Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

Peetz is her someone. He's the partner you see in MSHL but Chantal refuses to accept this truth. I don't wish her ill but I don't feel sorry for her. She lies, manipulates, is irresponsible and lazy. She thinks the world owes her more but the world has given her what she deserves. It's not because she is fat it's because she's a shit person
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Pips Star, megaglorp, Clockwork_PurBle and 116 others
One blessing we can take from the last 48hrs of live-streaming from sexpot Gunty MacGuntface, is that she has given up on the “Shame shame shame, shame on you, if your shite stinks too” or whatever the refrain is that has been ear-raping us Farmers and beyond for about a week.
Yanno what ah meeeen?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
Reactions: megaglorp, looney27, Springer and 42 others
It'sBecauseICare said:
Not that this hasn't already been a theory, but this entire dating crap is making her apparent lack of a dad in her life front and center.

Chantal, an already needy, perhaps socially challenged, young girl likely wanted attention from the guy that likely wanted nothing to do with her. IF HER STORIES from the teen years are even half correct, she'd sleep with anyone that even side-eyed her. She craved a man's attention and acceptance. Even if it was through disgusting sex in a dumpster.
Click to expand...
Here's quite a good example of her confirming that (@9:40).
I don't know if there's a way to embed this Archived video.

Edited to fix link
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: megaglorp, Feeble weeble, Chantal’s Toe Cleavage and 10 others
Null said:
people need to tone it down a bit and stop actively getting upset she's happy for once lol
Click to expand...
Disagree. I think it's disingenuous of us all to pretend we like seeing her happy. She's still the nasty, self-serving, angry narcissistic behemoth from 1 month ago. This pitiful piece of excrement deserves no pity or asspats, nor does she deserve our empathy for being 'happy'. The flat slob didn't earn it, and certainly doesn't deserve it.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: megaglorp, looney27, c2h5oh and 96 others
Gustaf said:
Disagree. I think it's disingenuous of us all to pretend we like seeing her happy. She's still the nasty, self-serving, angry narcissistic behemoth from 1 month ago. This pitiful piece of excrement deserves no pity or asspats, nor does she deserve our empathy for being 'happy'. The flat slob didn't earn it, and certainly doesn't deserve it.
Click to expand...
This much seethe is unnecessary when the target is a dumb fat Canadian woman that has no effect on your life. I don't care about Chantal being happy as long as she's being funny. It's also a nice change from her just stuffing her face for the 5000th time.
I'm also enjoying seeing her have to interact with people outside of her audience. We're learning a lot about how socially impared she is and if she happens to be in a better mood than usual so what?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: megaglorp, Gunslinger, looney27 and 128 others
Lame Entropy said:
This much seethe is unnecessary when the target is a dumb fat Canadian woman that has no effect on your life. I don't care about Chantal being happy as long as she's being funny. It's also a nice change from her just stuffing her face for the 5000th time.
I'm also enjoying seeing her have to interact with people outside of her audience. We're learning a lot about how socially impared she is and if she happens to be in a better mood than usual so what?
Click to expand...
"This much seethe"? Really? Good Sir, I'm writing a comment on a 'high-profile' post, nothing inflammatory about it. I am allowed my opinion as you are yours.
Let's not turn this into FB or Reddit by 'replying' banter. Not needed nor wanted
**EDIT to add** You said "the target is a dumb fat Canadian woman that has no effect on your life" - well, she has no direct impact on any of our lives, yet here we all are, watching and commenting.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: cromit, Dr. Cookie, hydrochloric gunt wash and 77 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: megaglorp, DNA_JACKED, Helloxexkitty and 55 others
It makes you wonder, what was the situation that came about that made her bully Peetz into a relationship the first time around?

They already were room mates that time, right? So it wasn’t just a case of trying to find a man to live with so she could get a place to rent (maybe I’m wrong and that’s what it was, correct me if my lore is off).

She was about 150lbs lighter back then, more youthful, going to the clubs.... why did she decide to try to lock Peetz down?

Did it start out as one of her manipulative games? Maybe trying to make some other uninterested fella jealous by telling him she might have feelings for her male room mate?

Was it the years of pumps and dumps and wanting finally to be able to announce to her family she had a boyfriend? (Peetz must have been her first boyfriend right? Holy crap she’s only had two boyfriends then in her whole life that means?!)

What in that watermelon head orchestrated the first Peetz relationship? There is clearly zero sexual chemistry, even long gone.

The more I think about it, the less it makes sense.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: megaglorp, Gunslinger, Sir Yarnsalot and 36 others
This video popped up in my recommended today. I've been curious about Chantal's income from Youtube and this video's logic for figuring it out using Youtube's monetization metrics seems legit.

