Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
View attachment 2082640
(x)

View attachment 2082641

View attachment 2082645
(x)

View attachment 2082646
Hello, my name is Ignatius/Iggy (They/she). You killed my non-gender-specific sperm donor. (TW: DEATH) Prepare to d*e.
(x)

View attachment 2082669
He looks... pretty much the way you'd expect him to.
(x)

View attachment 2082670
From certain angles I'd say he's actually Chad-like. Too bad he's a psycho.
(x)

View attachment 2082671
(x)

View attachment 2082672
(x)

View attachment 2082680
Oh, and his art (this drawing, at least) is actually sorta fun in an offbeat Nickelodeon cartoon kind of way? Again... too bad he's a psycho.
I agree that his art (judging by the few pieces I've seen at least) is pretty cute, I like the Twitter header:
profile~2.png
A lot of artistic people are weirdos (and a disproportionate percentage of artistic geniuses were/are apparently huge sexual degenerates as well). Most artists just accept it when they're viewed as a bit strange, but trannies want to simultaneously be seen as normal and "just like everyone else", while also "more unique than everyone else"--to have their cake and eat it too. If they woke up one day and blended in seamlessly with the rest of humanity they'd be throwing tantrums for being ignored, they all have god(dess) complexes and it's fucking unbearable.
just be a girl~3.png
This thing he replied to is obnoxious as well; they think the wide-eyed expression makes them look like anime heroines or something, but all it does is make them appear more mentally deranged. Just looking at those two photos side by side pisses me off
 
Last edited:
Judith Butler, one of the OG pioneers of gender theory, was being harassed by the cancel mob on Twitter because she was trying to explain that gender is a role we perform due to social pressure, whereas the idpol trannies think it's an innate feeling that's the most super important thing ever.
Serves her. Butler is a hack who "problematized" gender and reduced it to "iterated patterns of behaviors", thus paved the road for trans and queers.

Also they just had no idea who she was and she wasn't using the hyper-woke language of 2021 SJW puritanism. She was attempting to explain things in a social sciences way rather than using hyper-emotional language
Butler knows jack squat about social sciences. Her inspiration is Nietzsche and post-structuralism, and her notion of "gender as performativity" is an ontological claim, and therefore cannot be empirically tested.
 
Just looking at those two photos side by side pisses me off
You too can become a girl with lots of photo manipulation. That's all what that bloke did. It's really sinister if you think about it; he photoshops his pictures and tells his mentally deranged followers that they can become girls, just like he did. Except he didn't but this lie is going to "crack some eggs" who then do the same shit he does.
 
Serves her. Butler is a hack who "problematized" gender and reduced it to "iterated patterns of behaviors", thus paved the road for trans and queers.


Butler knows jack squat about social sciences. Her inspiration is Nietzsche and post-structuralism, and her notion of "gender as performativity" is an ontological claim, and therefore cannot be empirically tested.
I had to suffer through her work for my researchs and seeing her get cancelled would be a true joy. I wish more people spoke out against her but she is sadly still considered a genius by many scientists I encounter.
 
Serves her. Butler is a hack who "problematized" gender and reduced it to "iterated patterns of behaviors", thus paved the road for trans and queers.


Butler knows jack squat about social sciences. Her inspiration is Nietzsche and post-structuralism, and her notion of "gender as performativity" is an ontological claim, and therefore cannot be empirically tested.
She's also completely unreadable and hasn't had an original thought in her life. Martha Nussbaum rips her to shreds in this article, which I never miss an opportunity to post. It's a good read. Jane Clare Jones sets out the main points of the feminist critique of Butler here.
 
View attachment 2083459

I have been hate watching a lot of antifa/ SJW shit recently and youtube recommended me to a lefty meme video made by Comrade Cora. I click the link to their channel and sure enough its a fucking troon.

I saw this dude last night, some video on Twitter where he was displaying his true and honest female self by spinning extravagant and detailed sexual mutilation and cannibalism revenge-fantasies against TERFs. Tbqh somewhat creative, a respectable entry in the “troon threatens to rape and mutilate lesbians who will not fuck him” genre.
 
I highly doubt any stranger has ever coded her as male. I’m sure she’s had to deal with all the harassment and societal annoyances that come with womanhood.
Nisa is also very tall and broad- like over six foot - which is obviously unusual for a woman so I wouldn't be surprised if she sometimes gets mistaken for a trans woman in passing. When she's sitting down you don't really get a feel for how big she is.

Witch spergs online are the worst. What started out as some sort of feminist reclamation has just snowballed into a sad LARP for girls and wannabe-girls who were bad at chemistry at school. If you go on twitter and say that witchcraft is bullshit, you get assblasted by a bunch of cat ladies screaming at you for disrespectinbg their beliefs. It attracts trannies like pigs to shit, too.

