- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
And where? It's a shitty place, surrounded by even shittier places. Unfortunately I'm stuck here, with no way out.
Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big
- Thread starter JosephStalin
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2019
All the feels my friend. I’m also trapped and losing the will to live rapidly.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
Code:
youtube-dl.exe -f best https://twitter.com/KyleKashuv/status/1377739020315193344 -o "Custom Video Title.mp4"Also, Jesus Christ Canada. You need a negative test to get on a plane to go home, you need to take another test once you arrive, then you need to go to a hotel to await the results WHICH YOU PAY FOR, then you have to finish your quarantine anyway even with two negative tests. If you test positive, they literally put you in a government camp.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
Canada is such a fucked country. Alberta and BC should petition to join the US. I can't understand why Canadians let their country devolve into this shithole.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
Why are you lumping BC in with Alberta there? BC is one of the crazier provinces in general. Not quite Ontario levels, but up there.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
Aight fuck BC. Alberta is good on its own.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
This is why you make your population think like nigger cattle, then you can treat them like nigger cattle. Ol' Uncle Chang needs the property values to tank to get a better deal for his Yuan. Vancouver ain't gonna get cheaper on it's own!
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I didn't want to reply to you because I didn't feel like autistically dissecting your post.
I come here to laugh at retards while I'm bored at work, so forgive me if taking the time to rip you a new one was a low priority compared to just calling you a faggot and moving on. But since you get off on being wrong, here you go:
If you're going to copy-paste, at least fucking get the quote right.
"mortality rate among the infected of 0.2 percent or less - below the 0.9 that is now believed to be true". The IFR from a later metadata study was 0.2-0.4, not "0.2% less than 0.9".
It's a difference of 2.5-4.5x lower, and even then when it was published most mainstream outlets (including the WHO) were sticking to a 2.0-3.4% IFR.
Okay and?
Am I denying COVID exists?
Am I denying COVID can't kill people?
Point out where he specifically says this shit.
Point out where he says we need to constantly mask up.
Point out where he says we need to keep 2m/6ft of space
Point out where he says every age group needs to be vaccinated (and revaccinated again, and again, and again)
Getting tested I'll cede, given his entire thesis was that more of us are or have been infected than official numbers are counting - which means a larger asymptomatic/mild case population vs deaths & hospitalizations - which would of course show that its not as deadly as media & government are claiming.
Otherwise, the fact here is you are choosing not to believe the peer-reviewed meta-analysis that puts the infection lethality rate (IFR) at around 0.23%, and instead inserting your own headcanon into his vague words is telling. You're literally rejecting actual scientific data in favor of your own personal thoughts on what should be done.
So you think the government should punish people who you don't agree with because you are scared off the risks?
That's because you're a boot-licker AND a giant pussy.
So to sum up, stop being a faggot, and grow some balls if you want the panic over a weak-ass virus to be over.
If me not responding counts as "running away" then I'll just go ahead and assume you "ran away" from the other two scientists mentioned in that post - but hey I can always list more if you want to keep inserting your own head-canon into their words.
- Edit: Also its a strawman because in every other post you are just assuming we are all conspiracy theorists who get our info from Youtube
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2020
Outside of metro Vancouver and the island, BC is alright. Granted, those two regions constitute like 70% of the province's population, but still...
Anyways, in response to rising cases (and despite falling hospitalizations and intubations and ZERO ongoing deaths) the Grand Dictator Dr. Bonnie Henry has unilaterally toughened restrictions for a few weeks here in British Columbia. This includes the total shutdown of all indoor dining and gyms. No consideration given to the people who will be unable to provide for themselves or their families as a result of this. It is disgusting that she gets to simply decide to do this, despite the total lack of evidence for these measures' efficacy, with no oversight at all. Lockdowns aren't working? We need more lockdowns!
Personally, and I know this will never happen, but I'd like to see Her Royal Highness Dr. Bonnie Henry brought up on manslaughter charges for every person who's committed suicide in the province as a direct result of the loss of their job or other income source due to her restrictions. She certainly hasn't saved any lives, because lockdowns, masking mandates, and so on have not reduced cases, intubations, or deaths.
I'm planning on going camping in early June. Currently there are no legal restrictions that prohibit this. Der Furher Dr. Bonnie Henry requests that people avoid non-essential travel, but I have two responses to her request: 1) eat shit, and 2) camping is essential as it is a supremely cathartic experience that helps me maintain a minimum of sanity.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
well the New Strain Panic is definitely pushing back against any hopefulness or optimism the vaccines may have brought on earlier this year.
god forbid the general public gets a taste of hope.
god forbid the general public gets a taste of hope.