He estimates she makes $2,640 a month / $31,680 a year

 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: megaglorp, looney27, chunky junkie and 53 others
"Tasteful perverts only" means she'll look at a picture of your wiener but she won't let it near her mouth because kissing wieners is gross. And you should like going to the zoo.
Moo Muu said:
As utterly repulsive as Chantal is, there is someone for everyone. For example, most of the rude hamplanets on MSPL have spouses more often than not. I don’t think Chantal won’t be alone forever, for as much as a horrible person she is- some cuck who has no self respect will put up with that abuse because they think they deserve it.
I think the only thing hindering this is her own decision to be home bound and wallowing away in that nasty apartment going through all these phases.
I just hope that whatever cuck she might lure in to abuse like she does Peetz learns to respect themselves and GET OUT before it’s too late. These hamplanets always seem to guilt trip their partners into becoming caretakers even though they got themselves there.
Click to expand...
Yeah but Chantal doesn't want those guys. She wants someone fit and hot with hair and nice teeth who can, and I quote, "keep up with her" yet she brings absolutely nothing to the table. There might be a hot fetishest out there but what are the odds he's in Ottawa or he's willing to put up with someone who's clearly terrified of sex.

retro goddess said:
This video popped up in my recommended today. I've been curious about Chantal's income from Youtube and this video's logic for it figuring it out using Youtube's monetization metrics seems legit.

He estimates she makes $2,640 a month / $31,680 a year

View attachment 2067449
Click to expand...
I can believe this. It's before tax and in US dollars, correct? She doesn't live a lavish lifestyle and we know she's stupid with money so all her food, Torrid and Lush products are all paid on credit (some of it by Peetz) and she likely pays the minimum. If (I know) she's smart and has an accountant and keeps her receipts, she can put those purchases against her income to bring it down to the point where she likely pays very little in taxes. Most of her receipts are electronic so all she has to do is not delete the emailed receipts and she has everything. However she's not paying into a pension and unlikely is putting anything towards her future (RRSPs, etc.) so if she lives long, it's going to be grim.

But Nicholas has a good job so he can probably provide for her and pay for their weekend getaways, trips to the zoo and all the fine wine Chantal loves to drink.

Edit: Doesn't Madame have appointments today? Shouldn't we be watching a GRWM now where she's putting a face masks on her legs and getting her "big bum" in her cheeky shapewear "underwears?" And I want to see the skinny ankle and painted toenails.
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: megaglorp, looney27, Dr. Cookie and 36 others
LonelyEggRoll said:
It makes you wonder, what was the situation that came about that made her bully Peetz into a relationship the first time around?

They already were room mates that time, right? So it wasn’t just a case of trying to find a man to live with so she could get a place to rent (maybe I’m wrong and that’s what it was, correct me if my lore is off).

She was about 150lbs lighter back then, more youthful, going to the clubs.... why did she decide to try to lock Peetz down?

Did it start out as one of her manipulative games? Maybe trying to make some other uninterested fella jealous by telling him she might have feelings for her male room mate?

Was it the years of pumps and dumps and wanting finally to be able to announce to her family she had a boyfriend? (Peetz must have been her first boyfriend right? Holy crap she’s only had two boyfriends then in her whole life that means?!)

What in that watermelon head orchestrated the first Peetz relationship? There is clearly zero sexual chemistry, even long gone.

The more I think about it, the less it makes sense.
Click to expand...
Maybe it was just the fact that, back then, peetz was not interessed by a relationship with her.
Like a kid, maybe she wanted what she couldn't have, only because she couldn't have it (especially a man)

(Sorry english is hard)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: megaglorp, Gunslinger, Blah Blah Blah and 18 others
Oliver Onions said:
I'm not watching to find out, but was she just trying to be cute, or is she actually this dumb?

Correct me if I'm wrong ladies, but aren't boobs largely made up of fatty tissue rather than muscle? You can't train definition into them after letting them drop to your knees for the best part of a decade.


Chantal unleashing her sexual energy like
View attachment 2066616


My guess is she's the kind of gorl to think Lambrini counts as champagne. (Top marks to anyone catty/British enough to get that reference.)
Click to expand...
Chantal’s ready to bring the Brini to his place...then guzzle it in front of him while screeching about her cats.

Also yes, breasts are mostly fatty tissue. More importantly, giving them no support over the years causes the skin to stretch out and result in pancake titties, a la Kelly Lenza. Some of that is genetics but giving no support to your gorls absolutely exacerbates the issue.

Chantal thinking she can “train up” sagging tits with a bra is on the level of a formerly obese person who thinks they can train the now-sagging flap of skin on their stomach to go nice and taut again by wearing a girdle every day. Not going to happen. It’s stretched, it’s done, and only surgery will fix it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: megaglorp, looney27, choccystickyfingers and 26 others
I love her talking about what young guys want and what older guys want. She has almost zero dating experience and no friends so where the hell is she getting this from? And there's something so depressing about watching a 37 year old woman discuss makeup songs.

I can't find a YouTube clip of Meg (Family Guy) writing an email to her totally real boyfriend thanking him for making out with her on purpose. That's what we're witnessing.

But, according to la belle dame, after today, nothing is going to the same for her. The crash is going to be brutal. Peetz should move back to Cornwall.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: megaglorp, Gunslinger, looney27 and 40 others
Screenshot_20210407-163130_Instagram~2.jpg
Ready to slay the day,at 4pm? As mentioned upthread, didn't she have 2 appointments earlier today?

Edited for clarity
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: megaglorp, Gunslinger, looney27 and 71 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back