What is the more logical, likely scenario?
1. Kero sexually abused his own dog and other animals both living and dead, was romantically tied to a known zoosaidist, and had conversations with other zoosadists online, and the reason he wasn't arrested was because either the statute of limitations had passed or what he did wasn't illegal where he lived.
2. There was an organized effort from several people to completely ruin the life of a furfag on YouTube who had a channel with roughly 100,000 subs, an effort that took place over several years involving sexually abusing a dog that looked exactly like Kero's dog, making accounts on animal rape websites and forums pretending to be Kero long before he even had a YouTube channel, posting photos of a puppy before anyone knew Kero had a puppy or posted photos of it publicly, and pretending to be Kero in conversations with zoosadists including going to extreme lengths like learning to write exactly like Kero and using the same "arf arf" greeting, and hacking his accounts to change things to make Kero look more guilty. And they did all this to...gain what, exactly?
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one, and Iranian Super Hackers spending years and years trying to ruin one furfaggot's life, even getting a dog that looks EXACTLY like Kero's dog and getting clothes, shoes, and fursuits that are the SAME as Kero's, learning to write like Kero, and doing all this before Kero ever even had a YouTube channel not only sounds too complicated to be the truth, but it sounds literally unbelievable. A trolling effort like that would put the trolling schemes for Chris-chan to shame. Not to mention how Kero's story has changed SEVERAL times, which is a clear indication that Kero has been lying. Sorry, not buying the shit Kero is shoveling.