mate
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2018
I had no idea that SNEEDBALLS were so dangerous.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they literally do. The general feeling I'm seeing is they think that Nelson's questioning is poor and that the fact they're talking about the "angry crowd" means they have nothing else to go with.The public is so polarised that one's apparent performance in an argument is based almost entirely on how much the viewer agrees with them. I'm sure "the mob" thinks the prosecution is "spittin' fire" or however they phrase it, just like how the Michael Van Der Ween receives universal adulation on the Right while the Left is wondering if Trump should sue him for malpractice.
Judging by the reddit post above, everyone knows the prosecution is shitting the bed.The public is so polarised that one's apparent performance in an argument is based almost entirely on how much the viewer agrees with them (because fundamental difference in values=difference in evaluation of virtually everything). I'm sure "the mob" thinks the prosecution is "spittin' fire" or however they phrase it, just like how the Michael Van Der Ween receives universal adulation on the Right while the Left is wondering if Trump should sue him for malpractice.
A very different tune than they were singing last Tuesday when their SLAAAAY KWEEEEEEN girl was testifyingapparently an EMT isnt a medical professional
View attachment 2064563
New tin foil theory, the prosecutor is a voyeuristic masochist and is feverishly jerking off each night fantasizing about being quartered by BLM.Prosecution wants to make her come back at a later date lmao
They really don't, the cope narrative that's been forming is that the prosecution is throwing the case because they're complicit in institutional racism and that'll be the official story once Chauvin gets a sentence that's anything less than getting stoned to death by Ibram Kendi books while the jury chants BLM. They did think the crowd witnesses were all stunning and brave though.The public is so polarised that one's apparent performance in an argument is based almost entirely on how much the viewer agrees with them (because fundamental difference in values=difference in evaluation of virtually everything). I'm sure "the mob" thinks the prosecution is "spittin' fire" or however they phrase it, just like how the Michael Van Der Ween receives universal adulation on the Right while the Left is wondering if Trump should sue him for malpractice.
I've definitely seen some "they're part of the racist system making sure to let their thugs off" takes on Reddit and Twitter from those who know for certain chauvin is guilty but also know the prosecution is utterly failing to convince anyone of that fact.The public is so polarised that one's apparent performance in an argument is based almost entirely on how much the viewer agrees with them (because fundamental difference in values=difference in evaluation of virtually everything). I'm sure "the mob" thinks the prosecution is "spittin' fire" or however they phrase it, just like how the Michael Van Der Ween receives universal adulation on the Right while the Left is wondering if Trump should sue him for malpractice.
When life gives you lemons....lmao Defense liked her testimony so much they want to call her back on their side
![]()
I really don't want to believe that the prosecution is stupid to the extent where they didn't consider creating counterarguments for any reasonable defense provided. But that might just be the case.Since each shot is a new thing, I think we are seeing the results of buying into the narrative. I think.... I think the prosecution legitimately believed all the bullshit pressed by the press about how every single element of defense for Chauvin was wrong.
Folks, never mix sneedulants and chuckpressantsI had no idea that SNEEDBALLS were so dangerous.
WOLOLOHoly shit, how bad are you at prosecution that the defense is leaning over to your table and asking to call your witnesses full time for their own case?
Maybe, but I suspect those people are the same kind of people who think that Dems are part of white supremacy and that they can start a communist revolution out of the CHAZ if they just keep trying (i.e. they're to the Left what wignats are to the right), and the prosecution is playing to a more mainstream crowd.They really don't, the cope narrative that's been forming is that the prosecution is throwing the case because they're complicit in institutional racism and that'll be the official story once Chauvin gets a sentence that's anything less than getting stoned to death by Ibram Kendi books while the jury chants BLM. They did think the crowd witnesses were all stunning and brave though.
Its the only thing that makes sense, it ties together everything so nicely.I really don't want to believe that the prosecution is stupid to the extent where they didn't consider creating counterarguments for any reasonable defense provided. But that might just be the case.
lmao Defense liked her testimony so much they want to call her back on their side
![]()
Every redditor I have spoken to has immediately declared I'm lying about my degree. Even for extremely basic shit you can literally find with a google, or advanced shit you have to dumb down, to the point where I've had some demand I post my unredacted diploma. And god forbid they can find a Vox article written by a 30 year journo misquoting a study that was later removed for being shit. Never for being wrong, or being against consensus, but the mere application of a scientific thing to something that isn't pozzed.It will be the same comments when it gets to the ME and pathology expert witnesses. "Oh my god they only have 5 advanced degrees and 20 years experience, how could they let such unqualified people comment".
Its the usual "I fucking love science, believe experts (except when they disagree with us)" that redditors go in