Product Placement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
You finally replied after replying to every other of my messages to reeeeeee at, thanks for giving me more tard stuff to laugh at, it was worth it, you still can't get over the you were wrong about him, and that you are so weak you won't take any self responsibility to not being a dumb fuck, no wonder you already got covid and spread it around the shit he warned about.
Love the part you are mad where I said his research stated 0,2, less than the 0.9 when you legit just said the same thing while saying I'm wrong, sorry you said 0.23, that 0.03 really changes the post.
Also never said 0,2 was right or wrong in that post, as the main point of the post is how you are not listing to him, something you still haven't disprove, as you take no self responsibility.
Also why do you love this one peer reviewed study, but not all the other ones, backing up wearing masks, keeping 2 meters and telling you to self responsibility, why so selective if you love the science so much.
But like I've said should the government have the power to do lockdown, I think that is a fair thing to be against and good talking point, but when you are tard and spread coivd like you have admitted, you make a really good case for the government to have that power. Plus the tard rage at it is funny to me, when you are the ones digging your own grave, reminds me of someone shooting them self in the foot and blaming the gun or someone driving on the wrong side of the road and complaining they lost their driver's license. Not like you tards are going to change, so got to sit back laugh and enjoy the tard rage,
Will say you spoiler title does do a good job summing up your post there.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Product Placement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
Good news for you doomers
COVID-19: Chris Whitty warns virus measures needed for another two years to combat threat of variants
Coronavirus safety measures are likely to still be necessary for another two years, England's chief medical officer has said.
Professor Chris Whitty said it could take up to two years for the world to build up a bank of vaccines and technologies capable of rapidly dealing with COVID-19 variants and outbreaks.
While he said these tools will eventually "find a way through", there still remains a level of risk that needs to be managed before then.
Speaking during a Royal Society of Medicine webinar on Thursday, Professor Whitty said a cautious approach will be needed for the next couple of years "because we've got such a difficult situation to go through at the moment".
He added: "What we don't want to be is in a situation where we look back in six months and say 'If we'd only just been a bit more cautious for a month or two we would've actually got through [vaccinating] the whole population, we'd have understood a lot more, we'd know how to deal with this, we'd probably have a few variant vaccines on the stocks'.
"I don't think though this should be seen as an indefinite posture, I think this is a matter of probably the next year or two whilst we understand how to do this and find a way of responding rapidly to variants."
However, he said a "very wide portfolio of vaccines" is likely to be available in around two years, offering greater protection.
"If we scroll forward two years, I think we're going to have a very wide portfolio of vaccines," Professor Whitty said.
He added that technology can "turn around a vaccine to a new variant incredibly fast, compared to how historically we've been able to do it".
"So I think technology will find a way through this in the long run, but we've got a period of risk between now and then," he added.
'Vaccine protection wall is leaky, not complete'
Professor Whitty said that while the R number (the rate at which the virus replicated) is less than 1, variants coming into the UK "don't have much of a foothold", but he added that R is anticipated to rise above 1 as more things open up in the lockdown exit road map.
Politicians and experts have issued warnings to the public to stick to coronavirus rules, after the stay at home order was lifted in England on Monday and the "rule of six" came back into place for outside gatherings.
On Monday, Boris Johnson warned people to "proceed with caution".
"What we don't know is exactly how strong our fortifications now are, how robust our defences are against another wave," he said.
"That's why I stress the importance of everybody maintaining the discipline people have shown for so long."
It comes as a survey from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed the level of people testing positive for COVID-19 in England has fallen to its lowest level since 24 September.
Around one in 370 people in private households in England had COVID-19 in the week to 27 March - down slightly from one in 340 the previous week, the ONS said. In the week to 24 September the estimate stood at one in 470.
However, the ONS said the percentage of people testing positive for the virus is estimated to have increased in eastern England.
The trend was uncertain for all other regions, but had decreased in southeast and southwest England, the ONS added.
Yorkshire and the Humber had the highest proportion of people of any region in England likely to test positive for coronavirus in the week to March 27: around one in 230.
Northwest England had the next highest estimate at one in 280.
Meanwhile, England's deputy chief medical officer has said the UK was not fully prepared for a pandemic of this type.
Image:Jenny Harries said the UK wasn't 'fully prepared' for a pandemic of this type
Dr Jenny Harries said more testing would have been carried out if tests were available earlier on, and knowledge about asymptomatic transmission could have resulted in a prompt recommendation to wear masks.
Speaking at the launch of the new UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), of which she is chief executive, Dr Harries told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We were not fully prepared for this pandemic and, as I've said, I'm very happy to accept there is an awful lot to learn.
"I think we share some of those failings with many other countries."
Asked if the initial response to the pandemic was poor, she said: "I think it had merits and it had things that we would wish to improve."
