But I Digress
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2019
Looks like stimming. Is Potato doctor Autistic?Potato Nigger boppin his head up and down like he's listenin to some sic beatz in his head
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like stimming. Is Potato doctor Autistic?Potato Nigger boppin his head up and down like he's listenin to some sic beatz in his head
The judge had clarified that Tobin could speak on the enlarged heart and the effects of carbon monoxide on hemoglobin, keeping it to what was said by Fowler yesterday since that's what was on record.I think some of you misheard. My understanding was that the clarification Blackwell asked for indicates that this evidence was in existence before the trial, but had not been disclosed to the prosecution until yesterday, and it was provided to them, they did not seek it out. Therefore, bringing it up could not cause a mistrial. If the prosecution had obtained/created new evidence DURING the trial, then yes it would be a mistrial. That's my understanding at least.
@AnOminous can you weigh in?
No, Blackwell stated that the doctor just happened to call them after hearing the testimony yesterday to say "well actually we do have these lab results we just had to dig a little deeper so we omitted them in the initial subpoena, a subpoena which requested ALL of our test results for GF." That's why the judge said it was untimely and not allowed and would in fact cause a mistrial. This was all explicitly stated at 9 before the jury walked in. Dr. Tobin's testimony was to be limited.I think some of you misheard. My understanding was that the clarification Blackwell asked for indicates that this evidence was in existence before the trial, but had not been disclosed to the prosecution until yesterday, and it was provided to them, they did not seek it out. Therefore, bringing it up could not cause a mistrial. If the prosecution had obtained/created new evidence DURING the trial, then yes it would be a mistrial. That's my understanding at least.
@AnOminous can you weigh in?
idiots are stupid, its not a mistrialWHAT HAPPENED PEOPLE ARE SAYING MISTRIAL?????
Mistrial hasn't been declared yet, but Tobin mentioned some forbidden evidence, and within 2 minutes rebuttal was finished and Cahill started a 3 hour break.WHAT HAPPENED PEOPLE ARE SAYING MISTRIAL?????
WE CAN SNEED DEEPERLOL BREAK WITHIN THE BREAK
WE JUST REACHED BREAKCEPTION!!!
I like this version betterYou want trial? Fuck you, have some ads.
Mmmmm, forbidden evidenceforbidden evidence
even worse our rhodesian is currently on a plane, how is the defense supposed to rebut potato nigger without himPretty sure Tobins telling a lie of omission here. Floyd was probably ventilated really well by the time the blood was taken, so it's not surprising his O2 sat was 98. It's probably a guarantee it wasnt when he was picked up.