The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Everyone congratulate this woman for getting the drug dealer to testify in court.... via ZOOM meeting.
Screenshot_2021-04-06_09-36-35.png
 
"But what about black on black crime" became a meme on the left to mock conservatives for changing the subject on police brutality, but "black on black crime" is a huge problem that's worth taking seriously if you actually care about black people, which most of these leftists, even professional class black people in the media, don't.
 
Everyone congratulate this woman for getting the drug dealer to testify in court.... via ZOOM meeting.
View attachment 2063734
Oh shit, the dealers attorney is laying it on the table. His testimony could implicate him in murder. Looks like its the defense who wants him to get immunity too. Dis gon be gud.
 
There's been 797 people shot with 147 fatalities so far this year.
In Chicago, that is.
heyjackass dot com is a real eye opener.
I don't get as excited about the "more black people kill each other than white cops" argument, because their central conceit is that it's about authority and systemic violence. I do think their line of logic is retarded, but it's the same problem I have when people say that feminism sucks because women are less happy. Using happiness as a metric for life is already bad, they can easily say they are willing to suffer for freedom and now you are on the defensive trying to say why freedom is bad. Same with trannies and bad surgeries, you're not attacking the problem of the state itself, just that technology is not advanced enough, which one day it probably will be. You need to tackle the deeper issue.'

So if we are take on this argument of theirs you have to do it in the framework of what do you mean by systemic (it's not,) why is overpolicing bad (policing is reactive to situations not proactive ideologically, unless you're talking about the FBI) and where are you getting your data from (nowhere?) They will likely just fall back on Society is Racist, and if you simply do not accept that premise or ask them to prove it, they will likely fall apart. Genuinely debating with black people is actually very amusing because even the academic and public-facing thought leaders can be triggered into a chimpout very fast. I saw Cornel West get into a wild eyed screaming match within like a minute and a half on live TV, deep down all of them really have are emotional appeals and this code-switching thing they do to try and sound smart.

Their entire stance relies on the premise that you have absolutely no idea what it is like to be black, but they have an intimate understanding of what it means to be white. This goes unchallenged by mainstream media, academia, and entertainment. If you challenge this, they will disintegrate.
 
Oh shit, the dealers attorney is laying it on the table. His testimony could implicate him in murder. Looks like its the defense who wants him to get immunity too. Dis gon be gud.
So this isn't some bullshit queen for a day immunity they want, it's straight up transactional immunity. This sounds entertaining.
What’s your opinion on that guy yesterday that admitted Chauvin’s knee was on Floyd’s shoulder as opposed to his neck? That seems like a dangerous admission for a witness for the prosecution to make.
It's literally an obvious fact, if you could look at a picture of what actually happened and testify otherwise, you'd be committing perjury.

The prosecution just thinks they're entitled to a win on this because it's their turn, much like Hillary. They might be right given this jury. I think they're actually oblivious as to how much they've holed their own case below the waterline.

Remember, the defense hasn't even started and this shitshow is all the work of the prosecution.

The idiot public will still believe whatever swill gets presented as "news" where they highlight and cherrypick the few parts of the prosecution's case that are favorable for the prosecution, while completely ignoring the absolutely devastating cross. And in lots of cases, like the knee to the shoulder shit, the prosecution literally let this shit out on direct.

Lmao.

The fact that we're even wondering what the verdict will be proves we're living in 🤡 🌏.
 
Its impossible to understand why what is happening to society is happening without an understanding of faith and understanding human nature. If you give humans license to murder they will murder (abortion, state sponsored massacres, wars), if you give them free reign to loot they will. Its in their heart.

The core restraint on most people is the fear of God. Lose that and this is the result for society as a whole.

Theres a reason the rot is worse than usual. A categorical rejection of God and we are under a judgement of a reprobate mind (romans 1). Its a cycle that happens over and over. Here is Isiah's admonition to Israel shortly before they were carried off to Babylon.

Isiah
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! 21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

Paul said the same thing of the Romans in Romans 1 I believe. Its a historical cycle. We all know and read of people doing this exact thing, calling evil good and good evil, legalizing sin and criminalizing righteousness.

This sermon here directly addresses who is responsible for the riots and why it occurred in the first place.
how can god be real if niggers are real
 
Oh shit, the dealers attorney is laying it on the table. His testimony could implicate him in murder. Looks like its the defense who wants him to get immunity too. Dis gon be gud.
Can he get immunity from his other trial (unrelated charges) for testifying about this one?

Also why is he a prosecution witness anyways? Doesn't "I gave this dumb bastard drugs and a fake 20" hurt their case?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back