They like to argue that their 'community' has never been so non-white and global. As though peoples issue with them was that they didn't have diversity quotas. They're convinced they'll be able to sell people sodomy with dogs if they can find a black guy to appear on their show to talk about how much white people suck.

This is a rabbithole I regret going down somewhat. I saw a guy walking a dog and an image of Spinks dead eyed mugshot came to mind. Great.
 
Last edited:
I finished Uniquely Dangerous. I just felt the whole thing to be massively depressing. Spink seemed like somebody who could have been a great person in a parallel reality, instead he chose THAT hill to die on.
(Sorry for the slight derail) I'm still reading the book (but I'm pretty far in - chapter 26) and I sadly got the same impression. If he never acted on the zoo shit and at least tried to just be a gay dude he probably wouldn't have been so bad. I also thought it was interesting that he had a history of sexual abuse, I wonder if he would've turned out this way if he never got diddled as a child and pretended that the pedo's pet snake touched him instead as a weird coping mechanism (yes, it really says that, for those who didn't read it lol).

This is a rabbithole I regret going down somewhat. I saw a guy walking a dog and an image of Spinks dead eyed mugshot came to mind. Great.
I can't see "dog sitters" or veterinarians (or even those people who artificially inseminate livestock as their job) without wondering if they're in it for other reasons now after the shit I read about this "community", lol.
 
I checked the OP and the posts of the tweet date, so my bad if this image is posted within the sandwich.

View attachment 2051121

View attachment 2051123
---
Edit: Shit that will make your nose wrinkle in disgust:
View attachment 2051150
It amazing how many times he tries to bring up the consent argument. The only defense he has is the one stolen from the gays. Coming from the cub porn collecter himself it honestly would make sense if he was diddled when he was young so he doesn't have any boundaries.
 
lol, so now this makes me wonder what his thoughts on pedophilia is if he's pulling this argument (but seeing how he's into cub porn that shows us the answer already). I notice a lot of ~zoos~ try to take a moral high-ground and condemn pedophilia because "it's not the same, full grown animals aren't human children" (or they go halfsies and say "NOMAPs" are valid but acting on it isn't), if he outright says that both can consent then he could get some performative backlash (or not, maybe I have too much faith in degenerates).
 
It amazing how many times he tries to bring up the consent argument. The only defense he has is the one stolen from the gays. Coming from the cub porn collecter himself it honestly would make sense if he was diddled when he was young so he doesn't have any boundaries.

Speaking of taking the highground, the fact that he retweets this too from fellow animal rapists just...lmao. Isn't this like saying every teacher is actually a pedophile? This is beyond retarded.
A3B38FF4-E6FC-4433-9E87-D6CFB213A563.jpeg
 
Back