Fun game- post this in any thread where trannies are talking about witchery.

sandman.jpg
 
I recently saw that Judith Butler, one of the OG pioneers of gender theory, was being harassed by the cancel mob on Twitter because she was trying to explain that gender is a role we perform due to social pressure, whereas the idpol trannies think it's an innate feeling that's the most super important thing ever. Also they just had no idea who she was and she wasn't using the hyper-woke language of 2021 SJW puritanism
Amazing. While I generally disapprove of cancel culture I would get some schadenfreudic joy from seeing the actual GNC Monarch of PoMo Genderwooland get eaten alive by troons. Like a classic zombie attack with extra lipstick and over the knee socks.
Marvellous.

Butler was already protested by Brazilian (supposedly) right wingers (everyone is pretty much right wing or Ancap now so I’ve stopped fact-checking and embraced the new order) so getting cancelled by left AND right would be GENDERWANG!

AE12D51D-4C5D-4B34-94C4-57C93523D52F.jpeg

8999441A-2B89-4978-8876-FA44A1B73661.jpeg
 
This is him lol
View attachment 2083186
Got sort of ninja'd by another poster so I'll drop a few more funny things I found checking this guys history.

Of course he's an AGP we already knew that
View attachment 2083215

Spends a lot of time sperging and fighting with other users in the Pokemon sub

View attachment 2083219

Tested positive for covid and was a scared because fat
View attachment 2083227

Obviously fine though since he's on his period
The idea that your orgasms somehow change from male to female is probably the looniest thing I've ever heard a tranny say.
 
Butlerian notions of gender are generally disliked by a lot of troons nowadays it seems, especially by less intellectually sophisticated ones.

The problem (correctly perceived) is that social constructionist views of gender don't inherently support troon desires; it's not even inherently progressive. I think social constructionism as a rhetorical strategy is an underdog's trick, it allow you to inject a degree of incoherence ('deconstruct', 'problematize' etc.) that gives you some latitude to maneuver and present novel claims, but it doesn't allow you to enforce any kind of orthodoxy. It cuts both ways, just like say free speech does.

Hence, you can now find troons on reddit saying things like "gender identity isn't a social construct" or whatever.

"savagefootball22" tres féminin

Slate's Dear Prudence advice column, helmed by Daniel Mallory Lavery (née Mallory Ortberg), "husband" to deranged troon Grace Lavery, both sporadically featured in this thread, has an interesting letter:

My sister-in-law has announced she is trans and is in therapy to transition successfully. It was actually a relief because it seemed to explain her past self-destructive and self-seeking behavior (casual drug use, picking family fights, and even getting plastered at our wedding). We kept her at a distance from her past behavior but have been making attempts to bridge the gap, including introducing her (while socially distanced) to our infant daughter. The problem is she has taken a derivative of our daughter’s name for her own and has plastered the story across social media that we named our daughter for her (she tagged me in them). This is a complete fabrication and has confused our family and friends. The situation leaves my husband and I baffled and more than a little uncomfortable. In the past, my sister-in-law has been a habitual liar and would invent elaborate fictions and even fight with other people over them—like insisting the family had a dog growing up that a neighbor ran over and whose body she found, which never happened. What should we do here?

—Misnomers

It will serve you well to stop thinking of your sister-in-law’s transition as an explanation for or solution to things like drug use, family conflict, lying, or any other behavior you find difficult to deal with. It may very well be that her own sense of transness, whether conscious or subconscious, has played a part in some of these things, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it was the sole underlying cause, or that transitioning will resolve old relational patterns, bad habits, or difficult quirks of personality. She will still be a flawed human being after transitioning! That’s not to say that transitioning might not improve her life immensely, just that if you expect it will “fix” her shortcomings, I’m afraid you’ll be setting yourself up for disappointment.

I’m of two minds as to how I think you ought to handle this particular lie. On the one hand, as uncomfortable as it may have felt to see her invent a connection where none has previously existed, you can simply choose to ignore it and save your energy. If some people mistakenly think you named your daughter for your sister-in-law, it’s no skin off your nose. You can answer honestly if anyone asks you about it: “No, we’d already picked Moira before Moira II came out, but obviously we think it’s a lovely name.” If you plan on keeping your sister-in-law at a friendly but distant remove, that might be the most effective strategy. But you also have grounds to say something, especially since she tagged you in this latest tall tale: “I’m not sure why you’d say this. I’m glad you like the name, but we named our daughter before we knew you were changing yours.” Even if she gets defensive or wants to pick a quarrel with you, you don’t have to engage: “I don’t want to fight about this with you, so let’s drop the subject.” You can always decline to quarrel, even if the other party is determined to get into one.

The thing reveals more about their fucked up marriage dynamics than any actual advice (which seems to read: just placate the troon)

Tangentially, Lavery has announced they will fuck off twitter, but how long will a narc survive without their supply?