She said that while asymptomatic transmission had been "considered carefully", the proportion of cases - now thought to be 30% - was not recognised.
"So obviously the response that we put in place and some of the interventions were not accounting for that high degree of numbers of asymptomatic cases, so I think there's learning as we've gone through."
Professor Chris Whitty said it could take up to two years for the world to build up a bank of vaccines and technologies capable of rapidly dealing with COVID-19 variants and outbreaks.
While he said these tools will eventually "find a way through", there still remains a level of risk that needs to be managed before then.
Speaking during a Royal Society of Medicine webinar on Thursday, Professor Whitty said a cautious approach will be needed for the next couple of years "because we've got such a difficult situation to go through at the moment".
He added: "What we don't want to be is in a situation where we look back in six months and say 'If we'd only just been a bit more cautious for a month or two we would've actually got through [vaccinating] the whole population, we'd have understood a lot more, we'd know how to deal with this, we'd probably have a few variant vaccines on the stocks'.
"I don't think though this should be seen as an indefinite posture, I think this is a matter of probably the next year or two whilst we understand how to do this and find a way of responding rapidly to variants."
However, he said a "very wide portfolio of vaccines" is likely to be available in around two years, offering greater protection.
"If we scroll forward two years, I think we're going to have a very wide portfolio of vaccines," Professor Whitty said.
He added that technology can "turn around a vaccine to a new variant incredibly fast, compared to how historically we've been able to do it".
"So I think technology will find a way through this in the long run, but we've got a period of risk between now and then," he added.
'Vaccine protection wall is leaky, not complete'
Professor Whitty said that while the R number (the rate at which the virus replicated) is less than 1, variants coming into the UK "don't have much of a foothold", but he added that R is anticipated to rise above 1 as more things open up in the lockdown exit road map.
Politicians and experts have issued warnings to the public to stick to coronavirus rules, after the stay at home order was lifted in England on Monday and the "rule of six" came back into place for outside gatherings.
On Monday, Boris Johnson warned people to "proceed with caution".
"What we don't know is exactly how strong our fortifications now are, how robust our defences are against another wave," he said.
"That's why I stress the importance of everybody maintaining the discipline people have shown for so long."
It comes as a survey from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed the level of people testing positive for COVID-19 in England has fallen to its lowest level since 24 September.
Around one in 370 people in private households in England had COVID-19 in the week to 27 March - down slightly from one in 340 the previous week, the ONS said. In the week to 24 September the estimate stood at one in 470.
However, the ONS said the percentage of people testing positive for the virus is estimated to have increased in eastern England.
The trend was uncertain for all other regions, but had decreased in southeast and southwest England, the ONS added.
Yorkshire and the Humber had the highest proportion of people of any region in England likely to test positive for coronavirus in the week to March 27: around one in 230.
Northwest England had the next highest estimate at one in 280.
Meanwhile, England's deputy chief medical officer has said the UK was not fully prepared for a pandemic of this type.
Image:Jenny Harries said the UK wasn't 'fully prepared' for a pandemic of this type
Dr Jenny Harries said more testing would have been carried out if tests were available earlier on, and knowledge about asymptomatic transmission could have resulted in a prompt recommendation to wear masks.
Speaking at the launch of the new UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), of which she is chief executive, Dr Harries told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We were not fully prepared for this pandemic and, as I've said, I'm very happy to accept there is an awful lot to learn.
"I think we share some of those failings with many other countries."
Asked if the initial response to the pandemic was poor, she said: "I think it had merits and it had things that we would wish to improve."
She said that while asymptomatic transmission had been "considered carefully", the proportion of cases - now thought to be 30% - was not recognised.
"So obviously the response that we put in place and some of the interventions were not accounting for that high degree of numbers of asymptomatic cases, so I think there's learning as we've gone through."
You just got to go out and start spreading them new variants, make your dreams come true.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
Super double-secret probation!!!well the New Strain Panic is definitely pushing back against any hopefulness or optimism the vaccines may have brought on earlier this year.
god forbid the general public gets a taste of hope.
View attachment 2051237
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Someone afraid of COVID who calls the people who aren't afraid "doomers" is like when the fat virgin nice guys call the married men "incels" or when the middle aged entitled soccer moms call girls in their 20's "Karens".
Its amazing because she starts out with a truth bomb:
"There are the anti-science anti-vaxxer contingent, but I think there are many more people, millions of people, who for whatever reasons have concerns about the vaccine who just don't know what's in it for them"
Of course she, who knows the reality of the situation, then goes onto say how states should be closed because they can't use our livelihoods as bargaining chips.
