Lookism.net - Sluthate's Even More Autistic Spinoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
Did you guys know that I was the one who invented the humbucker? It's true. I was so tired of 60-cycle hum that I decided to design a pickup that had two coils out of phase with each other to cancel the interference. Don't believe that "Seth Lover" guy. I was the inventor.
 
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me you subhuman normalfag? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class at /zoo/ and have been involved in numerous secret dognapping raids at my local kennel and I have fucked over 300 dogs.
 
http://antilop.cc/sr/users/kmfkewm/html/kmfkewm_posts_page_058_start_0855.html

^ Pretty much this. I find that the feeling of disgust that the thought of somebody having sex with somebody else invokes in me is a good indicator of the appropriateness of the sexual interaction, although it is largely subjective and not based on logic (although I find that the two things are correlated pretty much exactly). The thought of a 40 year old fucking a baby makes me feel pretty damn disgusted. The thought of a 40 year old fucking an 11 year old makes me feel nauseous as well, although not as much so. The thought of a 40 year old fucking a willing 14 year old makes me.....not disgusted anyway.


https://www.dailydot.com/crime/silk-road-drug-ross-ulbright-dread-pirate-roberts-history/

Just days later, one of the oldest and most knowledgeable members of the Silk Road community announced that he was leaving. Kmfkewm, who once ran the Open Vendor Database, another online drug market, bid farewell to Silk Road for good on Sept. 29 for no discernable reason. He told fellow community members that his departure was nothing to worry about.

Three days later, on Oct. 2, Silk Road was seized by the FBI.

https://www.wired.com/2014/11/oldest-drug-market-is-russian/

Nicolas Christin, a Carnegie Mellon professor who has closely studied Dark Web drug markets, suggests the site’s simplicity and lack of its own payment system could reduce its “attack surface”—less code means less hackable bugs for law enforcement to attack. “It’s more like traditional drug dealing with online support than a real full-fledged anonymous marketplace,” says Christin, comparing RAMP to Silk Road’s simpler predecessor OVDB, or the Open Vendor Database. “To some extent it’s very primitive. But to some extent it clearly works really well, because these guys are still alive and kicking.”
 
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in Meth School, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret labs , and I have over $3,000,000 confirmed profit. I am trained in meth production and I’m the top cook in the entire US black market.
MRZ we don't need to hear about how you get your drugs anymore than we need to hear about your sexual relations with dogs
 
I'm not mrz :P.

http://antilop.cc/sr/users/kmfkewm/html/kmfkewm_posts_page_030_start_0435.html

Indeed, and it all comes back to complexity. Routing your traffic through an old computer that you turned into a Tor router that runs on OpenBSD is much more secure than running an OS in virtualbox that routes through Tor on the host. If your primary computer is rooted in the first case, the attacker will very likely need to exploit Tor to deanonymize you on the application layer. If the guest OS is rooted in the second case, the attacker could exploit virtualbox to break out of the isolation OR they could exploit Tor to break out of the isolation. Using virtualbox for isolation adds an entire large chunk of code that you need to trust not to be exploitable, versus the hardware solution where you are primarily only trusting the Tor code to not be exploitable. On the other hand, if you use no isolation at all, then you are not getting any additional protection, and as soon as your network facing application is pwnt you are deanonymized (as we saw in the freedom hosting attack).

It is also worth noting that firewall rules could have prevented the freedom hosting attack from working, as could have mandatory access controls. A combination of mandatory access controls + virtual or hardware isolation + firewall rules would have added three different layers of security via isolation that an attacker would have needed to overcome before they could get their payload to phone home.
 
I think it's funny that you mock a 10 year old who experimented with a dog, but don't think 15 year old girls can consent to fucking 19 year old males.
This is what my brain is thinking to protect itself:
F4xArft.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Says who?

It's mostly theorized, there haven't been that many studies on it, but some of the studies put it at 1:20 or more males having experimented with animals, and typically those who do start when they are below 18, though I imagine many such as myself didn't continue to with age. I was mostly oblivious when I was a 10 year old, I don't really blame myself for putting my dick in a dogs mouth lol.
 
Back