- Joined
- May 29, 2019
The difference is she deserves the charge.

Sam Hyde - Female Cops
from PGL_05. sub to sam for only 5 bucks and get the full 2 hour episode + all hydewars and other content https://mde.tvhttps://gumroad.com/samhyde

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The difference is she deserves the charge.
Saffer doctor on the stand is going over other factors, including Floyd's arteries and proximity to carbon monoxide from the squad car.I just started listening... could someone please fill me in on what happened so far today?
Nelson is reading this thread....The judge should work at a mechanic. He has breaks for days.
- "Your Honour, she's a woman. And somebody gave her a gun."It could be an interesting one to decide if it rises to the level of culpable negligence. It was clearly the height of incompetence and an utter fuck up that lead to a death but there will be something for the defence to go for.
she literally pulled her gun and shot the guy dead, and is trying to argue that she mistook the gun for a tazer lmaoSneedbar on the thread, but the officer who shot Daunte Wight is charged with second degree manslaughter.
eta fuckin ninjas
The state of education in the US.They've latched on to the lizard guy saying that the body created new blood vessels to redirect blood around a blockage and are taking it to it's retarded extreme, which is precisely what the prosecution wanted the jury to do, ignoring that new blood vessels != a fucking artery and that it's objectively not "fine". You may be able to live your normal sedentary life, but at some point something will tip you over the edge into sneedsville
>vid less than a month old![]()
Sam Hyde - Female Cops
from PGL_05. sub to sam for only 5 bucks and get the full 2 hour episode + all hydewars and other content https://mde.tvhttps://gumroad.com/samhydeyoutu.be
Not really. This is extremely short sighted, because the prosecution can come back swinging with "Oh ok, yeah the carbon monoxide did it. So Chauvin is guilty of manslaughter because he was negligent when arresting floyd."the carbon monoxide thing seems like a great curve ball tbh
Her reaction makes it look unintentional, so I'm willing to buy her shitty excuse.she literally pulled her gun and shot the guy dead, and is trying to argue that she mistook the gun for a tazer lmao
now there's a case where a murder charge might actually be warranted cause that tazer excuse seems kinda sketchy to me
What happened to the last officer who shot someone instead of tasing?
The way I'm interpreting it is that its a factor only because of all the other mitigating circumstances around his heart condition. As with everything else, a normal person wouldn't die from it.
Not really. This is extremely short sighted, because the prosecution can come back swinging with "Oh ok, yeah the carbon monoxide did it. So Chauvin is guilty of manslaughter because he was negligent when arresting floyd."
not really this either, they never criticized the actual act of putting him on the ground (obviously, since he's the one who did it) and have never themselves mentioned this. If they just suddenly go "oh yeah, we were wrong it's what the defense said!" they've obviously already lost. At this point in the trial, pros has made their case, the job is to minimize and discredit the defense trying to poke holes in their story. If they actively change the story based on what the defense says, no jury would convict, and for obvious reasons.Not really. This is extremely short sighted, because the prosecution can come back swinging with "Oh ok, yeah the carbon monoxide did it. So Chauvin is guilty of manslaughter because he was negligent when arresting floyd."
Yeah just looked it up. It was involuntary manslaughter rather than any of the more serious charges so I wonder how the two state's wordings differ here. Either way she'll probably get some nice please deal that involves never seeing a cell.He got two years including time served. And I don't think he's been able to work since.
The defence's strategy is very cunning, I must admit. Mr. Nelson is positing that Mr. Floyd's death is simply the result of a large number of unfortunate, intermingling factors. Thus the prosecutor must waste time and effort trying to take down, or bring into doubt, every single one of them.
So, I think this is a bit of a red herring, and is meant to make the prosecution take a weak argument
Not really. This is extremely short sighted, because the prosecution can come back swinging with "Oh ok, yeah the carbon monoxide did it. So Chauvin is guilty of manslaughter because he was negligent when arresting floyd."
wait til cross. i wouldbt be surprised if it boils down to pure speculation, since they wete at the front of the car. i guess the manifold could leak but without a mechanic report its just hypotheticalthe carbon monoxide thing seems like a great curve ball tbh