- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Sobwait, did Floyd not doe of a heart attack? But he had enough drugs in him to kill a horse.
What gives?
What gives?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't defend yourself against something that hasn't been asserted, so the jury has to hear the prosecution first and then hear the defense try to tear it apart. Either way, it is appropriate to give the accused an advantage, given that someone has to get the last word advantage because of the inherent structure of a trial.Does the defense always go second? Seems like a massive last word advantage when it comes to bringing out expert witnesses.
that advantage is likely intentionalDoes the defense always go second? Seems like a massive last word advantage when it comes to bringing out expert witnesses.
As a criminal defendant, you are generally facing, alone, the entire force and power of the state, and a prosecutor who has essentially unlimited resources to do anything possible to ensure you spend the rest of your life behind bars, or even get literally killed by the state. The U.S. is actually pretty good at having elaborate procedural safeguards so a criminal defendant has a fighting chance, but they're expensive. You'll pay for them.You can't defend yourself against something that hasn't been asserted, so the jury has to hear the prosecution first and then hear the defense try to tear it apart. Either way, it is appropriate to give the accused an advantage, given that someone has to get the last word advantage because of the inherent structure of a trial.
Personal opinion; dude died due to his own cocktail of drugs on top of his heart disease causing oxygen not to circulate through his body efficiently enough. Knee to the back of the neck might not have helped, but with all that fighting he was doing it was pretty much inevitable.Sobwait, did Floyd not doe of a heart attack? But he had enough drugs in him to kill a horse.
What gives?
Apologies if this isn't the best file etc. I'm a phonetard at the moment and had to screen record it.time stamp?
"might not have helped" is actually a big issue, that could make it manslaughter.Personal opinion; dude died due to his own cocktail of drugs on top of his heart disease causing oxygen not to circulate through his body efficiently enough. Knee to the back of the neck might not have helped, but with all that fighting he was doing it was pretty much inevitable.
That's Posobiec saying that you fucking idiot. If he says the sky is blue you should double-check.
its weird that fox has to remind darkies that they have souls (?)WokeFox / BlackFox / FoxSOUL just used the words "Hashtag CASE GOALS".
On Air.
That would be his ex-wife.Reports about an Asian woman seated in court who was Chauvin's guest. Who was she?
Also information about the potentially compromised juror. EDIT: and of course it was a middle aged white woman.
Probably his (technically I believe, there's some speculation it might be about protecting assets) ex-wifeReports about an Asian woman seated in court who was Chauvin's guest. Who was she?
Also information about the potentially compromised juror. EDIT: and of course it was a middle aged white woman.
Posobiec didn't say it, he is quoting someone elseThat's Posobiec saying that you fucking idiot. If he says the sky is blue you should double-check.
forensic pathologist ducked dived and sneeded her way through cross but ultimately contradicted several things asserted by yesterdays witnessesI'm listening to Jersh in lieu of the trial this morning. Anyone got a tl;dr for me?
Yeah seems like the Judge asked it in an almost Jokingly manner?That's Posobiec saying that you fucking idiot. If he says the sky is blue you should double-check.
Pool report: Judge questioned juror
Before proceedings began for the day Friday, Judge Peter Cahill questioned a juror during a brief hearing that was not broadcast via audio or video. According to a pool reporter, the judge asked the juror, a White woman, about having seen any potential outside information about what's going on in the trial.
The juror said she turned on her television to watch a show she records, and saw a show featuring a courtroom and a lawyer. She said she turned the TV off. The woman also confirmed she had received a text from her mother-in-law that said it looked like a bad day. Cahill asked, "No book deal in the works?" And the woman replied, "No. I don't know what to expect."
Asked whether she had had any other outside contact, the juror replied, "No, and if anyone approached me, I would report it."
The juror was excused, after which the judge indicated he did not believe any misconduct occurred.
Wait what. Final day for them? I thought we'd have another week, holy shit ahahahaha. That's so bad given their current showing, I'm hoping for Trayvon shenanigans from the defense.This is apparently the final day of witnesses for the prosecution, what did they think they're were going to accomplish with this? Maybe I'm not giving their blatant appeals to emotion enough credit, but the prosecution needs to present undeniable facts not second-hand opinions. Now I'm wondering what the hell the Defense is going to be up to for the next two weeks, they've already done their job during cross examination. More time for breaks, I guess.
Either the facts of the situation are simply not on their side, or the prosecution is intentionally throwing. Disagreeing with a study is not a fact, your opinion on another's autopsy is not a fact, the feeling you had when you were part of an angry mob is not a fact. If the jury is doing their job right, the first two weeks of witnesses has given them precisely dick to work with.