The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well so far the only suggestions I've gotten are to either form enclaves or start our own long march through the institutions. Both of those need leadership and rallying support, as well as some brass balls.

Surely we can come up with something, even just a meme like "Its Okay to be White." Anything is better than sitting around and taking it in the ass while pretending like we don't care. 4chan used to be great at this before it became a total fag show.
YOU GLOW, MAN
lol calm down
^Literally the most powerful phrase on the site
 
if such a motion is granted it goes against the entire point of having a jury decide the verdict instead of a judge.
If it would be impossible for a reasonable person to reach a verdict of guilty from only the prosecution's case then it should be struck by a judge rather than risk a clearly unsafe conviction.

That said removing charges at this point would probably swey the jury towards convicting on a charge under the theory of "you can't tell me what to do" and/or it looking like a cover-up.
 
How is posting in a thread 'raiding'? There's no cardboard tarbaby cutout saying "You must be this racist to post here".
Listen, they're very sensitive legal scholars and not at all just redditors spurned they got banned from r/politics.
It isn't as if this was from the beginning a shitpost containment thread where someone chimes in once every fifty pages with any actual insight into legal proceedings/statutes/etc.

Back to the trial, did anyone make a joke about recesses or drugs yet
 
Current witness just flew in from South Africa and boy are his ears tired.
flew in from south africa.png
 
If it would be impossible for a reasonable person to reach a verdict of guilty from only the prosecution's case then it should be struck by a judge rather than risk a clearly unsafe conviction.
yes, but there's a very high standard to "impossible" here. like, "there is undeniable video proof of defendant being in another city at the time of the crime", or "defendant is charged with murder but the alleged victim was just found to be alive and well and admits trying to fake his own death"

but just expert witnesses giving questionable takes? that is simply not enough to warrant shutting it all down immediately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back