View attachment 2072026

ETA: What caused Lavery to flounce off was the getting flak for saying abortion should be celebrated, which I think was mentioned earlier in this thread.
The advice is unironically quite reasonable, the only thing I'd change is to emphasize that the causality runs in the opposite direction to what the letter-writer supposes. If you wanted a single factor predictor for AGP/non-homosexual trooning, then couldn't do better than deficiency in social/emotional reciprocity. It's the shared feature of NPD, autism, anti-social PD schizophrenia, schizoid PD etc.. That's probably a bit much for Dani to admit though. :)

The reason to treat precocious puberty in girls is because a 7 year old with a developing body is going to be sexualized by those around her, and potentially also start experiencing sexual desires herself, which is not great. Certainly the outcomes of GnRH agonists have been bad, but the reasoning was understandable.
It's also often to increase their final height, hence if you look at the literature on GnRHa, papers often will talk about using it in conjunction with HGH.

I think in both cases, the rationale isn't particularly good, especially given the possibility of harm. Height doesn't matter very much for girls and worries about age inappropriate sexualization are not obviously reasonable. I'd be curious if there is even any evidence of benefits to the child's well-being from the treatment (as opposed to trials examining safety). It seems that the idea is relatively out of fashion anyways and that tweet is probably just /r/ThatHappened.



1618308169009.png


Some reddit moderation, this is from some large-ish random politics subreddit:
moderate-politics-1.png

moderate-politics-2.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/moderatepo..._of_the_subreddit_victims_of_our_own_success/ (x)
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2083205
This thing he replied to is obnoxious as well; they think the wide-eyed expression makes them look like anime heroines or something, but all it does is make them appear more mentally deranged. Just looking at those two photos side by side pisses me off
Friendly reminder you can just turn off all those filters and show the world the reality of your 5 O'clock shadow and man jaw.

I can Photoshop myself onto Kami's Lookout, it doesn't make me Goku.
 
Nisa is also very tall and broad- like over six foot - which is obviously unusual for a woman so I wouldn't be surprised if she sometimes gets mistaken for a trans woman in passing. When she's sitting down you don't really get a feel for how big she is.


Witch spergs online are the worst. What started out as some sort of feminist reclamation has just snowballed into a sad LARP for girls and wannabe-girls who were bad at chemistry at school. If you go on twitter and say that witchcraft is bullshit, you get assblasted by a bunch of cat ladies screaming at you for disrespectinbg their beliefs. It attracts trannies like pigs to shit, too.

Fun game- post this in any thread where trannies are talking about witchery.

Unfortunately, Neil Gaiman is also completely aboard the trans train in [Current year]. I find it sad, as he was one of the fist mainstream comics authors writing realistic portraits of both gays and lesbians. I am certain Wanda would be considered HSTS, though her sexuality (IIRC) is never mentioned.

Butlerian notions of gender are generally disliked by a lot of troons nowadays it seems, especially by less intellectually sophisticated ones.

The problem (correctly perceived) is that social constructionist views of gender don't inherently support troon desires; it's not even inherently progressive. I think social constructionism as a rhetorical strategy is an underdog's trick, it allow you to inject a degree of incoherence ('deconstruct', 'problematize' etc.) that gives you some latitude to maneuver and present novel claims, but it doesn't allow you to enforce any kind of orthodoxy. It cuts both ways, just like say free speech does.

Hence, you can now find troons on reddit saying things like "gender identity isn't a social construct" or whatever.


"savagefootball22" tres féminin


The advice is unironically quite reasonable, the only thing I'd change is to emphasize that the causality runs in the opposite direction to what the letter-writer supposes. If you wanted a single factor predictor for AGP/non-homosexual trooning, then couldn't do better than deficiency in social/emotional reciprocity. It's the shared feature of NPD, autism, anti-social PD schizophrenia, schizoid PD etc.. That's probably a bit much for Dani to admit though. :)


It's also often to increase their final height, hence if you look at the literature on GnRHa, papers often will talk about using it in conjunction with HGH.

I think in both cases, the rationale isn't particularly good, especially given the possibility of harm. Height doesn't matter very much for girls and worries about age inappropriate sexualization are not obviously reasonable. I'd be curious if there is even any evidence of benefits to the child's well-being from the treatment (as opposed to trials examining safety). It seems that the idea is relatively out of fashion anyways and that tweet is probably just /r/ThatHappened.



View attachment 2083538

Some reddit moderation, this is from some large-ish random politics subreddit:
View attachment 2083574
View attachment 2083573
https://www.reddit.com/r/moderatepo..._of_the_subreddit_victims_of_our_own_success/ (x)
That should peak some normies. Here's hoping.
 
A tranny that likes Stalin. Because LGBT had it so good in the USSR.
View attachment 2083612
View attachment 2083613
Also note the Beria profile picture.
I'll just leave this here... https://www.marxist.com/letter-to-stalin-can-a-homosexual-be-in-the-communist-party.htm

All of these anarchist and what-have-you kids think they're oh so progressive, but communism has rarely been good for gays - lesbians have mostly been able to fly under the radar, provided they were discreet. Still today, I find the most homophobia in the most leftie circles - we are an abstraction to them, something to put on a flyer to show your progressive bona fides. The actual material conditions of what it means to be gay are completely overlooked.
 
Back