JK Rowling and the Use of Pseudoscience to Justify Transphobia

Because I don't write fiction?
.
Legit its not that hard to make your own versions of writing fictional transgender characters (rightfully represented if you want) and get it published. Rather than complaining about it and crying transphobia you'd most likely be doing something worthwhile.

Plus I'm certain beyond this site you'll get alot of help from others if you want to start writing fiction or not.

If some freaking neet can get an entire show for his rape fantasy then I'm sure you'll actually make it.
 
JK Rowling has been writing fiction with underlying transphobic themes for years and her latest is a transphobic magnum opus featuring a transvestite serial killer. In real time, Ms. Rowling is taking a position that is harmful to transgender children and their parents, so her queer reader base has very understandingly rebelled and mounted a boycott against her.
So much of everybody's opinions about transgender people is rooted in shitty bible interpretations, obsolete or debunked junk science and straight out paranoid delusions, without ever actually meeting a trans person. In the case of this crowd, factor in fetishistic fantasies as well. You have people debating whether transgender minors should be allowed any sort of gender based health care and they've never met a trans kid, their parents or have the first clue about the actual standards of pediatric gender care.
So, what is to be done about J.K. Rowling? A boycott seems like an appropriate response in the same way any of us would best serve ourselves by not buying things we don't like.

If we set aside all practical constraints (political or otherwise), what would be the ideal response to her and authors like her?
 
Legit its not that hard to make your own versions of writing fictional transgender characters (rightfully represented if you want) and get it published. Rather than complaining about it and crying transphobia you'd most likely be doing something worthwhile.

Plus I'm certain beyond this site you'll get alot of help from others if you want to start writing fiction or not.

If some freaking neet can get an entire show for his rape fantasy then I'm sure you'll actually make it.
Is this worthwhile enough, dip shit? I don't write fiction. Period. This just got shared to well over 100, 000 people.

Our advocates are facing opposition in defense of the bills attempting to ban gender care for minors standing on half baked and completely false assumptions about what sort of treatments transgender children are receiving. With some, any engagement will be futile, but many will be won over with the facts as given to them by a transgender person, their family or friends who actually know them and what's going on with transgender health care.


So, what is to be done about J.K. Rowling? A boycott seems like an appropriate response in the same way any of us would best serve ourselves by not buying things we don't like.

If we set aside all practical constraints (political or otherwise), what would be the ideal response to her and authors like her?
Boycott is the best response to her and people like her . The less air time we give them the better. I prefer to talk over the transphobes to the people they are trying to alienate from us than engaging them directly.
 
tl;dr I do not claim to be a "real woman" . I am a transfeminine intersex AMAB person. You will never be a real man. You lack the power of reason, compassion and empathy. You are a sexist, supremacist sycophant conditioned by bigoted asshole parents, schoolteachers and a lifetime of learning from video games. One day you will die violently because that is the way of the mighty white man

Because I don't write fiction?
.

Your behavior is masculine. I give not one fuck what kind of junk your misogynistic maggot ass is packing.

This is nothing more than paranoid delusions and complete ignorance of what is going on. Transgender people aren't confused about anything but why ignorant asshole cishet people insist on harming us.

Here's the way it works:

1. Child declares that they are the gender opposite their sex.
2. Parent says, "no, you have to be A because you have B kind of junk between your legs"
3. Child insists that they are A despite having B.
4a. Parent punishes child, forcing them to be B
b. Child's behavioral health breaks down and 41% will kill themselves

4b. Parent consults pediatrician. Doctor recommends allowing the child to make their own decisions about how they wear their hair, their clothing, toys and playmates, without pushing them in either direction, just letting them be themselves. Right here, there are less drugs needed because the behavioral health comorbidities disappear. Puberty blockers are only prescribed to children that have been consistently insistent in their gender expression years. Nobody is rushing into drugs and surgery. That's willful stupidity talking.
c. Child grows into a healthy, productive transgender adult who may or may not have their genitals modified to match their gender identity.


somebody as stupid as you is barely worthy of response. read the standards of care, dolt. read the clinical studies. Denying these children care is the abuse, you transphobic talking turd.

Seriously, assholes. Get fucking current or shut the fuck up. Especially you morons with the XX/XY there are only two sexes and sex must match gender bullshit.
You seem kind of mad. And how can you describe online behavior as masculine as i only have said a few things to you and generally like to shit post. By your logic, your antagonistic tone and aggressiveness reaks of being a bonified dude.

