The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[Collections Agent]

Pretty sure that one guy who died in kenosha was shouting a 6 letter word that ended with a hard r.

It's ok he was going to hell anyway

 

[TitusOvid]

There's no placating the mob. In fact its been all the attempts to placate them that have got us to this point. Its time to deny the mob anything.

 

[Coccxys]

It would be perfectly legitimate for the judge to grant a motion dismissing the 2 murder charges based on the prosecution's testimony to date as they haven't made a case even if you take everything they say as true and disregard the defence. They can continue on just the manslaughter charge. Yeah, even that is bullshit but again if you take all the evidence in favor of the prosecution then you could see it into the grey area a jury needs to decide on.

 

[4AMPudding]

They're renaming schools in his honor, plastering murals of his face everywhere, and comparing him to Jesus Christ.

SJWs are not capable of admitting when they are wrong. St. Skittles had Zimzam pinned down and was bashing his head into the pavement. Michael Brown tried to grab Darren Wilson's gun, and "hands up, don't shoot" was a flat-out lie.

They still martyrize Trayvon and Brown. The lies for the history books are agreed upon, facts be damned.

This whole thing is giving me heavy islamic religion vibes.

 

[ogmudbone]

It's ok he was going to hell anyway

Yup for being a kiddy diddler

 

[Geralt of Rivia]

Pretty sure that one guy who died in kenosha was shouting a 6 letter word that ended with a hard r.

"Shoot me nigger! C'mon shoot me!"

Gets shot in the head for being a dumbass wigger.

 

[ogmudbone]

"Shoot me nigger! C'mon shoot me!"

Gets shot in the head for being a dumbass wigger.

View attachment 2085352

^countless antifa retards

 

[But I Digress]

It would be perfectly legitimate for the judge to grant a motion dismissing the 2 murder charges based on the prosecution's testimony to date as they haven't made a case even if you take everything they say as true and disregard the defence. They can continue on just the manslaughter charge. Yeah, even that is bullshit but again if you take all the evidence in favor of the prosecution then you could see it into the grey area a jury needs to decide on.

Imagine if Cahill set aside a guilty verdict at the end. Maximum Impact.

 

[DeadFish]

I have no idea what power a juror has. If I were one I'd convict Chauvin for either manslaughter or If possible irs fraud.

It would be my "I think ya innocent but that angry mob wants me dead so here's my compromise vote"

 

[Gehenna]

Lawyers object to preserve the record on appeal but it doesn't always play well to the jury.

The prosecution doesn't need to preserve anything. Only the defendent does.


There is literally no reason to 'preserve' this for the state.

 

[MoeChotto]

I have no idea what power a juror has. If I were one I'd convict Chauvin for either manslaughter or If possible irs fraud.

The tax fraud will be a separate trial. Trials are just conducted within a narrow scope of charges brought about by a certain incident. That's why there's no mention of taxes here, nor are all of the officers being charged together. A juror is just one of (in this case) 12 people and 2 alternates who deliberates with the other jurors to come up with a single verdict on the charges brought against the defendant at that specific trial which all of them unanimously agree upon.
The tax fraud trial will consist of a completely different jury.

Jurors who said they would make compromise votes were all stricken or dismissed for cause

 

[Gehenna]

To explain my above a bit more: An appeal is a citizen going to a higher court to explain how the state fucked up. It's on procedural grounds, something about the legal action was done wrong by the state and needs to be remedied. In a criminal prosecution, a citizen is tried for a crime by the state.

An appeal by the state would be the state saying the state fucked up.

For rather obvious reasons, the state cannot appeal to itself to say it fucked up. This is why you get things like the OJ decision standing despite the judge in that basically being hostile to the prosecution.

 

[WeDon'tNeedToWhisper]

"No further questions your honor"

 

[reinigen]

Poor blacks and whites have more interests in common than the mega-wealthy and megacorporations who constantly spew race baiting horseshit to make us hate each other.

Quick, someone post that chart of all the words the newspapers used about class issues leadinig up to Occupy Wallstreet, then all the racial issue words after Occupy Wallstreet.

edit: Found similar to what I wanted.

