Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

I wish I could laugh at this guilt-free, but then you realize that people like this are only 16 years old, which is still just a child. my generation grew up with the first forays into socializing online and it really is crazy just how different the online culture has changed in the last 10-15 years. going from being advised to absolutely NOT share any personal information (I remember in the beginning thinking I was going to get murdered if I told people the state I lived in) to people listing their "carrds", which literally detail super personal and intimate information, for every person to see in a very public setting is quite terrifying.
it seems no one is teaching these children basic online security; I follow a lot of artists on twitter and they occasionally make posts reminding their minor audience not to befriend or interact with adult creeps that prey on this new phenomena of kids oversharing personal information online, especially listing things like triggers which can be used against them to potentially harm them.
this isn't to say that my generation didn't have it's fair share of cringey people online (which, to be honest, is just what happens when you're a teenager), but compared to today's generation, where it almost seems the trend to appear as infantile, weak and dependent as humanly possible, it really is concerning to see how this generation transitions into early adulthood and beyond while being terminally online throughout their formative years.

I was thinking of this just the other day. I was an early internet adopter (compared to normies at least) and was balls deep into the whole Win95 / Netscape Navigator / dial-up scene. Fucking loved hittin' dat Information Superhighway and surfin' dat World Wide Web. And it was understood by everyone -- everyone -- that you did not fuck around with personal information online. Whenever I was hit with an "A/S/L?" on mIRC or whatever I would tell the questioning party that I lived in........ America. I remember building my first personal website (some Geocities shit) and I included an "About Me" page. Again, it was pretty vague, but after agonizing over the decision for days I included a picture of myself..... I was wearing a hat in the pic, it was a scanned photograph, shrunk to 100x100 pixels, and blurry as ass. Still, I felt like I maybe ended up revealing too much about myself and eventually removed the pic.

Hell, it's easy to forget that some of the first websites dedicated to sperging and ranting (think Livejournal and so on) were still constructed with anonymity in mind. Users were mainly identified by fictional handles and the most personal of written pieces were delegated as being "friends only" and so forth.

But today -- HOLY SHIT. You have people like Kevin Gibes, for example, who have zero hesitation about posting their most insane, perverted, and intimate fantasies in complete public view, on webpages that also contain their photographs and contact information. And, as noted, these freaks are grooming children who have zero concept of internet security. How did this happen? It's a combination of rapidly-advancing technology (it's now patently easier to share information) coupled with rapidly-changing cultural values. "Woke" globalist liberal trash ideology continues to ramp up with no signs of stopping. Those who don't sperg out on the internet are now treated with suspicion. After all, isn't it "liberating" to post images of your "girldick" online upon turning 18? And so on.

Good parents need to teach their kids 'net security. I've tried my best here. And as a based boomer I have a "content blocker" installed on the "family computer" we all share in the office. Keeping kids safe takes dedication and time, but it remains one of the primary roles of parents.

(Not to get too far off topic, but any youngcels who are interested in the culture of the "early internet" and would rather hear about it from a "regular person" instead of a soyed-up "nostalgia" weirdo, I highly recommend Dave Barry in Cyberspace. It's funny as shit and you can get it used for like one dollar).
 
Let's be real here, this is probably the least stupid way to do it.
Ah, but if you go from Oliver to Olivia people who have known you your whole life are less likely to slip up (and can simply carry on calling you ‘Olly’) and there are no oppression points in that! Changing your name to something entirely improbable, deliberately misspelled and with accompanying magical pronouns dramatically increases the opportunity for shrieking with outrage and demanding sympathy.

‘Luna’ is one I see come up a lot at the moment.
Hell, it's easy to forget that some of the first websites dedicated to sperging and ranting (think Livejournal and so on) were still constructed with anonymity in mind. Users were mainly identified by fictional handles and the most personal of written pieces were delegated as being "friends only" and so forth.

Yep, even people who posted their pierced nutsacks on BMEzine knew not to have their face pics on the same profile.

This reminds me of the first time I saw the face of the woman with the infamous ‘penis necklace’ tattoo...
D7E4F7B6-2DB9-4369-8A4B-226A1B968671.jpeg
and she looked like a librarian.
 
mtTroons usually just feminise their real name eg Andrew-Andrea.
The more normal ones, at least. The more degenerate ones them steal names from younger female relatives. Relatives they probably fantasize about.
Good parents need to teach their kids 'net security. I've tried my best here. And as a based boomer I have a "content blocker" installed on the "family computer" we all share in the office. Keeping kids safe takes dedication and time, but it remains one of the primary roles of parents.
Problem with controlling kid's internet too tightly is that they'll learn to evade your controls and then you lose any input over what they do.

Not that parents should give up entirely, that's retarded. But it feels like something that requires finesse.
 