Its why they are so assmad that Florida, Texas (and Georgia*?) have opened back up, and especially now that Florida is pushing back against any and all COVID restrictions (save for private sector): because its giving us the people back our lives so the rest of the shitheads can't use them as bargaining chips; that and the fact that bodies in the streets never happened.
It's actually really baffling that Georgia went from Public Enemy #1/Ground Zero for the imminent impending COVID death spree that's coming any day now just you wait, to virtually memory-holed overnight.
Georgia only locked down for 2 weeks - IIRC the only state to keep that promise, not even Florida Man and the Lone Star can claim that honor.
I get that Texas and Florida are both larger, but Georgia is still the 8 or 9th largest state (always in a back-and-forth tie with NC), and larger than most Central American and European nations in both side and population - yet even hate articles about Georgia seemingly vanished in an instant.
Now don't get me wrong, I dont expect the journos to report that their predictions were wrong and GA is doing fine sans lockdown or mask mandate - but almost all coverage of it in regard to COVID went silent.
Georgia only locked down for 2 weeks - IIRC the only state to keep that promise, not even Florida Man and the Lone Star can claim that honor.
I get that Texas and Florida are both larger, but Georgia is still the 8 or 9th largest state (always in a back-and-forth tie with NC), and larger than most Central American and European nations in both side and population - yet even hate articles about Georgia seemingly vanished in an instant.
Now don't get me wrong, I dont expect the journos to report that their predictions were wrong and GA is doing fine sans lockdown or mask mandate - but almost all coverage of it in regard to COVID went silent.
Product Placement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
So you are also a fat virgin and a soccer mom as well, explains a lot, thanks for letting us knowSomeone afraid of COVID who calls the people who aren't afraid "doomers" is like when the fat virgin nice guys call the married men "incels" or when the middle aged entitled soccer moms call girls in their 20's "Karens".
Its amazing because she starts out with a truth bomb:
"There are the anti-science anti-vaxxer contingent, but I think there are many more people, millions of people, who for whatever reasons have concerns about the vaccine who just don't know what's in it for them"
Of course she, who knows the reality of the situation, then goes onto say how states should be closed because they can't use our livelihoods as bargaining chips.
Its why they are so assmad that Florida, Texas (and Georgia*?) have opened back up, and especially now that Florida is pushing back against any and all COVID restrictions (save for private sector): because its giving us the people back our lives so the rest of the shitheads can't use them as bargaining chips; that and the fact that bodies in the streets never happened.
It's actually really baffling that Georgia went from Public Enemy #1/Ground Zero for the imminent impending COVID death spree that's coming any day now just you wait, to virtually memory-holed overnight.
Georgia only locked down for 2 weeks - IIRC the only state to keep that promise, not even Florida Man and the Lone Star can claim that honor.
I get that Texas and Florida are both larger, but Georgia is still the 8 or 9th largest state (always in a back-and-forth tie with NC), and larger than most Central American and European nations in both side and population - yet even hate articles about Georgia seemingly vanished in an instant.
Now don't get me wrong, I dont expect the journos to report that their predictions were wrong and GA is doing fine sans lockdown or mask mandate - but almost all coverage of it in regard to COVID went silent.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I had a good couple days. Last night my friend and I went to go see monkey vs. lizard movie, albeit with some difficulty since there were actually a lot of people at the theater for once. Still have those retarded CinemaSafe™ policies like masks in the lobby and two seats between groups, the latter almost forcing us to abandon the idea until we finally managed to find a show that had enough space for both of us together. Scrapped the mask as soon as I sat down and had a good time.
Then today I met up with my friend again and we went to a nice artsy town a couple cities over. We wandered around, headed to a bar (zero masks, even the bartender), toured an art museum, and walked some nature trails. Saw barely anyone masked up as we were out and about. The museum had a sign requesting mask wearing but I didn't bother and nobody said anything; my friend put his mask on to start but took it off after a minute when he realized the same.
Know what I didn't do today? Get vaccinated.
Fuck that CDC retard. Literally saying the quiet part out loud: "we need to remove your freedoms so you don't realize you don't need to get jabbed to return to normal!" It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if she (and a lot of HHS bigwigs) have shares in Big Pharma.
Then today I met up with my friend again and we went to a nice artsy town a couple cities over. We wandered around, headed to a bar (zero masks, even the bartender), toured an art museum, and walked some nature trails. Saw barely anyone masked up as we were out and about. The museum had a sign requesting mask wearing but I didn't bother and nobody said anything; my friend put his mask on to start but took it off after a minute when he realized the same.
Know what I didn't do today? Get vaccinated.
Fuck that CDC retard. Literally saying the quiet part out loud: "we need to remove your freedoms so you don't realize you don't need to get jabbed to return to normal!" It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if she (and a lot of HHS bigwigs) have shares in Big Pharma.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2020
- Status