Thats such a small number and cannot be generalized. Its a horrifically dangerous idea to promote this mindset, especially as no longitudinal studies have been found. Have you even read the case study of david who had his dick burned off in a botched circumcision? This shit is not always an answer.
 
Last edited:
They're trying to ban trans kids from school athletics in states where there aren't even very many transgender athletes and not one legislator could cite an instance where transgender girls dominated their fields to the detriment of "biological females" . One of the plaintiffs in the widely cited CT case defeated the trans girl they were suing the school board about. She got a scholarship and the trans girl didn't and this baseless complaint is being used as the foundation for discriminatory law.

Imagine living in a world where a female student can get a scholarship meant for female students. Utter insanity!

Several questions, if I may:

1. How do you define "dominate"? What criteria have you used to determine what does or does not constitute "domination of a field"?
2. Which legislators declined to cite instances of male trans domination, and where/when did they decline to do so?
3. In the context of your argument, what is the significance of legislators declining to cite instances of male trans domination? Are we to infer that because a certain legislator did not cite an instance of domination to one particular journalist or during one particular legislative session, that instances of domination do not / would not occur?
4. In the "widely cited CT case", the two male trans athletes were performing objectively better in their sport than any of their female competitors (according to a Fox News article published in 2020: "The two (trans athletes) have combined to win 15 girls state indoor or outdoor championships since 2017, according to the lawsuit." ). Is that not an instance of trans domination?
 
You claim not to be a degenerate but you actually believe kids should be taking troon pills and go through genital mutilation. You're also making Rowling sound more likable the more you say she's against degenerate shit.
Tom is also himself a walking example of why people think troons are absolute degenerates, being a pedophile and dogmongler. He doesn't see why it is a problem for troons to be represented by obviously perverted male sex predators like him. These days if you encounter a troon it is almost always going to be one of these sick, evil freaks like Tom.
 
Is this worthwhile enough, dip shit? I don't write fiction. Period. This just got shared to well over 100, 000 people.





Boycott is the best response to her and people like her . The less air time we give them the better. I prefer to talk over the transphobes to the people they are trying to alienate from us than engaging them directly.
Hey retard did you read what you post? That is a demographic policy brief and argues social acceptance is probably more wise than resorting to puberty blockers, as again there are no longitudinal studies. It even stresses negative long term outcomes such as stress on developing teens. Also, this has nothing to do with kids but teens.
 
Tom is also himself a walking example of why people think troons are absolute degenerates, being a pedophile and dogmongler. He doesn't see why it is a problem for troons to be represented by obviously perverted male sex predators like him. These days if you encounter a troon it is almost always going to be

Tom is also himself a walking example of why people think troons are absolute degenerates, being a pedophile and dogmongler. He doesn't see why it is a problem for troons to be represented by obviously perverted male sex predators like him. These days if you encounter a troon it is almost always going to be one of these sick, evil freaks like Tom.
Notice how its mostly males that do this shit and look like absolute caricatures. I am also reminded of this image.
 

Attachments

  • 1595111927653.jpg
    1595111927653.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 121
Notice how its mostly males that do this shit and look like absolute caricatures. I am also reminded of this image.
It's always really telling when you see a troon next to an actual woman, gesturing aggressively with his man hands, leaning into her to intimidate her with his male body language, looking like a literal fucking caveman.
 
These are comments I made to the facebook group, Real Progressives, in response to some rancor about the anger at Rowling and biological males in biological female spaces bullshit.

JK Rowling has been writing fiction with underlying transphobic themes for years and her latest is a transphobic magnum opus featuring a transvestite serial killer. In real time, Ms. Rowling is taking a position that is harmful to transgender children and their parents, so her queer reader base has very understandingly rebelled and mounted a boycott against her.

The actual science on the subject of sex and gender is pretty clear in it's refutation of the heteronormative sex/gender binary. Same sex attraction, transgender identities and intersex body variations are perfectly natural and with the exception of a very few IBV's, there's nothing pathological about any of it. It's not "abnormal" , but more properly, "atypical. It's just not so cut and dried that everybody fits the label male or female. Transgender women are simply not men just because they have a penis and transgender men are not women simply because they have a vagina. Cultural norms for gendered behavior are not even that consistent once you get past reproductive behaviors.