Just realized how weird packing is. My man package isn't large, but it's not some micro deformity (or really even small) either, but I'm generally don't feel like I'm packing anything unless I'm wearing weird sports clothes I don't normally wear. Do they think men walk around feeling like they have a bulge in their pants? Do they realize like half of dudes, even with bigger-ish dicks are growers who's penises can shrink and squish to wee proportions. I almost feel offended or something like it. Should I be packing too? Is that what they're saying? They should try the feeling of sitting on one's own balls when it's hot out. Very gender affirming.
agreed one of my personal tranny sideshows works for a packer company and it's so bonkers to me that its a thing, they make em for KIDS too which is fucked but above all it don't make no sense

wanting to have a stationary semi-hard lump in your underwear? it's gotta be a frottage thing, also a convenient cottage industry for pervs, a frottage cottage if you will

mtTroons usually just feminise their real name eg Andrew-Andrea.
to me it seems like its romantic feminine names like Jessica or Veronica, or flower names like Lily or Rose, or both in a one-two punch
 
I saw this dude last night, some video on Twitter where he was displaying his true and honest female self by spinning extravagant and detailed sexual mutilation and cannibalism revenge-fantasies against TERFs. Tbqh somewhat creative, a respectable entry in the “troon threatens to rape and mutilate lesbians who will not fuck him” genre.
Oh my god I saw that too, he’s a fucking lunatic
 
Butlerian notions of gender are generally disliked by a lot of troons nowadays it seems, especially by less intellectually sophisticated ones.

The problem (correctly perceived) is that social constructionist views of gender don't inherently support troon desires; it's not even inherently progressive. I think social constructionism as a rhetorical strategy is an underdog's trick, it allow you to inject a degree of incoherence ('deconstruct', 'problematize' etc.) that gives you some latitude to maneuver and present novel claims, but it doesn't allow you to enforce any kind of orthodoxy. It cuts both ways, just like say free speech does.

Hence, you can now find troons on reddit saying things like "gender identity isn't a social construct" or whatever.


"savagefootball22" tres féminin


The advice is unironically quite reasonable, the only thing I'd change is to emphasize that the causality runs in the opposite direction to what the letter-writer supposes. If you wanted a single factor predictor for AGP/non-homosexual trooning, then couldn't do better than deficiency in social/emotional reciprocity. It's the shared feature of NPD, autism, anti-social PD schizophrenia, schizoid PD etc.. That's probably a bit much for Dani to admit though. :)


It's also often to increase their final height, hence if you look at the literature on GnRHa, papers often will talk about using it in conjunction with HGH.

I think in both cases, the rationale isn't particularly good, especially given the possibility of harm. Height doesn't matter very much for girls and worries about age inappropriate sexualization are not obviously reasonable. I'd be curious if there is even any evidence of benefits to the child's well-being from the treatment (as opposed to trials examining safety). It seems that the idea is relatively out of fashion anyways and that tweet is probably just /r/ThatHappened.



View attachment 2083538

Some reddit moderation, this is from some large-ish random politics subreddit:
View attachment 2083574
View attachment 2083573
https://www.reddit.com/r/moderatepo..._of_the_subreddit_victims_of_our_own_success/ (x)
LOL. This is such a joke.
Screen Shot 2021-04-15 at 6.55.31 PM.png
 
agreed one of my personal tranny sideshows works for a packer company and it's so bonkers to me that its a thing, they make em for KIDS too which is fucked but above all it don't make no sense

wanting to have a stationary semi-hard lump in your underwear? it's gotta be a frottage thing, also a convenient cottage industry for pervs, a frottage cottage if you will


to me it seems like its romantic feminine names like Jessica or Veronica, or flower names like Lily or Rose, or both in a one-two punch
You can always gauge the tranny creep factor on the name. The ones I know in IRL: Claire is a personal friend and she’s great. The two at work Hannah is fun but Brandi I wouldn’t want to be left in a room with. Of course he looks/built like a line backer and mixed with an angry, unpleasant personality ...the horror of imagining this thing chasing you down an dark ally...

The rules apparently apply online. the sensible Claire’s and Hannah’s and the shitshow and 40: Misti’s, Kristi’s, Tiffani’s and Brandi’s
 
to me it seems like hsts are usually pretty aware that they're just gay transvestites. i might be wrong but they seem more in touch with reality and much less invested in make-believe like the 'trans lesbians' are. also less annoying and obnoxious, and less trying to force their shit on other people.
I am just going to say Monroe Bergdorf, Juno Dawson, Laverne Cox...true, they're not quite as obnoxious as the AGP's, but really, there's no reason to give the HSTSs a pass. Most drag never quite sat right with me either, because a lot of it is really women-hating tropes - it takes a real star to rise above those cliches.