 

[Coccxys]

I have no idea what power a juror has. If I were one I'd convict Chauvin for either manslaughter or If possible irs fraud.

It would be my "I think ya innocent but that angry mob wants me dead so here's my compromise vote"

Hell if a jury could go rouge like that I'd be convicting Floyd of being a druggie and insisting his gold casket is the fine and then convicting the prosecution of rampant faggotry.

 

[DiabeticSP]

Biden and the Minnesota mayor have already said riots bad.

I bet when people start burning shit the national guard is out with rubber bullets night two at the latest.

None of this trump era riot weeks before the NG hangs around.

 

[SITHRAK!]

Why is america so busted lmao.

Because throughout the twentieth century you welcomed an influx of people that looked white but held themselves to be superior to whites, spiritually and morally. Especially after WW2 you allowed these people, who looked white but hate whites with a burning intensity, to work against the interests of the white majority.

You let them take over institutions that shape the public mind (media and education) and determine law and justice. You allowed their philosophers’ theories to be presented as facts. You dismantled the scientific method because it’s findings clashed with their sociological theories. You allowed them unfettered access to the halls of power and an unreasonable amount of control over both sides of your politics.

You allowed them to develop a power base of social, economic, legal, moral and media control that ensures even the slightest criticism of them dooms the speaker to personal ruin. You allow them to drain your foreign aid budget to support an illegitimate state that is the source of a massive amount of Arab resentment, which exacerbated middle-east tensions to the point that the terrorists now regard you as a legitimate target. And you allow them to determine it’s perfectly all right to soak the desert sands and stony mountains of remote places with the blood of your sons and the resources of your nation.

You allow them control over your childrens’ minds and stand by passively as everyone, including whites themselves, are taught from the cradle to hate whites. You indifferently shrug as their mechanisms of control fan low embers of resentment into sheets of fire and rage. You let them amplify every grievance into an apocalypse. You let them weaponise negroid hate and callow stupidity into hundreds of millions of dollars in damage that white society pays for.

In short- you handed de facto control of the most powerful nation on earth to a bunch of people that hate you and want you dead with a nigger’s hands around your throat. And the worst part is, they have done this in every single society that has ever let them in- and you thought this time it would be different.

 

[Meat Target]

To explain my above a bit more: An appeal is a citizen going to a higher court to explain how the state fucked up. It's on procedural grounds, something about the legal action was done wrong by the state and needs to be remedied. In a criminal prosecution, a citizen is tried for a crime by the state.

An appeal by the state would be the state saying the state fucked up.

For rather obvious reasons, the state cannot appeal to itself to say it fucked up. This is why you get things like the OJ decision standing despite the judge in that basically being hostile to the prosecution.

And AFAIK the state can't appeal a Not Guilty verdict because that would be putting the defendant in double jeopardy.

 

[Coccxys]

Biden and the Minnesota mayor have already said riots bad.

I bet when people start burning shit the national guard is out

Well the chief has just resigned (after if was recommended he be fired) and the mayor has taken over running the police.





So they're at least screwed.

Also she gets to resign with full pension etc while everyone involved in this case was shotcanned (and charged) instantly.

 

[Focken Kiwi]

I have no idea what power a juror has. If I were one I'd convict Chauvin for either manslaughter or If possible irs fraud.

As a juror, you hear the same case we've been watching in livestreams minus the stuff that they're obviously away for. Then at the deliberation phase, they're given a list of charges and they converse in a back room over the evidence to decide what all Chauvin is guilty of. I don't think they can convict on charges that aren't presented. If I'm not mistaken, and I'm just going off of my own experiences as a juror on a murder trial, the prosecution presents the charges they were shooting to convict Chauvin with (ie. Manslaughter, 3rd Degree murder) and then a number of other minor composite charges should the jury not agree with certain elements so the defendant can be prosecuted on at least something. It should literally just be yae or nae but the jurors must unanimously agree on the verdict. They can't prosecute on popular vote.