Manosphere Eatdatpussy445 / EDP445 / Bryant Moreland / Deyione Scott-Wilson Eason - Fatass Eagles fanboy, confirmed pedophile, dying of kidney failure

Cue the 500 uninformative, bland "haha eatdatchomo445 goin to jail, bubba gonna get his bubblegoose busted, he's gonna get blacked by tyrone in the slammer" posts.

Every. Single. Time.

These aren't fucking funny and just drown out the actual informative posts.

One clip he admits he knew he initiated contact with a 13 year old. The other clip he says he honestly thinks he himself deserves to go to jail.
View attachment 2097750
View attachment 2097751
Why in the name of everloving fuck do people always confess to everything on camera? Why do they do this? Do they think that law enforcement, or in this case a fat sped nonce-hunter, are gonna be like "oh, well, since you put it that way, I kinda see where you're coming from, we'll just be on our way now"? Never in the history of police interrogations has this happened.

As a fan of police interrogations and true crime analysis*, watching suspects hang themselves with their own mouths is always mind bafflingly stupid. Bryant is literally staring at a camera and saying 'mm, yeah, i knew she was 13. yeah i was sexting her. yeah that's me. yeah here's my birthmark for comparison.' Like nigger, DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW??

Detectives/interrogators/nonce-hunters are not your fucking friends. They're not your therapists, not your guidance counselors, not your shoulder to cry on. They'll pretend to be personable and understanding at first, every single time, but they're there to give you enough rope to hang yourself. TCAP is a classic example: Hansen starts out non-confrontational, even comes off as understanding. This pedo-hunter isn't even trying to be friendly. (Of course, the full video hasn't come out yet but I'm willing to bet this fat clout-chasing sped doesn't have the bedside manner needed to coax a confession.)

God, it's infuriating to watch. I mean, it's great that the culprit is found and is stupid enough to hang himself, but it's still always baffling how people don't know they can (and should) just keep quiet and seek legal counsel.

*TCAP hardly falls into these categories, but it's a start. I recommend Jim Can't Swim on youtube, it's a great starting point.

 
I have no earthly idea who this guy is or what his schtick is, all I know is that im pretty sure Wyatt Mann made a cartoon of this fine member of the upstanding african american community at work a couple decades back
View attachment 2097594


Ya know im pretty sure theres a joke to be made about a nigger getting catfished but Im not nearly southern enough to know it despite my love of cajun/creole food
Looks a lot like EDP. except EDP is even fatter.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Vingle
It's an exaggerated example, yes, but the point (that you just helped make with this post) is that celebrity status isn't revoked just because of a sex scandal.
Except with Youtubers a person hears they're a kid toucher and they simply hit the unsubscribe button and move on to the next channel. Hell I've unsubscribed to channels for lame content or posting to many videos a day simply because it was making my subscriptions a pain to look through. So yeah dropping a Youtube pedo and not looking back is a lot easier than dropping Netflix which has a ton of shows and movies or saying I will never watch China Town again.
 
Question about Pedo hunter vigilantes:

Do their investigations stick? Since they are not official police investigations do they hold up in court? I am no expert but I would think that a rando on the internet who cat fishes another rando would be tough to prosecute in court? I watch Anxiety War and his videos are hilarious, but he never follows up on any of his pedos. Are these effective in putting these would be abuser behind bars, or do they mostly just embarass the perpetrators?
 
Slightly off topic, and I know EDP is known to shit posters, but I'm at least 51% sure that UrinatingTree has or has had a Kiwi account.

Urinating Tree EDP 2021-04-18_13-32.png
 
Question about Pedo hunter vigilantes:

Do their investigations stick? Since they are not official police investigations do they hold up in court? I am no expert but I would think that a rando on the internet who cat fishes another rando would be tough to prosecute in court? I watch Anxiety War and his videos are hilarious, but he never follows up on any of his pedos. Are these effective in putting these would be abuser behind bars, or do they mostly just embarass the perpetrators?
It depends on how they handle the evidence and whether or not those in power are willing to work with them. If every interaction is recorded, every chat, every phone call, in-person meetups, the ambush etc and if the Pedo hunters are able to turn over the phone used for every conversation to detectives, maybe, If they have a sympathetic prosecutor. In my state, many prosecutors are issuing statements saying that they do not approve of online pedo vigilantes and will not work with them. They are also being blamed for ruining ongoing investigations by their own departments which might be an issue if they're actually running online stings themselves, but inside info says this is not happening as much as they'd like the public to believe.

But even if the vigilantes are attention seeking clout chasers, they're still putting the pedos on blast in a public space which could potentially alert neighbors and family with kids to at least be aware that something might happen, so I'm ok with it.
 
Question about Pedo hunter vigilantes:

Do their investigations stick? Since they are not official police investigations do they hold up in court? I am no expert but I would think that a rando on the internet who cat fishes another rando would be tough to prosecute in court? I watch Anxiety War and his videos are hilarious, but he never follows up on any of his pedos. Are these effective in putting these would be abuser behind bars, or do they mostly just embarass the perpetrators?
In the UK they do, and despite their amateur nature - and some of the groups really are bottom of the barrel doylems who need to get a life - they rarely make mistakes. Even when they do it's not necessarily their fault...

One of the arguments they use to justify their actions is that often times confronting and arresting the predators themselves forces the police to act. I actually don't doubt this at all, in the UK the police use a threat model to prioritize their response. Having someone detain someone for the police would bump the response up the priority ladder more than an evidence pack would. (This is all situation dependent, an evidence pack suggesting children were at risk would be high up the priority list). This is because you always have time to respond to the evidence pack, but a detained predator is an immediate issue you need to respond to.

From what I have seen most US groups have less successful in getting predators arrested on camera unfortunately. I am not exactly sure why this is, but to my mind I also haven't seen any of the US groups attempt to detain the predators to wait for the police - since the US does have citizens arrest laws, I can only guess this is due to the amount of firearms in the states making detaining an individual much more dangerous than in the UK.
 
Not to be "that guy" but most people don't even know who Polanski is, all his friends are as Jewish rich and sexually deviant as he is and LA/Hollywood is not John Q Public. EDP is not Polanski tier.

Now THIS is true. People still refuse to stop paying money to Netflix despite several pedo arcs from the business.


It's a deception to think pedos are pedos because they can't find a grown woman. EDP had plenty of money and clout to get women even as a fat man. Look at Patrice O'Neal. EDP is a pedo not out of a lack of alternatives but out of desire. Same with all sex deviants. It's not nature or lack of alternative. It's all personal volitional desire.
Dude likes them 13.
I see what you're going for here but how fucking dare you associate the great Patrice O'Neal with this human garbage!
 
Do their investigations stick? Since they are not official police investigations do they hold up in court? I am no expert but I would think that a rando on the internet who cat fishes another rando would be tough to prosecute in court?
Police are often reluctant to touch things like this because the chain of custody and everything else relating to its authenticity are open to question. There's a reason cops are the ones who do criminal investigation. No matter how well intentioned, vigilante actions like this are problematic, and in the worst case, they get a predator to improve their opsec.
 
Back