I think with HSTS's, their view of gender tends to very much be that it is an 'achieved status.' Their actions, relationships and appearance legitimate their 'womanhood.' Hence, why you have that HSTS TikTok where the guy calls some TERF a "hamburgler-looking MFer" or something like that after gesturing at his body. To him, the fact that he looks like a woman and impeccably performs femininity, sleeps with men etc. legitimates that he is a woman or at least that the idea that he is a man in any common sense is preposterous.

That kind of view, obviously, is sometimes ugly, but it's also much less delusional and ridiculous than the self-identification based notions that AGP-types have tended to prefer. This difference is probably due to HSTS's generally being far more pragmatic.

Bailey in The Man Who Would Be Queen (pg. 182-3):
Kim’s story shows that sex reassignment is not necessarily an inevitable, unwavering goal for the homosexual transsexual. Rather, sex reassignment has a rational choice component: “Can I make it? Will I be happier as a female? Will I be more successful getting straight men as a woman than I am at getting gay men as a man?” (The last decision has to be weighted by a particular transsexual’s degree of preference for straight versus gay men. Most vastly prefer straight men.) This could help explain why the large majority of boys who start out looking transsexual ultimately do not pursue sex reassignment. Some doubt they can be attractive women. This is a significant difference between the homosexual and autogynephilic types. In making the decision whether to undergo sex reassignment, the autogynephiles do not seem to dwell much on whether they can attract mates. Even autogynephiles who worry that they cannot pass as women are concerned more about stares at the grocery store than about a lack of stares at the cocktail lounge. This makes sense. The autogynephile’s main romantic target is herself. This is also consistent with my intuition that autogynephilia is a very internally driven condition, much less susceptible to the kind of rational analysis that homosexual transsexuals seem to engage in.
Thus, most HSTS's are going to be plausible "women," so they'll rely on the much less debatable point that they are able to live as (at least their idea of) a woman. It helps that even if they weren't more pragmatic in making the decision to troon out, they're also psychologically different; much less autistic, far more behaviorally feminine, naturally motivated to invest effort into their appearances etc. AGP conceptual judo where you wrangle over word definitions and fall back on magic essences or whatever other subjective epistemological claims you prefer, are a loser's ploy. They make them, because there is so little difference between themselves and ordinary men.

It also seems that this pragmatic bent allows for HSTS's to be much more willing to be honest and flexible; it's not a gut punch to acknowledge that, yeh, in certain respects they are undeniably men. Hence, you'll see more HSTS's being broadly OK with being called a TS, tranny or w/e, so long as it's not intentionally derogatory. If you insist on calling them men without making any distinction, they'll basically just call you autistic and with some justification. This is from Thailand, but it captures the spirit that exists elsewhere:
1618531888929.png

A black troon saying exactly the same thing:
1618531998279.png

Note, how in both cases the concern is to not be 'just' a cross-dresser -- they're specifically offended by being told that they look like men.
 
Dear Substack,

I have to be a big boy and use filters and block lists, like everyone else in the world, to get the Internet experience I want. Please cease showing everyone content that gives me a frowny face so I don't have to lift a finger in dealing with my inability to navigate the world.

Everyone else should be responsible for shielding me from things I don't like, not me!
View attachment 2087219
https://twitter.com/JuliaSerano/status/1382152510324895747 (Archive)

Troon fragility is ridiculous. They really can't do shit for themselves except whine about other people not catering to them and wiping their asses.
This seems like the fastest way to get signed up for more newsletters and/or mass spam websites.

Niggywimminz develop extremely young and then have their first heat cycle at like age 7. I knew several below age 10 who already shat out a 9 month bowel movement. They do that shit normally in Apefreaka too.

Well given how troons and TRAs strive on misrepresenting biology, I felt the need to point out that statistically, no, black girls do not start menstruating that much earlier than other races. At least from this 2006 study (archive.is) in the US, median age of menarche (first period) is 12.43 overall, 12.06 for black girls, 12.25 for Hispanic and 12.55 for non Hispanic white females. Diet and most importantly starvation have the biggest effect on menarche age*. Girls in sub-Saharan Africa have a mean age at menarche of 14.5 and 13.5 in North Africa from this 2019 study (archive.is). This does put the child marriages in Africa in a new light. I mean, I already thought marrying a 14-15 year old girl was terrible but they're actually less developed than American high school girls!

*Given how popular pro-ana (pro anorexia trend) was back in the day, I'm actually surprised more teenage transtrenders aren't out there starving for their dysphoria. Now that I think about it, there are a lot of similarities between the 2 trends except everyone knew to treat eating disorders as obvious mental illness but we have to play pretend with gender ideology. Even the language is similar. A lot of wannabe (and real) anorexics complain about how they hate their bodies, always strive for some imaginary perfect body they can never achieve, get triggered by people who are closer to their ideal look and contemplate suicide because they cannot reach their goal weight (impossible since they always lower it once they get there) and people will not play along with their delusions.
 
Back