In the full inclusion community, we like to say that it's about hearts, not parts and it's definitely not about the clothes you wear or how you wear your hair. Though I will not disagree about the offensively demanding behavior of the militant trans activists pissing you all off this way, i don't think such a strict judgement of the majority of us based on nothing but what kind of junk we have is very progressive. It's really not that hard to relate to trans people as everyday men and women once you get to know us.

So much of everybody's opinions about transgender people is rooted in shitty bible interpretations, obsolete or debunked junk science and straight out paranoid delusions, without ever actually meeting a trans person. In the case of this crowd, factor in fetishistic fantasies as well. You have people debating whether transgender minors should be allowed any sort of gender based health care and they've never met a trans kid, their parents or have the first clue about the actual standards of pediatric gender care.

They're trying to ban trans kids from school athletics in states where there aren't even very many transgender athletes and not one legislator could cite an instance where transgender girls dominated their fields to the detriment of "biological females" . One of the plaintiffs in the widely cited CT case defeated the trans girl they were suing the school board about. She got a scholarship and the trans girl didn't and this baseless complaint is being used as the foundation for discriminatory law.

 
learn about XXY and other variants as well as chemical anomalies that occur that have nothing to do with the sex chromosomes.
Who cares you have none of these things. People with Kleinfelters turn out to be slow losers with a low sperm count. You're all of that without the extra chromosome.
 
These are comments I made to the facebook group, Real Progressives, in response to some rancor about the anger at Rowling and biological males in biological female spaces bullshit.

JK Rowling has been writing fiction with underlying transphobic themes for years and her latest is a transphobic magnum opus featuring a transvestite serial killer. In real time, Ms. Rowling is taking a position that is harmful to transgender children and their parents, so her queer reader base has very understandingly rebelled and mounted a boycott against her.

The actual science on the subject of sex and gender is pretty clear in it's refutation of the heteronormative sex/gender binary. Same sex attraction, transgender identities and intersex body variations are perfectly natural and with the exception of a very few IBV's, there's nothing pathological about any of it. It's not "abnormal" , but more properly, "atypical. It's just not so cut and dried that everybody fits the label male or female. Transgender women are simply not men just because they have a penis and transgender men are not women simply because they have a vagina. Cultural norms for gendered behavior are not even that consistent once you get past reproductive behaviors.

In the full inclusion community, we like to say that it's about hearts, not parts and it's definitely not about the clothes you wear or how you wear your hair. Though I will not disagree about the offensively demanding behavior of the militant trans activists pissing you all off this way, i don't think such a strict judgement of the majority of us based on nothing but what kind of junk we have is very progressive. It's really not that hard to relate to trans people as everyday men and women once you get to know us.

So much of everybody's opinions about transgender people is rooted in shitty bible interpretations, obsolete or debunked junk science and straight out paranoid delusions, without ever actually meeting a trans person. In the case of this crowd, factor in fetishistic fantasies as well. You have people debating whether transgender minors should be allowed any sort of gender based health care and they've never met a trans kid, their parents or have the first clue about the actual standards of pediatric gender care.

They're trying to ban trans kids from school athletics in states where there aren't even very many transgender athletes and not one legislator could cite an instance where transgender girls dominated their fields to the detriment of "biological females" . One of the plaintiffs in the widely cited CT case defeated the trans girl they were suing the school board about. She got a scholarship and the trans girl didn't and this baseless complaint is being used as the foundation for discriminatory law.

Daily reminder that the Farms are not your blog. Thomas.
 
Hey retard did you read what you post? That is a demographic policy brief and argues social acceptance is probably more wise than resorting to puberty blockers, as again there are no longitudinal studies. It even stresses negative long term outcomes such as stress on developing teens. Also, this has nothing to do with kids but teens.
hey dumbass and dumbass enablers, read what you like, believe what you .like and none of it will change that fact that you're mean, stupid, toxic talking turds.

pics or didnt happen
get a life.

 
hey dumbass and dumbass enablers, read what you like, believe what you .like and none of it will change that fact that you're mean, stupid, toxic talking turds.
Lmao you gave me that research to read. Anyway, im done here enjoy being a dog fucking caraciature of a person.
 
Last edited:
Back